Review Article

The Effects of Cryotherapy on Proprioception System

Table 1

Summary of publications that investigated the effect of cryotherapy on proprioception system (according to date of publication).

AuthorsCryotherapy procedureAreaSubjectsProprioceptive testInstrument value

Douglas et al., 2013 [50]15 min
ice water immersion
Temp.: below 4.4°C
at the level of 5 cm
above the medial malleolus
Data collection:
before and immediately after
Foot and ankle
dominant
extremity

Age: 23.9 ± 2
Balance test
static and dynamic
3 10 s
V-stability A/P
V-stability M/L
V-overall stability (OA)
Biodex Balance SystemaStatic balance

for all variables
Dynamic balance
AP and OA

ML

Williams et al., 2013 [60]20 min
crushed ice, 1.1 kg
2 different conditions
ice bag with compression,
ice bag without compression
72-hour rest interval
Ankle
dominant leg

M—9
F—21
Age: 20.6 ± 1
Star excursion balance test
reaching nondominant leg
as far as possible
V-rich distance, normalized [%]
Static balance, single leg
10 s period
V-path and velocity of COP
Force plateb
for all variables

Costello and Donnelly, 2011 [57]30 min
water immersion
Temp.:
cold water (14 ± 1°C)
tepid water (28 ± 1°C)
participants were seated in a water immersed to the level of umbilicus
Data collection:
before and after
Knee
dominant
extremity

M—8
F—6
Age: 23.3 ± 1
A-JPS
non-weight-bearing
P: seated position with the leg
90° flexion of knee
~35°, 55°, and 75° randomly
assigned index angle
~5 s hold and reproduced
weight-bearing
P: stand with 95% approx. of body weight on testing leg
Flexion (~60°) to Extension (~45°)
extension (0°) to flexion (45°)
3 trials for each angle
Blindfolded
V-absolute error, relative error, variable error °
Eagle 3D Motion Systemc
3 markers:
(i) greater trochanter,
(ii) lateral epicondyle of the femur,
(iii) lateral malleolus
= 400 Hz

for all variables

Khanmohammadi et al., 2011 [58]15 min
water immersion
Temp.: 6 ± 1°C
5 cm above the malleolus
Data collection:
before, after, and 15 min after
Ankle
dominant extremity

F—30
Age: 21.9 ± 0.8
A-JPS and P-JPS
P: seated
from neutral position to the middle range of dorsal-flexion at 10° and 20° of plantar-flexion,
first passive and then active
time to memorize 3 s
Blindfolded, V-error [°]
Goniometer
for all variables

Oliveira et al., 2010 [56]20 min
crushed ice 1200 g
Ice bag: 20 25 cm
Data collection:
before and immediately after
Knee,
quadriceps muscle
dominant extremity

M—6
F—9
Age: 22.4 ± 1.4
A-JPS
reproduction of 7 angles
between 40° and 60°, 3 trials
OKC
P: seated 90° flexion of knee, movement to extension with velocity ~10°/s, time to memorize 5 s
Blindfolded
V-absolute error, relative error °
4 markers:
(i) greater trochanter,
(ii) lateral epicondyle of the femur,
(iii) lateral malleolus,
(iv) neck of fibula
Video images analysisd

for all variables
no difference due to cryotherapy location

Surenkok et al., 2008 [55]30 min
cold pack
(3M cold/hot gel pack)
center of the gel pack over the tip of the patella
1 week later, following cold spray application
Data collection:
before, after
balance test, 5 min after
Knee
dominant extremity

M—15
Age: 22 ± 2.8
P-JPS
P: seated 90° flexion of knee
movement velocity 5°/s,
towards flexion or extension
Test: press stop button in the middle of the range of motion-45° 
Blindfolded, 3 trials
V-absolute error °
Balance test
V-balance index-BI
Cybex
dynamometere
Movable platformf

for all variables but not for cold spray in case of balance test

Dewhurst et al., 2007 [59]As long as temp. decrease 3°C with respect to control muscle temp.
Specifically made ice blanket consisting of large, thick plastic sacks filled with crushed ice
Both full legs (from gluteal to the foot)
F—9
Age: 22 ± 3
Balance tests
quiet standing, barefoot, 2 visual conditions, eyes open and closed,
Two positions:
Romberg position (large support base)
Modified Tandem position
(narrow support base)
Duration: 30 s took to analysis, 3 times
2 min rest between trials
V-root mean square (RMS), mean velocity (MV), sway area (SA), mean power frequently (MPF) of COP
muscle temp. (1 cm below subcutaneous fat layer-vastus lateralis), skin temp.
(2 sites of vastus lateralis and soleus), and core temp. were measured
Force plateg
for all variables

Wassinger et al., 2007 [17]20 min
cubed ice
ice bag 1.15 l, 1500 g
The middle of the ice was centered over the acromion
Data collection:
before 2 times, after once
Shoulder
dominant extremity

M—14
F—8
Age: 21.6 ± 2.4
A-JPS
P: standing
(1) 20 FLEX-20° of shoulder flexion with 0° of humeral rotation and full elbow extension
(2) 90 ABDER-90° of shoulder abduction with 90° of external rotation and full elbow extension
Test: angle reproduction
from 1 to 2 and from 2 to 1 position
Blindfolded
3 trials in each direction
V-aiming error [cm]
functional ability of shoulder test
V-functional throwing performance test-FTPI
Biodex
System 3h

all variables for JPS
FTPI

Hart et al., 2005 [54]20 min
cubed ice (2 cm3/cub)
~0.5–1 kg
Plastic bag:
24.5 45.7 cm
anterior surface of the knee joint
Data collection:
before, after, 15 min and 30 min after
Knee
chosen by subject

M—9 
F—11 
Age: 23.8 ± 3.6
5 baseline forward jumps,
Single leg landing
at least 30 s rest between trials
avg. from 5 trials
V-F ground reaction forces [N/kg], sagittal knee joint motion °,
RMS of EMG [V]:
gluteus medius, biceps femoris,
vastus lateralis, medial gastrocnemius
Electric goniometer
ELGOMi
Force platej
EMG

for all variables

Dover and Powers, 2004 [15]30 min
cubed ice, 1 kg
Ice bag: 20 25 cm
over the tip of the acromion
Data collection:
before, after
Shoulder
dominant extremity

M—15
F—15
Age: 22.2 ± 3.4
A-JPS
P: standing with 90° shoulder abduction and 90° elbow flexion,
the target angle position:
90% of internal (IR) and external rotation (ER), time to memorize 3 s
3 trials in each direction
Blindfolded
V-absolute error, variable error, constant error °
Inclinometer
for all variables

Rubley et al., 2003 [24]15 min
ice-bath immersion
Temp. of water: 10°C
~2,54 cm arm proximal to the medial epicondyle to the distal end of finders
Data collection:
before, after, and 15 min after
2x
both arms

M—8
F—7
Age: 22 ± 3
Force sense test
P: sitting comfortably in a chair in front of a table
(1) MIVC (10 s, 3 trials), pinch force measurements between thumb and index finger
(2) Sensation tests:
cutaneous sensation [g]
2-point discrimination testing [mm]
(3) 10, 25, 40% of MIVC
5 trials, 30 s, 30 s break
V-RMS of force; avg. and sd [N]
Force grip barsk
Monofilaments systeml
Disk-Criminatorm
Sensation tests

2-point discrim.


for forces (precision and accuracy)

Uchio et al., 2003 [53]15 min
Icing System 2000n maintains temp. 4°C of cooling pad
Data collection:
before, after, and 15 min after
Knee
2 days later other knee

M—10
F—10
Age: 24.5
A-JPS
P: seated 90° of knee flexion,
leg was stopped at 10 different target angles between 5 and 25° knee flexion
time to memorize 3 s, 10°/s velocity
Blindfolded, 10 trials
V-flexion error, extension error °
Knee laxity test
Cybexo
dynamometer
Knee
arthrometer p

Tremblay et al., 2001 [29]20 min
crushed ice
in a moist towel over the anterior aspects of the thigh
Data collection:
before, after
Quadriceps muscle
dominant extremity

M—14
F—6
Age: 22.1 ± 2.6
Weight-discrimination task
P: seated of 90° flexion of the knee, movement: extension-flexion
standard weight 2.5 kg
Comparison weight:
0.5–0.4–0.28–0.11 kg
Which weigh was heavier?
14 trials, blindfolded
V-% of correct discrimination
Exercise tableq
for lower extremity

Hopper et al., 1997 [52]15 min,
ice water immersion, temp.: 4°C, to depth of 5 cm above the medial malleolus, data collection: before, after
Ankle
(randomly chosen)

M—42
F—7
Age: 19.4
A-JPS
after passive placement
at 40% and 80% of active
full range of motion
3 trials in each section
Pedal goniometer

Thieme et al., 1996 [51]20 min
2 ice packs
(30,5 49 cm), 1160 g of ice each
One covered approx. 10 cm above to 10 cm below the patella, the other on and around popliteal space
Knee
left leg

M—21
F—16
Age: 23.4 ± 6.3
A-JPS
P: seated, randomly assigned starting angles: 90, 60, or 30° of knee flexion, reproduce the movement for both the angles and timing of motion
90–60°, 60–30°, 30-full extension
2 trials in each sector
Blindfolded
V-peak angle, final angle °movement reproduction, total time of repetition [s]
Kin-Com
Isokinetic
dynamometerr

LaRiviere and Osternig, 1994 [49]5 and 20 min.
ice immersion
Temp.: 4°C,
4 cm distal from the knee joint line
AnkleA-JPS
active reproduction after a predetermined angle was actively located, 2 joint angles:
30 and 40 of ankle flexion, 8 trials
Electrogoniometer

Ingersoll et al., 1992 [48]20 min
cold water 1°C
Foot and ankle
right leg
One-leg balance test
P: stork stand [s]
Topagnosis test [cm]
2-point discrimination [cm]
A marker
Stopwatch

Investigation instruments: 
aBiodex Balance System, Biodex Medical System, Inc. Shirley, New York
bAMTI Accusway, AMTI Copr., Watertown, MA
cEagle 3D (5 cameras), Motion Analysis Corporation, Santa Rosa, CA, USA
dAriel Performance Analysis System, Ariel Dynamics, CA, USA
eCybex 770 Norm, Lumex Inc., Ronkonkoma, NY, USA
fKAT 3000, Breg., Vista, CA, USA
gKistler 9261A, Winterthur, Switzerland
hBiodex System 3, Biodex Medical Inc., Shirley, NY, USA
iELGOM, model SG110, Biometrics, Ltd., Ladysmith, VA
jTyp, 4060-10, Bertec, Inc., Columbus, Ohio
kVishay Measurements Group, Shelton, CT
lSemmes-Weinstein monofilament, Lafayette Instruments, Lafayette, IN
mLafayette Instruments, Lafayette, IN
nIcing System 2000, Nippon Sigmax, Japan
oCybex International Inc., 10 Trotter Dr, Medway, MA 02053
pKT2000TM MEDmetric Corp, 7542 Trade St, San Diego, CA 92121-2412
qModel 2400, Midland Co, Columbia, SC
rKin-Com, Isokinetic Dynamometer, Chattecx Corp., Hixson, TN
Abbreviations: 
A-JPS: Active joint position sense
P-JPS: Passive joint position sense002E
PMR: Path of motion replication
LOS: Limits of stability
OKC: Open kinetic chain
CKC: Closed kinetic chain
: Number of subjects
F: Female
M: Male
V: Dependent variable
P: Initial position
A/P: Anterior-posterior
M/L: Mediolateral
Age (mean, ±standard deviation).