Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014, Article ID 740925, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/740925
Clinical Study

Perineal Ultrasound as a Complement to POP-Q in the Assessment of Cystoceles

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany

Received 4 July 2014; Accepted 17 September 2014; Published 27 November 2014

Academic Editor: Stefan Rimbach

Copyright © 2014 Laila Najjari et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. M. Wu, C. A. Matthews, M. M. Conover, V. Pate, and M. Jonsson Funk, “Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 123, no. 6, pp. 1201–1206, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. C. Bump, A. Mattiasson, K. Bo et al., “The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 175, no. 1, pp. 10–17, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. W. Auwad, R. M. Freeman, and S. Swift, “Is the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) being used? A survey of members of the International Continence Society (ICS) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS),” International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–1, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  4. L. Najjari, J. Hennemann, R. Kirschner-Hermanns, N. Maass, and T. Papathemelis, “Visualization of polypropylene and polyvinylidene fluoride slings in perineal ultrasound and correlation with clinical outcome,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 181035, 8 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. H. P. Dietz, B. T. Haylen, and J. Broome, “Ultrasound in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 511–514, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. K. B. Kluivers, J. C. M. Hendriks, C. Shek, and H. P. Dietz, “Pelvic organ prolapse symptoms in relation to POPQ, ordinal stages and ultrasound prolapse assessment,” International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1299–1302, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. R. Broekhuis, K. B. Kluivers, J. C. M. Hendriks, J. J. Fütterer, J. O. Barentsz, and M. E. Vierhout, “POP-Q, dynamic MR imaging, and perineal ultrasonography: do they agree in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse?” International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 541–549, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. Singh, W. M. N. Reid, and L. A. Berger, “Assessment and grading of pelvic organ prolapse by use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 185, no. 1, pp. 71–77, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Hennemann, L. Kennes, N. Maass, and L. Najjari, “Evaluation of established and new reference lines in the context of the standardization of perineal ultrasound,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. L. Najjari, J. Hennemann, N. Maass, and R. K. Kirschner-Hermanns, “Perineal ultrasound for diagnostics of male stress incontinence: comparative study on the application of urogynecological standards for men and women,” Der Urologe, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 384–389, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. G. Altman, Practical Statistics for Medical Research, Chapman and Hall, London, UK, 1st edition, 1991.
  12. M. Majida, I. H. Braekken, W. Umek, K. Bo, Š. Benth, and M. E. Engh, “Interobserver repeatability of three- and four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound assessment of pelvic floor muscle anatomy and function,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 567–573, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. W. H. Kobak, K. Rosenberger, and M. D. Walters, “Interobserver variation in the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse,” International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 121–124, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. R. Bland, B. B. Earle, M. Z. Vitolins, and G. Burke, “Use of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse staging system of the International Continence Society, American Urogynecologic Society, and Society of Gynecologic Surgeons in perimenopausal women,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 181, no. 6, pp. 1324–1328, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus