Research Article

Comparative Biomechanical and Microstructural Analysis of Native versus Peracetic Acid-Ethanol Treated Cancellous Bone Graft

Figure 5

(a)–(f) Histological analysis of native cancellous bone (NCB) and peracetic acid-ethanol (PE)-treated cancellous bone allograft (CBG). Fluorescence microscopic image of cross sections from NCB (a) and PE-treated CBG (b) after Alizarin staining (scale bar = 1000 μm). Micrographs of NCB (c) and PE-treated CBG (d) after hematoxylin and eosin staining demonstrating connective tissue in the NCB sample (scale bar = 50 μm). Asterisks and plus sign denote cancellous bone and connective tissue, respectively. Arrow indicates crescent-shaped lamellae running parallel to the bone marrow interface; no tissue is visible in PE-treated CBG (d). Histologic sections of NCB (e) and PE-treated CBG (f) after Giemsa staining (scale bar = 50 μm). Arrows correspond to osteocytes colored in dark purple. The fine cellular structures of osteocytes with dendritic processes and nuclei of NCB are clearly visible. In contrast, sections of PE-treated CBG demonstrate pores from bone forming osteocytes with their rested nuclei with remnant cellular structures after PE treatment.
784702.fig.005a
(a)
784702.fig.005b
(b)
784702.fig.005c
(c)
784702.fig.005d
(d)
784702.fig.005e
(e)
784702.fig.005f
(f)