Review Article

Current Evidence regarding Prophylactic Antibiotics in Head and Neck and Maxillofacial Surgery

Table 2


AuthorYearStudy designProcedureSample sizeSSI valueARRNNT

Andreasen et al. [18]2006Systematic reviewMaxillofacial fractures4 Studies

Lawler et al. [34]2005ReviewDentoalveolar surgery4 studies

Lodi et al. [7]2012Interventional reviewThird molars18 studies with 2456 participantsCompared with placebo, antibiotics probably reduce the risk of infection in patients undergoing third molar extraction(s) by approximately 70%.SSI:

Dry socket: 
SSI: 0.29 (95% CI 0.16 to 0.50)
Dry socket: 0.62 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.95)
SSI: 12
Dry socket 38

Abubaker and Rollert [25]2001RCTMandible fractures 30 patients (Group 1: 14, Group 2: 16). All patients received penicillin 2 M i.v. every 4 hours through the pre- and intraoperative period and for 12 hours postoperatively Group 1 then received 500 mg penicillin VK every 6 hours for 5 days, group 2 placebo for same duration and under the same scheduleGroup 1: 2/14 (14.3%)
Group 2: 2/16 (12.5%)

No significant difference

Esposito et al. [8]2010Intervention review
Cochrane
Dental implantation6 RCTs, The meta-analyses of the six trials showed a statistically significant higher number of participants experiencing implant failures in the group not receiving antibiotics 0.3325

Hochman et al. [21]2006Meta-analysisTympanostomy9 RCTs, Topical prophylactic antibiotic drops for at least 48 h postoperatively 2

Dhiwakar et al. [19]2012Cochrane reviewTonsillectomy10 RCT, antibiotics to reduce posttonsillectomy morbidityFever as secondary outcome 0.63, (95% CI 0.46 to 0.85)

Saleh et al. [20]2012Systematic review and meta-analysisEndoscopic sinus surgeryTotal of 4 RCT and meta-analyses with 3 RCT;
0.76, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.09