Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014, Article ID 967178, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/967178
Research Article

Comparison of the Sagittal Spine Lordosis by Supine Computed Tomography and Upright Conventional Radiographs in Patients with Spinal Trauma

Division of Traumatology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistraß 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland

Received 19 February 2014; Revised 17 April 2014; Accepted 5 May 2014; Published 21 May 2014

Academic Editor: Morio Matsumoto

Copyright © 2014 Samy Bouaicha et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. Venugopal, A. F. Kinghorn, C. E. Emordi, P. R. Atkinson, and R. J. Kendall, “An evaluation of the use of whole-body computed tomography in trauma patients at a United Kingdom trauma centre,” European Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 193–195, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. K. B. Wood, P. Kos, M. Schendel, and K. Persson, “Effect of patient position on the sagittal-plane profile of the thoracolumbar spine,” Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 165–169, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  3. M. L. Andreasen, L. Langhoff, T. S. Jensen, and H. B. Albert, “Reproduction of the lumbar lordosis: a comparison of standing radiographs versus supine magnetic resonance imaging obtained with straightened lower extremities,” Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 26–30, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. D. Peterson, L. M. Nelson, A. C. McManus, and R. P. Jackson, “The effect of operative position on lumbar lordosis: a radiographic study of patients under anesthesia in the prone and 90-90 positions,” Spine, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1419–1424, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. Mauch, C. Jung, J. Huth, and G. Bauer, “Changes in the lumbar spine of athletes from supine to the true-standing position in magnetic resonance imaging,” Spine, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1002–1007, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. S. Eun, H. Y. Lee, S. H. Lee, K. H. Kim, and W. C. Liu, “MRI versus CT for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis,” Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 104–109, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  7. F. Magerl, M. Aebi, S. D. Gertzbein, J. Harms, and S. Nazarian, “A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries,” European Spine Journal, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 184–201, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Heinzelmann and G. A. Wanner, Thoracolumbar Spinal Injuries, Springer, 2008.
  9. P. Roussouly, S. Gollogly, E. Berthonnaud, and J. Dimnet, “Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position,” Spine, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 346–353, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. Resch, M. Rabl, H. Klampfer, E. Ritter, and P. Povacz, “Surgical vs. conservative treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar transition,” Unfallchirurg, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 281–288, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J.-P. C. Farcy, M. Weidenbaum, and S. D. Glassman, “Sagittal index in management of thoracolumbar burst fractures,” Spine, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 958–965, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. J. Sutherland, F. Miller, and G. J. Wang, “Early progressive lordosis following compression fractures. Two case reports from a series of 'stable' thoracolumbar compression fractures,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 173, pp. 216–220, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. F. K. Al-Khalifa, N. Adjei, A. J. Yee, and J. A. Finkelstein, “Patterns of collapse in thoracolumbar burst fractures,” Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 410–412, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. L. Carman, R. H. Browne, and J. G. Birch, “Measurement of scoliosis and lordosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American), vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 328–333, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. T. Morrissy, G. S. Goldsmith, E. C. Hall, D. Kehl, and G. H. Cowie, “Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American), vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 320–327, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus