Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014, Article ID 980501, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/980501
Research Article

Parallel Solutions for Voxel-Based Simulations of Reaction-Diffusion Systems

1Institute of Applied Mathematics and Information Technologies, National Research Council of Italy, Via de Marini, 16149 Genoa, Italy
2Genetic Unit, IRCCS Saint John of God, Clinical Research Centre, Via Pilastroni 4, 25125 Brescia, Italy
3Institute of Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council of Italy, Via Fratelli Cervi 93, 20090 Segrate, Milan, Italy

Received 21 February 2014; Revised 12 May 2014; Accepted 18 May 2014; Published 12 June 2014

Academic Editor: Horacio Pérez-Sánchez

Copyright © 2014 Daniele D’Agostino et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Z. Wang, J. Luo, G. Fu, Z. Wang, and R. Wu, “Stochastic modeling of systems mapping in pharmacogenomics,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 912–917, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. L. Cook, A. N. Gerber, and S. J. Tapscott, “Modeling stochastic gene expression: implications for haploinsufficiency,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 26, pp. 15641–15646, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Sturrock, A. Hellander, A. Matzavinos, and M. A. J. Chaplain, “Spatial stochastic modelling of the Hes1 gene regulatory network: intrinsic noise can explain heterogeneity in embryonic stem cell differentiation,” Journal of the Royal Society, Interface/The Royal Society, vol. 10, no. 80, Article ID 20120988, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Paulsson, “Models of stochastic gene expression,” Physics of Life Reviews, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 157–175, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Tan, S. Saurabh, M. P. Bruchez, R. Schwartz, and P. Leduc, “Molecular crowding shapes gene expression in synthetic cellular nanosystems,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 602–608, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. B. Zimmerman and S. O. Trach, “Estimation of macromolecule concentrations and excluded volume effects for the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 222, no. 3, pp. 599–620, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. P. Minton, “The influence of macromolecular crowding and macromolecular confinement on biochemical reactions in physiological media,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 14, pp. 10577–10580, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. P. Minton, “The effect of volume occupancy upon the thermodynamic activity of proteins: some biochemical consequences,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 119–140, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. Li, O. G. Berg, and J. Elf, “Effects of macromolecular crowding and DNA looping on gene regulation kinetics,” Nature Physics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 294–297, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Q. K. Beg, A. Vazquez, J. Ernst et al., “Intracellular crowding defines the mode and sequence of substrate uptake by Escherichia coli and constrains its metabolic activity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 31, pp. 12663–12668, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. Richter, M. Nessling, and P. Lichter, “Experimental evidence for the influence of molecular crowding on nuclear architecture,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 120, no. 9, pp. 1673–1680, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. E. Mosca, P. Cazzaniga, D. Pescini, G. Mauri, and L. Milanesi, “Modelling spatial heterogeneity and macromolecular crowding with membrane systems,” in Membrane Computing, vol. 6501 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 285–304, Springer, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. E. Mosca, I. Merelli, L. Milanesi, A. Clematis, and D. D'Agostino, “A parallel implementation of the Sτ-DPP stochastic simulator for the modelling of biological systems,” in 21st Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing (PDP '13), pp. 427–431, IEEE, March 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. Pasquale, C. Maj, A. Clematis et al., “A CUDA implementation of the Spatial TAU-leaping in Crowded Compartments (STAUCC) simulator,” in Proceedings of the 22nd Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing (PDP '14), pp. 609–616, IEEE, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. R. A. Kerr, T. M. Bartol, B. Kaminsky et al., “Fast Monte Carlo simulation methods for biological reaction-diffusion systems in solution and on surfaces,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 3126–3149, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. S. Andrews, “Spatial and stochastic cellular modeling with the smoldyn simulator,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 804, pp. 519–542, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. Boulianne, S. Al Assaad, M. Dumontier, and W. J. Gross, “GridCell: a stochastic particle-based biological system simulator,” BMC Systems Biology, vol. 2, article 66, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. I. Hepburn, W. Chen, S. Wils, and E. de Schutter, “STEPS: efficient simulation of stochastic reaction-diffusion models in realistic morphologies,” BMC Systems Biology, vol. 6, article 36, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. Fange, A. Mahmutovic, and J. Elf, “MesoRD 1.0: stochastic reaction-diffusion simulations in the microscopic limit,” Bioinformatics, vol. 28, no. 23, pp. 3155–3157, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. F. Oliveira, A. Terrin, G. di Benedetto et al., “The role of type 4 phosphodiesterases in generating microdomains of cAMP: large scale stochastic simulations,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 7, Article ID e11725, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. P. Tolle and D. P. le Novere, “Particle-based stochastic simulation in systems biology,” Current Bioinformatics, vol. 1, pp. 315–320, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  22. I. Merelli, D. Pescini, E. Mosca et al., “Grid computing for sensitivity analysis of stochastic biological models,” in Parallel Computing Technologies (PaCT), vol. 6873 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 62–73, Springer, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  23. M. Aldinucci, M. Coppo, F. Damiani, M. Drocco, M. Torquati, and A. Troina, “On designing multicore-aware simulators for biological systems,” in Proceedings of the 19th International Euromicro Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing (PDP '11), pp. 318–325, IEEE, February 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. H. Li and L. Petzold, “Efficient parallelization of the stochastic simulation algorithm for chemically reacting systems on the graphics processing unit,” International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 107–116, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. Macchiarulo, “A massively parallel implementation of Gillespie algorithm on FPGAs,” in Proceedings of the 2008 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 1343–1346, 2008.
  26. D. T. Gillespie, “Stochastic simulation of chemical kinetics,” Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, vol. 58, pp. 35–55, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. Y. Cao, D. T. Gillespie, and L. R. Petzold, “Efficient step size selection for the tau-leaping simulation method,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 124, no. 4, Article ID 044109, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. V. Chickarmane, C. Troein, U. A. Nuber, H. M. Sauro, and C. Peterson, “Transcriptional dynamics of the embryonic stem cell switch,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 2, no. 9, article e123, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  29. M. Kærn, T. C. Elston, W. J. Blake, and J. J. Collins, “Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 451–464, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. S. van Zon, M. J. Morelli, S. Tǎnase-Nicola, and P. R. ten Wolde, “Diffusion of transcription factors can drastically enhance the noise in gene expression,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 91, no. 12, pp. 4350–4367, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. L. Salwinski and D. Eisenberg, “In silico simulation of biological network dynamics,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1017–1019, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus