Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 125615, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/125615
Clinical Study

Effects of High Volume Haemodiafiltration on Inflammatory Response Profile and Microcirculation in Patients with Septic Shock

1Clinic of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Tartu University Hospital, L. Puusepa 8, 51014 Tartu, Estonia
2Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Tartu, L. Puusepa 8, 51014 Tartu, Estonia
3Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, DRK Kliniken, Berlin, Salvador-Allende Strasse 2-8, Köpenick, 12559 Berlin, Germany

Received 4 February 2015; Revised 14 April 2015; Accepted 15 April 2015

Academic Editor: Germán Vicente-Rodriguez

Copyright © 2015 Kadri Tamme et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. C. Bone, R. A. Balk, F. B. Cerra et al., “Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis,” Chest, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 1644–1655, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. C. Angus and T. van der Poll, “Severe sepsis and septic shock,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 369, no. 9, pp. 840–851, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. P. Dellinger, M. M. Levy, A. Rhodes et al., “Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 580–637, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. C. Ronco, M. Bonello, V. Bordoni et al., “Extracorporeal therapies in non-renal disease: treatment of sepsis and the peak concentration hypothesis,” Blood Purification, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 164–174, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. Servillo, M. Vargas, A. Pastore et al., “Immunomodulatory effect of continuous venovenous hemofiltration during sepsis: preliminary data,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 108951, 6 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. Ronco, R. Bellomo, P. Homel et al., “Effects of different doses in continuous veno-venous haemofiltration on outcomes of acute renal failure: a prospective randomised trial,” The Lancet, vol. 355, no. 9223, pp. 26–30, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. Cole, R. Bellomo, D. Journois, P. Davenport, I. Baldwin, and P. Tipping, “High-volume haemofiltration in human septic shock,” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 978–986, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. Cornejo, P. Downey, R. Castro et al., “High-volume hemofiltration as salvage therapy in severe hyperdynamic septic shock,” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 713–722, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. N. Boussekey, A. Chiche, K. Faure et al., “A pilot randomized study comparing high and low volume hemofiltration on vasopressor use in septic shock,” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1646–1653, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. M. Honore, J. Jamez, M. Wauthier et al., “Prospective evaluation of short-term, high-volume isovolemic hemofiltration on the hemodynamic course and outcome in patients with intractable circulatory failure resulting from septic shock,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 3581–3587, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. O. Joannes-Boyau, S. Rapaport, R. Bazin, C. Fleureau, and G. Janvier, “Impact of high volume hemofiltration on hemodynamic disturbance and outcome during septic shock,” ASAIO Journal, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 102–109, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. O. Joannes-Boyau, P. M. Honoré, P. Perez et al., “High-volume versus standard-volume haemofiltration for septic shock patients with acute kidney injury (IVOIRE study): a multicentre randomized controlled trial,” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1535–1546, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Kron, S. Kron, R. Wenkel et al., “Extended daily on-line high-volume haemodiafiltration in septic multiple organ failure: a well-tolerated and feasible procedure,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 146–152, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. de Backer, S. Hollenberg, C. Boerma et al., “How to evaluate the microcirculation? report of a round table conference,” Critical Care, vol. 11, article R101, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, “Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement,” The Lancet, vol. 1, no. 8476, pp. 307–310, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. I. Karu, J. Starkopf, K. Zilmer, and M. Zilmer, “Growth factors serum levels in coronary artery disease patients scheduled for bypass surgery: perioperative dynamics and comparisons with healthy volunteers,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 985404, 5 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. Bellomo, J. A. Kellum, C. R. Gandhi, M. R. Pinsky, and B. Ondulik, “The effect of intensive plasma water exchange by hemofiltration on hemodynamics and soluble mediators in canine endotoxemia,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 161, no. 5, pp. 1429–1436, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. L.-P. Chu, J.-J. Zhou, Y.-F. Yu, Y. Huang, and W.-X. Dong, “Clinical effects of pulse high-volume hemofiltration on severe acute pancreatitis complicated with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome,” Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 78–83, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. Atan, D. Crosbie, and R. Bellomo, “Techniques of extracorporeal cytokine removal: a systematic review of the literature on animal experimental studies,” International Journal of Artificial Organs, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 149–158, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. M. Honoré, R. Jacobs, W. Boer et al., “New insights regarding rationale, therapeutic target and dose of hemofiltration and hybrid therapies in septic acute kidney injury,” Blood Purification, vol. 33, no. 1–3, pp. 44–51, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. M. Honoré and J. R. Matson, “Extracorporeal removal for sepsis: acting at the tissue level—the beginning of a new era for this treatment modality in septic shock,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 896–897, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. V. Di Carlo and S. R. Alexander, “Hemofiltration for cytokine-driven illnesses: the mediator delivery hypothesis,” International Journal of Artificial Organs, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 777–786, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. A. Namas, R. Namas, C. Lagoa et al., “Hemoadsorption reprograms inflammation in experimental gram-negative septic peritonitis: insights from in vivo and in silico studies,” Molecular Medicine, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1366–1374, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. P. M. Honore, R. Jacobs, O. Joannes-Boyau et al., “Moving from a cytotoxic to a cytokinic approach in the blood purification labyrinth: have we finally found Ariadne's thread?” Molecular Medicine, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1363–1365, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. Bellomo, M. Lipcsey, P. Calzavacca et al., “Early acid-base and blood pressure effects of continuous renal replacement therapy intensity in patients with metabolic acidosis,” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 429–436, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. Yokoyama, S. Takabayashi, T. Komada et al., “Removal of prostaglandin E2 and increased intraoperative blood pressure during modified ultrafiltration in pediatric cardiac surgery,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 137, no. 3, pp. 730–735, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. L. Maddison, K. M. Riigor, J. Karjagin, and J. Starkopf, “Sublingual microcirculatory changes during transient intra-abdominal hypertension—a prospective observational study in laparoscopic surgery patients,” Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 367–374, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. R. Sykora, J. Chvojka, A. Krouzecky et al., “High versus standard-volume haemofiltration in hyperdynamic porcine peritonitis: effects beyond haemodynamics?” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 371–380, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C. Ruiz, G. Hernandez, C. Godoy, P. Downey, M. Andresen, and A. Bruhn, “Sublingual microcirculatory changes during high-volume hemofiltration in hyperdynamic septic shock patients,” Critical Care, vol. 14, no. 4, article R170, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. E. M. J. Borthwick, C. J. Hill, K. S. Rabindranath, A. P. Maxwell, D. F. McAuley, and B. Blackwood, “High-volume haemofiltration for sepsis,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 2013, no. 1, Article ID CD008075, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus