Worksite Tobacco Prevention: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Adoption, Dissemination Strategies, and Aggregated Health-Related Outcomes across Companies

Table 4

Bivariate odds ratios for predictors (1 data) of differences in worksite tobacco prevention (ordinal regressions).

	Differences (2 minus 1 data) in
	Policy restrictiveness	Number of individual support measures	SOC smoke-free policy	SOC cessation course
Organizational attributes^1
Company size
<50 employees	1.62	1.62	0.98	1.21
50–250 employees	1.82	1.90	0.97	0.98
>250 employees	ref.	ref.	ref.	ref.
Branch
Construction	2.27	0.41	0.94	0.80
Hospitality	0.46	1.02	1.18	0.89
Health and welfare	0.83	0.91	0.77	1.58
Other	ref.	ref.	ref.	ref.
% women in workforce
<20%	1.60^+	0.77	0.83	0.92
20–39%	1.01	0.67	0.83	0.79
40–59%	1.16	0.81	1.14	0.79
60–79%	0.78	0.81	0.68	1.18
>80%	ref.	ref.	ref.	ref.
Other WHP^2-measures	1.04	0.97	0.86	0.91
Attributes of the representative^1
Personal concern	0.89^+	0.90	0.80	0.88^+
Perceived advantages^3	0.79	0.94	0.59	0.94
Dissemination strategies
Brochure only	0.97	0.53	0.87	0.56
Brochure and other^4	ref.	ref	ref.	ref.
Number of contacts^5	0.99	1.04	1.02	1.05
Type of intervention
Monothematic intervention^6	0.51	1.42	0.80	1.63
Comprehensive intervention^7	ref.	ref.	ref.	ref.

Note.  For scale coding, see Table 1.
Stage of change.
; ; .
¹Measured at 1.
²Workplace health promotion (0 up to 6 measures, as stated in the questionnaire).
³Pros and cons for the respective measure, cons recoded.
⁴Information event, telephone marketing, and free initial consultation.
⁵In addition to brochure; as listed in the customer database.
⁶Control group 3 companies with intervention.
⁷Intervention group 2 companies with intervention.