Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 148954, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/148954
Review Article

Cementation of Glass-Ceramic Posterior Restorations: A Systematic Review

1University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, The University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
2St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Department of Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, Nieuwegein, Netherlands

Received 23 April 2015; Revised 23 July 2015; Accepted 5 August 2015

Academic Editor: Handan Yılmaz

Copyright © 2015 Carline R. G. van den Breemer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. R. Calamia, “Etched porcelain facial veneers: a new treatment modality based on scientific and clinical evidence,” The New York Journal of Dentistry, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 255–259, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. H. J. Conrad, W.-J. Seong, and I. J. Pesun, “Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 389–404, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. N. V. Raptis, K. X. Michalakis, and H. Hirayama, “Optical behavior of current ceramic systems,” International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 31–41, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. Chan and H. Weber, “Plaque retention on teeth restored with full-ceramic crowns: a comparative study,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 666–671, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. Sjögren, G. Sletten, and J. E. Dahl, “Cytotoxicity of dental alloys, metals, and ceramics assessed by Millipore filter, agar overlay, and MTT tests,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 229–236, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. Tian, J. K.-H. Tsoi, J. P. Matinlinna, and M. F. Burrow, “Aspects of bonding between resin luting cements and glass ceramic materials,” Dental Materials, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. e147–e162, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Edelhoff and M. Özcan, “To what extent does the longevity of fixed dental prostheses depend on the function of the cement? Working Group 4 materials: cementation,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 193–204, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. Magne, “Immediate dentin sealing: a fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations,” Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 144–155, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. L. Pashley, R. W. Comer, M. D. Simpson, J. A. Horner, D. H. Pashely, and W. F. Caughman, “Dentin permeability: sealing the dentin in crown preparations,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Bertschinger, S. J. Paul, H. Lüthy, and P. Schärer, “Dual application of dentin bonding agents: effect on bond strength,” American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 115–119, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Gehrt, S. Wolfart, N. Rafai, S. Reich, and D. Edelhoff, “Clinical results of lithium-disilicate crowns after up to 9 years of service,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 275–284, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. Sirisha, T. Rambabu, Y. Ravishankar, and P. Ravikumar, “Validity of bond strength tests: a critical review-Part II,” Journal of Conservative Dentistry, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 420–426, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. De Munck, K. Van Landuyt, M. Peumans et al., “A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 118–132, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. R. Landis and G. G. Koch, “The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data,” Biometrics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 159–174, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  15. A. Peutzfeldt, A. Sahafi, and S. Flury, “Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 266–373, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. Bitter, S. Paris, C. Hartwig, K. Neumann, and A. M. Kielbassa, “Shear bond strengths of different substrates bonded to lithium disilicate ceramics,” Dental Materials Journal, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 493–502, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Toman, S. Toksavul, and A. Akin, “Bond strength of all-ceramics to tooth structure using new luting systems,” Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 373–378, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. Zhang and M. Degrange, “Shear bond strengths of self-adhesive luting resins fixing dentine to different restorative materials,” Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 593–608, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Toman, E. Cal, M. Türkün, and F. Ertuğrul, “Bond strength of glass-ceramics on the fluorosed enamel surfaces,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 281–286, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. G. Pekkan and C. Hekimoglu, “Evaluation of shear and tensile bond strength between dentin and ceramics using dual-polymerizing resin cements,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 242–252, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A.-K. Lührs, S. Guhr, H. Günay, and W. Geurtsen, “Shear bond strength of self-adhesive resins compared to resin cements with etch and rinse adhesives to enamel and dentin in vitro,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 193–199, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. Altintas, A. U. Eldeniz, and A. Usumez, “Shear bond strength of four resin cements used to lute ceramic core material to human dentin,” Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 634–640, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Flury, A. Lussi, A. Peutzfeldt, and B. Zimmerli, “Push-out bond strength of CAD/CAM-ceramic luted to dentin with self-adhesive resin cements,” Dental Materials, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 855–863, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. H. Kermanshah, A. T. Borougeni, and T. Bitaraf, “Comparison of the microshear bond strength of feldspathic porcelain to enamel with three luting resins,” Journal of Prosthodontic Research, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 110–116, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Dagostin and M. Ferrari, “Effect of resins sealing of dentin on the bond strength of ceramic restorations,” Dental Materials, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 304–310, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. Dalby, A. Ellakwa, B. Millar, and F. E. Martin, “Influence of immediate dentin sealing on the shear bond strength of pressed ceramic luted to dentin with self-etch resin cement,” International Journal of Dentistry, vol. 2012, Article ID 310702, 7 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. Y.-S. Choi and I.-H. Cho, “An effect of immediate dentin sealing on the shear bond strength of resin cement to porcelain restoration,” Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 39–45, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. F. Falkensammer, G. V. Arnetzl, A. Wildburger, C. Krall, and J. Freudenthaler, “Influence of different conditioning methods on immediate and delayed dentin sealing,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 204–210, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. Dündar, E. Çal, B. Gökçe, M. Türkün, and M. Özcan, “Influence of fluoride- or triclosan-based desensitizing agents on adhesion of resin cements to dentin,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 579–586, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. F. E. Giray, L. Duzdar, M. Oksuz, and I. Tanboga, “Evaluation of the bond strength of resin cements used to lute ceramics on laser-etched dentin,” Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 413–421, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. L. Graiff, C. Piovan, P. Vigolo, and P. N. Mason, “Shear bond strength between feldspathic CAD/CAM ceramic and human dentine for two adhesive cements,” Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 294–299, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. F. S. Michelini, U. C. Belser, S. S. Scherrer, and W. G. De Rijk, “Tensile bond strength of gold and porcelain inlays to extracted teeth using three cements,” The International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 324–331, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. N. Escribano and J. C. de la Macorra, “Microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive luting cements to ceramic,” The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 337–341, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. C. D'Arcangelo, F. De Angelis, M. D'Amario, S. Zazzeroni, C. Ciampoli, and S. Caputi, “The influence of luting systems on the microtensile bond strength of dentin to indirect resin-based composite and ceramic restorations,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 328–336, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. N. Ozturk, O. Inan, E. Inan, and B. Ozturk, “Microtensile bond strength of cad-cam and pressed-ceramic inlays to dentin,” European Journal of Dentistry, vol. 1, pp. 91–96, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  36. Y. Suyama, J. de Munck, M. V. Cardoso, T. Yamada, and B. Van Meerbeek, “Bond durability of self-adhesive composite cements to dentine,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 908–917, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. F. De Angelis, A. Minnoni, L. M. Vitalone et al., “Bond strength evaluation of three self-adhesive luting systems used for cementing composite and porcelain,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 626–634, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. F. J. Rigolin, M. E. Miranda, F. M. Flório, and R. T. Basting, “Evaluation of bond strength between leucite-based and lithium disilicate-based ceramics to dentin after cementation with conventional and self-adhesive resin agents,” Acta Odontológica Latinoamericana, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 16–24, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. Sarr, A. Mine, J. De Munck et al., “Immediate bonding effectiveness of contemporary composite cements to dentin,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 569–577, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. S. M. Marocho, M. Ozcan, R. Amaral, M. A. Bottino, and L. F. Valandro, “Effect of resin cement type on the microtensile bond strength to lithium disilicate ceramic and dentin using different test assemblies,” The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 361–368, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. S. Uno, T. Tanaka, C. Kawamoto, J. Konishi, and H. Sano, “Microtensile bond strength to dentin and cavity adaptation of Cerec 2 inlay restoration,” American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 59–63, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. A.-K. Lührs, J. De Munck, W. Geurtsen, and B. Van Meerbeek, “Composite cements benefit from light-curing,” Dental Materials, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 292–301, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. A. Rathke, G. Hokenmaier, R. Muche, and B. Haller, “Effectiveness of the bond established between ceramic inlays and dentin using different luting protocols,” The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 147–154, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. L. D. V. Habekost, G. B. Camacho, F. F. Demarco, and J. M. Powers, “Tensile bond strength and flexural modulus of resin cements—influence on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlays,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 488–495, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. N. Ozturk and F. Aykent, “Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 275–281, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. S. Kitayama, P. Pilecki, N. A. Nasser et al., “Effect of resin coating on adhesion and microleakage of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing fabricated all-ceramic crowns after occlusal loading: a laboratory study,” European Journal of Oral Sciences, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 454–462, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. G. Bernal, R. M. Jones, D. T. Brown, C. A. Munoz, and C. J. Goodacre, “The effect of finish line form and luting agent on the breaking strength of Dicor crowns,” The International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 286–290, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. F. J. Burke, “The effect of variations in bonding procedure on fracture resistance of dentin-bonded all-ceramic crowns,” Quintessence International, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 293–300, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. A. Attia, K. M. Abdelaziz, S. Freitag, and M. Kern, “Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 117–123, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. Behr, M. Rosentritt, M. Mangelkramer, and G. Handel, “The influence of different cements on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic and fiber-reinforced crowns,” International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 538–542, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. W. Mörmann, D. Wolf, A. Ender, A. Bindl, T. Göhring, and T. Attin, “Effect of two self-adhesive cements on marginal adaptation and strength of esthetic ceramic CAD/CAM molar crowns,” Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 403–410, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. A. M. Al-Wahadni, D. L. Hussey, N. Grey, and M. M. Hatamleh, “Fracture resistance of aluminium oxide and lithium disilicate-based crowns using different luting cements: an in vitro study,” Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 51–58, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. J. T. McCormick, W. Rowland, H. T. Shillingburg Jr., and M. G. Duncanson Jr., “Effect of luting media on the compressive strengths of two types of all-ceramic crown,” Quintessence International, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 405–408, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. F. J. T. Burke and D. C. Watts, “Effect of differing resin luting systems on fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns,” Quintessence International, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. G. B. D. A. Cubas, L. Habekost, G. B. Camacho, and T. Pereira-Cenci, “Fracture resistance of premolars restored with inlay and onlay ceramic restorations and luted with two different agents,” Journal of Prosthodontic Research, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 53–59, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. S. Shahrbaf, R. Van Noort, B. Mirzakouchaki, E. Ghassemieh, and N. Martin, “Fracture strength of machined ceramic crowns as a function of tooth preparation design and the elastic modulus of the cement,” Dental Materials, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 234–241, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. A. S. Kassem, O. Atta, and O. El-Mowafy, “Fatigue resistance and microleakage of CAD/CAM ceramic and composite molar crowns,” Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 28–32, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. V. L. Ortega, L. F. Pegoraro, P. C. R. Conti, A. L. Do Valle, and G. Bonfante, “Evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars, restored with ceromer or heat-pressed ceramic inlays and fixed with dual-resin cements,” Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 393–397, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. M.-L. Good, J. F. Orr, and C. A. Mitchell, “In vitro study of mean loads and modes of failure of all-ceramic crowns cemented with light-cured or dual-cured luting cement, after 1 and 30 d of storage,” European Journal of Oral Sciences, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 83–88, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. A. M. Spohr, G. A. Borges, and J. A. Platt, “Thickness of immediate dentin sealing materials and its effect on the fracture load of a reinforced all-ceramic crown,” European Journal of Dentistry, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 474–483, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. V. Medic, K. Obradovic-Djuricic, S. Dodic, and R. Petrovic, “In vitro evaluation of microleakage of various types of dental cements,” Srpski Arhiv za Celokupno Lekarstvo, vol. 138, no. 3-4, pp. 143–149, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. X.-H. Gu and M. Kern, “Marginal discrepancies and leakage of all-ceramic crowns: influence of luting agents and aging conditions,” International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 109–116, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. M. Federlin, S. Schmidt, K. A. Hiller, B. Thonemann, and G. Schmalz, “Partial ceramic crowns: influence of preparation design and luting material on internal adaptation,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 560–570, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. M. Rosentritt, M. Behr, R. Lang, and G. Handel, “Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays,” Dental Materials, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 463–469, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. N. Martin and N. M. Jedynakiewicz, “Interface dimensions of CEREC-2 MOD inlays,” Dental Materials, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 68–74, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. P. Hahn, T. Attin, M. Gröfke, and E. Hellwig, “Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays,” Dental Materials, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 191–196, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. P. Hahn, H.-G. Schaller, U. Müllner, and E. Hellwig, “Marginal leakage in class II-restorations after use of ceramic-inserts luted with different materials,” Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 567–574, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. G. Schmalz, M. Federlin, and E. Reich, “Effect of dimension of luting space and luting composite on marginal adaptation of a class II ceramic inlay,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 392–399, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. C. P. Trajtenberg, S. J. Caram, and S. Kiat-Amnuay, “Microleakage of all-ceramic crowns using self-etching resin luting agents,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 392–399, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. M. Ghazy, O. El-Mowafy, and R. Roperto, “Microleakage of porcelain and composite machined crowns cemented with self-adhesive or conventional resin cement,” Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 523–530, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. M. Federlin, S. Krifka, M. Herpich, K.-A. Hiller, and G. Schmalz, “Partial ceramic crowns: influence of ceramic thickness, preparation design and luting material on fracture resistance and marginal integrity in vitro,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 251–260, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. A. I. Abdalla and C. L. Davidson, “Marginal integrity after fatigue loading of ceramic inlay restorations luted with three different cements,” American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 77–80, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. E. Cal, E. U. Celik, and M. Turkun, “Microleakage of IPS empress 2 inlay restorations luted with self-adhesive resin cements,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 417–424, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. B. Bott and M. Hannig, “Effect of different luting materials on the marginal adaptation of Class I ceramic inlay restorations in vitro,” Dental Materials, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 264–269, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. K. Iida, S. Inokoshi, and N. Kurosaki, “Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 445–452, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. M. Behr, M. Hansmann, M. Rosentritt, and G. Handel, “Marginal adaptation of three self-adhesive resin cements vs. a well-tried adhesive luting agent,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 459–464, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. R. Frankenberger, U. Lohbauer, R. B. Schaible, S. A. Nikolaenko, and M. Naumann, “Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements,” Dental Materials, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 185–191, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. M. Ferrari, A. Dagostin, and A. Fabianelli, “Marginal integrity of ceramic inlays luted with a self-curing resin system,” Dental Materials, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 270–276, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. M. Behr, M. Rosentritt, T. Regnet, R. Lang, and G. Handel, “Marginal adaptation in dentin of a self-adhesive universal resin cement compared with well-tried systems,” Dental Materials, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 191–197, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. B. Haller, K. Hassner, and K. Moll, “Marginal adaptation of dentin bonded ceramic inlays: effects of bonding systems and luting resin composites,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 574–584, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. F. Schenke, K.-A. Hiller, G. Schmalz, and M. Federlin, “Marginal integrity of partial ceramic crowns within dentin with different luting techniques and materials,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 516–525, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. S. Kitayama, N. A. Nasser, P. Pilecki et al., “Effect of resin coating and occlusal loading on microleakage of class II computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing fabricated ceramic restorations: a confocal microscopic study,” Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 182–192, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. C. H. Åberg, J. W. V. Dijken, and A.-L. Olofsson, “Three-year comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemented with composite resin or glass ionomer cement,” Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 140–149, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. K. A. Malament and S. S. Socransky, “Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 20 years: part IV. The effects of combinations of variables,” The International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 134–140, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. J. W. V. van Dijken and P. Hörstedt, “Marginal breakdown of fired ceramic inlays cemented with glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement or resin composite,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 265–272, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. J. W. V. van Dijken, C. Höglund-Åberg, and A.-L. Olofsson, “Fired ceramic inlays: a 6-year follow up,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 219–225, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. F. Isidor and K. Brøndum, “A clinical evaluation of porcelain inlays,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 140–144, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. G. Sjögren, M. Molin, and J. W. V. van Dijken, “A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite,” International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 241–246, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. A. Klink and F. Huettig, “Complication and survival of Mark II restorations: 4-year clinical follow-up,” The International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 272–276, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. R. Zuellig-Singer and R. W. Bryant, “Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays: influence of luting agent,” Quintessence International, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 573–582, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. D. Gemalmaz, M. Ozcan, and H. N. Alkumru, “A clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays bonded with different luting agents,” The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 273–283, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. N. Krämer, C. Reinelt, G. Richter, and R. Frankenberger, “Four-year clinical performance and marginal analysis of pressed glass ceramic inlays luted with ormocer restorative vs. conventional luting composite,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 813–819, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. R. Frankenberger, C. Reinelt, A. Petschelt, and N. Krämer, “Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays,” Dental Materials, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 960–968, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. D. J. Fasbinder, J. B. Dennison, D. Heys, and G. Neiva, “A clinical evaluation of chairside lithium disilicate CAD/CAM crowns: a two-year report,” The Journal of the American Dental Association, vol. 141, supplement 2, pp. 10S–14S, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  95. J. W. V. van Dijken, “Resin-modified glass ionomer cement and self-cured resin composite luted ceramic inlays. A 5-year clinical evaluation,” Dental Materials, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 670–674, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. J. W. V. van Dijken and L. Hasselrot, “A prospective 15-year evaluation of extensive dentin-enamel-bonded pressed ceramic coverages,” Dental Materials, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 929–939, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. N. Krämer and R. Frankenberger, “Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years,” Dental Materials, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 262–271, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. N. Krämer, M. Taschner, U. Lohbauer, A. Petschelt, and R. Frankenberger, “Totally bonded ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years,” Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 307–314, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. P. Y. Atali, O. Cakmakcioglu, B. Topbasi, C. Turkmen, and O. Suslen, “IPS empress onlays luted with two dual-cured resin cements for endodontically treated teeth: a 3-year clinical evaluation,” The International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 40–42, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. M. Taschner, N. Krämer, U. Lohbauer et al., “Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays luted with self-adhesive resin cement: a 2-year in vivo study,” Dental Materials, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 535–540, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. R. Frankenberger, M. Taschner, F. Garcia-Godoy, A. Petschelt, and N. Krämer, “Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after 12 years,” Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 393–398, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. R. Stoll, I. Cappel, A. Jablonski-Momeni, K. Pieper, and V. Stachniss, “Survival of inlays and partial crowns made of IPS empress after a 10-year observation period and in relation to various treatment parameters,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 556–563, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus