Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 183918, 18 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/183918
Review Article

Molecular Dynamics, Monte Carlo Simulations, and Langevin Dynamics: A Computational Review

1Vaccine Program, National Research Council, 1200 Montreal Road, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1A 0R6
2School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Ottawa, 800 King Edward Road, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1N 6N5

Received 28 August 2014; Accepted 5 November 2014

Academic Editor: Xuguang Li

Copyright © 2015 Eric Paquet and Herna L. Viktor. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. Morra and G. Colombo, “Relationship between energy distribution and fold stability: insights from molecular dynamics simulations of native and mutant proteins,” Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 660–672, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. Alhadeff, D. Assa, P. Astrahan, M. Krugliak, and I. T. Arkin, “Computational and experimental analysis of drug binding to the Influenza M2 channel,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Biomembranes, vol. 1838, no. 4, pp. 1068–1073, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. H. Dong, G. Fiorin, W. F. Degrado, and M. L. Klein, “Exploring histidine conformations in the M2 channel lumen of the influenza a virus at neutral pH via molecular simulations,” Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, vol. 4, no. 18, pp. 3067–3071, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. F. Reboul, G. R. Meyer, B. T. Porebski, N. A. Borg, and A. M. Buckle, “Epitope flexibility and dynamic footprint revealed by molecular dynamics of a pMHC-TCR complex,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 8, no. 3, Article ID e1002404, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. Tarus, C. Chevalier, C. A. Richard, B. Delmas, C. Primo, and A. Slama-Schwok, “Molecular dynamics studies of the nucleoprotein of influenza a virus: role of the protein flexibility in RNA binding,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 1, Article ID e30038, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. E. Amaro, R. V. Swift, L. Votapka, W. W. Li, R. C. Walker, and R. M. Bush, “Mechanism of 150-cavity formation in influenza neuraminidase,” Nature Communications, vol. 2, no. 1, article 388, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. Le, “Incorporating molecular dynamics simulations into rational drug design: a case study on influenza a neuraminidases,” in Bioinformatics, H. Pérez-Sánchez, Ed., chapter 7, pp. 159–184, InTech, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. L. Le, E. H. Lee, D. J. Hardy, T. N. Truong, and K. Schulten, “Molecular dynamics simulations suggest that electrostatic funnel directs binding of Tamiflu to influenza N1 neuraminidases,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 6, no. 9, Article ID e1000939, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Y.-T. Wang, C.-H. Chan, Z.-Y. Su, and C.-L. Chen, “Homology modeling, docking, and molecular dynamics reveal HR1039 as a potent inhibitor of 2009 A(H1N1) influenza neuraminidase,” Biophysical Chemistry, vol. 147, no. 1-2, pp. 74–80, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Y. Zhang, H. Shen, M. Zhang, and G. Li, “Exploring the proton conductance and drug resistance of BM2 channel through molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations at different pH conditions,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 982–988, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. N.-J. Deng, W. Zheng, E. Gallicchio, and R. M. Levy, “Insights into the dynamics of HIV-1 protease: a kinetic network model constructed from atomistic simulations,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 133, no. 24, pp. 9387–9394, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Wang, C. Ma, G. Fiorin et al., “Molecular dynamics simulation directed rational design of inhibitors targeting drug-resistant mutants of influenza A virus M2,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 133, no. 32, pp. 12834–12841, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. S. Chang, H. J. Huang, and C. Y. C. Chen, “High performance screening, structural and molecular dynamics analysis to identify H1 inhibitors from TCM Database@Taiwan,” Molecular BioSystems, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 3366–3374, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. Lagüe, B. Roux, and R. W. Pastor, “Molecular dynamics simulations of the influenza hemagglutinin fusion peptide in micelles and bilayers: conformational analysis of peptide and lipids,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 354, no. 5, pp. 1129–1141, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Siebena, R. Kappelb Zhuc, A. Wozniakd et al., “Influenza virus binds its host cell using multiple dynamic interactions,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 109, no. 34, pp. 13626–13631, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. Z. Yang, Y. Nie, G. Yang, Y. Zu, Y. Fu, and L. Zhou, “Synergistic effects in the designs of neuraminidase ligands: analysis from docking and molecular dynamics studies,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 267, no. 3, pp. 363–374, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. Rungrotmongkol, M. Malaisree, N. Nunthaboot, P. Sompornpisut, and S. Hannongbua, “Molecular prediction of oseltamivir efficiency against probable influenza a (H1N1-2009) mutants: molecular modeling approach,” Amino Acids, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 393–398, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. Pan, H. Sun, C. Bai et al., “Prediction of zanamivir efficiency over the possible 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) mutants by multiple molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations,” Journal of Molecular Modeling, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 2465–2473, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. G. G. Dodson, D. P. Lane, and C. S. Verma, “Molecular simulations of protein dynamics: new windows on mechanisms in biology,” EMBO Reports, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 144–150, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. Sieben, C. Kappel, R. Zhu et al., “Influenza virus binds its host cell using multiple dynamic interactions,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 34, pp. 13626–13631, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  21. D. Vlachakis, A. Karozou, and S. Kossida, “3D molecular modelling study of the H7N9 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase as an emerging pharmacological target,” Influenza Research and Treatment, vol. 2013, Article ID 645348, 9 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. C. Peri, P. Gagni, F. Combi et al., “Rational epitope design for protein targeting,” ACS Chemical Biology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 397–404, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. R. Flower, K. Phadwal, I. K. MacDonald, P. V. Coveney, M. N. Davies, and S. Wan, “T-cell epitope prediction and immune complex simulation using molecular dynamics: state of the art and persisting challenges,” Immunome Research, vol. 6, no. 2, article S4, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. Xu, E. I. Newhouse, R. E. Amaro et al., “Distinct glycan topology for avian and human sialopentasaccharide receptor analogues upon binding different hemagglutinins: a molecular dynamics perspective,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 387, no. 2, pp. 465–491, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Lawrenz, J. Wereszczynski, R. Amaro, R. Walker, A. Roitberg, and J. A. McCammon, “Impact of calcium on N1 influenza neuraminidase dynamics and binding free energy,” Proteins, vol. 78, no. 11, pp. 2523–2532, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. P. Pan, L. Li, Y. Li, D. Li, and T. Hou, “Insights into susceptibility of antiviral drugs against the E119G mutant of 2009 influenza A (H1N1) neuraminidase by molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations,” Antiviral Research, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 356–364, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. K. A. Fichthorn and W. H. Weinberg, “Theoretical foundations of dynamical Monte Carlo simulations,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 1090–1096, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. Duane, A. D. Kennedy, B. J. Pendleton, and D. Roweth, “Hybrid Monte Carlo,” Physics Letters B, vol. 195, no. 2, pp. 216–222, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. G. J. Martyna, D. J. Tobias, and M. L. Klein, “Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 4177–4189, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. Shu, Z. Lin, Y. Zhang, Y. Wu, H. Mei, and Y. Jiang, “Molecular dynamics simulation of oseltamivir resistance in neuraminidase of avian influenza H5N1 virus,” Journal of Molecular Modeling, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 587–592, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, “Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1087–1092, 1953. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. D. Frenkel, G. C. A. M. Mooij, and B. Smit, “Novel scheme to study structural and thermal properties of continuously deformable molecules,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 3053–3076, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. I. Siepmann and D. Frenkel, “Configurational-bias Monte Carlo: a new sampling scheme for flexible chains,” Molecular Physics, vol. 75, pp. 59–70, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  34. P. Minary, M. E. Tuckerman, and G. J. Martyna, “Dynamical spatial warping: a novel method for the conformational sampling of biophysical structure,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 2055–2083, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. T. Huber and W. F. van Gunsteren, “SWARM-MD: searching conformational space by cooperative molecular dynamics,” Journal of Physical Chemistry A, vol. 102, no. 29, pp. 5937–5943, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. J. Zhang, “An effective simulated annealing refined replica exchange Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for the infectious disease model of H1N1 influenza pandemic,” World Journal of Modelling and Simulation, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 29–39, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. I. Siepmann and D. Frenkel, “Configurational-bias Monte Carlo: a new sampling scheme for flexible chains,” Molecular Physics, vol. 75, pp. 59–70, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. J. P. Ulmschneider and W. L. Jorgensen, “Monte Carlo backbone sampling for polypeptides with variable bond angles and dihedral angles using concerted rotations and a Gaussian bias,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 118, no. 9, pp. 4261–4271, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. K. Lindorff-Larsen, P. Maragakis, S. Piana, M. P. Eastwood, R. O. Dror, and D. E. Shaw, “Systematic validation of protein force fields against experimental data,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 2, Article ID e32131, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. A. K. Harrisa, J. R. Meyersona, Y. Matsuokac et al., “Structure and accessibility of HA trimers on intact 2009 H1N1 pandemic influenza virus to stemregion-specific neutralizing antibodies,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 110, pp. 4592–4597, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  41. S. Toxvaerd, “Hamiltonians for discrete dynamics,” Physical Review E, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 2271–2274, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. K. Vanommeslaeghe, E. Hatcher, C. Acharya et al., “CHARMM general force field: a force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 671–690, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. B. R. Brooks, C. L. Brooks III, A. D. Mackerell Jr. et al., “CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1545–1614, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. D. Baker and A. Sali, “Protein structure prediction and structural genomics,” Science, vol. 294, no. 5540, pp. 93–96, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. Özen, T. Haliloğlu, and C. A. Schiffer, “Dynamics of preferential substrate recognition in HIV-1 protease: redefining the substrate envelope,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 410, no. 4, pp. 726–744, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright, Numerical Optimisation, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2006.
  47. S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi, “Optimization by simulated annealing,” Science, vol. 220, pp. 671–680, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  48. R. O. Dror, M. O. Jensen, D. W. Borhani, and D. E. Shaw, “Exploring atomic resolution physiology on a femtosecond to millisecond timescale using molecular dynamics simulations,” Journal of General Physiology, vol. 135, no. 6, pp. 555–562, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. M. Feig and C. L. Brooks III, “Recent advances in the development and application of implicit solvent models in biomolecule simulations,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 217–224, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. W. Im, S. Bernèche, and B. Roux, “Generalized solvent boundary potential for computer simulations,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 114, no. 7, pp. 2924–2937, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. E. Gallicchio and R. M. Levy, “GBNP, an analytic implicit solvent model suitable for molecular dynamics simulations and high-resolution modeling,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 479–499, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. M. W. Mahoney and W. L. Jorgensen, “A five-site model for liquid water and the reproduction of the density anomaly by rigid, nonpolarizable potential functions,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 112, no. 20, pp. 8910–8922, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. C. Chipot and A. Pohorille, Eds., Free Energy Calculations, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2007.
  54. T. J. Chung, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2010. View at MathSciNet
  55. M. Tuckerman, B. J. Berne, and G. J. Martyna, “Reversible multiple time scale molecular dynamics,” The Journal of Chemical Physics B, vol. 380, pp. 665–677, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  56. C. Dellago, P. G. Bolhuis, and P. L. Geissler, “Transition path sampling,” in Advances in Chemical Physics, vol. 132, chapter 1, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. A. E. Garcia, “Large-amplitude non-linear motions in proteins,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 68, Article ID 2696, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  58. M. E. Tuckerman, Y. Liu, G. Ciccotti, and G. J. Martyna, “Non-Hamiltonian molecular dynamics: Generalizing Hamiltonian phase space principles to non-Hamiltonian systems,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 1678–1702, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. G. S. Ezra, “On the statistical mechanics of non-Hamiltonian systems: the generalized Liouville equation, entropy, and time-dependent metrics,” Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 29–53, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  60. S. Nosé, “A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 511–519, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. Y. Liu and M. E. Tuckerman, “Generalized Gaussian moment thermostatting: a new continuous dynamical approach to the canonical ensemble,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 1685–1700, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. G. J. Martyna, M. L. Klein, and M. Tuckerman, “Nosé-Hoover chains: the canonical ensemble via continuous dynamics,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 2635–2643, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. H. C. Andersen, “Rattle: a “velocity” version of the shake algorithm for molecular dynamics calculations,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 24–34, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. J.-P. Ryckaert, G. Ciccotti, and H. J. C. Berendsen, “Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 327–341, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. V. Kraeutler, W. F. van Gunsteren, and P. H. Huenenberger, “A fast SHAKE algorithm to solve distance constraint equtions for small molecules in molecular dynamics simulations,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 22, pp. 501–508, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. T. R. Forester and W. Smith, “SHAKE, rattle, and roll: efficient constraint algorithms for linked rigid bodies,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 102–111, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. J. A. Izaguirre and S. S. Hampton, “Shadow hybrid Monte Carlo: an efficient propagator in phase space of macromolecules,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 200, no. 2, pp. 581–604, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. G. J. Martyna, M. E. Tuckerman, D. J. Tobias, and M. L. Klein, “Explicit reversible integrators for extended systems dynamics,” Molecular Physics, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 1117–1157, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. B. K. Mai, M. H. Viet, and M. S. Li, “Top leads for swine influenza A/H1N1 virus revealed by steered molecular dynamics approach,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 2236–2247, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. M. Klvana, M. Pavlova, T. Koudelakova et al., “Pathways and mechanisms for product release in the engineered haloalkane dehalogenases explored using classical and random acceleration molecular dynamics simulations,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 392, no. 5, pp. 1339–1356, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. X. Wu and B. R. Brooks, “Self-guided Langevin dynamics simulation method,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 381, no. 3-4, pp. 512–518, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. R. W. Zwanzig, “Nonlinear generalized Langevin equations,” Journal of Statistical Physics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 215–220, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. S. Izvekov and G. A. Voth, “Modeling real dynamics in the coarse-grained representation of condensed phase systems,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 125, no. 15, Article ID 151101, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. E. Vanden-Eijnden and G. Ciccotti, “Second-order integrators for Langevin equations with holonomic constraints,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 429, no. 1–3, pp. 310–316, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. Q. Huang, C.-L. Chen, and A. Herrmann, “Bilayer conformation of fusion peptide of influenza virus hemagglutinin: a molecular dynamics simulation study,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 14–22, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. R. E. Amaro, X. Cheng, I. Ivanov, D. Xu, and J. A. McCammon, “Characterizing loop dynamics and ligand recognition in human- and avian-type influenza neuraminidases via generalized born molecular dynamics and end-point free energy calculations,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 131, no. 13, pp. 4702–4709, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. J. G. Kirkwood, “Statistical mechanics of fluid mixtures,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 300–313, 1935. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  78. S. Park, F. Khalili-Araghi, E. Tajkhorshid, and K. Schulten, “Free energy calculation from steered molecular dynamics simulations using Jarzynski's equality,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 3559–3566, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. M. Sprik and G. Ciccotti, “Free energy from constrained molecular dynamics,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 109, no. 18, pp. 7737–7744, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. J. Kästner and W. Thiel, “Bridging the gap between thermodynamic integration and umbrella sampling provides a novel analysis method: umbrella integration,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 123, no. 14, Article ID 144104, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. G. M. Torrie and J. P. Valleau, “Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: umbrella sampling,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 187–199, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. S. Kumar, D. Bouzida, R. H. Svendsen, P. A. Kollman, and J. M. Rosenber, “The weighted histogram analysis method for free-energy calculations on biomolecules. 1. The method,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 13, p. 1011, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  83. A. Laio, A. Rodriguez-Fortea, F. L. Gervasio, M. Ceccarelli, and M. Parrinello, “Assessing the accuracy of metadynamics,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 14, pp. 6714–6721, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. E. Paquet and H. L. Viktor, “Macromolecular structure comparison and docking: an algorithmic Review,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2183–2193, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. M. Raab and I. Tvaroška, “The binding properties of the H5N1 influenza virus neuraminidase as inferred from molecular modeling,” Journal of Molecular Modeling, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1445–1456, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. C. T. T. Su, C. Schönbach, and C.-K. Kwoh, “Molecular docking analysis of 2009-H1N1 and 2004-H5N1 influenza virus HLA-B*4405-restricted HA epitope candidates: implications for TCR cross-recognition and vaccine development,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 14, supplement 2, article S21, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. H. Liu and X. Yao, “Molecular basis of the interaction for an essential subunit PA-PB1 in influenza virus RNA polymerase: Insights from molecular dynamics simulation and free energy calculation,” Molecular Pharmaceutics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 75–85, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. M. Dominik and J. Hutter, Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics: Basic Theory and Advanced Methods, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2009.
  89. M. Ceriotti, M. Parrinello, T. E. Markland, and D. E. Manolopoulos, “Efficient stochastic thermostatting of path integral molecular dynamics,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 133, no. 12, Article ID 124104, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. F. Perrucio, L. Ridder, and A. J. Mulholland, “Quantum-mechanicl/molecular-mechanical methods in medicinal chemistry,” in Quamtum Medicinal Chemistry, P. Carloni and F. Alber, Eds., Wilely, Weinheim, Germany, 2003. View at Google Scholar