Research Article
Assessing Computational Steps for CLIP-Seq Data Analysis
Table 2
Top 10 tetramers in Caco-2 CLIP peaks (FDR < 0.001).
(a) |
| Caco2-1 | Background from INPUT | Raw | Background from genome | 4mers | Percent (%) | value | Rank | value |
| GGAGa | 19.6a | | 10 | 1.00 | AGGAb | 18.4b | | 17 | 1.00 | CAGGc | 18.3c | | 19 | 1.00 | TGGCd | 18.3d | | 20 | 0.18 | GTGGe | 18.3e | | 21 | 0.65 | TGGGf | 17.8f | | 23 | 1.00 | AAGA | 17.0 | | 28 | 0.05 | GCAGg | 17.0g | | 29 | 1.00 | GGTG | 16.8 | | 30 | 1.00 | GGCT | 16.8 | | 32 | 1.00 |
|
|
(b) |
| Caco2-2 | Background from INPUT | Raw | Background from genome | 4mers | Percent (%) | value | Rank | value |
| GGAGa | 20.1a | | 9 | 1.00 | TGGCd | 19.1d | | 13 | 0.05 | GTGGe | 18.8e | | 16 | 0.41 | TGGGf | 18.4f | | 19 | 1.00 | GGTG | 17.9 | | 23 | 1.00 | AGGAb | 17.7b | | 24 | 1.00 | GCAGg | 17.6g | | 26 | 1.00 | CAGGc | 17.3c | | 27 | 1.00 | CAGA | 17.0 | | 30 | 1.00 | AAGA | 16.1 | | 39 | 1.00 |
|
|
(c) |
| Caco2-3 | Background from INPUT | Raw | Background from genome | 4mers | Percent (%) | value | Rank | value |
| GGAGa | 21.2a | | 7 | 1.00 | GAAG | 19.5 | | 12 | | TGGCd | 19.4d | | 13 | | CAGGc | 18.3c | | 18 | 1.00 | AGGAb | 17.9b | | 21 | 1.00 | TGGGf | 17.9f | | 22 | 1.00 | GTGGe | 17.8e | | 24 | 1.00 | GCAGg | 17.7g | | 26 | 1.00 | AGAA | 17.4 | | 27 | 1.00 | GGAA | 17.1 | | 28 | 1.00 |
|
|
Tetramers common in all three samples have the same letters.
|