Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 231656, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/231656
Research Article

Bilateral Image Subtraction and Multivariate Models for the Automated Triaging of Screening Mammograms

1Grupo de Investigación en Bioinformática, Escuela de Medicina, Tecnológico de Monterrey, 64849 Monterrey, NL, Mexico
2Departamento de Investigación e Innovación, Escuela de Medicina, Tecnológico de Monterrey, 64710 Monterrey, NL, Mexico

Received 4 October 2014; Revised 12 June 2015; Accepted 15 June 2015

Academic Editor: Rituraj Purohit

Copyright © 2015 José Celaya-Padilla et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. DeSantis, J. Ma, L. Bryan, and A. Jemal, “Breast cancer statistics, 2013,” CA—Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 52–62, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. B. Miller, C. Wall, C. J. Baines, P. Sun, T. To, and S. A. Narod, “Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial,” British Medical Journal, vol. 348, article g366, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Løberg, M. L. Lousdal, M. Bretthauer, and M. Kalager, “Benefits and harms of mammography screening,” Breast Cancer Research, vol. 17, no. 1, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. R. M. Rangayyan, F. J. Ayres, and J. E. Leo Desautels, “A review of computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer: toward the detection of subtle signs,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 344, no. 3-4, pp. 312–348, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Bleyer and H. G. Welch, “Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 367, no. 21, pp. 1998–2005, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. K. Doi, “Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential,” Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 31, no. 4-5, pp. 198–211, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. A. Baker, E. L. Rosen, J. Y. Lo, E. I. Gimenez, R. Walsh, and M. S. Soo, “Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 181, no. 4, pp. 1083–1088, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. H. Eadie, P. Taylor, and A. P. Gibson, “A systematic review of computer-assisted diagnosis in diagnostic cancer imaging,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. e70–e76, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Dromain, B. Boyer, R. Ferré, S. Canale, S. Delaloge, and C. Balleyguier, “Computed-aided diagnosis (CAD) in the detection of breast cancer,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 417–423, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. Doi, “Current status and future potential of computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging,” The British Journal of Radiology, vol. 78, supplement 1, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. Doi, “Current status and future potential of computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging,” The British Journal of Radiology, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. J. Tang, R. M. Rangayyan, J. Xu, I. El Naqa, and Y. Yang, “Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer with mammography: recent advances,” IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 236–251, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Dheeba and N. A. Singh, “Computer aided intelligent breast cancer detection: second opinion for radiologists—a prospective study,” in Computational Intelligence Applications in Modeling and Control, pp. 397–430, Springer, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  14. V. A. McCormack and I. dos Santos Silva, “Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1159–1169, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. M. Checka, J. E. Chun, F. R. Schnabel, J. Lee, and H. Toth, “The relationship of mammographic density and age: implications for breast cancer screening,” The American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 198, no. 3, pp. W292–W295, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. Zheng, J. H. Sumkin, M. L. Zuley, X. Wang, A. H. Klym, and D. Gur, “Bilateral mammographic density asymmetry and breast cancer risk: a preliminary assessment,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 81, no. 11, pp. 3222–3228, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. Scutt, G. A. Lancaster, and J. T. Manning, “Breast asymmetry and predisposition to breast cancer,” Breast Cancer Research, vol. 8, no. 2, article R14, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. S. Suri and R. M. Rangayyan, Recent Advances in Breast Imaging, Mammography, and Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Breast Cancer, vol. 155, SPIE Press, 2006.
  19. X. Wang, D. Lederman, J. Tan, X. H. Wang, and B. Zheng, “Computerized prediction of risk for developing breast cancer based on bilateral mammographic breast tissue asymmetry,” Medical Engineering and Physics, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 934–942, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. Díez, A. Oliver, X. Lladó et al., “Revisiting intensity-based image registration applied to mammography,” IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 716–725, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. F.-F. Yin, M. L. Giger, C. J. Vyborny, K. Doi, and R. A. Schmidt, “Comparison of bilateral-subtraction and single-image processing techniques in the computerized detection of mammographic masses,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 473–481, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. F.-F. Yin, M. L. Giger, K. Doi, C. E. Metz, C. J. Vyborny, and R. A. Schmidt, “Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: analysis of bilateral subtraction images,” Medical Physics, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 955–963, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. J. Méndez, P. G. Tahoces, M. J. Lado, M. Souto, and J. J. Vidal, “Computer-aided diagnosis: automatic detection of malignant masses in digitized mammograms,” Medical Physics, vol. 25, no. 6, p. 957, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. Martí, Y. Díez, A. Oliver, M. Tortajada, R. Zwiggelaar, and X. Lladó, “Detecting abnormal mammographic cases in temporal studies using image registration features,” in Breast Imaging, pp. 612–619, Springer, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. J. M. Celaya-Padilla, J. Rodriguez-Rojas, J. I. Galván-Tejada, A. Martínez-Torteya, V. Treviño, and J. G. Tamez-Peña, “Bilateral image subtraction features for multivariate automated classification of breast cancer risk,” in Medical Imaging 2014: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, vol. 9035 of Proceedings of SPIE, San Diego, Calif, USA, February 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. F.-F. Yin, M. L. Giger, K. Doi, C. J. Vyborny, and R. A. Schmidt, “Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: automated alignment of breast images and its effect on bilateral-subtraction technique,” Medical Physics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 445–452, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Heath, K. Bowyer, D. Kopans, R. Moore, and P. Kegelmeyer, “The digital database for screening mammography,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography (IWDM '00), pp. 212–218, Toronto, Canada, June 2000.
  28. J. M. Celaya-Padilla, J. Rodriguez-Rojas, V. Trevino, and J. G. Tamez-Pena, “Local image registration a comparison for bilateral registration mammography,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Seminar on Medical Information Processing and Analysis, p. 892210, Mexico City, Mexico, 2013.
  29. D. Rueckert, L. I. Sonoda, C. Hayes, D. L. Hill, M. O. Leach, and D. J. Hawkes, “Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast mr images,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 712–721, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. L. Ibanez, W. Schroeder, L. Ng, and J. Cates, The ITK Software Guide, Kitware, 2003.
  31. R. M. Rangayyan, S. Banik, and J. E. L. Desautels, “Computer-aided detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms of interval cancer,” Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 611–631, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. R. Duits, T. D. Haije, E. Creusen, and A. Ghosh, “Morphological and linear scale spaces for fiber enhancement in DW-MRI,” Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 326–368, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  33. G. E. Sotak Jr. and K. L. Boyer, “The Laplacian-of-Gaussian kernel: a formal analysis and design procedure for fast, accurate convolution and full-frame output,” Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 147–189, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. S. Singh, T. T. Singh, H. M. Devi, and T. Sinam, “Local contrast enhancement using local standard deviation,” International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 47, no. 15, pp. 39–44, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. K. C. Clarke, “Computation of the fractal dimension of topographic surfaces using the triangular prism surface area method,” Computers & Geosciences, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 713–722, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. T. M. Beasley, S. Erickson, and D. B. Allison, “Rank-based inverse normal transformations are increasingly used, but are they merited?” Behavior Genetics, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 580–595, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. R. Tibshirani, “Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. Methodological, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 267–288, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  38. J. Friedman, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani, “Glmnet: lasso and elastic-net regularized generalized linear models,” R package Version, vol. 1, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  39. K. Ganesan, U. R. Acharya, K. C. Chua, L. C. Min, and K. T. Abraham, “Pectoral muscle segmentation: a review,” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 48–57, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. D. Raba, A. Oliver, J. Martí, M. Peracaula, and J. Espunya, “Breast segmentation with pectoral muscle suppression on digital mammograms,” in Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, J. S. Marques, N. P. de la Blanca, and P. Pina, Eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 471–478, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. D. C. Moura and M. A. G. López, “An evaluation of image descriptors combined with clinical data for breast cancer diagnosis,” International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 561–574, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus