Review Article
Effectiveness and Safety of Controlled Venous Pressure in Liver Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Table 4
Network analysis results between IVCC and IAC.
| Outcomes | Direct comparison | Indirect comparison | MD (95% CI) | | MD (95% CI) | GRADE |
| Central venous pressure | 0.76 (−1.17, 2.70) | 0.05 | 1.6 (−0.24, 3.44) | High | Total blood loss | −346.0 (−423.89, −268.12) | <0.0001 | 180.81 (−72.4, 433.66) | Low | Blood loss during transection | −249.22 (−288.84, −209.61) | <0.0001 | 677.69 (325.73, 1029.65) | Low | Operation time | −10.0 (−18.73, −1.28) | 0.02 | 5.02 (−11.26, 21.3) | Moderate | Liver transected time | −2.17 (−3.23, −1.11) | <0.0001 | 2.12 (−1.62, 5.86) | Low |
| | RR (95% CI) | | RR (95% CI) | Grade |
| Transfusion rate | 0.83 (0.52, 1.32) | 0.44 | 0.82 (0.45, 1.51) | High | Total complications | 0.97 (0.77, 1.23) | 0.80 | 1.22 (0.85, 1.76) | High |
|
|
GRADE: Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.
|