Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 327280, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/327280
Research Article

Integrated Evaluation of Urban Water Bodies for Pollution Abatement Based on Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Approach

1Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
2Department of Geotechnical, Civil Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China

Received 16 March 2015; Accepted 1 April 2015

Academic Editor: Eldon R. Rene

Copyright © 2015 Sarfraz Hashim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Akkoyunlu and M. E. Akiner, “Pollution evaluation in streams using water quality indices: a case study from Turkey's Sapanca Lake Basin,” Ecological Indicators, vol. 18, pp. 501–511, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Yudianto and X. Yuebo, “The feasibility of bacteria application for treating the polluted urban stream from the perspective of numerical modelling,” Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 419–427, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  3. G. Onkal-Engin, I. Demir, and S. N. Engin, “Determination of the relationship between sewage odour and BOD by neural networks,” Environmental Modelling and Software, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 843–850, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Chen, “Rapid urbanization in China: a real challenge to soil protection and food security,” Catena, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. X. Dong, W. Zhou, and S. He, “Removal of anaerobic soluble microbial products in a biological activated carbon reactor,” Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1745–1753, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. X. Yuebo, T. A. Kabo-Bah, and S. Yajing, “Bacterial technology as a sustainable solution to polluted urbanized rivers and wastewater treatment systems in China,” Journal of Applied Technology in Environmental Sanitation, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 87–93, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Campolo, P. Andreussi, and A. Soldati, “Water quality control in the river Arno,” Water Research, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 2673–2680, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. R. Kannel, S. Lee, Y.-S. Lee, S. R. Kanel, and G. J. Pelletier, “Application of automated QUAL2Kw for water quality modeling and management in the Bagmati River, Nepal,” Ecological Modelling, vol. 202, no. 3-4, pp. 503–517, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. A. Kabo-Bah, X. Y. Bo, and Y. Song, “Regression models for determining the fate of BOD5 under biological treatment method in polluted rivers,” Journal of Hydrology Current Research, vol. 3, no. 3, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  10. J. B. Zhou, M. M. Jiang, B. Chen, and G. Q. Chen, “Emergy evaluations for constructed wetland and conventional wastewater treatments,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1781–1789, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. Gunes, B. Tuncsiper, S. Ayaz, and A. Drizo, “The ability of free water surface constructed wetland system to treat high strength domestic wastewater: a case study for the Mediterranean,” Ecological Engineering, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 278–284, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. A. Álvarez, I. Ruíz, and M. Soto, “Anaerobic digesters as a pretreatment for constructed wetlands,” Ecological Engineering, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 54–67, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Ali, L.-Y. Chai, C.-J. Tang et al., “The increasing interest of ANAMMOX research in China: bacteria, process development, and application,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 134914, 21 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. E. Foresti, M. Zaiat, and M. Vallero, “Anaerobic processes as the core technology for sustainable domestic wastewater treatment: consolidated applications, new trends, perspectives, and challenges,” Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 3–19, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Hashim, Y. B. Xie, I. Hashim, and I. Ahmad, “Urban river pollution control based on bacterial technology,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 692, pp. 127–132, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. D. Yudianto and Y. Xie, “Influences of limited ammonium nitrogen and water temperature on the urban stream restoration using bacterial technology—view from the perspective of numerical modelling,” Journal of Water Resource & Protection, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 227–234, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. S.-M. Liou, S.-L. Lo, and S.-H. Wang, “A generalized water quality index for Taiwan,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 96, no. 1–3, pp. 35–52, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. Simsek and O. Gunduz, “IWQ Index: a GIS-integrated technique to assess irrigation water quality,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 128, no. 1–3, pp. 277–300, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. P. Singh, S. K. Ghosh, and P. Sharma, “Water quality management of a stretch of river Yamuna: an interactive fuzzy multi-objective approach,” Water Resources Management, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 515–532, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. P. Singh, “An integrated fuzzy approach to assess water resources' potential in a watershed,” ACFAI Journal of Computational Fluid Mathematics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–23, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  21. D.-Y. Chang, “Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 649–655, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. P. Singh and S. K. Dubey, “Optimal selection of a landfill disposal site using a modified fuzzy utility approach,” Fuzzy Information and Engineering, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 313–338, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. B. Srdjevic and Y. D. P. Medeiros, “Fuzzy AHP assessment of water management plans,” Water Resources Management, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 877–894, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. Hashim, X. Yuebo, and A. T. Kabo-Bah, “Beneficial bacteria helpful to restore water bodies,” Oriental Journal of Chemistry, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 1397–1399, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. T. L. Saaty, “A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 234–281, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  26. A. H. I. Lee, W.-C. Chen, and C.-J. Chang, “A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 96–107, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. S. Boroushaki and J. Malczewski, “Implementing an extension of the analytical hierarchy process using ordered weighted averaging operators with fuzzy quantifiers in ArcGIS,” Computers & Geosciences, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 399–410, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. F. F. Nobre, L. T. F. Trotta, and L. F. A. M. Gomes, “Multi-criteria decision making: an approach to setting priorities in health care,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 18, no. 23, pp. 3345–3354, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. H. Deng, “Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 215–231, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. G. E. Boender, J. G. de Graan, and F. A. Lootsma, “Multi-criteria decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparisons,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 133–143, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  31. P. J. van Laarhoven and W. Pedrycz, “A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 229–241, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  32. L. Mikhailov and P. Tsvetinov, “Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 23–33, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. Y. C. Erensal, T. Öncan, and M. L. Demircan, “Determining key capabilities in technology management using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: a case study of Turkey,” Information Sciences, vol. 176, no. 18, pp. 2755–2770, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Computation, vol. 8, pp. 338–353, 1965. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  35. H. S. Hansen, “GIS-based multi-criteria analysis of wind farm development,” in Proceedings of the 10th Scandinavian Research Conference on Geographical Information Science, pp. 75–87, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  36. Y. Song, Y. Xie, and P. Fu, “Eco-friendly domestic sewage treatment with bacterial technology,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Water Resource and Environmental Protection (ISWREP '11), pp. 1294–1297, Xi'an City, China, May 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus