Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 328142, 15 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/328142
Review Article

Mobile Phone-Based Joint Angle Measurement for Functional Assessment and Rehabilitation of Proprioception

1Univ. Grenoble-Alpes, AGIM, La Tronche, France
2Univ. Lille, 59000 Lille, France
3Mines Douai, URIA, 59508 Douai, France
4IDS, Montceau-les-Mines, France
5Institut Universitaire de France, Paris, France
6Laboratory for Ergonomics and Work-related Disorders, Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction (SMI), Department of Health Science and Technology, Univ. Aalborg, Denmark

Received 24 April 2015; Revised 22 June 2015; Accepted 2 July 2015

Academic Editor: Massimiliano Pau

Copyright © 2015 Quentin Mourcou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. R. Grob, M. S. Kuster, S. A. Higgins, D. G. Lloyd, and H. Yata, “Lack of correlation between different measurements of proprioception in the knee,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery—British Volume, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 614–618, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. F. Ribeiro and J. Oliveira, “Factors influencing proprioception: what do they reveal?” in Biomechanics in Applications, V. Klika, Ed., chapter 14, InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. L. Hay, C. Bard, M. Fleury, and N. Teasdale, “Availability of visual and proprioceptive afferent messages and postural control in elderly adults,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 129–139, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. C. Gauchard, C. Jeandel, A. Tessier, and P. P. Perrin, “Beneficial effect of proprioceptive physical activities on balance control in elderly human subjects,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 273, no. 2, pp. 81–84, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. M. L. Hughes, P. Tommasino, A. Budhota, and D. Campolo, “Upper extremity proprioception in healthy aging and stroke populations, and the effects of therapist- and robot-based rehabilitation therapies on proprioceptive function,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 9, article 120, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. S. Hillier, M. Immink, and D. Thewlis, “Assessing proprioception—a systematic review of possibilities,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. E. Ozdalga, A. Ozdalga, and N. Ahuja, “The smartphone in medicine: a review of current and potential use among physicians and students,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 14, no. 5, article e128, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. N. K. Boulos, S. Wheeler, C. Tavares, and R. Jones, “How smartphones are changing the face of mobile and participatory healthcare: an overview, with example from eCAALYX,” BioMedical Engineering Online, vol. 10, no. 1, article 24, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. Zhu and Z. Zhou, “A real-time articulated human motion tracking using tri-axis inertial/magnetic sensors package,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 295–302, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. Milani, C. A. Coccetta, A. Rabini, T. Sciarra, G. Massazza, and G. Ferriero, “Mobile smartphone applications for body position measurement in rehabilitation: a review of goniometric tools,” PM&R, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1038–1043, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Y. Tousignant-Laflamme, N. Boutin, A. M. Dion, and C.-A. Vallée, “Reliability and criterion validity of two applications of the iPhone to measure cervical range of motion in healthy participants,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 10, no. 1, article 69, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Quek, S. G. Brauer, J. Treleaven, Y.-H. Pua, B. Mentiplay, and R. A. Clark, “Validity and intra-rater reliability of an Android phone application to measure cervical range-of-motion,” Measurements, vol. 11, article 65, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. S. H. Shin, D. H. Ro, O.-S. Lee, J. H. Oh, and S. H. Kim, “Within-day reliability of shoulder range of motion measurement with a smartphone,” Manual Therapy, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 298–304, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. B. C. Werner, R. E. Holzgrefe, J. W. Griffin et al., “Validation of an innovative method of shoulder range-of-motion measurement using a smartphone clinometer application,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. e275–e282, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. Mitchell, S. B. Gutierrez, S. Sutton, S. Morton, and A. Morgenthaler, “Reliability and validity of goniometric iPhone applications for the assessment of active shoulder external rotation,” Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 521–525, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. Oïhénart, C. Duc, and K. Aminian, “iShould: functional evaluation of the shoulder using a smartphone,” Gait & Posture, vol. 36, supplement 1, pp. S61–S62, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. L. B. Johnson, S. Sumner, T. Duong et al., “Validity and reliability of smartphone magnetometer-based goniometer evaluation of shoulder abduction—a pilot study,” Manual Therapy, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. G. Ferriero, F. Sartorio, C. Foti, D. Primavera, E. Brigatti, and S. Vercelli, “Reliability of a new application for smartphones (DrGoniometer) for elbow angle measurement,” PM&R, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 1153–1154, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Ockendon and R. E. Gilbert, “Validation of a novel smartphone accelerometer-based knee goniometer,” The Journal of Knee Surgery, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 341–345, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. K. Hambly, R. Sibley, and M. Ockendon, “Level of agreement between a novel smartphone application and a long arm goniometer for the assessment of maximum active knee flexion by an inexperienced tester,” International Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, vol. 2, pp. 1–14, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  21. A. Jones, R. Sealey, M. Crowe, and S. Gordon, “Concurrent validity and reliability of the simple goniometer iPhone app compared with the Universal Goniometer,” Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 512–516, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. Milanese, S. Gordon, P. Buettner et al., “Reliability and concurrent validity of knee angle measurement: smart phone app versus universal goniometer used by experienced and novice clinicians,” Manual Therapy, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 569–574, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Rwakabayiza, L. C. D. Pereira, E. Lécureux, and B. Jolles-Haeberli, “Mesurer l'amplitude articulaire du genou: goniomètre universel ou smartphone?” Orthopédie, vol. 411, no. 44, pp. 2372–2375, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  24. A.-V. Bruyneel and F. Bridon, “Inclinométrie du genou: comparaison de la reproductibilité d'un outil mécanique et d'une application sur smartphone,” Kinésithérapie la Revue, vol. 15, no. 158, pp. 74–79, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  25. J.-Y. Jenny, “Measurement of the knee flexion angle with a smartphone-application is precise and accurate,” Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 784–787, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. G. Ferriero, S. Vercelli, F. Sartorio et al., “Reliability of a smartphone-based goniometer for knee joint goniometry,” International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 146–151, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J.-Y. Jenny, A. Bureggah, and Y. Diesinger, “Measurement of the knee flexion angle with smartphone applications: which technology is better?” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. F. Andrea, V. Luigi, M. Daniele et al., “Smartphone versus knee ligament arthrometer when size does not matter,” International Orthopaedics, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 2197–2199, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. T.-L. Yoon, K.-M. Park, S.-A. Choi, J.-H. Lee, H.-J. Jeong, and H.-S. Cynn, “A comparison of the reliability of the trochanteric prominence angle test and the alternative method in healthy subjects,” Manual Therapy, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 97–101, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. F. M. Peters, R. Greeff, N. Goldstein, and C. T. Frey, “Improving acetabular cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty by using smartphone technology,” Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1324–1330, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. P. C. Charlton, B. F. Mentiplay, Y.-H. Pua, and R. A. Clark, “Reliability and concurrent validity of a Smartphone, bubble inclinometer and motion analysis system for measurement of hip joint range of motion,” Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 262–267, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. S. L. Vohralik, A. R. Bowen, J. Burns, C. E. Hiller, and E. J. Nightingale, “Reliability and validity of a smartphone app to measure joint range,” American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 325–330, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. C. M. Williams, A. J. Caserta, and T. P. Haines, “The TiltMeter app is a novel and accurate measurement tool for the weight bearing lunge test,” Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 392–395, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. J. Kolber, M. Pizzini, A. Robinson, D. Yanez, and W. J. Hanney, “The reliability and concurrent validity of measurements used to quantify lumbar spine mobility: an analysis of an iPhone application and gravity based inclinometry,” International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 129, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  35. M. T. Izatt, G. R. Bateman, and C. J. Adam, “Evaluation of the iPhone with an acrylic sleeve versus the Scoliometer for rib hump measurement in scoliosis,” Scoliosis, vol. 7, no. 1, article 14, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. O. I. Franko, C. Bray, and P. O. Newton, “Validation of a scoliometer smartphone app to assess scoliosis,” Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. e72–e75, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. F. Balg, M. Juteau, C. Theoret, A. Svotelis, and G. Grenier, “Validity and reliability of the iPhone to measure rib hump in scoliosis,” Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 774–779, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. Qiao, L. Xu, Z. Zhu et al., “Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the axial trunk rotation: manual versus smartphone-aided measurement tools,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 15, no. 1, article 343, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. U. Röijezon, N. C. Clark, and J. Treleaven, “Proprioception in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Part 1: basic science and principles of assessment and clinical interventions,” Manual Therapy, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 368–377, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. B. L. Riemann, J. B. Myers, and S. M. Lephart, “Sensorimotor system measurement techniques,” Journal of Athletic Training, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 85–98, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. N. Strimpakos, “The assessment of the cervical spine. Part 1: range of motion and proprioception,” Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 114–124, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. D. J. Goble, “Proprioceptive acuity assessment via joint position matching: from basic science to general practice,” Physical Therapy, vol. 90, no. 8, pp. 1176–1184, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. R. L. Gajdosik and R. W. Bohannon, “Clinical measurement of range of motion. Review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity,” Physical Therapy, vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 1867–1872, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. J. Treleaven, G. Jull, and M. Sterling, “Dizziness and unsteadiness following whiplash injury: characteristic features and relationship with cervical joint position error,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 36–43, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. J. K. Loudon, M. Ruhl, and E. Field, “Ability to reproduce head position after whiplash injury,” Spine, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 865–868, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. M. Revel, C. Andre-Deshays, and M. Minguet, “Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility in patients with cervical pain,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 288–291, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. M. Balke, D. Liem, N. Dedy et al., “The laser-pointer assisted angle reproduction test for evaluation of proprioceptive shoulder function in patients with instability,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, vol. 131, no. 8, pp. 1077–1084, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. P. Yan, G. Kurillo, R. Bajcsy et al., “mHealth application for upper extremity range of motion and reachable workspace,” in Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 20, vol. 184 of Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, pp. 478–480, IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. G. Wu, S. Siegler, P. Allard et al., “ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—part I: ankle, hip, and spine,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 543–548, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. G. Wu, F. C. T. Van Der Helm, H. E. J. Veeger et al., “ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion. Part II. Shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 981–992, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. M. Memon, S. R. Wagner, C. F. Pedersen, F. H. Aysha Beevi, and F. O. Hansen, “Ambient assisted living healthcare frameworks, platforms, standards, and quality attributes,” Sensors, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 4312–4341, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. E.-Y. Jung, J.-H. Kim, K.-Y. Chung, and D. K. Park, “Home health gateway based healthcare services through U-health platform,” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 207–218, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. G. Lamprinakos, S. Asanin, T. Broden et al., “An integrated remote monitoring platform towards telehealth and telecare services interoperability,” Information Sciences, vol. 308, pp. 23–37, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. W. Maass and U. Varshney, “Design and evaluation of Ubiquitous Information Systems and use in healthcare,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 597–609, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. D. Kotz, S. Avancha, and A. Baxi, “A privacy framework for mobile health and home-care systems,” in Proceedings of the 1st ACM Workshop on Security and Privacy in Medical and Home-Care Systems (SPIMACS '09), pp. 1–12, ACM, Chicago, Ill, USA, November 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. L. Algar and K. Valdes, “Using smartphone applications as hand therapy interventions,” Journal of Hand Therapy, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 254–257, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. M. Varnfield, M. Karunanithi, C.-K. Lee et al., “Smartphone-based home care model improved use of cardiac rehabilitation in postmyocardial infarction patients: results from a randomised controlled trial,” Heart, vol. 100, no. 22, pp. 1770–1779, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. A. M. Layton, J. Whitworth, J. Peacock, M. N. Bartels, P. A. Jellen, and B. M. Thomashow, “Feasibility and acceptability of utilizing a smartphone based application to monitor outpatient discharge instruction compliance in cardiac disease patients around discharge from hospitalization,” International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications, vol. 2014, Article ID 415868, 10 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. A. Marshall, O. Medvedev, and A. Antonov, “Use of a smartphone for improved self-management of pulmonary rehabilitation,” International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications, vol. 2008, Article ID 753064, 5 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. M. Van Reijen, I. I. Vriend, V. Zuidema, W. van Mechelen, and E. A. Verhagen, “The implementation effectiveness of the ‘Strengthen your ankle’ smartphone application for the prevention of ankle sprains: design of a randomized controlled trial,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 15, no. 1, article 2, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. I. Vriend, I. Coehoorn, and E. Verhagen, “Implementation of an app-based neuromuscular training programme to prevent ankle sprains: a process evaluation using the RE-AIM framework,” British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 484–488, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  62. V. Rialle, N. Vuillerme, and A. Franco, “Outline of a general framework for assessing e-health and gerontechnology applications: axiological and diachronic dimensions,” Gerontechnology, vol. 9, no. 2, article 245, 2010. View at Google Scholar