Research Article

Comparison of Primary Models to Predict Microbial Growth by the Plate Count and Absorbance Methods

Table 3

Growth parameters and their 95% confidence limits and coefficients of determination (), SSE, and RMSE of fit obtained with different growth models for the average OD growth curves of Listeria monocytogenes CECT 4031 at 37°C in TSB+YE inoculating 102, 104, and 106 CFU mL−1 shown in Figure 1(b).

Growth modelInitial concentration (CFU mL−1)Lag time (h)Growth rate
(OD units h−1)

(OD units)

(OD units)
SSERMSE

Three-phase linear10219.11
(18.96–19.27)
0.163
(0.154–0.173)
0.142
(0.069–0.214)
0.7420.9940.00130.0127
10414.61
(14.42–14.81)
0.173
(0.159–0.187)
0.143
(0.065–0.222)
0.7240.9890.00260.0181
1068.79
(8.23–9.35)
0.150
(0.126–0.174)
0.149
(0.072–0.227)
0.7120.9300.04900.0614

Gompertz10218.99
(18.87–19.10)
0.169
(0.161–0.177)
0.132
(0.128–0.136)
0.784
(0.776–0.792)
0.9980.02210.0153
10414.46
(14.31–14.62)
0.179
(0.167–0.191)
0.133
(0.127–0.139)
0.757
(0.746–0.768)
0.9970.03530.0204
1069.33
(9.09–9.56)
0.218
(0.190–0.245)
0.141
(0.129–0.154)
0.755
(0.726–0.783)
0.9900.04910.0320

Logistic10219.06
(18.99–19.12)
0.168
(0.163–0.171)
0.128
(0.126–0.130)
0.779
(0.775–0.783)
0.9990.00520.0074
10414.55
(14.43–14.67)
0.178
(0.170–0.186)
0.128
(0.123–0.132)
0.755
(0.748–0.762)
0.9990.01600.0137
1069.40
(9.22–9.58)
0.217
(0.199–0.235)
0.135
(0.126–0.144)
0.747
(0.730–0.765)
0.9960.02270.0218

Richards10219.12
(19.05–19.19)
0.183
(0.175–0.191)
0.126
(0.124–0.128)
0.778
(0.774–0.781)
1.333
(1.152–1.514)
0.9990.00450.0069
10414.74
(14.61–14.87)
0.219
(0.205–0.233)
0.123
(0.119–0.128)
0.754
(0.748–0.760)
2.040
(1.565–2.515)
0.9990.01230.0121
1069.93
(9.81–10.06)
0.318
(0.303–0.333)
0.119
(0.115–0.123)
0.748
(0.742–0.754)
6.730
(4.925–8.536)
0.9990.00280.0078

Baranyi10218.79
(18.65–18.93)
0.148
(0.142–0.155)
0.1200.781
(0.776–0.786)
0.9980.0138
10414.04
(13.87–14.21)
0.163
(0.153–0.173)
0.1300.745
(0.739–0.752)
0.9970.0178
1068.95
(8.75–9.15)
0.201
(0.183–0.218)
0.1390.731
(0.718–0.743)
0.9950.0219