Research Article

ProGeRF: Proteome and Genome Repeat Finder Utilizing a Fast Parallel Hash Function

Table 1

Comparison of amount detection and execution times (in seconds) of Mreps, Misa, Sputnik, GMATo, SciRoKo, TRF, and ProGeRF. The features were run on a Dell Inspiron, Intel core 2 duo 2.2 GHz processor with 2 MB cache, 3 GB RAM, 320 GB hard drive, Ubuntu operating system 14.04 LTS 32 bits.

Sequence Mreps Misa Sputnik GMATo SciRoKo TRF ProGeRF
Rep (time) Rep (time) Rep (time) Rep (time) Rep (time) Rep (time) Rep (time)

NC_004318.1 (1204 kb) 9608 (2.8) 22867 (3.2) 7420 (0.7) 23539 (10.3) 3763 (1.1) 30244 (72.4) 26164 (3.9)
NC_001136.8 (1531 kb) 935 (1.4) 10640 (3.3) 1427 (0.9) 10721 (7.7) 185 (0.7) 8101 (4.5) 11552 (2.4)
NC_000962.2 (4411 kb)1412 (3.9) 6832 (8.9) 3140 (1.46) 6846 (12.1) 72 (1.5) 19496 (24.5) 11422 (4.0)
Setaria* (15 Mb)— (—)2054241 (868.3) 480644 (105.7) 2073643 (9859.1) 47770 (129.0) 2438036 (1481.5) 2319812 (1352.0)

Whole genome. The value in brackets is the runtimes in seconds.