Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Technology in the Differential Diagnosis of Solid Breast Masses with Different Sizes: Which Features Are Most Efficient?
Table 4
Diagnostic performance of ARFI for breast masses from different size groups.
Group and feature
Sensitivity (%)
Specificity (%)
PPV (%)
NPV (%)
Accuracy (%)
Az (95% CI)
Small ()
SWV ≥ 2.545
55.6 (25/45)
95.5 (63/66)
89.3 (25/28)
75.9 (63/83)
79.3 (88/111)
0.790 (0.743–0.837)
VTI pattern = 4
93.3 (42/45)
71.2 (47/66)
68.9 (42/61)
94.0 (47/50)
80.2 (89/111)
0.786 (0.739–0.833)
AR ≥ 1.155a
93.3 (42/45)
90 (45/50)
89.4 (42/47)
93.8 (45/48)
91.6 (87/95)
0.942 (0.916–0.967)
Big ()
SWV ≥ 3.575
82.2 (60/73)
98.9 (86/87)
98.4 (60/61)
86.9 (86/99)
91.3 (146/160)
0.903 (0.874–0.931)
VTI pattern = 4
91.8 (67/73)
80.5 (70/87)
79.8 (67/84)
92.1 (70/76)
85.6 (137/160)
0.838 (0.802–0.875)
AR ≥ 1.035b
89.0 (65/73)
79.7 (51/64)
83.3 (65/78)
86.4 (51/59)
84.7 (116/137)
0.886 (0.856–0.917)
Total ()
SWV ≥ 3.05
69.5 (82/118)
97.4 (149/153)
95.3 (82/86)
80.5 (149/185)
85.2 (231/271)
0.846 (0.820–0.873)
VTI pattern = 4
92.4 (109/118)
76.5 (117/153)
75.1 (109/145)
92.9 (117/126)
83.4 (226/271)
0.815 (0.786–0.844)
AR ≥ 1.14c
85.6 (101/118)
87.7 (100/114)
87.8 (101/115)
85.5 (100/117)
86.6 (201/232)
0.909 (0.889–0.930)
Note: aARs were calculated for masses of Patterns 1, 3, and 4, ; bARs were calculated for masses of Patterns 1, 3, and 4, ; cARs were calculated for masses of Patterns 1, 3, and 4, .