Research Article

Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Technology in the Differential Diagnosis of Solid Breast Masses with Different Sizes: Which Features Are Most Efficient?

Table 4

Diagnostic performance of ARFI for breast masses from different size groups.

Group and featureSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)PPV (%)NPV (%)Accuracy (%)Az (95% CI)

Small ()
 SWV ≥ 2.54555.6
(25/45)
95.5
(63/66)
89.3
(25/28)
75.9
(63/83)
79.3
(88/111)
0.790
(0.743–0.837)
 VTI pattern = 493.3
(42/45)
71.2
(47/66)
68.9
(42/61)
94.0
(47/50)
80.2
(89/111)
0.786
(0.739–0.833)
 AR ≥ 1.155a93.3
(42/45)
90
(45/50)
89.4
(42/47)
93.8
(45/48)
91.6
(87/95)
0.942
(0.916–0.967)
Big ()
 SWV ≥ 3.57582.2
(60/73)
98.9
(86/87)
98.4
(60/61)
86.9
(86/99)
91.3
(146/160)
0.903
(0.874–0.931)
 VTI pattern = 491.8
(67/73)
80.5
(70/87)
79.8
(67/84)
92.1
(70/76)
85.6
(137/160)
0.838
(0.802–0.875)
 AR ≥ 1.035b89.0
(65/73)
79.7
(51/64)
83.3
(65/78)
86.4
(51/59)
84.7
(116/137)
0.886
(0.856–0.917)
Total ()
 SWV ≥ 3.0569.5
(82/118)
97.4
(149/153)
95.3
(82/86)
80.5
(149/185)
85.2
(231/271)
0.846
(0.820–0.873)
 VTI pattern = 492.4
(109/118)
76.5
(117/153)
75.1
(109/145)
92.9
(117/126)
83.4
(226/271)
0.815
(0.786–0.844)
 AR ≥ 1.14c85.6
(101/118)
87.7
(100/114)
87.8
(101/115)
85.5
(100/117)
86.6
(201/232)
0.909
(0.889–0.930)

Note: aARs were calculated for masses of Patterns 1, 3, and 4, ; bARs were calculated for masses of Patterns 1, 3, and 4, ; cARs were calculated for masses of Patterns 1, 3, and 4, .