Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 412716, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/412716
Research Article

Development of an Ex Vivo, Beating Heart Model for CT Myocardial Perfusion

1University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands, Department of Radiology, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
2Department of Radiology and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Postbus 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
3Siemens AG Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany
4University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, Netherlands
5LifeTec Group BV, Den Dolech 2, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, Netherlands
6University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands

Received 11 September 2014; Accepted 23 December 2014

Academic Editor: Marco Francone

Copyright © 2015 Gert Jan Pelgrim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. D. Schuijf, W. Wijns, J. W. Jukema et al., “A comparative regional analysis of coronary atherosclerosis and calcium score on multislice CT versus myocardial perfusion on SPECT,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 1749–1755, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Rossi, D. Merkus, E. Klotz, N. Mollet, P. J. de Feyter, and G. P. Krestin, “Stress myocardial perfusion: imaging with multidetector CT,” Radiology, vol. 270, no. 1, pp. 25–46, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Y. Wang, L. Qin, X. Shi et al., “Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 198, no. 3, pp. 521–529, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. F. Bamberg, A. Becker, F. Schwarz et al., “Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging,” Radiology, vol. 260, no. 3, pp. 689–698, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. H. Mahnken, E. Klotz, H. Pietsch et al., “Quantitative whole heart stress perfusion CT imaging as noninvasive assessment of hemodynamics in coronary artery stenosis: preliminary animal experience,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 298–305, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. M. Huber, V. Leber, B. M. Gramer et al., “Myocardium: dynamic versus single-shot CT perfusion imaging,” Radiology, vol. 269, no. 2, pp. 378–386, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. A. Kaufmann and P. G. Camici, “Myocardial blood flow measurement by PET: technical aspects and clinical applications,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 75–88, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. Morton, A. Chiribiri, M. Ishida et al., “Quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease: comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 60, no. 16, pp. 1546–1555, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Schampaert, M. van 't Veer, M. C. M. Rutten et al., “Autoregulation of coronary blood flow in the isolated beating pig heart,” Artificial Organs, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 724–730, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Skrzypiec-Spring, B. Grotthus, A. Szelag, and R. Schulz, “Isolated heart perfusion according to Langendorff—still viable in the new millennium,” Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 113–126, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. O. Langendorff, “Untersuchungen am überlebenden Säugethierherzen,” Pflüger, Archiv für die Gesammte Physiologie des Menschen und der Thiere, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 291–332, 1895. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. Modersohn, S. Eddicks, C. Grosse-Siestrup, I. Ast, S. Holinski, and W. Konertz, “Isolated hemoperfused heart model of slaughterhouse pigs,” International Journal of Artificial Organs, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 215–221, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. F. Bamberg, E. Klotz, T. Flohr et al., “Dynamic myocardial stress perfusion imaging using fast dual-source CT with alternating table positions: initial experience,” European Radiology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1168–1173, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. D. Cerqueira, N. J. Weissman, V. Dilsizian et al., “Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association,” Circulation, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 539–542, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. W. F. Fearon, L. B. Balsam, H. M. O. Farouque et al., “Novel index for invasively assessing the coronary microcirculation,” Circulation, vol. 107, no. 25, pp. 3129–3132, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. H. Aupperle, J. Garbade, C. Ullmann et al., “Comparing the ultrastructural effects of two different cardiac preparation- and perfusion-techniques in a porcine model of extracorporal long-term preservation,” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 214–221, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Schuster, I. Grünwald, A. Chiribiri et al., “An isolated perfused pig heart model for the development, validation and translation of novel cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques,” Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, vol. 12, article 53, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. Bastarrika, L. Ramos-Duran, M. A. Rosenblum, D. K. Kang, G. W. Rowe, and U. J. Schoepf, “Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging: initial clinical experience,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 306–313, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. T. Ho, K. C. Chua, E. Klotz, and C. Panknin, “Stress and rest dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-attenuation curves with dual-source CT,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 811–820, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Weininger, U. J. Schoepf, A. Ramachandra et al., “Adenosine-stress dynamic real-time myocardial perfusion CT and adenosine-stress first-pass dual-energy myocardial perfusion CT for the assessment of acute chest pain: initial results,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 81, no. 12, pp. 3703–3710, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. J. Hearse and F. J. Sutherland, “Experimental models for the study of cardiovascular function and disease,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 597–603, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Rossi, A. Uitterdijk, M. Dijkshoorn et al., “Quantification of myocardial blood flow by adenosine-stress CT perfusion imaging in pigs during various degrees of stenosis correlates well with coronary artery blood flow and fractional flow reserve,” European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 331–338, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. F. Schwarz, R. Hinkel, E. Baloch et al., “Myocardial CT perfusion imaging in a large animal model: comparison of dynamic versus single-phase acquisitions,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1229–1238, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. So, J. Hsieh, J. Y. Li, J. Hadway, H. F. Kong, and T. Y. Lee, “Quantitative myocardial perfusion measurement using CT Perfusion: a validation study in a porcine model of reperfused acute myocardial infarction,” International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1237–1248, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. F. Bamberg, R. Hinkel, F. Schwarz et al., “Accuracy of dynamic computed tomography adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging in estimating myocardial blood flow at various degrees of coronary artery stenosis using a porcine animal model,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 71–77, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus