Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015, Article ID 450309, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/450309
Review Article

Psychobiobehavioral Model for Preterm Birth in Pregnant Women in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

1Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 1N4
2Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, TRW Building, 3rd Floor, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 4Z6
3Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute for Child and Maternal Health, Heritage Medical Research Building, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 4N1
4O’Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 4Z6
5Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California, Irvine, 4562 Social and Behavioral Sciences Gateway, Irvine, CA 92697-7085, USA
6School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mount Royal University, 4825 Mount Royal Gate SW, Calgary, AB, Canada T3E 6K6
7School of Nursing and Midwifery, Aga Khan University-East Africa, Opposite Aga Khan Primary School Plot (9/11), Colonel Muammar Gaddafi Road, P.O. Box 8842, Kampala, Uganda
8School of Nursing and Midwifery, Aga Khan University-Karachi, Stadium Road, P.O. Box 3500, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
9Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aga Khan University-Nairobi, 3rd Parklands Avenue off Limuru Road, P.O. Box 30270, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
10Department of Pediatrics, Aga Khan University-Nairobi, 2nd Parklands Avenue, East Tower Block, Room 505, Nairobi 00100, Kenya

Received 12 February 2015; Accepted 3 April 2015

Academic Editor: Igor Hudić

Copyright © 2015 Shahirose S. Premji et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Preterm birth (PTB) is a final common outcome resulting from many interrelated etiological pathways; of particular interest is antenatal psychosocial distress (i.e., stress, anxiety, and depression). In LMI countries, both exposure to severe life stressors and rate of PTB are on average greater when compared with high-income countries. In LMI countries women are exposed to some of the most extreme psychosocial stress worldwide (e.g., absolute poverty, limited social resources). High prevalence of antenatal stress and depression have been observed in some studies from LMI countries. We propose a psychosocial, biological, and behavioral model for investigating the complex multisystem interactions in stress responses leading to PTB and explain the basis of this approach. We discuss ethical considerations for a psychosocial, biological, and behavioral screening tool to predict PTB from a LMI country perspective.

1. Introduction

Preterm birth (PTB) is a global health concern with a worldwide prevalence rate exceeding 10%. PTB is associated with a high rate of death in the first year of life accounting for 80% of the world’s 1.1 million deaths of children, as well as 50% of pediatric neurodevelopment problems [14]. Twelve of the 15 countries that contribute more than 60% to the global burden of PTB are low- and middle-income (LMI) countries [1]. Pakistan, Kenya, and the United Republic of Tanzania (hereafter Tanzania), for instance, have a PTB rate of 15.8, 12.3, and 11.4 per 100 live births, respectively [5]. We use these countries as exemplars when presenting perspectives on antenatal psychosocial distress (i.e., emotional suffering presenting as depression and anxiety during pregnancy) and pathways to PTB. Despite the higher incidence of both PTB and psychosocial distress in many LMI countries, empirical work on psychosocial predictors of PTB has been predominantly conducted in high-income countries [6, 7]. While this body of research is very valuable, findings are not necessarily applicable to LMI countries.

How do LMI countries differ from high-income countries in ways that may influence the link between stress and PTB? Most obviously, family resources are generally limited as a result of poverty, which restrict women’s ability to seek care during and following birth [8]. Women in LMI countries, for instance, Pakistan, are exposed to greater poverty with 17% of the population living below the poverty line (2007/8 statistics) [9]. Existing resources must be conserved for basic care for the child and often simply for survival. Poor quality of care in facilities which are not well resourced and poor attitude of staff [8] may amplify women’s fears about pregnancy being risky both for them and their infants. Moreover, every day approximately 800 women die as consequence of pregnancy- or childbirth-related problems; almost all of these deaths are situated in LMI countries [10]. Similarly, almost all neonatal deaths occur in LMI countries and predominantly in the neonatal period, that is, within the first four weeks following birth. During the postpartum period, limited care and resources are available to women and their babies.

Second, exposure to severe life stressors (e.g., absolute poverty, limited social resources) is on average greater in LMI countries, compared to high-income countries. High prevalence of antenatal stress and depression have been observed in some studies from LMI countries (e.g., 40.9% in a secondary hospital based sample [11] and 25% in a community-based sample [12]). These rates are comparable to subpopulations of low socioeconomic North American and European women (e.g., 23–47%) [13, 14]. The exposure to more and more intense stressors among women in LMI countries is likely not without consequence. Maternal psychosocial distress (i.e., pregnancy-related anxiety, state anxiety, depression, or perceived stress) during pregnancy has been linked to PTB [1416]. Moreover, both PTB and psychosocial distress are associated with offspring’s negative lifelong developmental and intergenerational trajectories and may have a disproportionate toll in LMI countries.

A final difference is that pregnant women in LMI countries are bound by different social norms and cultural ties. Women in LMI countries experience inequities in access to education (43% literacy rate for males compared to 28% for females) [17] and economic opportunities. In many cases, sociocultural norms in LMI countries may limit women’s ability to act autonomously or have a voice in care decision [18]. Pregnant women worry about sex of their unborn infant as male preference is common. For instance, in Pakistan, a women’s status within the family may be linked to birth of a son [11, 1719]. The importance attached to a male child [20] limits their opportunity to be involved in decision-making and creates dynamic social relations within the family in relation to both their own care and their infant [18].

In sum, while PTB is particularly prevalent in many LMI countries, LMI countries lag behind in explicating the contribution of psychosocial distress to PTB and where limited resources are available to translate empirically derived knowledge into prevention. We propose a model including psychosocial, biological, and behavioral dimensions to investigate the complex multisystem interactions linking stress with PTB with a particular emphasis on LMI countries. Conceptualizing the stress-PTB link in LMI countries will not only allow us to gain insight into psychosocial predictors of PTB in LMI countries but also provide unique opportunities to improve our understanding of the etiology of PTB. We discuss the potential benefits and limitations of developing a population-based psychosocial, biological, and behavioral screening tool to predict PTB from a LMI country perspective, given existing resources.

2. Materials and Methods

We searched peer-reviewed electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), grey literature, and reference list of relevant articles, as well as solicited articles from an existing peer network in Pakistan, Kenya, and Tanzania. The details of the search and selection strategy, quality assessment and data extraction, and consultation exercise are described in detail elsewhere [21]. To explicate the potential benefits and limitations of developing a population-based psychosocial, biological, and behavioral screening to predict PTB from a LMI country perspective, a new search strategy was undertaken. Key terms such as prediction, mass screening, and serum screening were combined with pregnancy outcome; stress, psychological; and preterm birth. No limits were applied with regard to country of origin of studies or language. The synthesis of the literature shared below draws from the realist approach in recognition that systematic reviews often exclude important observations from studies deemed less rigorous that may illuminate “mechanisms” [2224] or pathways to PTB. The realist approach relies on the expertise of those undertaking the review to build an explanatory theory (i.e., how and why) of the observed impacts and provide insight and identify gaps and mechanisms that need to be explored [2224]. Our Maternal Infant Global Health Team (Global Collaborators in Research) (MiGHT) includes clinicians (e.g., nurse, midwife, obstetrician and gynecologist, psychologist, and laboratory specialist), researchers, and policy decision makers who have critically evaluated the literature. The breadth in the synthesis is the result of (a) situating our observations of behavioral practices such as pica or the deliberate consumption of soil and (b) revisiting the literature to deconstruct the nature of stress (e.g., chronic, acute) and (c) offering potential explanations for the varied findings in studies examining the relationship between psychosocial distress and PTB.

3. Results and Discussion

Our initial conceptual framework [21] on the relationship between psychosocial distress and PTB continues to evolve. Figure 1 reflects our refined understanding of environment stressors pregnant women in LMI countries are exposed to and their response to this environment. Our new model specifically considers (a) individual differences in stress reactivity and accounts for the fact that not all women who experience psychosocial stressors will have an adverse pregnancy outcome, (b) biological response patterns expressed as a cumulative physiologic burden (i.e., allostatic load), (c) behavioral response patterns to stress, and (d) interactive feedback effects. The model exemplifies the importance of early identification of psychosocial stressors and maladaptive biological and behavioral responses given the interplay of multiple systems in the pathways to PTB.

Figure 1: Psychosocial, biological, and behavioral model.
3.1. Conceptual Framework

Below we discuss each concept of the model followed by implications of developing a population-based screening tool based on the psychosocial, biological, and behavioral model. We conclude by offering highlights of the importance and relevance of this work.

3.1.1. Stress-Related Physiological Responses and Biological Mediators of PTB: Racial Differences

Independent risk factors for PTB account for less than half of the racial disparity in risk of PTB, particularly between black and white women in United States of America, the former having a higher risk of delivering very preterm [25]. Medical conditions of pregnancy, for example, gestational hypertension and preeclampsia, have also been shown to differ by ethnic background after adjusting for socioeconomic and other risk factors within social context (e.g., education level, lifestyle-related factors) [2529].

In the nonpregnant state, biological responses to stress (e.g., physical exercise), specifically the release of cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone, differed between African American and Caucasian women, such that Caucasian women showed higher levels of adrenocorticotropic hormone without associated increases in cortisol [30]. Ethnic differences in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis functioning have also been found in pregnant women [3133]. During pregnancy, biomarkers (e.g., cortisol, adrenocorticotropic hormone, corticotropin-releasing hormone, nonfasting cholesterol, and triglyceride levels) and trajectories of biomarkers (e.g., corticotropin-releasing hormone) of the HPA system have been reported to differ by ethnicity after accounting for risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic and behavior) [3135]. An earlier systematic review reported an association between race/ethnicity and C-reactive protein level after adjusting for confounding (e.g., age, sex) and mediating (e.g., obesity, smoking) variables [36]. South Asian cohorts had higher levels of C-reactive protein than Caucasian women (i.e., white) [36]. The magnitude of changes in stress-related physiological measures across pregnancy and biological mediators of PTB also differ depending on race/ethnicity [3739]. For example, African American women have lower levels of cortisol during early gestation (i.e., 18–20 weeks of gestation) than non-Hispanic white women and the lowest increase in corticotropin-releasing hormone over the course of pregnancy (24–26 and 30–32 weeks of gestation) [31]. Moreover, a “Hispanic paradox” has been observed whereby better pregnancy outcomes have been reported among Hispanic women despite severe preeclampsia and adverse sociodemographic profiles [40]. Although the underlying pathways remain unknown, it has been proposed that biological systems (e.g., cardiovascular) of ethnic groups may adapt differently given environmental differences [27, 41, 42].

3.1.2. Acute Stress and Chronic Stress

Stress is defined “as an imbalance between demands placed on us (from our environment) and our ability to manage them” [43, page 121] which manifests as psychosocial distress. Psychosocial distress is multifaceted and encompasses emotional states that result from acute stress (e.g., a heated argument with spouse, divorce, and loss through death), emotional states that characterize the individual (e.g., anxiety, depression), and chronic stressors experienced as a consequence of social, cultural, and environmental phenomena [44, 45]. Acute stress is deemed to be short term, though no operational definition is provided for “short,” and allows the body to regain homeostasis [45, 46]. Pregnancy itself may be viewed as an acute stressor in a sense that it may elicit fears of maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity particularly surrounding delivery and the forthcoming responsibility of providing for a child, a concept that has been referred to as pregnancy-related anxiety [47]. In contrast, chronic stressors are those where the threat or demand persists over time; that is, they are long-lived and resolution may or may not be achieved [44, 46]. Chronic stress may partly reflect external events that are enduring sources of stress in day-to-day life such as neighborhood crime, poverty, homelessness or household strain, and racial composition [44]. It is beyond the scope of this paper to synthesize the literature on each dimension of psychosocial distress; however, we present below a brief overview.

Psychosocial distress is associated with pregnancy outcomes, controlling for other risk factors including, for example, health behaviors, medical, and sociodemographic factors [45, 48]. The magnitude of the effect, however, seems to vary by location of study (high- versus low-income) [16], socioeconomic status (United States) [16], ethnic and immigrant populations, and periods of gestation [37]. Moreover, in studies from high-income countries, dimensions of psychosocial distress were noted to exert differential influences on PTB. Pregnancy-related anxiety consistently predicts PTB and this association is evident in diverse income and ethnic groups [15]. North American and European studies examining the relationship between depression and PTB have also shown inconsistent findings, with a minority of the studies finding (e.g., [4951]) a statistically significant association with a small effect size [15]. Though many North American and European studies have shown an association between state anxiety or emotional response due to situational circumstances (e.g., fear or danger due to catastrophic events) and PTB (e.g., [15, 50, 52]), findings have been mixed, with studies demonstrating no association (e.g., [53, 54]) and associations in subgroups of samples or in combination with other measures [15]. Similarly, a person’s perception of ongoing and enduring sources of stress in their day-to-day life has shown mixed results with large studies reporting an association (e.g., [55]) as well as no association (e.g., [14]) with PTB.

We proposed that the impact of stress on PTB involves intersects between acute and chronic stress (i.e., multidimensional nature of stress) and biological (i.e., biomarkers) and behavioral responses that establish differential pathways to PTB [25, 45]. For instance, childhood adversity increases vulnerability to adverse psychological (e.g., depression), physical (e.g., diabetes), and pregnancy (e.g., PTB) health outcomes [5658]. Consequently, our model draws from the adverse childhood experiences-international questionnaire (ACE-IQ) which is intended to measure chronic stress in early life in individuals irrespective of country of domicile [59]. The individual (e.g., sexual and emotional abuse and neglect by parents or caregivers), social relationship (e.g., family dysfunction), sociocultural (e.g., race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status), and community level (e.g., witnessing community violence) items of the ACE-IQ [59], however, have not been validated. Examples of types of stressors within each level contributing to chronic stress are detailed in Figure 2 and many (e.g., education, socioeconomic measure, and domestic violence) have individually been associated with poor pregnancy outcome [47, 6065]. Given “wear and tear” on the brain and body from these cumulative stressors (i.e., chronic stress), biological responses in multiple systems (e.g., HPA axis, cardiac, immune, and metabolic) may be compromised or fail outright. Increase in the individual’s allostatic load as a consequence of dysregulation of these interrelated systems may ultimately result in pathophysiological effects, including PTB [6668]. Our conceptual model also emphasizes the multiplicative nature of these responses to explain the pathogenesis of stress-related medical conditions during pregnancy which leads to induced PTB. Aspects of the HPA axis and sympathetic, immune, and cardiovascular systems also promote behavior changes in the effort to restore allostasis [46, 67]. Below we explain assertions and propose hypotheses for consideration for future research.

Figure 2: Chronic stress, types of stressors.

Chronic Stress Influences Response to Acute Stress and Biomarkers Vary by Type of Stress. Kramer et al. [25], drawing from studies in psychiatry (e.g., [69, 70]) and international migration and birth outcomes (e.g., [71]), have proposed that early life experiences can have long-term effects on the HPA axis, such as altering cortisol responses to acute stressors and baseline cortisol levels. For example, Finnish children separated from their fathers serving in World War II evidenced higher salivary cortisol and plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone in responses to a standardized psychosocial stress test more than 60 years after the separation. Baseline cortisol was significantly higher among separated women than nonseparated women who did not differ significantly in characteristics from separated women [70]. Early life experiences can also influence reactivity and biological responses to new stressful stimuli (e.g., pregnancy itself) [25, 69, 72]. For example, a systematic review of 24 studies (30 million singleton births) examining international migration and adverse birth outcomes reported lower risk of PTB among black immigrants when compared to black women born in the United States. In contrast, this level of protection was not conferred to Asian women who were at higher risk of PTB when compared to native-born population regardless of continent (e.g., United States and Europe) [71].

In epidemiological and clinical research, C-reactive protein is an important marker for a range of disease outcomes (e.g., cardiovascular, type 2 diabetes) [73]. Studies [7476] indicate that CRP measured during early pregnancy is a useful predictor of PTB, particularly at specific cut-offs (e.g., greater than 4 mg/L [74]). The nature of stress (acute versus chronic) influences C-reactive protein levels [25, 72]. Chronic stress suppresses immune function or alters immune responses while acute stress stimulates immune function [25]. Inflammatory biomarkers have been shown to mediate the relationship between psychosocial stress (acute and chronic) and PTB [77, 78]. Interactions between acute and chronic stress influence C-reactive protein levels (and HPA axis functioning) suggesting that the impact of acute stress (e.g., pregnancy-related anxiety) can be amplified in the presence of chronic stress [72, 79]. Acute stress in combination with chronic stress may increase the strength of association with PTB [79]. C-reactive protein may improve risk stratification of PTB when combined with other biomarkers of PTB [80].

3.1.3. Stress Reactivity

Many studies show an association between stressors experienced during pregnancy and PTB, but it is also clear that not all women exposed to stress during pregnancy will proceed to deliver preterm. This may be the case because of differences in how women respond to stressful situations they encounter. Support for this view comes from the broader literature on stress and disease suggesting that heightened psychobiological stress reactivity may explain, at least in part, why some but not all individuals exposed to stress will develop disease [8183]. Below we highlight this literature. A broader review of the implications of individual differences in physiological stress reactivity for maternal and fetal birth outcomes is provided elsewhere [45].

There are only a handful of studies to date that have empirically tested the link between stress reactivity and birth outcomes, but they converge to suggest that more pronounced heart rate and blood pressure responses to laboratory stressors are associated with poorer birth outcomes. In the earliest of these studies, McCubbin et al. [84] assessed 39 primigravidae, predominantly white and black US women’s heart rate and blood pressure responses to a computer-based arithmetic stressor protocol at approximately 35 weeks of gestational age. Findings suggest that women who proceed to deliver preterm had significantly higher diastolic stress responses than women with term infants. Moreover, each 1 mm Hg increase in diastolic reactivity was associated with a 0.31 weeks’ decrease in gestational length. Similarly, de León et al. [85] reported a 0.07 weeks’ decrease in gestational length with each 1 mm Hg increase in mean blood pressure in 70 pregnant Argentinian women exposed to the cold pressor test. That study also reported the absence of a link between baseline blood pressure and gestational length, highlighting the need to obtain stress reactivity measures. A third, larger study exposed 75 black and 238 white pregnant women to a mental arithmetic and Stroop color-word task [86]. For black women only, an association between a 1 mm Hg increase in diastolic reactivity and a decrease of 0.17 weeks of gestational length was observed. This finding indicates that stress reactivity may be an important variable to consider in studies aiming to explain the typically higher rate of PTB among black women [25, 87]. A final study is unique in that it assessed stress reactivity not during pregnancy but before pregnancy onset. Harville et al., [56] in a large, longitudinal study, tested the association between blood pressure responses to a video game, star tracing, and cold pressor test and preterm birth incidence in a first pregnancy occurring within 18 years after the stress exposure. Women with higher mean arterial pressure reactivity had higher PTB risk, suggesting that it is not only pregnancy-related increased blood pressure reactivity [8486] that is associated with PTB but an underlying more general stress reactivity trait that maybe associated with poor birth outcomes.

Allostatic Load and Its Biomarkers Predict PTB. Psychosocial distress activates physiological responses in the HPA axis and sympathetic, immune, and cardiovascular systems in the effort to restore allostasis (i.e., physiological stability by altering the internal milieu) [46, 67]. In this context, biomarkers that detect physiological compromise might be useful as predictors of psychosocial distress and its negative consequences. Systematics reviews, however, have concluded that no single biomarker consistently predicts PTB and findings remain inconsistent [88, 89]. Allostatic load links psychosocial distress and its physiological responses over time, given “wear and tear” to multisystem dysregulation, which promotes a cascade of events ultimately impacting pregnancy outcome (i.e., PTB) [6668, 90, 91]. Consequently, composite measures of biomarkers versus individual biomarkers may be a stronger predictor of negative consequences of psychosocial distress [9294]. Despite the popularity of allostatic load as a research concept of stress in the general population and different allostatic load algorithmic computations available in the literature [9496], only one small North American study was identified in the pregnancy-related field. In this study, secondary analysis of previously collected biomarkers showed an association between allostatic load at 26–28 weeks of gestation and gestational age [97]. An allostatic load index, in which a -score of each biomarker was included, was inversely related to gestational age [97]. Interrelated physiological (i.e., biochemical) response patterns expressed as a cumulative physiologic burden, that is, allostatic load, may predict PTB and mitigate or exacerbate negative consequences of pregnancy-related anxiety. We moreover propose that biomarkers selected in future prospective studies should (a) represent patterns of events leading to allostatic load, (b) be empirically linked to psychosocial distress, and (c) be implicated in the pathophysiological processes linking perinatal distress to PTB. In the context of LMI countries, biomarkers should be easily obtained (e.g., serum versus cervicovaginal or amniotic fluid) and are amenable to point-of-care testing and of clinical utility to varied cadre of health care providers (e.g., midwives, skilled birth attendants) to facilitate immediate decision-making.

Allostatic Load Explains Medically Induced PTB. Pregnancy-induced hypertension and gestational diabetes are not only common during pregnancy but also the leading global causes of maternal and infant mortality and establish health trajectories over the course of life and across generations [98, 99]. In LMI countries, the incidence of preeclampsia is 2.8% of live births, notably seven times higher than in high-income countries [100, 101]. Although the incidence of gestational diabetes remains unknown, the high prevalence and growing incidence of diabetes in African populations, projected to 18.6 million by 2030, suggest that pregnant African women are at higher risk of gestational diabetes [102, 103]. Both preeclampsia and gestational diabetes form part of the indications for early delivery, hence PTB, and represent dysregulation in physiological processes which may in part be explained by allostatic load [104, 105].

Mood and anxiety disorders in women of childbearing age, either preconception or before 20 weeks of gestational age, increased risk of preeclampsia after controlling for variables such as age, race/ethnicity, and prepregnancy body mass index [106]. Moreover, allostatic load index ascertained using biomarkers—systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, prepregnancy body mass index, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, nonfasting triglyceride, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6—measured prior to 15 weeks of gestational age was associated with preeclampsia [105]. During pregnancy, physiological regulatory set points (e.g., levels of insulin, cortisol, glucose, and leptin) continually change to accommodate the demands of the fetal-placental-maternal unit. Dysregulation of this complex metabolic system as a result of chronic insult such as stress and anxiety can explain the genesis of gestational diabetes and eventual type 2 diabetes [104]. Women who are metabolically challenged in early pregnancy (12 weeks), as indicated by increased levels of glycated hemoglobin [107], may present with hyperinsulinism, insulin insensitivity, and slighter high blood pressure prior to developing pregnancy-induced hypertension [99]. Increased glycated hemoglobin has been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes (e.g., hypertension, miscarriage, and perinatal mortality) [107]. A relationship has been demonstrated between high diastolic blood pressure responses to stress during pregnancy and decreased gestational age [8486]. It appears that women at risk of psychosocial distress who are also likely to develop pregnancy-induced medical conditions suggested the same etiologic entities with common terminal pathways for medically indicated and spontaneous preterm labor without premature rupture of chorioamniotic membranes [46, 93, 108110]. Consequently, both subtypes should be examined in studies elucidating psychosocial distress and their biological pathways to PTB.

Psychosocial Distress and Biomarkers Should Be Measured Repeatedly. Pregnant women demonstrate a decrease in perceptions of psychosocial distress and dampening of biological stress responses in the late second trimester which is thought to protect the women and fetus [111]. Pregnant women who fail to demonstrate these changes may be at greater risk of PTB [37, 112]. Studies (e.g., [32, 111]) found that although point measures reported no association, changes in state anxiety [111], magnitude of change in perceived stress scale scores [32], and simply an increase in perceived stress [111] predicted either length of gestation [32] or PTB [111]. Glynn et al. [111] found that, in a regression model, pregnant women with increases in perceived stress were more likely to have a PTB than women with increase in state anxiety, although both are unique predictors of PTB. Similarly, decrease in triglyceride level with increasing gestational age has been implicated in PTB [113]. A slower increase in triglyceride level was noted in women who delivered prior to 34 weeks of gestation [114]. Point measures may therefore be of limited use to our understanding of the relationship between psychosocial distress, biomarkers, and PTB as psychosocial distress and biomarker measures are influenced by timing of pregnancy [37, 48, 111].

Health Behaviors Compensate for Allostatic Load. Health behaviors may be a means of compensating for allostatic load resulting from psychosocial distress to ensure stability, that is, allostasis [46, 115]. Psychosocial health during pregnancy has been linked to pica, the practice of eating nonnutritive substances (e.g., soil, raw starch, ice, and charcoal) for greater than 1 month [116, 117]. In many East African regions, women eat “odowa” (soft stones), “pemba” (white clay), or “udongo” (red clay), which can be purchased at local shops or markets [118, 119]. Approximately 45% of pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in Geita district, Mwanza, Tanzania, or health centre in western Kenya were practicing pica (i.e., eating soil) [118, 119]. However, rates as high as 63.7% have been reported in health facilities in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania [120].

While the prevalence of pica is high among women living in low- and middle-income countries [118120], there is little information regarding the effects of this pregnancy-related behavior on PTB. Kawai and colleagues [121] found no association between geophagy and PTB as well as other pregnancy outcomes (e.g., small for gestational age and low birth weight). Studies, conducted in Argentina [122] and in Texas [123] and New York City in the United States [124], examining pica practices in relation to iron status and neonatal outcomes [122], maternal hemoglobin at delivery and pregnancy outcomes [123], and elevated lead levels [124] showed no statistical significant differences in rates of PTB [122, 123] or higher rates of preterm birth in pica practicing pregnant women [124].

Psychosocial distress has also been linked to addictive behaviors such as alcohol consumption. In Kenya, alcohol abuse is a mounting concern and is reported to be more prevalent than smoking [125, 126]. Factors contributing to increase in alcohol include socioeconomic challenges [125, 126] against a backdrop of changes in sociocultural norms [126]. Of particular concern are those who report drinking excessively, including women of child bearing age [125]. The Kenya Demographic and Health Survey indicates that unplanned pregnancies (defined as mistimed or unwanted) are common among unmarried Kenyan women 15–19 years of age and married Kenyan women [127, 128]. Pregnancy recognition may not occur for 5 weeks, during which time alcohol use may be high and lead to lifelong adverse consequences for the fetus (e.g., growth deficit, dysmorphology, and executive functioning, neuromotor, emotional, and speech/language difficulties) [129]. Over and above the direct effects of alcohol on the fetus, heavy maternal consumption of alcohol during pregnancy (i.e., dose response) has been associated with PTB [130132]. The studies examining associations between alcohol consumption and PTB have been based in high-income countries (e.g., Australia, United States, Canada, and Spain).

3.2. Screening Programs

In LMI countries, the antenatal period provides the greatest opportunity for contact with women of reproductive age as more women seek care during pregnancy than preconception and in the postpartum period. Preconception care, that is, care initiated one year prior to the initiation of unprotected sexual intercourse, is routinely not offered or not accessible [133]. Although only 28% of pregnant women in Pakistan, and 47% in Kenya, receive antenatal care at least four times during pregnancy as recommended by the World Health Organization [134], the majority make at least one visit to an antenatal clinic: 61% in Pakistan and 92% in Kenya [135]. An integrated screening tool that considers psychosocial, biological, and behavioral measures to predict PTB has the potential to reduce psychosocial distress by implementing relatively low-cost psychological interventions early in pregnancy and improve pregnancy and health outcomes of mother and fetus/infant across the life span. Pakistan, like many other LMI countries, has minimal mental health resources; the services that are available are disorganized with respect to the catchment areas they serve [136]. In the absence of mechanisms to refer women to specialized health services (i.e., mental health and high risk pregnancies), costs would outweigh the benefits of screening [137]. Consequently, the psychosocial-biobehavioral screening tool will need to be administered by health care providers trained in perinatal mental health, be user friendly, and be implemented within a model of care that permits triaging high risk women, monitoring, or referring high risk women to appropriate mental health services [138].

The LMI country context requires special consideration in anticipating potential ethical challenges regarding psychosocial interventions. The sociocultural milieu influences women’s care seeking behavior [18]; thus, ethical obligations to respect patient autonomy and to act with beneficence (i.e., do no harm) when promoting women’s mental health [137] are much more complex given the dynamic nature of the decision-making. Designing and evaluating the effectiveness of a screening program must involve a community-based participatory approach in which stakeholders (i.e., pregnant women, families, and community leaders mutually) consider the social determinants of health to cocreate screening programs that will be taken up by the community [139, 140]. The approach espouses to the Public Health Code of Ethics which will advocate for and empower pregnant women with limited decision-making capacity to access health care services that are responsive to their needs [140].

Ethical approaches to managing clinical dilemmas with screening for psychosocial distress and risk of PTB must consider interrelationship between maternal mental health and fetal well-being, that is, relational ethics [137]. Allostatic load may indirectly influence maternal and infant health by impacting behavior systems thereby hindering mother-infant interactions [68, 90, 141]. These altered interactions in the long-term lead to delays in the infant’s physical (i.e., growth, illness like diarrhea), emotional, cognitive, language, and social functioning [142146] which can influence well-being of the mother, father, and family. Consequently, health care providers have an obligation to care for the mother (i.e., beneficence) as well as the fetus/infant (i.e., nonmaleficence or do no harm) [137].

4. Conclusion

The psychosocial, biological, and behavioral model proposed in this paper is unique as it considers each individual’s unique life course that would influence stress perspective, biological responses, and coping strategies. Moreover, intervention strategies may be tailored to the risk profile identified thereby conserving and effectively utilizing limited resources in LMI countries. The model also stresses the importance of screening at multiple time points along the continuum of pregnancy as physiological processes of pregnancy alter stress responses (psychosocial and biological). The more blunted responses as pregnancy progresses protect the fetus and mother from adverse health consequences [37, 48, 111]. Key issues currently include identifying evidence-informed integrated psychosocial distress measures, biomarkers of allostatic load, and health behaviors; critical time periods for screening; and assessment and referral practices in poor resourced settings such as LMI countries.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

Salima Sulaiman, Joseph W. Musana, Pauline Samia, and Kiran Shaikh contributed equally to this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the ongoing support of colleagues at the Aga Khan University, Pakistan, Kenya, and Tanzania campuses, and various academic institutions in Canada, who are also members of Maternal Infant Global Health Team (MiGHT) (Global Collaborators in Research). Additional MiGHT collaborators listed in alphabetical order include Ms. Dorcas Akoya Amunga, Charles Aywak, Dr. Susan Dahinten, Dr. Farooq Ghani, Dr. Rafat Jan, Dr. Imtiaz Jehan, Mr. Adam King, Ms. Laila Khymani, Mrs. Mwash Loveluck, Mr. Mohamoud Merali, Dr. Ayesha Mian, Dr. Alliya Mohamed, Ms. Veilla Moses Mteri, Dr. Haider Ali Naqvi, Dr. Christopher T. Naugler, Dr. Geoffrey Omuse, Ms. Christine Omukani Okoko, Dr. M. Sarah Rose, Ms. Dorcus Asami Satia, Ms. Rozina Shazad, Dr. Zeenat Sulaiman, and Dr. Saba Wasim.

References

  1. J. E. Lawn, M. G. Gravett, T. M. Nunes, C. E. Rubens, and C. Stanton, “Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (1 of 7): definitions, description of the burden and opportunities to improve data,” BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth, vol. 10, supplement 1, article S1, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. J. E. Lawn, K. Wilczynska-Ketende, and S. N. Cousens, “Estimating the causes of 4 million neonatal deaths in the year 2000,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 706–718, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. E. Simmons, C. E. Rubens, G. L. Darmstadt, and M. G. Gravett, “Preventing preterm birth and neonatal mortality: exploring the epidemiology, causes, and interventions,” Seminars in Perinatology, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 408–415, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. A. Savitz, “Invited commentary: disaggregating preterm birth to determine etiology,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 168, no. 9, pp. 990–992, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. World Health Organization, Born Too Soon, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2012.
  6. J. Fisher, M. C. de Mello, V. Patel et al., “Prevalence and determinants of common perinatal mental disorders in women in low-and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 139–149, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. World Health Organization, Maternal Mental Health and Child Health and Development in Low and Middle Income Countries: Report of the Meeting Held in Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
  8. K. Finlayson and S. Downe, “Why do women not use antenatal services in low- and middle-income countries? a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 10, no. 1, Article ID e1001373, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. The World Bank, “Pakistan Overview,” 2015, http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/pakistan/overview.
  10. World Health Organization, “Maternal mortality,” Fact Sheet 348, WHO, 2014, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs348/en/. View at Google Scholar
  11. K. Shaikh, S. S. Premji, M. S. Rose, A. Kazi, S. Khowaja, and S. Tough, “The association between parity, infant gender, higher level of paternal education and preterm birth in Pakistan: a cohort study,” BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth, vol. 11, article 88, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Rahman, Z. Iqbal, and R. Harrington, “Life events, social support and depression in childbirth: perspectives from a rural community in the developing world,” Psychological Medicine, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1161–1167, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. A. Bennett, A. Einarson, A. Taddio, G. Koren, and T. R. Einarson, “Prevalence of depression during pregnancy: systematic review,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 698–709, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. S. Kramer, J. Lydon, L. Séguin et al., “Stress pathways to spontaneous preterm birth: the role of stressors, psychological distress, and stress hormones,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 169, no. 11, pp. 1319–1326, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Dunkel Schetter and L. Tanner, “Anxiety, depression and stress in pregnancy: implications for mothers, children, research, and practice,” Current Opinion in Psychiatry, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 141–148, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. N. K. Grote, J. A. Bridge, A. R. Gavin, J. L. Melville, S. Iyengar, and W. J. Katon, “A meta-analysis of depression during pregnancy and the risk of preterm birth, low birth weight, and intrauterine growth restriction,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 1012–1024, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. Sen, P. Ostlin, and A. George, Unequal, Unfair, Ineffective and Inefficient. Gender Inequity in Health: Why It Exists and How We Can Change It, Women and Gender Equity Knowledge Network, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2007.
  18. S. Premji, S. Khowaja, S. Meherali, and R. Forgeron, “Sociocultural influences on newborn health in the first 6 weeks of life: qualitative study in a fishing village in Karachi, Pakistan,” BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth, vol. 14, no. 1, article 232, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Kazi, Z. Fatmi, J. Hatcher, U. Niaz, and A. Aziz, “Development of a stress scale for pregnant women in the South Asian context: the A-Z stress scale,” Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 353–361, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. U. Niaz, “Women's mental health in Pakistan,” 2009, http://womenissuespk.blogspot.ca/2009/10/womens-mental-health-in-pakistan.html.
  21. S. Premji, “Perinatal distress in women in low- and middle-income countries: allostatic load as a framework to examine the effect of perinatal distress on preterm birth and infant health,” Maternal and Child Health Journal, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 2393–2407, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. Pawson, T. Greenhalgh, G. Harvey, and K. Walshe, “Realist review—a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions,” Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, vol. 10, supplement 1, pp. 21–34, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. G. Wong, T. Greenhalgh, G. Westhorp, and R. Pawson, “Realist methods in medical education research: what are they and what can they contribute?” Medical Education, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 89–96, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. T. Greenhalgh, G. Robert, F. MacFarlane, P. Bate, O. Kyriakidou, and R. Peacock, “Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review,” Social Science & Medicine, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 417–430, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. R. Kramer, C. J. Hogue, A. L. Dunlop, and R. Menon, “Preconceptional stress and racial disparities in preterm birth: an overview,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 90, no. 12, pp. 1307–1316, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Tanaka, G. Jaamaa, M. Kaiser et al., “Racial disparity in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in New York state: a 10-year longitudinal population-based study,” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 163–170, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. S. H. Bouthoorn, R. Gaillard, E. A. P. Steegers et al., “Ethnic differences in blood pressure and hypertensive complications during pregnancy the generation R study,” Hypertension, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 198–205, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. C. Lu and B. Chen, “Racial and ethnic disparities in preterm birth: the role of stressful life events,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 191, no. 3, pp. 691–699, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. I. E. Headen, E. M. Davis, M. S. Mujahid, and B. Abrams, “Racial-ethnic differences in pregnancy-related weight,” Advances in Nutrition, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 83–94, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. A. Yanovski, S. Z. Yanovski, A. J. Boyle et al., “Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity during exercise in African American and Caucasian women,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 85, no. 8, pp. 2660–2663, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. L. M. Glynn, C. D. Schetter, A. Chicz-DeMet, C. J. Hobel, and C. A. Sandman, “Ethnic differences in adrenocorticotropic hormone, cortisol and corticotropin-releasing hormone during pregnancy,” Peptides, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1155–1161, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. R. J. Ruiz, J. Fullerton, C. E. Brown, and J. Schoolfield, “Relationships of cortisol, perceived stress, genitourinary infections, and fetal fibronectin to gestational age at birth,” Biological Research for Nursing, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 39–48, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. T. M. Siler-Khodr, G. Forthman, C. Khodr, S. Matyszczyk, Z. Khodr, and G. Khodr, “Maternal serum corticotropin-releasing hormone at midgestation in hispanic and white women,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 557–564, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. C. Holzman, J. Jetton, T. Siler-Khodr, R. Fisher, and T. Rip, “Second trimester corticotropin-releasing hormone levels in relation to preterm delivery and ethnicity,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 657–663, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. Y. J. Schreuder, B. A. Hutten, M. van Eijsden et al., “Ethnic differences in maternal total cholesterol and triglyceride levels during pregnancy: the contribution of demographics, behavioural factors and clinical characteristics,” European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 580–589, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. Nazmi and C. G. Victora, “Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic differentials of C-reactive protein levels: a systematic review of population-based studies,” BMC Public Health, vol. 7, article 212, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. C. A. Sandman, E. P. Davis, and L. M. Glynn, “Psychobiological stress and preterm birth,” in Preterm Birth—Mother and Child, chapter 4, InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, 2012, http://cdn.intechweb.org/pdfs/27122.pdf. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. M. R. Kramer and C. R. Hogue, “What causes racial disparities in very preterm birth? a biosocial perspective,” Epidemiologic Reviews, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 84–98, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. L. M. Christian, R. Glaser, K. Porter, and J. D. Iams, “Stress-induced inflammatory responses in women: effects of race and pregnancy,” Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 75, no. 7, pp. 658–669, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. A. Carr, T. Kershaw, H. Brown, T. Allen, and M. Small, “Hypertensive disease in pregnancy: an examination of ethnic differences and the Hispanic paradox,” Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 11–15, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. X. Xiong, G. Pridjian, and R. P. Dickey, “Racial and ethnic disparities in preterm births in infants conceived by in vitro fertilization in the United States,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 209, no. 2, pp. 128.e1–128.e6, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. Ramírez, M. E. Ford, A. L. Stewart, and J. A. Teresi, “Measurement issues in health disparities research,” Health Services Research, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1640–1657, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. M. Danielsson, I. Heimerson, U. Lundberg, A. Perski, C.-G. Stefansson, and T. Åkerstedt, “Psychosocial stress and health problems: Health in Sweden: the National Public Health report 2012. Chapter 6,” Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, vol. 40, no. 9, supplement, pp. 121–134, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. C. G. Dunkel-Schetter and M. Laura, Stress in Pregnancy: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Issues to Guide Interdisciplinary Researchers, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2011.
  45. L. M. Christian, “Physiological reactivity to psychological stress in human pregnancy: current knowledge and future directions,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 106–116, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. G. Latendresse, “The interaction between chronic stress and pregnancy: preterm birth from a biobehavioral perspective,” Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 8–17, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. C. D. Schetter, “Psychological science on pregnancy: stress processes, biopsychosocial models, and emerging research issues,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 62, pp. 531–558, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. P. D. Wadhwa, S. Entringer, C. Buss, and M. C. Lu, “The contribution of maternal stress to preterm birth: issues and considerations,” Clinics in Perinatology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 351–384, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. D. E. Jesse, W. Seaver, and D. C. Wallace, “Maternal psychosocial risks predict preterm birth in a group of women from Appalachia,” Midwifery, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 191–202, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. J. Dayan, C. Creveuil, M. Herlicoviez et al., “Role of anxiety and depression in the onset of spontaneous preterm labor,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 155, no. 4, pp. 293–301, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. S. T. Orr, S. A. James, and C. B. Prince, “Maternal prenatal depressive symptoms and spontaneous preterm births among African-American women in Baltimore, Maryland,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 156, no. 9, pp. 797–802, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. R. L. Goldenberg, S. P. Cliver, F. X. Mulvihill et al., “Medical, psychosocial, and behavioral risk factors do not explain the increased risk for low birth weight among black women,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 175, no. 5, pp. 1317–1324, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. L. Andersson, I. Sundström-Poromaa, M. Wulff, M. Åström, and M. Bixo, “Neonatal outcome following maternal antenatal depression and anxiety: a population-based study,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 159, no. 9, pp. 872–881, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. T. P. Dominguez, C. D. Schetter, R. Mancuso, C. M. Rini, and C. Hobel, “Stress in African American pregnancies: testing the roles of various stress concepts in prediction of birth outcomes,” Annals of Behavioral Medicine, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 12–21, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. L. C. Messer, N. Dole, J. S. Kaufman, and D. A. Savitz, “Pregnancy intendedness, maternal psychosocial factors and preterm birth,” Maternal and Child Health Journal, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 403–412, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. E. W. Harville, E. P. Gunderson, K. A. Matthews, C. E. Lewis, and M. Carnethon, “Pre-pregnancy stress reactivity and pregnancy outcome,” Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 564–571, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. B. Vanaelst, T. De Vriendt, I. Huybrechts, S. Rinaldi, and S. De Henauw, “Epidemiological approaches to measure childhood stress,” Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 280–297, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. C. Benjet, G. Borges, and M. E. Medina-Mora, “Chronic childhood adversity and onset of psychopathology during three life stages: childhood, adolescence and adulthood,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 732–740, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. World Health Organization, “Adverse Childhood Experiences International Questionnaire (ACE-IQ),” http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/activities/adverse_childhood_experiences/en/.
  60. R. E. Behrman, A. S. Butler, and Institute of Medicine (U.S.) Committee on Understanding Premature Birth and Assuring Healthy Outcomes, Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and Prevention, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2006.
  61. R. L. Goldenberg, J. F. Culhane, J. D. Iams, and R. Romero, “Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth,” The Lancet, vol. 371, no. 9606, pp. 75–84, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. P. Blumenshine, S. Egerter, C. J. Barclay, C. Cubbin, and P. A. Braveman, “Socioeconomic disparities in adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review,” The American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 263–272, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. K. Laughon, P. Renker, N. Glass, and B. Parker, “Revision of the abuse assessment screen to address nonlethal strangulation,” Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 502–507, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. Y. Neggers, R. Goldenberg, S. Cliver, and J. Hauth, “Effects of domestic violence on preterm birth and low birth weight,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 455–460, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. P. S. Shah and J. Shah, “Maternal exposure to domestic violence and pregnancy and birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses,” Journal of Women's Health, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 2017–2031, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. M. Shannon, T. L. King, and H. P. Kennedy, “Allostasis: a theoretical framework for understanding and evaluating perinatal health outcomes,” Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 125–134, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. B. S. McEwen and J. C. Wingfield, “The concept of allostasis in biology and biomedicine,” Hormones and Behavior, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 2–15, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. B. L. Ganzel, P. A. Morris, and E. Wethington, “Allostasis and the human brain: integrating models of stress from the social and life sciences,” Psychological Review, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 134–174, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. A. Gonzalez, J. M. Jenkins, M. Steiner, and A. S. Fleming, “The relation between early life adversity, cortisol awakening response and diurnal salivary cortisol levels in postpartum women,” Psychoneuroendocrinology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 76–86, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. A. K. Pesonen, K. Räikkönen, K. Feldt et al., “Childhood separation experience predicts HPA axis hormonal responses in late adulthood: a natural experiment of World War II,” Psychoneuroendocrinology, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 758–767, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. M. L. Urquia, R. H. Glazier, B. Blondel et al., “International migration and adverse birth outcomes: role of ethnicity, region of origin and destination,” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 243–251, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. T. J. Marin, T. M. Martin, E. Blackwell, C. Stetler, and G. E. Miller, “Differentiating the impact of episodic and chronic stressors on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis regulation in young women,” Health Psychology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 447–455, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. T. W. McDade, S. T. Lindau, and K. Wroblewski, “Predictors of c-reactive protein in the national social life, health, and aging project,” Journals of Gerontology—Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 129–136, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. L. M. Banaem, B. Mohamadi, M. A. Jaafarabadi, and N. A. Moghadam, “Maternal serum C-reactive protein in early pregnancy and occurrence of preterm premature rupture of membranes and preterm birth,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 780–786, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. W. Pitiphat, M. W. Gillman, K. J. Joshipura, P. L. Williams, C. W. Douglass, and J. W. Rich-Edwards, “Plasma C-reactive protein in early pregnancy and preterm delivery,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 162, no. 11, pp. 1108–1113, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. G. B. Hvilsom, P. Thorsen, B. Jeune, and L. S. Bakketeig, “C-reactive protein: a serological marker for preterm delivery?” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 424–429, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. M. E. Coussons-Read, M. Lobel, J. C. Carey et al., “The occurrence of preterm delivery is linked to pregnancy-specific distress and elevated inflammatory markers across gestation,” Brain, Behavior, & Immunity, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 650–659, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. T. V. Johnson, A. Abbasi, and V. A. Master, “Systematic review of the evidence of a relationship between chronic psychosocial stress and C-reactive protein,” Molecular Diagnosis and Therapy, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 147–164, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. G. E. Miller and E. Chen, “Life stress and diminished expression of genes encoding glucocorticoid receptor and β2-adrenergic receptor in children with asthma,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 14, pp. 5496–5501, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. B. D. Pearce, J. Grove, E. A. Bonney et al., “Interrelationship of cytokines, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis hormones, and psychosocial variables in the prediction of preterm birth,” Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 40–46, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. W. T. Boyce, M. Chesney, A. Alkon et al., “Psychobiologic reactivity to stress and childhood respiratory illnesses: results of two prospective studies,” Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 411–426, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. S. Cohen and S. B. Manuck, “Stress, reactivity, and disease,” Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 423–426, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. W. R. Lovallo and W. Gerin, “Psychophysiological reactivity: mechanisms and pathways to cardiovascular disease,” Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 36–45, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. J. A. McCubbin, E. J. Lawson, S. Cox, J. J. Sherman, J. A. Norton, and J. A. Read, “Prenatal maternal blood pressure response to stress predicts birth weight and gestational age: a preliminary study,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 175, no. 3, pp. 706–712, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. R. G. P. de León, L. G. P. de León, A. Coviello, and E. de Vito, “Vascular maternal reactivity and neonatal size in normal pregnancy,” Hypertension in Pregnancy, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 243–256, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. M. Hatch, G. Berkowitz, T. Janevic et al., “Race, cardiovascular reactivity, and preterm delivery among active-duty military women,” Epidemiology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 178–182, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. C. J. Hogue, R. Menon, A. L. Dunlop, and M. R. Kramer, “Racial disparities in preterm birth rates and short inter-pregnancy interval: an overview,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 90, no. 12, pp. 1317–1324, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. R. Menon, M. R. Torloni, C. Voltolini et al., “Biomarkers of spontaneous preterm birth: an overview of the literature in the last four decades,” Reproductive Sciences, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1046–1070, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. R. L. Chan, “Biochemical markers of spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic women,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 164081, 8 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. B. R. Howell and M. M. Sanchez, “Understanding behavioral effects of early life stress using the reactive scope and allostatic load models,” Development & Psychopathology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1001–1016, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. A. C. Huizink, P. G. Robles de Medina, E. J. H. Mulder, G. H. A. Visser, and J. K. Buitelaar, “Stress during pregnancy is associated with developmental outcome in infancy,” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 810–818, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. T. E. Seeman, B. H. Singer, J. W. Rowe, R. I. Horwitz, and B. S. McEwen, “Price of adaptation—allostatic load and its health consequences: MacArthur studies of successful aging,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 157, no. 19, pp. 2259–2268, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. T. E. Seeman, B. S. McEwen, J. W. Rowe, and B. H. Singer, “Allostatic load as a marker of cumulative biological risk: MacArthur studies of successful aging,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 8, pp. 4770–4775, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. R.-P. Juster, B. S. McEwen, and S. J. Lupien, “Allostatic load biomarkers of chronic stress and impact on health and cognition,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 2–16, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. T. M. Beckie, “A systematic review of allostatic load, health, and health disparities,” Biological Research for Nursing, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 311–346, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. M. S. Clark, M. J. Bond, and J. R. Hecker, “Environmental stress, psychological stress and allostatic load,” Psychology, Health and Medicine, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 18–30, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. M. E. Wallace and E. W. Harville, “Allostatic load and birth outcomes among white and black women in New Orleans,” Maternal & Child Health Journal, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1025–1029, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. K. K. Nielsen, M. de Courten, and A. Kapur, “Health system and societal barriers for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) services—lessons from World Diabetes Foundation supported GDM projects,” BMC International Health and Human Rights, vol. 12, article 33, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. S. Kayemba-Kay's, C. Peters, M. P. P. Geary, N. R. Hill, D. R. Mathews, and P. C. Hindmarsh, “Maternal hyperinsulinism and glycaemic status in the first trimester of pregnancy are associated with the development of pregnancy-induced hypertension and gestational diabetes,” European Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 168, no. 3, pp. 413–418, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. K. O. Osungbade and O. K. Ige, “Public health perspectives of preeclampsia in developing countries: implication for health system strengthening,” Journal of Pregnancy, vol. 2011, Article ID 481095, 6 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. World Health Organization, Coverage of Maternity Care: A Listing of Available Information, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2004.
  102. K. J. Hunt and K. L. Schuller, “The increasing prevalence of diabetes in pregnancy,” Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 173–199, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. M. Azevedo and S. Alla, “Diabetes in sub-Saharan Africa: Kenya, Mali, Mozambique, Nigeria, South Africa and Zambia,” International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 101–108, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. M. L. Power and J. Schulkin, “Maternal obesity, metabolic disease, and allostatic load,” Physiology & Behavior, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 22–28, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. V. J. Hux and J. M. Roberts, “A potential role for allostatic load in preeclampsia,” Maternal & Child Health Journal, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 591–597, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. C. Qiu, M. A. Williams, R. Calderon-Margalit, S. M. Cripe, and T. K. Sorensen, “Preeclampsia risk in relation to maternal mood and anxiety disorders diagnosed before or during early pregnancy,” The American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 397–402, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. M. E. Inkster, T. P. Fahey, P. T. Donnan, G. P. Leese, G. J. Mires, and D. J. Murphy, “Poor glycated haemoglobin control and adverse pregnancy outcomes in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review of observational studies,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 6, article 30, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. J.-M. Moutquin, “Classification and heterogeneity of preterm birth,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 110, supplement 20, pp. 30–33, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. M. A. Klebanoff, “Conceptualizing categories of preterm birth,” Prenatal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 13–15, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. K. E. Pickett, B. Abrams, and S. Selvin, “Defining preterm delivery—the epidemiology of clinical presentation,” Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 305–308, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. L. M. Glynn, C. D. Schetter, C. J. Hobel, and C. A. Sandman, “Pattern of perceived stress and anxiety in pregnancy predicts preterm birth,” Health Psychology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 43–51, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. C. Buss, E. P. Davis, C. J. Hobel, and C. A. Sandman, “Maternal pregnancy-specific anxiety is associated with child executive function at 6–9 years age,” Stress, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 665–676, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. T. Emet, I. Üstüner, S. G. Güven et al., “Plasma lipids and lipoproteins during pregnancy and related pregnancy outcomes,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 288, no. 1, pp. 49–55, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. J. M. Catov, L. M. Bodnar, K. E. Kip et al., “Early pregnancy lipid concentrations and spontaneous preterm birth,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 197, no. 6, pp. 610.e1–610.e7, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. C. D. Placek and E. H. Hagen, “A test of three hypotheses of pica and amylophagy among pregnant women in Tamil Nadu, India,” American Journal of Human Biology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 803–813, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. C. H. Edwards, A. A. Johnson, E. M. Knight et al., “Pica in an urban environment,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 124, no. 6, pp. 954S–962S, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. S. L. Young, “Pica in pregnancy: new ideas about an old condition,” Annual Review of Nutrition, vol. 30, pp. 403–422, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. E. C. Nyanza, M. Joseph, S. S. Premji, D. S. K. Thomas, and C. Mannion, “Geophagy practices and the content of chemical elements in the soil eaten by pregnant women in artisanal and small scale gold mining communities in Tanzania,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 14, no. 1, article 144, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. A. I. Luoba, P. W. Geissler, B. Estambale et al., “Geophagy among pregnant and lactating women in Bondo District, western Kenya,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 98, no. 12, pp. 734–741, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. C. N. Nyaruhucha, “Food cravings, aversions and pica among pregnant women in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania,” Tanzania Journal of Health Research, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 29–34, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. K. Kawai, E. Saathoff, G. Antelman, G. Msamanga, and W. W. Fawzi, “Geophagy (soil-eating) in relation to anemia and helminth infection among HIV-infected pregnant women in Tanzania,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 36–43, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. L. B. López, S. H. Langini, and M. L. Pita de Portela, “Maternal iron status and neonatal outcomes in women with pica during pregnancy,” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 151–152, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. A. J. Rainville, “Pica practices of pregnant women are associated with lower maternal hemoglobin level at delivery,” Journal of the American Dietetic Association, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 293–296, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. S. Thihalolipavan, B. M. Candalla, and J. Ehrlich, “Examining pica in NYC pregnant women with elevated blood lead levels,” Maternal & Child Health Journal, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 49–55, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. T. Q. Lo, J. E. Oeltmann, F. O. Odhiambo et al., “Alcohol use, drunkenness and tobacco smoking in rural western Kenya,” Tropical Medicine and International Health, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 506–515, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. J. Birech, J. Kabiru, J. Misaro, and D. Kariuki, “Alcohol abuse and the family: a case study of the Nandi community of Kenya,” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, vol. 3, pp. 137–144, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  127. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) and ICF Macro, Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 2008-09, KNBS and ICF Macro, Calverton, Md, USA, 2010.
  128. Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), Ministry of Health (MOH), and ORC Macro, Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 2003, CBS, MOH, and ORC Macro, Calverton, Md, USA, 2004.
  129. S. Premji, K. Benzies, K. Serrett, and K. A. Hayden, “Research-based interventions for children and youth with a fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: revealing the gap,” Child: Care, Health and Development, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 389–397, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. V. M. Srikartika and C. M. O'Leary, “Pregnancy outcomes of mothers with an alcohol-related diagnosis: a population-based cohort study for the period 1983–2007,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 122, no. 6, pp. 795–804, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. Y. Miyake, K. Tanaka, H. Okubo, S. Sasaki, and M. Arakawa, “Alcohol consumption during pregnancy and birth outcomes: the Kyushu Okinawa Maternal and Child Health Study,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 14, article 79, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  132. J. Patra, R. Bakker, H. Irving, V. W. V. Jaddoe, S. Malini, and J. Rehm, “Dose-response relationship between alcohol consumption before and during pregnancy and the risks of low birthweight, preterm birth and small for gestational age (SGA)—a systematic review and meta-analyses,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 118, no. 12, pp. 1411–1421, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. S. Dean, I. Rudan, F. Althabe et al., “Setting research priorities for preconception care in low- and middle-income countries: aiming to reduce maternal and child mortality and morbidity,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 10, no. 9, Article ID e1001508, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. J. Villar, H. Ba'aqeel, G. Piaggio et al., “WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care,” The Lancet, vol. 357, no. 9268, pp. 1551–1564, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. Unicef, The State of the World's Children 2012, United Nations Children's Fund, New York, NY, USA, 2012.
  136. World Health Organization and Ministry of Health Pakistan, WHO-AIMS Report on Mental Health System in Pakistan, World Health Organization, Ministry of Health Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan, 2009.
  137. L. J. Miller, “Ethical issues in perinatal mental health,” Psychiatric Clinics of North America, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 259–270, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  138. M.-P. Austin, J. Colton, S. Priest, N. Reilly, and D. Hadzi-Pavlovic, “The antenatal risk questionnaire (ANRQ): acceptability and use for psychosocial risk assessment in the maternity setting,” Women and Birth, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 17–25, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  139. C. R. Horowitz, M. Robinson, and S. Seifer, “Community-based participatory research from the margin to the mainstream: are researchers prepared?” Circulation, vol. 119, no. 19, pp. 2633–2642, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  140. L. Anderko, “Achieving health equity on a global scale through a community-based, public health framework for action,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 486–489, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. B. S. McEwen, “Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators: central role of the brain,” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 367–381, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  142. M. M. Black, A. H. Baqui, K. Zaman, S. El Arifeen, and R. E. Black, “Maternal depressive symptoms and infant growth in rural Bangladesh,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 951S–957S, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  143. A. Rahman, V. Patel, J. Maselko, and B. Kirkwood, “The neglected ‘m’ in MCH programmes—why mental health of mothers is important for child nutrition,” Tropical Medicine & International Health, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 579–583, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  144. S. L. Grace, A. Evindar, and D. E. Stewart, “The effect of postpartum depression on child cognitive development and behavior: a review and critical analysis of the literature,” Archives of Women's Mental Health, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 263–274, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  145. S. Saigal, “Behavioral and emotional functioning in preterm infants,” Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  146. S. Pawlby, D. Sharp, D. Hay, and V. O'Keane, “Postnatal depression and child outcome at 11 years: the importance of accurate diagnosis,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 107, no. 1–3, pp. 241–245, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus