Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015, Article ID 450468, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/450468
Research Article

Inhibition of Adhesion, Proliferation, and Invasion of Primary Endometriosis and Endometrial Stromal and Ovarian Carcinoma Cells by a Nonhyaluronan Adhesion Barrier Gel

University Clinic Erlangen, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Endometriosis Centre Franconia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany

Received 7 October 2014; Revised 23 January 2015; Accepted 28 January 2015

Academic Editor: Kotaro Kitaya

Copyright © 2015 Stefan P. Renner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Larosa, F. Facchini, G. Pozzoli, M. Leone, M. Grande, and B. Monica, “Endometriosis: aetiopathogenetic basis,” Urologia, vol. 77, supplement 17, pp. 1–11, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Burghaus, P. Klingsiek, P. A. Fasching et al., “Risk factors for endometriosis in a German case-control study,” Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, vol. 71, no. 12, pp. 1073–1079, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  3. S. P. Renner, R. Strick, P. Oppelt et al., “Evaluation of clinical parameters and estrogen receptor alpha gene polymorphisms for patients with endometriosis,” Reproduction, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 153–161, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. L. Olive and L. B. Schwartz, “Endometriosis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 328, no. 24, pp. 1759–1769, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Falcone and D. I. Lebovic, “Clinical management of endometriosis,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 691–705, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. P. Renner, S. Rix, A. Boosz et al., “Preoperative pain and recurrence risk in patients with peritoneal endometriosis,” Gynecological Endocrinology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 230–235, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. E. Taylor and C. Williams, “Surgical treatment of endometriosis: location and patterns of disease at reoperation,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 57–61, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. R. Koninckx, A. Ussia, L. Adamyan, A. Wattiez, and J. Donnez, “Deep endometriosis: definition, diagnosis, and treatment,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 564–571, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. P. Diamond and M. L. Freeman, “Clinical implications of postsurgical adhesions,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 567–576, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. Liakakos, N. Thomakos, P. M. Fine, C. Dervenis, and R. L. Young, “Peritoneal adhesions: Etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical significance - Recent advances in prevention and management,” Digestive Surgery, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 260–273, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. W. W. Vrijland, J. Jeekel, H. J. van Geldorp, D. J. Swank, and H. J. Bonjer, “Abdominal adhesions: intestinal obstruction, pain, and infertility,” Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1017–1022, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. Young, A. Johns, C. Templeman et al., “Reduction of postoperative adhesions after laparoscopic gynecological surgery with Oxiplex/AP Gel: a pilot study,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 1450–1456, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. Lundorff, J. Donnez, M. Korell, A. J. M. Audebert, K. Block, and G. S. diZerega, “Clinical evaluation of a viscoelastic gel for reduction of adhesions following gynaecological surgery by laparoscopy in Europe,” Human Reproduction, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 514–520, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Robertson, G. Lefebvre, N. Leyland et al., “Adhesion prevention in gynaecological surgery,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 598–608, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  15. R. E. Bristow and F. J. Montz, “Prevention of adhesion formation after radical oophorectomy using a sodium hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose (HA-CMC) barrier,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 301–308, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. Ahmad, J. M. Duffy, C. Farquhar et al., “Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 2, Article ID CD000475, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Pellicano, M. Guida, S. Bramante et al., “Reproductive outcome after autocrosslinked hyaluronic acid gel application in infertile patients who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 498–500, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. B. Johns, G. M. Keyport, F. Hoehler, and G. S. DiZerega, “Reduction of postsurgical adhesions with intergel adhesion prevention solution: a multicenter study of safety and efficacy after conservative gynecologic surgery,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 595–604, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. “The cervical cap,” The Medical Letter on Drugs and Therapeutics, vol. 30, no. 776, pp. 93–94, 1988.
  20. M. W. Laschke, J. Rudzitis-Auth, and M. D. Menger, “Regional treatment with liquid barrier agents: a novel therapeutic option for intraperitoneal endometriosis?” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 709–710, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. M. Kyama, A. Mihalyi, P. Simsa et al., “Role of cytokines in the endometrial-peritoneal cross-talk and development of endometriosis,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 444–454, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. B. P. Toole, T. N. Wight, and M. I. Tammi, “Hyaluronan-cell interactions in cancer and vascular disease,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 7, pp. 4593–4596, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Götte and G. W. Yip, “Heparanase, hyaluronan, and CD44 in cancers: a breast carcinoma perspective,” Cancer Research, vol. 66, no. 21, pp. 10233–10237, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. B. Tan, J. H. Wang, Q. D. Wu, W. O. Kirwan, and H. P. Redmond, “Sodium hyaluronate enhances colorectal tumour cell metastatic potential in vitro and in vivo,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 246–250, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Pucciarelli, L. Codello, A. Rosato, P. del Bianco, G. Vecchiato, and M. Lise, “Effect of antiadhesive agents on peritoneal carcinomatosis in an experimental model,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 66–71, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. Haverlag, M. E. E. van Rossen, M. P. van den Tol, F. Bonthuis, R. L. Marquet, and J. Jeekel, “Hyaluronate-based coating solution for prevention of surgical adhesions has no major effect on adhesion and growth of intraperitoneal tumour cells,” European Journal of Surgery, vol. 165, no. 8, pp. 791–795, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. P. M. Carpenter and A. V. Dao, “The role of hyaluronan in mesothelium-induced motility of ovarian carcinoma cells,” Anticancer Research, vol. 23, no. 5A, pp. 3985–3990, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. Tan, P. Argenta, R. Ramirez, R. Bliss, and M. Geller, “The use of sodium hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose (HA-CMC) barrier in gynecologic malignancies: a retrospective review of outcomes,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 499–505, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C. H. E. Weimar, N. S. Macklon, E. D. Post Uiterweer, J. J. Brosens, and B. Gellersen, “The motile and invasive capacity of human endometrial stromal cells: implications for normal and impaired reproductive function,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 19, no. 5, Article ID dmt025, pp. 542–557, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. A. Sampson, “Metastatic or embolic endometriosis, due to the menstrual dissemination of endometrial tissue into the venous circulation,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 93–110, 143, 1927. View at Google Scholar
  31. C. B. Gilks, “Molecular abnormalities in ovarian cancer subtypes other than high-grade serous carcinoma,” Journal of Oncology, vol. 2010, Article ID 740968, 7 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. C. L. Pearce, C. Templeman, M. A. Rossing et al., “Association between endometriosis and risk of histological subtypes of ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of case-control studies,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 385–394, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. A. Zeitvogel, R. Baumann, and A. Starzinski-Powitz, “Identification of an invasive, N-cadherin-expressing epithelial cell type in endometriosis using a new cell culture model,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 159, no. 5, pp. 1839–1852, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. T. Ornek, A. Fadiel, O. Tan, F. Naftolin, and A. Arici, “Regulation and activation of ezrin protein in endometriosis,” Human Reproduction, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 2104–2112, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A.-P. Kao, K.-H. Wang, C.-C. Chang et al., “Comparative study of human eutopic and ectopic endometrial mesenchymal stem cells and the development of an in vivo endometriotic invasion model,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 1308–1315.e1, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. I. Yotova, P. Quan, A. Gaba et al., “Raf-1 levels determine the migration rate of primary endometrial stromal cells of patients with endometriosis,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 2127–2139, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. X. Santamaria, E. E. Massasa, and H. S. Taylor, “Migration of cells from experimental endometriosis to the uterine endometrium,” Endocrinology, vol. 153, no. 11, pp. 5566–5574, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. I. Wacker, M. Sachs, K. Knaup et al., “Key role for activin B in cellular transformation after loss of the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1707–1718, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. C. Parker, H. Ellis, B. J. Moran et al., “Postoperative adhesions: ten-year follow-up of 12,584 patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery,” Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 822–830, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. V. J. Young, J. K. Brown, P. T. K. Saunders, and A. W. Horne, “The role of the peritoneum in the pathogenesis of endometriosis,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 558–569, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. D. E. MacHado, P. T. Berardo, C. Y. Palmero, and L. E. Nasciutti, “Higher expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor VEGFR-2 (Flk-1) and metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in a rat model of peritoneal endometriosis is similar to cancer diseases,” Journal of Experimental and Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 29, no. 1, article 4, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. H. Malvezzi, V. G. Aguiar, C. C. P. de Paz, J. E. Tanus-Santos, I. A. D. A. Penna, and P. A. Navarro, “Increased circulating MMP-2 levels in infertile patients with moderate and severe pelvic endometriosis,” Reproductive Sciences, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 557–562, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. F. Sohler, A. Sommer, D. L. Wachter et al., “Tissue remodeling and nonendometrium-like menstrual cycling are hallmarks of peritoneal endometriosis lesions,” Reproductive Sciences, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 85–102, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A. Calcagno, T. Grassi, L. Mariuzzi et al., “Expression patterns of Aurora A and B kinases, Ki-67 and the estrogen and progesterone receptors determined using an endometriosis tissue microarray model,” Human Reproduction, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 2731–2741, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. S. Scotti, P.-A. Regidor, A. E. Schindler, and E. Winterhager, “Reduced proliferation and cell adhesion in endometriosis,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 610–617, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. Wang and X. Ma, “Effects of estrogen and progestin on expression of MMP-2 and TIMP-2 in a nude mouse model of endometriosis,” Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 229–233, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. Y. C. Cheong, S. M. Laird, T. C. Li, J. B. Shelton, W. L. Ledger, and I. D. Cooke, “Peritoneal healing and adhesion formation/reformation,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 556–566, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. A. F. Haney, “Identification of macrophages at the site of peritoneal injury: evidence supporting a direct role for peritoneal macrophages in healing injured peritoneum,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 988–995, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. F. Bittinger, C. Schepp, C. Brochhausen et al., “Remodeling of peritoneal-like structures by mesothelial cells: its role in peritoneal healing,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 28–33, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. S. Yung and M. Davies, “Response of the human peritoneal mesothelial cell to injury: an in vitro model of peritoneal wound healing,” Kidney International, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 2160–2169, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. I. Oikonomakis, S. D. Wexner, P. Gervaz, S.-Y. You, M. Secic, and P. Giamundo, “Seprafilm: a retrospective preliminary evaluation of the impact on short-term oncologic outcome in colorectal cancer,” Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 1376–1380, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. P. A. de laco, M. Stefanetti, D. Pressato et al., “A novel hyaluronan-based gel in laparoscopic adhesion prevention: preclinical evaluation in an animal model,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 318–323, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. V. Mais, G. L. Bracco, P. Litta, T. Gargiulo, and G. B. Melis, “Reduction of postoperative adhesions with an auto-crosslinked hyaluronan gel in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery: a blinded, controlled, randomized, multicentre study,” Human Reproduction, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1248–1254, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. C. Belluco, F. Meggiolaro, D. Pressato et al., “Prevention of postsurgical adhesions with an autocrosslinked hyaluronan derivative gel,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 217–221, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. M. Wallwiener, S. Brucker, H. Hierlemann, C. Brochhausen, E. Solomayer, and C. Wallwiener, “Innovative barriers for peritoneal adhesion prevention: liquid or solid? A rat uterine horn model,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 86, no. 4, supplement, pp. 1266–1276, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. T. K. Rajab, M. Wallwiener, C. Planck, C. Brochhausen, B. Kraemer, and C. W. Wallwiener, “A direct comparison of seprafilm, adept, intercoat, and spraygel for adhesion prophylaxis,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 161, no. 2, pp. 246–249, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. R. Schonman, R. Corona, A. Bastidas, C. de Cicco, K. Mailova, and P. R. Koninckx, “Intercoat gel (oxiplex): efficacy, safety, and tissue response in a laparoscopic mouse model,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 188–194, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. A. Di Spiezio Sardo, M. Spinelli, S. Bramante et al., “Efficacy of a polyethylene oxide-sodium carboxymethylcellulose gel in prevention of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic surgery,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 462–469, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. N. Fuchs, N. Smorgick, I. Ben Ami et al., “Intercoat (Oxiplex/AP gel) for preventing intrauterine adhesions after operative hysteroscopy for suspected retained products of conception: double-blind, prospective, randomized pilot study,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 126–130, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus