Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015, Article ID 465465, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/465465
Clinical Study

Comparison of Propofol, Propofol-Remifentanil, and Propofol-Fentanyl Administrations with Each Other Used for the Sedation of Patients to Undergo ERCP

1Anesthesia Clinic, Türkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital, Kızılay S. No. 4, Sıhhıye, Altındağ, 06810 Ankara, Turkey
2Anesthesia Clinic, Caycuma State Hospital, Zonguldak, Turkey
3Gastroenterology Clinic, Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya, Turkey
4Gastroenterology Clinic, Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Received 17 April 2015; Revised 22 July 2015; Accepted 28 July 2015

Academic Editor: Michel Kahaleh

Copyright © 2015 Candan Haytural et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. M. Thompson, D. J. Wright, W. Murray, G. L. Ritchie, H. D. Burton, and P. A. Stonebridge, “Analysis of 153 deaths after upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: room for improvement?” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 22–25, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Michalodimitrakis, P. Christodoulou, A. M. Tsatsakis, I. Askoxilakis, I. Stiakakis, and I. Mouzas, “Death related to midazolam overdose during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography,” American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 93–97, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. İ. E. Ince, L. Iyilikci, Ş. Yilmaz, D. Günes, M. Akkus, and D. Isguven, “Sedation for short hemato-oncologic invasive procedures in children: comparison of propofol-remifentanil and propofol-fentanyl,” Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 112–117, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. J. Kramer, S. Ganzberg, S. Prior, and R. G. Rashid, “Comparison of propofol-remifentanil versus propofol-ketamine deep sedation for third molar surgery,” Anesthesia Progress, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 107–117, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. H. Lee, C. K. Lee, S.-H. Park et al., “Balanced propofol sedation versus propofol monosedation in therapeutic pancreaticobiliary endoscopic procedures,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 2113–2121, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Turan, K. Karadayı, M. Duman et al., “Endoskopik retrograd kolanjiopankreatografi (ERKP) deneyimimiz,” Çukurova Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 171–176, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  7. A. W. Murray, C. G. Morran, G. N. C. Kenny, and J. R. Anderson, “Arterial oxygen saturation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: the effects of a midazolam/pethidine combination,” Gut, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 270–273, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. Yüceyar, Peridural anestezi sırasında propofol sedasyonun solunum ve dolaşım sistemine etkileri [Uzmanlık tezi], İstanbul Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkey, 1994.
  9. S. Karaman, T. Akarsu, and V. Fırat, “Epidural anestezide bilinçli sedasyon; remifentanyl ve propofol karşılaştırması,” Türk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Derneği Dergisi, vol. 33, pp. 313–320, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  10. B. Fredman, M. H. Nathanson, I. Smith, J. Wang, K. Klein, and P. White, “Sevoflurane for outpatient anaesthesia: a comparison with propofol,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 82, pp. 355–359, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  11. P. E. Marik, “Propofol: therapeutic indications and side-effects,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 10, no. 29, pp. 3639–3649, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. Iyilikçi, B. Balkan, E. Gökel et al., “The effects of alfentanil or remifentanil pretreatment on propofol injection pain,” Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 499–502, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  13. M. Agostoni, L. Fanti, P. G. Arcidiacono et al., “Midazolam and pethidine versus propofol and fentanyl patient controlled sedation/analgesia for upper gastrointestinal tract ultrasound endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial,” Digestive and Liver Disease, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 1024–1029, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Amornyotin, W. Chalayonnavin, and S. Kongphlay, “Propofol-based sedation does not increase rate of complication during percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy procedure,” Gastroenterology Research and Practice, vol. 2011, Article ID 134819, 6 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. J. Gillham, R. C. Hutchinson, R. Carter, and G. N. C. Kenny, “Patient-maintained sedation for ERCP with a target-controlled infusion of propofol: a pilot study,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 14–17, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Mazanikov, M. Udd, L. Kylänpää et al., “Patient-controlled sedation for ERCP: a randomized double-blind comparison of alfentanil and remifentanil,” Endoscopy, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 487–492, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. Gazdag, N. Kocsis, J. Tolna, and Z. Iványi, “Etomidate versus propofol for electroconvulsive therapy in patients with schizophrenia,” Journal of ECT, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 225–229, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Falk and P. J. Zed, “Etomidate for procedural sedation in the emergency department,” Annals of Pharmacotherapy, vol. 38, no. 7-8, pp. 1272–1277, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus