Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015, Article ID 519830, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/519830
Review Article

Alpha-Linolenic Acid: An Omega-3 Fatty Acid with Neuroprotective Properties—Ready for Use in the Stroke Clinic?

1Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis, 660 route des Lucioles, Valbonne, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France
2CNRS, IPMC, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France
3Inova Neuroscience Institute, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA 22042, USA
4Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
5Obesity Research Center, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11461, Saudi Arabia
6Mercy Health Hauenstein Neurosciences & Department of Translational Science and Molecular Medicine, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
7Department of Neurology and Program in Neuroscience, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA

Received 16 April 2014; Accepted 8 September 2014

Academic Editor: Juliana Maria Leite Nobrega de Moura Bell

Copyright © 2015 Nicolas Blondeau et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) is plant-based essential omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids that must be obtained through the diet. This could explain in part why the severe deficiency in omega-3 intake pointed by numerous epidemiologic studies may increase the brain’s vulnerability representing an important risk factor in the development and/or deterioration of certain cardio- and neuropathologies. The roles of ALA in neurological disorders remain unclear, especially in stroke that is a leading cause of death. We and others have identified ALA as a potential nutraceutical to protect the brain from stroke, characterized by its pleiotropic effects in neuroprotection, vasodilation of brain arteries, and neuroplasticity. This review highlights how chronic administration of ALA protects against rodent models of hypoxic-ischemic injury and exerts an anti-depressant-like activity, effects that likely involve multiple mechanisms in brain, and may be applied in stroke prevention. One major effect may be through an increase in mature brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a widely expressed protein in brain that plays critical roles in neuronal maintenance, and learning and memory. Understanding the precise roles of ALA in neurological disorders will provide the underpinnings for the development of new therapies for patients and families who could be devastated by these disorders.

1. Introduction

Dietary approaches for stroke prevention and rehabilitation hold promise to improve outcomes in individuals at risk of stroke and those who have had a stroke [14]. Although there is abundant literature that connects reduction in stroke risk to certain dietary elements and increase in stroke risk to other certain dietary components, there is a paucity of clinical trial data to direct the public and clinicians in this important area of clinical need. Compounds with pleiotropic effects aimed at reducing infarct size by one or more mechanisms and improving outcome would be advantageous in reducing the devastating effects of stroke on patients and their families [13]. One compound that has been demonstrated to exert neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory, and antidepressant properties is α-linolenic acid (ALA), an 18-carbon, essential omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) (Figure 1). In this review we discuss beneficial effects of α-linolenic acid and clinically relevant data to suggest that further exploration of this dietary component might be useful in stroke prevention and recovery.

Figure 1: Structure of α-linolenic acid. α-Linolenic acid is an 18-carbon, polyunsaturated fatty acid that is essential for normal health. Because humans do not possess the enzymes to synthesize the compound, it must be obtained from dietary sources.

Omega-3 fatty acids are required for normal health, especially for the brain development and function [16]. Prior work has shown that a seafood-rich diet was associated with low rates of coronary heart disease and autoimmune disorders in Greenland Eskimos which has been generally ascribed to the intake of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid [DHA] [4]. A change in diet over the last century toward a higher total fat and saturated fat content and a sedentary lifestyle has been associated with an increase in the incidence of chronic disorders such as hypertension, diabetes, and atherosclerosis [1720], all of which are stroke risk factors or risk markers. In addition, omega-6 fatty acids are consumed at a higher level compared with omega-3 fatty acids in a standard western diet and they have been implicated in coronary atherogenesis [21]. The distinction between the two types of PUFAs is underscored by the fact that a higher ratio of omega-6 fatty acids (linoleic acid) to omega-3 fatty acids (alpha-linolenic acid) increases platelet aggregation [22], is prothrombotic, and increases vasoconstriction [14, 20, 23]. These effects are presumably due, at least in part, to being integral components of the cell membrane [1, 24]. A large body of evidence from experimental, clinical, and epidemiologic research reports a cardioprotective role of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids EPA and DHA derived primarily from fatty fish. While prospective observational cohort investigations indicated that consumption of fatty fish twice or more a week significantly lowers risk of cardiovascular death [25], the findings from randomized clinical trials examining the effects of fish oil supplementation on cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality in secondary prevention settings were inconsistent. Fourteen randomized clinical trials were evaluated by both Messori et al. [26] and Kwak et al. [27]. These two groups adopted different statistical methods, but neither found a benefit associated with omega-3 fatty acid supplements versus placebo [26, 27]. Importantly, however, the 14 randomized clinical trials so far reported have been small and short-term studies that were not specifically designed to evaluate CVD end points and, of note, the 2 large open-label trials that report a benefit with omega-3 supplementation [28, 29] were excluded from their analysis. While awaiting more definitive results that include a standardized dose and a formulation maximizing bioavailability, the American Heart Association has released dietary guidelines that recommend intake of fatty fish twice a week, underscoring the view that a cardioprotective diet needs to be rich in omega-3 fatty acids [3032]. There is extensive literature on the effects of EPA and DHA in cardiovascular disease compared to α-linolenic acid, the precursor of EPA and DHA (see [1, 24] and the references therein).

2. Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) and α-Linolenic Acid

In the absence of definitive evidence, several sources imply, rather than directly state, that the high ratio of omega-6/omega-3 that constitutes the typical western diet may promote the pathogenesis of many diseases, including cardiovascular disease, cancer, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. It is therefore a widely held belief that restoring the balance omega-6/omega-3 to a ratio of 5 : 1 is important, but this “ratio theory” remains controversial. Indeed, a high omega-6 intake may not be characteristic of many western countries and a focus on the omega-6/omega-3 ratio risk diverts attention away from simply increasing the absolute intake of omega-3 fatty acids, which alone has been shown to have beneficial effects, especially on cardiovascular health [33]. Interestingly, only the daily intake of EPA and DHA was promoted while the absolute and relative change of omega-6/omega-3 in the food between the late paleolithic period and the current US western diet seems mainly mediated by the pronounced change in the linolenic acid (LA): α-linolenic acid (ALA) ratio of the diet [34]. This points out that the importance of ALA as a particularly bioactive component from vegetables food source has been underestimated, especially because humans, like all mammals, cannot synthesize α-linolenic acid (e.g., we do not possess the enzymes for de novo synthesis. ALA must therefore be obtained from the diet and excellent sources of ALA include rapeseed and walnuts [35, 36]. In fact, interest in omega-3 in CVD has mainly focused on EPA and DHA rather than ALA because ALA bioconversion to EPA and DHA is minimal and therefore a diet rich in ALA might not fulfill DHA requirements (for review, [37, 38]). Since a wide variety of protective mechanisms were ascribed directly to DHA (for review, [39, 40]), diet supplementation with high levels of ALA has been seen of little interest as compared to supplementation with preformed EPA or DHA. This might have been an unfortunate outcome in view of the growing evidence that dietary ALA may also protect against CVD.

First, ALA-enriched diets have been shown in some animal studies to influence the concentration of lipoprotein in plasma. This ability to decrease low density lipoprotein (LDL) may be of importance as increased levels of LDL in plasma are strikingly correlated with the risk of developing atherosclerosis and CHD. Unfortunately, this plasmatic LDL reduction has not been found in studies in humans, although consumption of ALA-enriched sources affected LDL content in ALA, EPA, and DHA that were increased [4143]. Second, consumption of ALA-enriched sources and of fish oils rich in EPA/DHA has similar antiarrhythmic properties [44, 45], which are known to reduce the human risk of myocardial infarction and fatal ischemic heart disease. Nevertheless, the conclusion of prospective cohort studies that dietary ALA is beneficial against CVD [4648] has been recently challenged by a meta-analysis concluding that increasing ALA intake may only produce modest cardioprotection [49]. In addition to the modification of ionic channels currents induced by the incorporation of these polyunsaturated fatty acids into the cardiomyocytes membrane phospholipid bilayer, which could account for the antiarrhythmic effects, omega-3 PUFAs are paradoxical antioxidant and anti-inflammatory compounds and therefore could indirectly decrease oxidation and inflammation associated with CVD [5052]. A diet rich in ALA reduces proinflammatory cytokines which in turn is related to the omega-6/omega-3 ratio (i.e., a lower ratio reduces the proinflammatory mediators [7]; inflammation is considered to play an important role in atherosclerosis, a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and stroke [53]). In a recent study, de Goede and colleagues [54] have examined the 10-year incidence of CHD and stroke in relation to ALA intake in a Dutch population-based cohort of over 20,000 adults. While no association between ALA intake and incident coronary heart disease was observed, their study revealed that ALA intake lowered the risk of stroke. Compared to an Eskimo population where the omega-6/omega-3 ratio is 1, the ratio of a typical western diet is 10/1–25/1 [34]. Thus, increasing the intake of ALA may be beneficial in reducing stroke risk.

3. Stroke and α-Linolenic Acid

A typical western diet is severely deficient in omega-3 fatty acids and this may elevate the risk for stroke [1, 3, 24, 54]. During an ischemic stroke, glutamate excitotoxicity through overactivation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors is the major mechanism of neuronal cell death within the core and surrounding ischemic area called the penumbra. Neuronal necrosis driven by glutamate excitotoxicity occurs within minutes to hours following cerebral ischemia. This creates an extremely reduced time window of intervention for administration of therapeutics aimed at inhibiting glutamate-mediated cell death pathways [55]. This time constraint of acute neuroprotection will probably be difficult to achieve in clinical practice drawing attention to the importance of prevention. The common view of prevention of the risk factors is to reduce the occurrence of stroke. Nevertheless an emerging concept in the field is that nutritional factors may exert a protective role against stroke-induced damage, a field of study of potentially major relevance but still poorly addressed (see [1, 3]).

There is a great deal of evidence that ALA is a potent neuroprotective agent against focal and global ischemia in animal models [11, 5662]. This same mechanism appears to underlie clinical findings, where, in adult men, serum levels of ALA were independently associated with a 37% reduction in stroke risk [63]. Also, the higher the intake of α-linolenic acid, the lower the prevalence of a carotid plaque [64], and similar results were reported in mice [35]. ALA activates a neuronal background rectifying potassium channel [65] leading to membrane hyperpolarization which in turn increases the magnesium block of the calcium channel associated with NMDA receptors which play a predominant role in mediating glutamate-mediated excitotoxic neuronal cell death [58, 61]. In this rodent model of global ischemia where hippocampal pyramidal neuronal death is mainly driven by glutamate excitotoxicity, we found that ALA exerted a profound protective effect that was more pronounced and reproducible than with EPA and DHA [61]. Additional studies in rodents revealed an essential role for the transcription factor, nuclear factor kappaB, in the ability of ALA to protect neurons against ischemia [11] and to induce tolerance [57], a phenomenon where neurons become resistant to a stressful environment such as ischemia [66]. ALA was shown to increase levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a widely distributed protein that [59] in the brain carries out diverse functions, including neuronal maintenance, learning and memory, neuronal survival, and neurogenesis [6772]. Other proteins, such as HSP70, a heat shock protein [57, 60], which acts as a protein chaperone, also have roles in regulating programmed cell death (i.e., apoptosis) [73]. While some features are known, the precise mechanisms by which α-linolenic acid exerts its pleiotropic properties in brain are still not clear. Omega-3 fatty acids act via multiple mechanisms such as through the alteration of plasma membrane fluidity, lipid rafts, and signal transduction mechanisms in addition to effects on gene expression [74]. Delineating ALA-mediated mechanisms may increase the number of cellular and molecular targets that lead to enhanced therapeutic efficacy.

4. Stroke and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF)

Of the known gene targets of ALA, BDNF shows promise as a therapy for stroke. In many studies, BDNF has been shown to reduce infarct size and improve outcome (see [7577] and the references therein) whereas blocking endogenous BDNF worsens ischemia [78]. Administration of BDNF via the intravenous route as well as the intracerebroventricular route reduced infarct size and improved outcome in the transient middle cerebral artery occlusion model of stroke [79, 80]. However, in humans, anticipated pharmacokinetic challenges make it difficult to develop BDNF itself as a therapy to the clinic [81]. This problem, however, creates opportunities to discover compounds that increase endogenous expression of BDNF in brain. To this end, chronic ALA treatment increases BDNF mRNA and protein levels in the cortex and hippocampus (Figure 2), two brain regions that are susceptible to ischemia but are also involved in plasticity responses. ALA increases neurogenesis, synaptogenesis, and synaptic function in the rodent brain [82]. The ability to increase neurogenesis in the brain is critical because it has been shown that neural stem cells improve neurological function in stroke [8387]. Neural stem cells can modulate the ischemic environment via the upregulation of survival-promoting/neurotrophic factors such as BDNF and/or by restoring neurotransmitter function by integrating in existing networks and improving network circuitry. Taken together, these findings indicate that ALA induces tolerance and reduces infarct size in animal models of stroke. ALA was also demonstrated to exert antidepressant activity and increase BDNF mRNA and protein levels in the brain which in turn likely stimulates neurogenesis, synaptogenesis, and synaptic function. The benefit between the intake of ALA and the reduction in stroke risk in humans, the substantial evidence that ALA reduces infarct size, improves outcome and survival in animal models and the fact that ALA exhibits a wide safety margin provides a strong rationale for the systematic study of ALA administration in stroke.

Figure 2: Interplay between NMDA and TrkB receptors mediated by ALA-induced lipid rafts in neuronal plasma membranes. An increase in the nutraceutical ALA is hypothesized to markedly increase membrane fluidity leading to the efficient formation of lipid rafts [5] in neuronal plasma membranes. Lipid rafts are the functional domains of the plasma membrane and play a crucial role in the regulation of transmembrane signaling [6]. TrkB receptors and some NMDA receptors are constituents of lipid rafts [710] and one of the major nonprotein components of lipid rafts is cholesterol [6]. The enhanced formation and/or efficiency of transmembrane signaling is hypothesized to result in enhanced activation (phosphorylation) of NMDA and TrkB receptors via the binding of BDNF to its cognate receptor, TrkB. Activation of NMDA receptors results in enhanced calcium influx and activation of signal transduction pathways leading to activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) via the canonical pathway (phosphorylation of I-κB leads to its dissociation from the dimer (p65/p50) which then translocates to the nucleus where it binds to κB sites to regulate gene expression) which in turn increases BDNF mRNA and protein levels [1114]. Enhanced intracellular BDNF protein expression would lead to an increase in secretion, thereby maintaining its availability to bind to TrkB in an autocrine fashion [14, 15] as well as to stimulate neurogenesis, synaptogenesis, and synaptic function at distant sites (paracrine function).

5. Stroke, Depression, ALA, and BDNF

Poststroke depression is a common occurrence and can adversely affect outcome after stroke [88]. Stroke and depression are complex and multifaceted diseases but both disorders have common pathological substrates that could be targeted by therapeutic intervention. For example, there is growing evidence that neuroplasticity plays a crucial role in both pathologies. Consequently, compounds that increase neuroplasticity in the brain could ameliorate or prevent an infarct and reduce downstream consequences such as poststroke depression.

A longitudinal study of 50,000 women found that increased intake of ALA reduced depressive symptom [89]. Earlier studies showed similar results [9092]. In normal mice, ALA treatment (given intravenously or in the diet) exerted an antidepressant effect. This effect was associated with increased synaptogenesis and an increase in BDNF mRNA levels in brain (Figure 3; [82, 93]). Evidence has shown that antidepressant drugs enhance the activation of TrkB receptors, the high affinity receptor that binds BDNF [94] and is a key event in exerting antidepressant properties [82, 94, 95]; BDNF has been implicated in mediating the antidepressant effects in brain [96].

Figure 3: In vivo subchronic ALA treatment increases mature BDNF levels in neurons of the cortex and hippocampus, but not in striatum. BDNF increase in these specific brain regions is consistent with well-known properties for the efficiency of antidepressant drugs and with the level of brain protection offered by the subchronic ALA treatment. Mature BDNF expression was measured 10 days after the subchronic treatment by Western blots in cortex, hippocampus (), and striatum () of mice injected with ALA or vehicle. Subchronic treatment consisted of three i.v. injections of 500 nmol/kg of α-linolenic acid on days 1, 3, and 7.

6. Conclusion

In common with several others groups, we have demonstrated the broad neuroprotective and neuroplastic potential of omega-3 injection in animal models of neurodegenerative conditions, including acute neurological injuries such as stroke and spinal cord injury (for review, see [1, 3, 97]. In addition, intravenous perfusion of omega-3 fatty acid—in the form of 10% fish oil emulsion supplementing parenteral nutrition—has been shown to improve organ failure-related outcomes [98]. Although the impact of omega-3 fatty acid intravenous supplementation in human neurological conditions has not been addressed, it is tempting to speculate that this approach may offer significant benefit in human ischemic conditions. With regard to omega-3 consumption, a maximum dose of 3 g/day of long chain omega-3 fulfills the Generally Recognized as Safe status in the United States and the French recommendation not to exceed more than 15 times the Daily Recommended Intake [99]. Therefore, we believe that, in light of the currently available data, the conventional recommendations of omega-3 at a dose of 1 g/day of ALA, or 0.750–1 g/day of EPA + DHA, may offer therapeutic benefit in patients at risk of cardiovascular diseases. It is also noteworthy that these doses are without adverse effects. General consensus on the importance of eating for health may turn as a particular commitment for prevention, recovery, and rehabilitation from stroke. Healthy eating after stroke may be important for recovery though additional formal testing is needed, as it could be to improve outcome and reduce reoccurrence. Choosing healthy foods may be a challenge, underlying the importance of identifying natural products with health benefit, like ALA that is a nonproprietary, naturally occurring omega-3 fatty acid contained in foodstuffs. ALA has anti-inflammatory and other potential beneficial properties and, based on the weight of available data, may reduce stroke risk, size, and/or consequences. Sources of α-linolenic acid include but are not limited to flaxseed, rapeseed, and walnuts. ALA is well tolerated and can be supplemented into the diet in a variety of food sources including muffins. The potential benefits of ALA are supported by both animal studies and human observational epidemiologic studies. Early phase clinical trials evaluating α-linolenic acid are justified, and if these indicate benefit, larger scale studies of this agent in stroke prevention should follow.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency Grant nos. CBM.NEURO.01.10.US.012 and CBM.NEURO.01.10.US.019 and by CNRS and St Hubert and the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale Grant no. DRM20101220421 to Nicolas Blondeau. The authors thank Dr. Catherine Heurteaux for many helpful discussions and all their past and present team members and collaborators who have contributed to the data and discussion in the review.

References

  1. N. Blondeau and J. S. Tauskela, “A new future in brain preconditioning based on nutraceuticals: a focus on a-linolenic omega-3 fatty acid for stroke protection,” in Innate Tolerance in the CNS, J. M. Gidday, M. A. Perez-Pinzon, and J. H. Zhang, Eds., Springer Series in Translational Stroke Research, pp. 133–163, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. C. Nguemeni, B. Delplanque, C. Rovère et al., “Dietary supplementation of alpha-linolenic acid in an enriched rapeseed oil diet protects from stroke,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 226–233, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. Nguemeni, E. Gouix, M. Bourourou, C. Heurteaux, and N. Blondeau, “Alpha-linolenic acid: a promising nutraceutical for the prevention of stroke,” PharmaNutrition, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. P. Simopoulos, “The importance of the omega-6/omega-3 fatty acid ratio in cardiovascular disease and other chronic diseases,” Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 233, no. 6, pp. 674–688, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Basiouni, K. Stöckel, H. Fuhrmann, and J. Schumann, “Polyunsaturated fatty acid supplements modulate mast cell membrane microdomain composition,” Cellular Immunology, vol. 275, no. 1-2, pp. 42–46, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. K. Simons and D. Toomre, “Lipid rafts and signal transduction,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31–39, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. G. Zhao, T. D. Etherton, K. R. Martin, P. J. Gillies, S. G. West, and P. M. Kris-Etherton, “Dietary α-linolenic acid inhibits proinflammatory cytokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells in hypercholesterolemic subjects,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 385–391, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. Mutoh, T. Hamano, A. Tokuda, and M. Kuriyama, “Unglycosylated Trk protein does not co-localize nor associate with ganglioside GM1 in stable clone of PC12 cells overexpressing Trk (PCtrk cells),” Glycoconjugate Journal, vol. 17, no. 3-4, pp. 233–237, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. Golub, S. Wacha, and P. Caroni, “Spatial and temporal control of signaling through lipid rafts,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 542–550, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Besshoh, S. Chen, I. R. Brown, and J. W. Gurd, “Developmental changes in the association of NMDA receptors with lipid rafts,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 85, no. 9, pp. 1876–1883, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. N. Blondeau, C. Widmann, M. Lazdunski, and C. Heurteaux, “Activation of the nuclear factor-κB is a key event in brain tolerance,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 13, pp. 4668–4677, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. X. Jiang, F. Tian, Y. Du et al., “BHLHB2 controls Bdnf promoter 4 activity and neuronal excitability,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1118–1130, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. H. Lipsky, K. Xu, D. Zhu et al., “Nuclear factor κB is a critical determinant in N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-mediated neuroprotection,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 254–264, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. M. Marini, S. J. Rabin, R. H. Lipsky, and I. Mocchetti, “Activity-dependent release of brain-derived neurotrophic factor underlies the neuroprotective effect of N-methyl-D-aspartate,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 45, pp. 29394–29399, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. X. Jiang, F. Tian, K. Mearow, P. Okagaki, R. H. Lipsky, and A. M. Marini, “The excitoprotective effect of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors is mediated by a brain-derived neurotrophic factor autocrine loop in cultured hippocampal neurons,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 713–722, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. M. Bourre, O. Dumont, M. Piciotti et al., “Essentiality of omega 3 fatty acids for brain structure and function,” World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics, vol. 66, pp. 103–117, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Hedelin, E. T. Chang, F. Wiklund et al., “Association of frequent consumption of fatty fish with prostate cancer risk is modified by COX-2 polymorphism,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 398–405, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Hughes-Fulford, R. R. Tjandrawinata, C.-F. Li, and S. Sayyah, “Arachidonic acid, an omega-6 fatty acid, induces cytoplasmic phospholipase A2 in prostate carcinoma cells,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1520–1526, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Shannon, I. B. King, R. Moshofsky et al., “Erythrocyte fatty acids and breast cancer risk: a case-control study in Shanghai, China,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 1090–1097, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. P. Simopoulos, “Omega-3 fatty acids in health and disease and in growth and development,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 438–463, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Regnstrom, J. Nilsson, P. Tornvall, C. Landou, and A. Hamsten, “Susceptibility to low-density lipoprotein oxidation and coronary atherosclerosis in man,” The Lancet, vol. 339, no. 8803, pp. 1183–1186, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. Freese, M. Mutanen, L. M. Valsta, and I. Salminen, “Comparison of the effects of two diets rich in monounsaturated fatty acids differing in their linoleic/α-linolenic acid ratio on platelet aggregation,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 73–77, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. N. G. Bazan, “Omega-3 fatty acids, pro-inflammatory signaling and neuroprotection,” Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 136–141, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. N. D. Riediger, R. A. Othman, M. Suh, and M. H. Moghadasian, “A systemic review of the roles of n-3 fatty acids in health and disease,” Journal of the American Dietetic Association, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 668–679, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. He, Y. Song, M. L. Daviglus et al., “Accumulated evidence on fish consumption and coronary heart disease mortality: a meta-analysis of cohort studies,” Circulation, vol. 109, no. 22, pp. 2705–2711, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Messori, V. Fadda, D. Maratea, and S. Trippoli, “ω-3 fatty acid supplements for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: from “no proof of effectiveness” to ‘proof of no effectiveness’,” JAMA Internal Medicine, vol. 173, no. 15, pp. 1466–1468, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. S. M. Kwak, S.-K. Myung, Y. J. Lee, and H. G. Seo, “Efficacy of omega-3 fatty acid supplements (eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid) in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 172, no. 9, pp. 686–694, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. Marchioli, “Dietary supplementation with N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamin E after myocardial infarction: results of the GISSI-Prevenzione trial,” The Lancet, vol. 354, no. 9177, pp. 447–455, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. Yokoyama, H. Origasa, M. Matsuzaki et al., “Effects of eicosapentaenoic acid on major coronary events in hypercholesterolaemic patients (JELIS): a randomised open-label, blinded endpoint analysis,” The Lancet, vol. 369, no. 9567, pp. 1090–1098, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. R. M. Krauss, R. H. Eckel, B. Howard et al., “AHA Dietary Guidelines Revision 2000: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Nutrition Committee of the American Heart Association,” Circulation, vol. 102, no. 18, pp. 2284–2299, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. N. J. Stone, “Fish consumption, fish oil, lipids, and coronary heart disease,” Circulation, vol. 94, no. 9, pp. 2337–2340, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. P. M. Kris-Etherton, W. S. Harris, and L. J. Appel, “Fish consumption, fish oil, omega-3 fatty acids, and cardiovascular disease,” Circulation, vol. 106, no. 21, pp. 2747–2757, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. C. Stanley, R. L. Elsom, P. C. Calder et al., “UK Food Standards Agency Workshop Report: the effects of the dietary n-6:n-3 fatty acid ratio on cardiovascular health,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 1305–1310, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. P. Simopoulos, “Overview of evolutionary aspects of omega 3 fatty acids in the diet,” World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics, vol. 83, pp. 1–11, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. Rodriguez-Leyva, C. M. C. Bassett, R. McCullough, and G. N. Pierce, “The cardiovascular effects of flaxseed and its omega-3 fatty acid, alpha-linolenic acid,” Canadian Journal of Cardiology, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 489–496, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. J.-M. Bourre, “Where to find omega-3 fatty acids and how feeding animals with diet enriched in omega-3 fatty acids to increase nutritional value of derived products for human: what is actually useful?” Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 232–242, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. G. Barceló-Coblijn and E. J. Murphy, “Alpha-linolenic acid and its conversion to longer chain n-3 fatty acids: benefits for human health and a role in maintaining tissue n-3 fatty acid levels,” Progress in Lipid Research, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 355–374, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. T. Brenna, N. Salem Jr., A. J. Sinclair, and S. C. Cunnane, “α-linolenic acid supplementation and conversion to n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in humans,” Prostaglandins Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, vol. 80, no. 2-3, pp. 85–91, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. W. E. Connor, “Importance of n-3 fatty acids in health and disease,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 71, supplement 1, pp. 171S–175S, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  40. D. Richard, P. Bausero, C. Schneider, and F. Visioli, “Polyunsaturated fatty acids and cardiovascular disease,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 66, no. 20, pp. 3277–3288, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. C. R. Harper, M. C. Edwards, and T. A. Jacobson, “Flaxseed oil supplementation does not affect plasma lipoprotein concentration or particle size in human subjects,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 136, no. 11, pp. 2844–2848, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. C. R. Harper, M. J. Edwards, A. P. DeFilipis, and T. A. Jacobson, “Flaxseed oil increases the plasma concentrations of cardioprotective (n-3) fatty acids in humans,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 83–87, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. F. Fuentes, J. López-Miranda, P. Pérez-Martínez et al., “Chronic effects of a high-fat diet enriched with virgin olive oil and a low-fat diet enriched with α-linolenic acid on postprandial endothelial function in healthy men,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 159–165, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. J. H. Christensen, M. S. Christensen, E. Toft, J. Dyerberg, and E. B. Schmidt, “α-linolenic acid and heart rate variability,” Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 57–61, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. C. R. Harper and T. A. Jacobson, “Usefulness of omega-3 fatty acids and the prevention of coronary heart disease,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 96, no. 11, pp. 1521–1529, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. M. De Lorgeril, S. Renaud, N. Mamelle et al., “Mediterranean alpha-linolenic acid-rich diet in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease,” The Lancet, vol. 343, no. 8911, pp. 1454–1459, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. M. de Lorgeril, P. Salen, J.-L. Martin, I. Monjaud, J. Delaye, and N. Mamelle, “Mediterranean diet, traditional risk factors, and the rate of cardiovascular complications after myocardial infarction: final report of the Lyon Diet Heart Study,” Circulation, vol. 99, no. 6, pp. 779–785, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. F. B. Hu, M. J. Stampfer, J. E. Manson et al., “Dietary intake of α-linolenic acid and risk of fatal ischemic heart disease among women,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 890–897, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. E. Wendland, A. Farmer, P. Glasziou, and A. Neil, “Effect of α linolenic acid on cardiovascular risk markers: a systematic review,” Heart, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 166–169, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. D. Richard, K. Kefi, U. Barbe, P. Bausero, and F. Visioli, “Polyunsaturated fatty acids as antioxidants,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 451–455, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. E. Vericel, A. Polette, S. Bacot, C. Calzada, and M. Lagarde, “Pro- and antioxidant activities of docosahexaenoic acid on human blood platelets,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 566–572, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. T. A. Mori and L. J. Beilin, “Omega-3 fatty acids and inflammation,” Current Atherosclerosis Reports, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 461–467, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. F. M. van der Valk, D. F. van Wijk, and E. S. G. Stroes, “Novel anti-inflammatory strategies in atherosclerosis,” Current Opinion in Lipidology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 532–539, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. J. de Goede, W. M. M. Verschuren, J. M. A. Boer, D. Kromhout, and J. M. Geleijnse, “Alpha-linolenic acid intake and 10-year incidence of coronary heart disease and stroke in 20,000 middle-aged men and women in the Netherlands,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 3, Article ID e17967, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. M. A. Moskowitz, E. H. Lo, and C. Iadecola, “The science of stroke: mechanisms in search of treatments,” Neuron, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 181–198, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. N. Blondeau, O. Pétrault, S. Manta et al., “Polyunsaturated fatty acids are cerebral vasodilators via the TREK-1 potassium channel,” Circulation Research, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 176–184, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. N. Blondeau, C. Widmann, M. Lazdunski, and C. Heurteaux, “Polyunsaturated fatty acids induce ischemic and epileptic tolerance,” Neuroscience, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 231–241, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. C. Heurteaux, N. Guy, C. Laigle et al., “TREK-1, a K+ channel involved in neuroprotection and general anesthesia,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 23, no. 13, pp. 2684–2695, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. C. Heurteaux, C. Laigle, N. Blondeau, G. Jarretou, and M. Lazdunski, “Alpha-linolenic acid and riluzole treatment confer cerebral protection and improve survival after focal brain ischemia,” Neuroscience, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 241–251, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. L. Lang-Lazdunski, N. Blondeau, G. Jarretou, M. Lazdunski, and C. Heurteaux, “Linolenic acid prevents neuronal cell death and paraplegia after transient spinal cord ischemia in rats,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 564–575, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. I. Lauritzen, N. Blondeau, C. Heurteaux, C. Widmann, G. Romey, and M. Lazdunski, “Polyunsaturated fatty acids are potent neuroprotectors,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1784–1793, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. Y. F. Xiao, S. N. Wright, G. K. Wang, J. P. Morgan, and A. Leaf, “Fatty acids suppress voltage-gated Na+ currents in HEK293t cells transfected with the α-subunit of the human cardiac Na+ channel,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 2680–2685, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. J. A. Simon, J. Fong, J. T. Bernert Jr., and W. S. Browner, “Serum fatty acids and the risk of stroke,” Stroke, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 778–782, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. L. Djoussé, S. C. Hunt, D. K. Arnett, M. A. Province, J. H. Eckfeldt, and R. C. Ellison, “Dietary linolenic acid is inversely associated with plasma triacylglycerol: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 1098–1102, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. M. Fink, F. Lesage, F. Duprat et al., “A neuronal two P domain K+ channel stimulated by arachidonic acid and polyunsaturated fatty acids,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 3297–3308, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. J. S. Tauskela and N. Blondeau, “Prescription for stroke: should preconditioning be investigated as a drug?” in Ischemic Tolerance of the Brain, Research Signpost, B. J. Schaller, Ed., pp. 85–135, Research Signpost, Kerala, India, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  67. M. M. Hofer and Y.-A. Barde, “Brain-derived neurotrophic factor prevents neuronal death in vivo,” Nature, vol. 331, no. 6153, pp. 261–262, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. J. Lee, W. Duan, and M. P. Mattson, “Evidence that brain-derived neurotrophic factor is required for basal neurogenesis and mediates, in part, the enhancement of neurogenesis by dietary restriction in the hippocampus of adult mice,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 1367–1375, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. B. Lu and A. Figurov, “Role of neurotrophins in synapse development and plasticity,” Reviews in the Neurosciences, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. A. M. Marini, X. Jiang, X. Wu et al., “Preconditioning and neurotrophins: a model for brain adaptation to seizures, ischemia and other stressful stimuli,” Amino Acids, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 299–304, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. M. P. Mattson, W. Duan, and Z. Guo, “Meal size and frequency affect neuronal plasticity and vulnerability to disease: cellular and molecular mechanisms,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 417–431, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. Q. Yan, R. D. Rosenfeld, C. R. Matheson et al., “Expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor protein in the adult rat central nervous system,” Neuroscience, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 431–448, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. D. D. Mosser, A. W. Caron, L. Bourget et al., “The chaperone function of hsp70 is required for protection against stress-induced apoptosis,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 20, no. 19, pp. 7146–7159, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. P. C. Calder, “Mechanisms of action of (n-3) fatty acids,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 142, no. 3, pp. 592S–599S, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. A. H. Nagahara and M. H. Tuszynski, “Potential therapeutic uses of BDNF in neurological and psychiatric disorders,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 209–219, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. Y. Jiang, N. Wei, T. Lu, J. Zhu, G. Xu, and X. Liu, “Intranasal brain-derived neurotrophic factor protects brain from ischemic insult via modulating local inflammation in rats,” Neuroscience, vol. 172, pp. 398–405, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. H. D. Müller, K. M. Hanumanthiah, K. Diederich, S. Schwab, W.-R. Schäbitz, and C. Sommer, “Brain-derived neurotrophic factor but not forced arm use improves long-term outcome after photothrombotic stroke and transiently upregulates binding densities of excitatory glutamate receptors in the rat brain,” Stroke, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 1012–1021, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. E. Larsson, A. Nanobashvili, Z. Kokaia, and O. Lindvall, “Evidence for neuroprotective effects of endogenous brain-derived neurotrophic factor after global forebrain ischemia in rats,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1220–1228, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. W. R. Schabitz, S. Schwab, M. Spranger, and W. Hacke, “Intraventricular brain-derived neurotrophic factor reduces infarct size after focal cerebral ischemia in rats,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 500–506, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. W.-R. Schabitz, C. Sommer, W. Zoder et al., “Intravenous brain-derived neurotrophic factor reduces infarct size and counterregulates Bax and Bcl-2 expression after temporary focal cerebral ischemia,” Stroke, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 2212–2217, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. D. Wu, “Neuroprotection in experimental stroke with targeted neurotrophins,” NeuroRx, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 120–128, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. N. Blondeau, C. Nguemeni, D. N. Debruyne et al., “Subchronic alpha-linolenic acid treatment enhances brain plasticity and exerts an antidepressant effect: a versatile potential therapy for stroke,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 2548–2559, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. C. Capone, S. Frigerio, S. Fumagalli et al., “Neurosphere-derived cells exert a neuroprotective action by changing the ischemic microenvironment,” PLoS ONE, vol. 2, no. 4, article e373, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. S. Maysami, J. Q. Lan, M. Minami, and R. P. Simon, “Proliferating progenitor cells: a required cellular element for induction of ischemic tolerance in the brain,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1104–1113, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. Y. Moriyama, N. Takagi, and K. Tanonaka, “Intravenous injection of neural progenitor cells improved depression-like behavior after cerebral ischemia,” Translational Psychiatry, vol. 1, article e29, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. T. Nomura, O. Honmou, K. Harada, K. Houkin, H. Hamada, and J. D. Kocsis, “I.V. infusion of brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene-modified human mesenchymal stem cells protects against injury in a cerebral ischemia model in adult rat,” Neuroscience, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 161–169, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. R. Pallini, L. R. Vitiani, A. Bez et al., “Homologous transplantation of neural stem cells to the injured spinal cord of mice,” Neurosurgery, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1014–1024, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. B. Fure, T. B. Wyller, K. Engedal, and B. Thommessen, “Emotional symptoms in acute ischemic stroke,” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 382–387, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. M. Lucas, F. Mirzaei, E. J. O’Reilly et al., “Dietary intake of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids and the risk of clinical depression in women: a 10-y prospective follow-up study,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 1337–1343, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. J. R. Hibbeln, “Fish consumption and major depression,” The Lancet, vol. 351, no. 9110, p. 1213, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. M. Peet, B. Murphy, J. Shay, and D. Horrobin, “Depletion of omega-3 fatty acid levels in red blood cell membranes of depressive patients,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 315–319, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. M. Peet and C. Stokes, “Omega-3 fatty acids in the treatment of psychiatric disorders,” Drugs, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 1051–1059, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. V. R. Venna, D. Deplanque, C. Allet, K. Belarbi, M. Hamdane, and R. Bordet, “PUFA induce antidepressant-like effects in parallel to structural and molecular changes in the hippocampus,” Psychoneuroendocrinology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 199–211, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. D. Soppet, E. Escandon, J. Maragos et al., “The neurotrophic factors brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin-3 are ligands for the trkB tyrosine kinase receptor,” Cell, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 895–903, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. E. Koponen, T. Rantamaki, V. Voikar, T. Saarelainen, E. MacDonald, and E. Castren, “Enhanced BDNF signaling is associated with an antidepressant-like behavioral response and changes in brain monoamines,” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 973–980, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. I. A. Kerman, “New insights into BDNF signaling: relevance to major depression and antidepressant action,” American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 169, no. 11, pp. 1137–1140, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. A. T. Michael-Titus, “Omega-3 fatty acids and neurological injury,” Prostaglandins Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, vol. 77, no. 5-6, pp. 295–300, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. A. R. Heller, S. Rössler, R. J. Litz et al., “Omega-3 fatty acids improve the diagnosis-related clinical outcome,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 972–979, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. A. Martin, “The “apports nutritionnels conseilles (ANC)” for the French population,” Reproduction Nutrition Development, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 119–128, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus