Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 537318, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/537318
Review Article

Perinatal Health Statistics as the Basis for Perinatal Quality Assessment in Croatia

1School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, School of Public Health “A. Štampar”, Croatian Institute of Public Health, Rockefellerova 4, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
2School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb, Department of Pediatrics, Kišpatićeva 12, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
3School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Petrova 13, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
4General Hospital Zabok, Trg Dragutina Domjanića 6, 49210 Zabok, Croatia

Received 5 June 2015; Revised 7 October 2015; Accepted 9 November 2015

Academic Editor: Malgorzata Bala

Copyright © 2015 Urelija Rodin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. Lindmark and J. Langhoff-Ros, “Perinatal quality indicators and perinatal audit,” in Textbook of Perinatal Medicine, A. Kurjak and F. A. Chervenak, Eds., vol. 1, pp. 264–268, 2nd edition, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  2. World Health Organization, “Standards and reporting requirements related to fetal, perinatal, neonatal and infant mortality,” in International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. 10th Revision, vol. 2 of Instruction Manuel, chapter 5, pp. 151–156, World Health Organization, Valletta, Malta, 2011, http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/ICD10Volume2_en_2010.pdf. View at Google Scholar
  3. J. Zeitlin, K. Wildman, G. Bréart et al., “PERISTAT. Indicators for monitoring and evaluating perinatal health in Europe,” European Journal of Public Health, vol. 13, supplement 3, pp. 29–37, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Zeitlin, K. Wildman, and G. Bréart, “Perinatal health indicators for Europe: an introduction to the PERISTAT project,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 111, supplement 1, pp. S1–S4, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Zeitlin, K. Wildman, G. Bréart et al., “Selecting an indicator set for monitoring and evaluating perinatal health in Europe: criteria, methods and results from the PERISTAT project,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology & Reproductive Biology, vol. 111, supplement 1, pp. S5–S14, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. Ostroški, “Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Croatia 2014,” Croatian Bureau of Statistics, Zagreb, Croatia, 2014, http://www.dzs.hr/Hrv_Eng/ljetopis/2014/sljh2014.pdf.
  7. World Health Organization, Croatia: WHO Statistical Profile, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2015, http://www.who.int/gho/countries/hrv.pdf?ua=1.
  8. M. Pekeč and V. Petrić, “Is there a change occurring in Croatia in the 21 st century?” in Eurostat. Statistics Explained. Marriages and Births in Croatia, 2015, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Marriages_and_births_in_Croatia/2015. View at Google Scholar
  9. T. Poljičanin and T. Benjak, “Croatian Health Service Yearbook 2014,” Croatian Institute of Public Health, 2015, http://www.hzjz.hr/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/ljetopis_20142.pdf.
  10. A. Dražančić, U. Rodin, and B. Filipović-Grčić, “Perinatal care in Croatia yesterday, today, tomorrow,” Liječnički Vjesnik, vol. 129, no. 3-4, pp. 87–99, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. U. Rodin, B. Filipović-Grčić, and A. Dražančić, “Births and perinatal mortality of very low birth weight newborns in Croatia in the 2001–2010 period,” Gynaecologia et Perinatologia, vol. 20, supplement 2, pp. 46–50, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  12. J. Đelmiš, J. Juras, and U. Rodin, “Perinatal mortality in Republic of Croatia in the year 2014,” Gynaecologia et Perinatologia, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 3–18, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  13. U. Rodin, “Quality of data from new birth notification in Croatian maternities,” Gynaecologia et Perinatologia, vol. 11, supplement 1, pp. 25–29, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  14. World Health Organization, Reviewing Maternal Deaths and Complication to Make Pregnancy Safer; Beyond the Numbers, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2004.
  15. World Health Organization, Health for All Database, World Health Organization, 2014, http://data.euro.who.int/hfadb.
  16. Ministry of Health, “Plan and Programme of Health Care Measures in Compulsory Health Insurance,” Official Gazette, 126/2006.
  17. J. B. Gould, “Vital records for quality improvement,” Pediatrics, vol. 103, no. 1, supplement E, pp. 278–290, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. T. A. Slagle, “Perinatal information systems for quality improvement: visions for today,” Pediatrics, vol. 103, no. 1, supplement E, pp. 266–277, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. S. Kramer, S. Liu, Z. Luo, H. Yuan, R. W. Platt, and K. S. Joseph, “Analysis of perinatal mortality and its components: time for a change?” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 156, no. 6, pp. 493–497, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. H. T. Cartlidge and J. H. Stewart, “Effect of changing the stillbirth definition on evaluation of perinatal mortality rates,” The Lancet, vol. 346, no. 8973, pp. 486–488, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. W. Setel, S. B. Macfarlane, S. Szreter et al., “A scandal of invisibility: making everyone count by counting everyone,” The Lancet, vol. 370, no. 9598, pp. 1569–1577, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Macfarlane, M. Gissler, F. Bloomer, and S. Rasmussen, “The availability of perinatal health indicators in Europe,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 111, supplement 1, pp. 15–32, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  23. J. E. Lawn, S. Cousens, and J. Zupan, “4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why?” The Lancet, vol. 365, no. 9462, pp. 891–900, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. N. Lack, J. Zeitlin, L. Krebs, W. Künzel, and S. Alexander, “Methodological difficulties in the comparison of indicators of perinatal health across Europe,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 111, supplement 1, pp. S33–S44, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. G. L. Darmstadt, Z. A. Bhutta, S. Cousens, T. Adam, N. Walker, and L. De Bernis, “Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save?” The Lancet, vol. 365, no. 9463, pp. 977–988, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. Shibuya, S. Scheele, and T. Boerma, “Health statistics: time to get serious,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 83, no. 10, p. 722, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. E. Lawn, D. Osrin, A. Adler, and S. Cousens, “Four million neonatal deaths: counting and attribution of cause of death,” Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 410–416, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. Buitendijk, J. Zeitlin, M. Cuttini, J. Langhoff-Roos, and J. Bottu, “Indicators of fetal and infant health outcomes,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 111, supplement 1, pp. S66–S77, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. Zeitlin, A. Mohangoo, and M. Delnord, “The European Perinatal Health Report,” 2010, http://www.europeristat.com/reports/european-perinatal-health-report-2010.html.
  30. J. Đelmiš, J. Juras, and U. Rodin, “Perinatal mortality in Republic of Croatia in the year 2013,” Gynaecologia et Perinatologia, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. S3–S18, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. U. Rodin, B. Filipović-Grčić, T. Ćorić, and J. Juras, “Perinatal deaths causes in Croatia in the year 2014,” Gynaecologia et Perinatologia, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 19–25, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  32. B. Filipović-Grčić, Ž. Mustapić, U. Rodin, D. Bartoniček, and R. Grizelj, “Mortality of newbornsto discharge from hospital in Croatia in the year 2014,” Gynaecologia et Perinatologia, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 26–32, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  33. E. Papiernik and L. G. Keith, “The regionalization of perinatal care in France—description of a missing policy,” European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 99–103, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. R. Vieux, J. Fresson, J.-M. Hascoet et al., “Improving perinatal regionalization by predicting neonatal intensive care requirements of preterm infants: an EPIPAGE-based cohort study,” Pediatrics, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 84–90, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. K. Beeckman, F. Louckx, S. Downe, and K. Putman, “The relationship between antenatal care and preterm birth: the importance of content of care,” European Journal of Public Health, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 366–371, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. Committee on Perinatal Health, Toward Improving the Outcome of Pregnancy. Recommendations for the Regional Development of Maternal and Perinatal Health Services, The National Foundation—March of Dimes, White Plains, NY, USA, 1976.
  37. P. R. Swyer, “The regional organisation of special care for the neonate,” Pediatric Clinics of North America, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 761–776, 1970. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. K. P. Russell, S. H. Gardiner, and E. E. Nichols, “A conceptual model for regionalization and consolidation of obstetric-gynecologic services,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 121, no. 6, pp. 756–764, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. R. Usher, “Changing mortality rates with perinatal intensive care and regionalization,” Seminars in Perinatology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 309–319, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. Zeitlin, E. Papiernik, and G. Bréart, “Regionalization of perinatal care in Europe,” Seminars in Neonatology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 99–110, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. V. Y. H. Yu and P. M. Dunn, “Development of regionalized perinatal care,” Seminars in Neonatology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 89–97, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. D. L. Levy, K. Noelke, and J. P. Goldsmith, “Maternal and infant transport program in Louisiana,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 500–504, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. American Academy of Pediatrics and Committee on Fetus and Newborn, “Policy statement, levels of neonatal care,” Pediatrics, vol. 114, no. 5, pp. 1341–1347, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  44. Croatian Society for Perinatal Medicine and Working Group for Perinatal Health Care, “Proposal of organization of perinatal care in the Republic of Croatia,” Gynaecologia et Perinatologia, vol. 12, pp. 87–99, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  45. G. Lewis, “Reviewing maternal deaths to make pregnancy safer,” Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 447–463, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. D. Karimian-Teherani, G. Haidinger, T. Waldhoer, A. Beck, and C. Vutuc, “Under-reporting of direct and indirect obstetrical deaths in Austria, 1980–98,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 323–327, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. S. Alexander, K. Wildman, W. Zhang, M. Langer, C. Vutuc, and G. Lindmark, “Maternal health outcomes in Europe,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 111, supplement 1, pp. S78–S87, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. A. Dražančić, “Maternal mortality,” Gynaecologia et Perinatologia, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 7–17, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. C. McCourt, J. Weaver, H. Statham, S. Beake, J. Gamble, and D. K. Creedy, “Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature,” Birth, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 65–79, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, “Safe prevention of primary cesarean delivery,” Obstetric-Care-Consensus 1, 2014, http://www.acog.org/Resources-And-Publications/Obstetric-Care-Consensus-Series/Safe-Prevention-of-the-Primary-Cesarean-Delivery. View at Google Scholar