Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015, Article ID 582590, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/582590
Research Article

Using Coronary Artery Calcification Combined with Pretest Clinical Risk Assessment as a Means of Determining Investigation and Treatment in Patients Presenting with Chest Pain in a Rural Setting

1Department of Cardiology, Ysbyty Gwynedd, Bangor LL57 2PW, UK
2School of Medical Sciences, Bangor University, Brigantia Building, Penrallt Road, Bangor LL57 2DG, UK
3Department of Radiology, Ysbyty Gwynedd, Bangor LL57 2PW, UK

Received 25 August 2014; Revised 29 September 2014; Accepted 29 September 2014

Academic Editor: Zhonghua Sun

Copyright © 2015 Baskar Sekar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. NICE, NICE Clinical Guideline 95, 2010, http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg95.
  2. M. P. Callaway, P. Richards, P. Goddard, and M. Rees, “The incidence of coronary artery calcification on standard thoracic CT scans,” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 70, no. 834, pp. 572–574, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. E. Stillman, M. Oudkerk, M. Ackerman et al., “Use of multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of acute chest pain: a consensus statement of the North American Society of Cardiac Imaging and the European Society of Cardiac Radiology,” European Radiology, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 2196–2207, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Flotats, J. Knuuti, M. Gutberlet et al., “Hybrid cardiac imaging: SPECT/CT and PET/CT. A joint position statement by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Society of Cardiac Radiology (ESCR) and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC),” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 201–212, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Oudkerk, A. E. Stillman, S. S. Halliburton et al., “Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging,” European Radiology, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 2785–2807, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. Jorgenson, R. K. Jacobsen, U. Toft, M. Aadahi, C. Glumer, and C. Pisinger, “Effect of screening and lifestyle counseling on incidence of ischaemic heart disease in general population:Inter99 randomised trial,” British Medical Journal, vol. 348, Article ID g3617, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  7. A. Wallis, N. Manghat, and M. Hamilton, “The role of coronary CT in the assessment and diagnosis of patients with chest pain,” Clinical Medicine, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 222–229, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. Alfakih and S. Plein, “The NICE guidelines on the assessment of chest pain,” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 192–194, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. J. Budoff and K. M. Gul, “Expert review on coronary calcium,” Vascular Health and Risk Management, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 315–324, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. A. Abdool, R. Ashrafi, M. Davies et al., “A UK cardiac centre experience of low-risk, stable chest pain patients with calcium score of zero,” vol. 21, article 78, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. N. Bhulani, A. Khawaja, A. Jafferani, M. Baqir, R. Ebrahimi, and Z. Sajjad, “Coronary calcium scoring: are the results comparable to computed tomography coronary angiography for screening coronary artery disease in a South Asian population?” BMC Research Notes, vol. 6, no. 1, article 279, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Hausleiter, T. Meyer, F. Hermann et al., “Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 301, no. 5, pp. 500–507, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Dedic, A. Rossi, G. J. R. Ten Kate et al., “First-line evaluation of coronary artery disease with coronary calcium scanning or exercise electrocardiography,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 190–195, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, “Chest pain of recent onset CT calcium scoring factsheet,” http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/12947/47987/47987.pdf.
  15. A. Arbab-Zadeh, J. M. Miller, C. E. Rochitte et al., “Diagnostic accuracy of CT coronary angiography according to pretest probability of coronary artery disease and severity of coronary arterial calcification: the CorE-64 international,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 379–387, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. P. Schenker, S. Dorbala, E. C. T. Hong et al., “Interrelation of coronary calcification, myocardial ischemia, and outcomes in patients with intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease: a combined positron emission tomography/computed tomography study,” Circulation, vol. 117, no. 13, pp. 1693–1700, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. Rubinshtein, T. Gaspar, D. A. Halon, J. Goldstein, N. Peled, and B. S. Lewis, “Prevalence and extent of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with zero or low calcium score undergoing 64-slice cardiac multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of a chest pain syndrome,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 472–475, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Sosnowski, P. Pysz, L. Szymański, A. Gola, and M. Tendera, “Negative calcium score and the presence of obstructive coronary lesions in patients with intermediate CAD probability,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. e16–e18, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Q. A. Truong, K. G. Kallianos, and C. P. Cannon, “Coronary artery disease: calcium score of zero: not a gatekeeper to rule out coronary artery disease,” Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 271–273, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. G. A. Diamond, J. S. Forrester, M. Hirsch et al., “Application of conditional probability analysis to the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 1210–1221, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. M. Van Werkhoven, S. M. de Boer, J. D. Schuijf et al., “Impact of clinical presentation and pretest likelihood on the relation between calcium score and computed tomographic coronary angiography,” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 106, no. 12, pp. 1675–1679, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. O. Lazoura, K. Vassiou, T. Kanavou, M. Vlychou, D. L. Arvanitis, and I. V. Fezoulidis, “Incidental non-cardiac findings of a coronary angiography with a 128-slice multi-detector CT scanner: should we only concentrate on the heart?” Korean Journal of Radiology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 60–68, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. K. Alfakih and M. Budoff, “Multi-detector computed tomography coronary angiography: the incidental lung findings,” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 50–51, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus