Clinical Study

Prognostic Value of 18F-FDG PET-CT in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Is Dynamic Scanning Helpful?

Table 2

Details of the NPC cohort with dynamic PET-CT ().

NumberAgeSexSUVmaxmaxVOLSUV40Status

139M6.2 0.052 25.7 15.833NED
231F7.7 0.052 27.5 51.643NED
338M13.4 0.130 14.4 15.72b1NED
451M3.9 0.039 13.7 7.412NED
555M11.0 0.095 10.2 11.133NED
634F6.2 0.072 9.8 11.042NED
742M7.4 0.051 17.9 21.731NED
864M8.9 0.069 17.5 20.222NED
965M5.4 0.031 17.8 16.132NED
1069M6.8 0.046 16.7 24.512NED
1143M24.0 0.221 9.9 10.142NED
1238F5.5 0.051 22.0 28.633AWD
1361M14.3 0.127 6.7 3.732NED
1457M8.4 0.061 15.3 14.233NED
1563M5.0 0.038 26.4 11.333AWD
1650F6.7 0.081 5.2 3.732NED

Notes: age (years), age at diagnosis; SUVmax, the maximum standardized uptake value; max (mināˆ’1), the maximum net influx constant of FDG from plasma into tissue; VOLSUV40, tumor volume in cm3 calculated in SUV maps using the threshold of 40% SUVmax; , tumor volume in cm3 calculated in maps using the threshold of 37% max; TNM, tumor-node metastases stage by AJCC staging system; NED = no evidence of disease; AWD = alive with disease.