Research Article
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Features of Breast Malignancies with Different Sizes: Correlation with Prognostic Factors
Table 2
Distribution of CEUS enhancement patterns and prognostic factors.
| CEUS performance | | | | | | | | | | | | | + | − | + | − | + | − | + | − | + | − | + | − | + | − | + | − | + | − | + | − | + | − | + | − |
| Enhancement degree | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Hyperenhancement | 28 | 10 | 29 | 17 | 26 | 12 | 26 | 20 | 24 | 14 | 35 | 11 | 30 | 8 | 38 | 8 | 20 | 19 | 31 | 20 | 21 | 17 | 19 | 27 | Iso- or hypoenhancement | 6 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 4 | Enhancement order | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Centripetal | 20 | 12 | 24 | 11 | 21 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 17 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 23 | 9 | 29 | 6 | 17 | 15 | 20 | 15 | 19 | 13 | 12 | 23 | Centrifugal or diffuse | 14 | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 4 | 10 | 22 | 11 | 4 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 3 | 17 | 5 | 4 | 11 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 7 | 14 | 8 | Penetrating vessels | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Present | 17 | 6 | 19 | 5 | 16 | 7 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 8 | 20 | 4 | 17 | 6 | 20 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 16 | 8 | 15 | 8 | 15 | 9 | Absent | 17 | 7 | 16 | 17 | 16 | 8 | 15 | 18 | 13 | 11 | 22 | 11 | 18 | 6 | 26 | 7 | 13 | 13 | 16 | 17 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 22 | Enhancement pattern | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Heterogeneous | 6 | 5 | 21 | 16 | 7 | 4 | 20 | 17 | 6 | 5 | 28 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 29 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 16 | 5 | 6 | 14 | 23 | Homogeneous | 28 | 8 | 14 | 6 | 25 | 11 | 12 | 8 | 22 | 14 | 14 | 6 | 29 | 7 | 17 | 3 | 11 | 14 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 14 | 12 | 8 | Enhancement area | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Enlargement | 27 | 6 | 25 | 14 | 23 | 10 | 22 | 17 | 21 | 12 | 30 | 9 | 26 | 7 | 32 | 7 | 17 | 16 | 25 | 14 | 21 | 12 | 19 | 20 | Nonenlargement | 7 | 7 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 5 | 10 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 12 | 6 | 9 | 5 | 14 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 7 | 11 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 11 |
|
|
Note: data are the number of cases. G1: Group 1; G2: Group 2.
|