Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015, Article ID 614035, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/614035
Research Article

Accuracy of Colposcopically Directed Biopsy: Results from an Online Quality Assurance Programme for Colposcopy in a Population-Based Cervical Screening Setting in Italy

1Preventive Gynaecology Unit, European Institute of Oncology, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital, Via Aldo Moro 8, Cona, 44124 Ferrara, Italy
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St. Orsola Hospital, Via Giuseppe Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy
4Cervical Cancer Screening Unit, Bologna Health Care District, Via della Repubblica 11, San Lazzaro di Savena, 40068 Bologna, Italy
5Cancer Prevention Centre, Ravenna Health Care District, Viale Vincenzo Randi 5, 48121 Ravenna, Italy
6Department of Health, Regione Emilia-Romagna, Viale Aldo Moro 21, 40127 Bologna, Italy
7Romagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Cancer Institute (IRST) IRCCS, Via Piero Maroncelli 40, Meldola, 47014 Forlì, Italy

Received 4 August 2014; Accepted 15 December 2014

Academic Editor: Walter Prendiville

Copyright © 2015 Mario Sideri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. J. Buxton, D. M. Luesley, M. I. Shafi, and M. Rollason, “Colposcopically directed punch biopsy: a potentially misleading investigation,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 98, no. 12, pp. 1273–1276, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. O. A. Chappatte, D. L. Byrne, K. S. Raju, M. Nayagam, and A. Kenney, “Histological differences between colposcopic-directed biopsy and loop excision of the transformation zone (LETZ): a cause for concern,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 46–50, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. The ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) Group, “Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance,” The American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 188, no. 6, pp. 1383–1392, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. G. Pretorius, W.-H. Zhang, J. L. Belinson et al., “Colposcopically directed biopsy, random cervical biopsy, and endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II or worse,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 191, no. 2, pp. 430–434, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. C. Gage, V. W. Hanson, K. Abbey et al., “Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 264–272, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. L. Moss, P. Hadden, G. Douce, P. W. Jones, M. Arbyn, and C. W. E. Redman, “Is the colposcopically directed punch biopsy a reliable diagnostic test in women with minor cytological lesions?” Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 421–426, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Costa, M. De Nuzzo, A. Rubino et al., “Independent determinants of inaccuracy of colposcopically directed punch biopsy of the cervix,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 57–63, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. W. Prendiville, J. Cullimore, and S. Norman, “Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). A new method of management for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 96, no. 9, pp. 1054–1060, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. K. Heatley and J. P. Bury, “The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix,” Cytopathology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 93–99, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. Bucchi, F. Falcini, P. Schincaglia et al., “Performance indicators of organized cervical screening in Romagna (Italy),” European Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 223–228, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. Bucchi, P. Cristiani, S. Costa et al., “Rationale and development of an on-line quality assurance programme for colposcopy in a population-based cervical screening setting in Italy,” BMC Health Services Research, vol. 13, no. 1, article 237, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. Walker, S. Dexeus, G. de Palo et al., “International terminology of colposcopy: an updated report from the international federation for cervical pathology and colposcopy,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 175–177, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. Cristiani, S. Costa, P. Schincaglia et al., “An online quality assurance program for colposcopy in a population-based cervical screening setting in Italy: results on colposcopic impression,” Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, vol. 18, pp. 309–313, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Gardner and D. Altman, Statistics with Confidence. Confidence Intervals and Statistical Guidelines, BMJ Books, London, UK, 1989.
  15. A. J. Cagle, S. Y. Hu, J. W. Sellors et al., “Use of an expanded gold standard to estimate the accuracy of colposcopy and visual inspection with acetic acid,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 156–161, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Bondi, P. Pierotti, P. Crucitti, and S. Lega, “The virtual slide in the promotion of cytologic and hystologic quality in oncologic screenings,” Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanita, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 144–150, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. S. Guido, J. Jeronimo, M. Schiffman, and D. Solomon, “The distribution of neoplasia arising on the cervix: results from the ALTS trial,” The American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 193, no. 4, pp. 1331–1337, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Jeronimo and M. Schiffman, “Colposcopy at a crossroads,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 195, no. 2, pp. 349–353, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. G. Pretorius, J. L. Belinson, R. J. Burchette, S. Hu, X. Zhang, and Y.-L. Qiao, “Regardless of skill, performing more biopsies increases the sensitivity of colposcopy,” Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 180–188, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. Tidbury, A. Singer, and D. Jenkins, “CIN 3: the role of lesion size in invasion,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 99, no. 7, pp. 583–586, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. Orlandi, S. Costa, P. Terzano et al., “Presurgical assessment and therapy of microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 255–260, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus