Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 628416, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/628416
Clinical Study

Patient-Specific Simulation of Coronary Artery Pressure Measurements: An In Vivo Three-Dimensional Validation Study in Humans

1Unit of Medical Technology and Intelligent Information Systems, Department of Materials Science, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
2Department of Cardiology, Medical School, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
3Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences & Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
4Michailideion Cardiac Center, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
5Biomedical Research Institute-FORTH, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
6Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
7Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IFC-CNR), 56124 Pisa, Italy

Received 25 April 2014; Accepted 10 September 2014

Academic Editor: Karim Bendjelid

Copyright © 2015 Panagiotis K. Siogkas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. J. Kern, A. Lerman, J. W. Bech et al., “Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization, council on clinical cardiology,” Circulation, vol. 114, no. 12, pp. 1321–1341, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Kojic, N. Filipovic, B. Stojanovic, and N. Kojic, Computer Modeling in Bioengineering: Theoretical Background, Examples and Software, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2008.
  3. F. Kabinejadian and D. N. Ghista, “Compliant model of a coupled sequential coronary arterial bypass graft: effects of vessel wall elasticity and non-Newtonian rheology on blood flow regime and hemodynamic parameters distribution,” Medical Engineering & Physics, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 860–872, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Malvè, A. García, J. Ohayon, and M. A. Martínez, “Unsteady blood flow and mass transfer of a human left coronary artery bifurcation: FSI vs. CFD,” International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 745–751, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. Vasava, P. Jalali, M. Dabagh, and P. J. Kolari, “Finite element modelling of pulsatile blood flow in idealized model of human aortic arch: study of hypotension and hypertension,” Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 861837, 14 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. M. A. Ikbal, S. Chakravarty, Sarifuddin, and P. K. Mandal, “Unsteady analysis of viscoelastic blood flow through arterial stenosis,” Chemical Engineering Communications, vol. 199, no. 1, pp. 40–62, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. R. Leach, V. L. Rayz, M. R. K. Mofrad, and D. Saloner, “An efficient two-stage approach for image-based FSI analysis of atherosclerotic arteries,” Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 213–223, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Bluestein, Y. Alemu, I. Avrahami et al., “Influence of microcalcifications on vulnerable plaque mechanics using FSI modeling,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1111–1118, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. A. Kock, J. V. Nygaard, N. Eldrup et al., “Mechanical stresses in carotid plaques using MRI-based fluid-structure interaction models,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 1651–1658, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Borghi, N. B. Wood, R. H. Mohiaddin, and X. Y. Xu, “Fluid-solid interaction simulation of flow and stress pattern in thoracoabdominal aneurysms: a patient-specific study,” Journal of Fluids and Structures, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 270–280, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Torii, M. Oshima, T. Kobayashi, K. Takagi, and T. E. Tezduyar, “Fluid-structure interaction modeling of a patient-specific cerebral aneurysm: influence of structural modeling,” Computational Mechanics, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 151–159, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. X. Li, J. J. Beech-Brandt, L. R. John, P. R. Hoskins, and W. J. Easson, “Numerical analysis of pulsatile blood flow and vessel wall mechanics in different degrees of stenoses,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 40, no. 16, pp. 3715–3724, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. Vahidi and N. Fatouraee, “Large deforming buoyant embolus passing through a stenotic common carotid artery: a computational simulation,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1312–1322, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. H. Lee, H. G. Choi, and J. Y. Yool, “Finite element simulation of blood flow in a flexible carotid artery bifurcation,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1355–1361, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. X. H. Wang and X. Y. Li, “Fluid-structure interaction based study on the physiological factors affecting the behaviors of stented and non-stented thoracic aortic aneurysms,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 2177–2184, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Lantz, J. Renner, and M. Karlsson, “Wall shear stress in a subject specific human aorta—influence of fluid-structure interaction,” International Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 759–778, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. V. Vavourakis, Y. Papaharilaou, and J. A. Ekaterinaris, “Coupled fluid-structure interaction hemodynamics in a zero-pressure state corrected arterial geometry,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 44, no. 13, pp. 2453–2460, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. Torii, N. B. Wood, N. Hadjiloizou et al., “Fluid-structure interaction analysis of a patient-specific right coronary artery with physiological velocity and pressure waveforms,” Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering with Biomedical Applications, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 565–580, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  19. C. V. Bourantas, M. I. Papafaklis, L. Athanasiou et al., “A new methodology for accurate 3-dimensional coronary artery reconstruction using routine intravascular ultrasound and angiographic data: implications for widespread assessment of endothelial shear stress in humans,” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 582–593, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. N. Koshiba, J. Ando, X. Chen, and T. Hisada, “Multiphysics simulation of blood flow and LDL transport in a porohyperelastic arterial wall model,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 374–385, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. G. Porenta, H. Schima, A. Pentaris et al., “Assessment of coronary stenoses by Doppler wires: a validation study using in vitro modeling and computer simulations,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 793–801, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. T. D. S. Mabotuwana, L. K. Cheng, and A. J. Pullan, “A model of blood flow in the mesenteric arterial system,” BioMedical Engineering Online, vol. 6, article 17, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. N. M. Maurits, G. E. Loots, and A. E. P. Veldman, “The influence of vessel wall elasticity and peripheral resistance on the carotid artery flow wave form: a CFD model compared to in vivo ultrasound measurements,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 427–436, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. K. Perktold, M. Hofer, G. Rappitsch, M. Loew, B. D. Kuban, and M. H. Friedman, “Validated computation of physiologic flow in a realistic coronary artery branch,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 217–228, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Santamarina, E. Weydahl, J. M. Siegel, and J. E. Moore, “Computational analysis of flow in a curved tube model of the coronary arteries: effects of time-varying curvature,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 944–954, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. A. Urquiza, P. J. Blanco, M. J. Vénere, and R. A. Feijóo, “Multidimensional modelling for the carotid artery blood flow,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 195, no. 33–36, pp. 4002–4017, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  27. S. Z. Zhao, P. Papathanasopoulou, Q. Long, I. Marshall, and X. Y. Xu, “Comparative study of magnetic resonance imaging and image-based computational fluid dynamics for quantification of pulsatile flow in a carotid bifurcation phantom,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 962–971, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. E. O. Kung, A. S. Les, C. A. Figueroa et al., “In vitro validation of finite element analysis of blood flow in deformable models,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 1947–1960, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. N. H. J. Pijls, W. F. Fearon, P. A. L. Tonino et al., “Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (fractional flow reserve versus angiography for multivessel evaluation) study,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 177–184, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus