Can Early Rehabilitation after Total Hip Arthroplasty Reduce Its Major Complications and Medical Expenses? Report from a Nationally Representative Cohort

Table 3

The logistic regression modeling on prosthetic infection (PI), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and revision of hip arthroplasty (RHA) within one year after THA.

	Outcome variables
	PI			DVT			RHA
	OR	95% CI	value	OR	95% CI	value	OR	95% CI	value
Timing of rehabilitation
Delayed versus early	3.152	1.211–8.203	0.0187	1.309	0.212–8.072	0.7720	2.346	0.825–6.675	0.1100
Gender; (male versus female)	4.118	1.230–13.78	0.0217	1.366	0.285–6.547	0.6964	1.456	0.483–4.393	0.5044
Age group; (<65 versus ≧65)	1.130	0.395–3.229	0.8194	0.635	0.110–3.648	0.6105	0.768	0.244–2.415	0.6513
Length of stay	0.970	0.885–1.063	0.5123	1.018	0.871–1.190	0.8220	1.030	0.957–1.108	0.4355
CCS	1.062	0.711–1.588	0.7684	2.440	1.152–5.172	0.0199	0.998	0.610–1.633	0.9945
E code patient; (yes versus no)	9.873	2.881–33.840	0.0003				3.486	0.643–18.911	0.1478
Complications
OA (yes versus no)	1.917	0.604–6.083	0.2693				3.153	0.833–11.935	0.0908
AN (yes versus no)	0.989	0.316–3.097	0.9854				1.554	0.451–5.352	0.4847
HTN (yes versus no)	1.015	0.283–3.639	0.9815	0.828	0.088–7.805	0.8692	0.670	0.169–2.662	0.5692
DM (yes versus no)	1.466	0.306–7.016	0.6322	0.230	0.009–5.961	0.3759	3.944	0.896–17.368	0.0696
PRF (yes versus no)	3.405	0.298–38.921	0.3242

Note. CCS: Charlson Comorbidity Scores; OR: odds ratio; OA: osteoarthritis; AN: avascular necrosis; HTN: hypertension; DM: diabetes mellitus; PRF: poor renal function.