Review Article
Cognitive-Motor Interference in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review of Evidence, Correlates, and Consequences
Table 2
Characteristics of studies utilizing balance tasks during dual tasking.
| Study ID | Author | Publication year | Sample size | EDSS | Motor outcome | Cognitive task | Quality |
| O | Wajda et al. [38] | 2014 | 62 | 6.0 (2.0)b,d | COP sway area | Word list generation | High | A | Kramer et al. [24] | 2014 | 61 | 3.0 ± 1.0a | Center of force displacement (single leg) | Random number typing | High | P | Negahban et al. [39] | 2013 | 23 | 2.5 ± 1.1a | Recurrence quantification analysis | Silent serial 3’s with endpoint recall | Medium | Q | Jacobs and Kasser [40] | 2012 | 13 | 0–4.5c | Step initiation time | Auditory stroop task | High | R | Boes et al. [41] | 2012 | 45 | 2–6.5c | COP sway area | Word list generation | High | S | Negahban et al. [42] | 2011 | 23 | 2.5 ± 1.1a | COP sway area | Silent serial 3’s with endpoint recall | High | T | Kalron et al. [43] | 2011 | 52 | 1.7 ± 0.2a | COP sway rate | Visual stroop task | High |
|
|
Notes: aMean ± SD; bmedian (IQR); crange; dself-reported.
|