BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2015 / Article
Special Issue


View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 754876 |

Bengt Svensson, Srinivasa R. Nagubothu, Christoffer Nord, Jessica Cedervall, Isabell Hultman, Lars Ährlund-Richter, Anna Tolf, Stellan Hertegård, "Stem Cell Therapy in Injured Vocal Folds: A Three-Month Xenograft Analysis of Human Embryonic Stem Cells", BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 754876, 7 pages, 2015.

Stem Cell Therapy in Injured Vocal Folds: A Three-Month Xenograft Analysis of Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Academic Editor: Haldun Oguz
Received21 Jan 2015
Accepted08 Apr 2015
Published18 Oct 2015


We have previously shown that human embryonic stem cell (hESC) therapy to injured rabbit vocal folds (VFs) induces human tissue generation with regained VF vibratory capacity. The aims of this study were to test the sustainability of such effect and to what extent derivatives of the transplanted hESCs are propagated in the VFs. The VFs of 14 New Zealand rabbits were injured by a localized resection. HESCs were transplanted to 22 VFs which were analyzed for persistence of hESCs after six weeks and after three months. At three months, the VFs were also analyzed for viscoelasticity, measured as dynamic viscosity and elastic modulus, for the lamina propria (Lp) thickness and relative content of collagen type I. Three months after hESC cell therapy, the dynamic viscosity and elastic modulus of the hESC treated VFs were similar to normal controls and lower than untreated VFs (). A normalized VF architecture, reduction in collagen type I, and Lp thickness were found compared with untreated VFs (). At three months, no derivatives of hESCs were detected. HESCs transplanted to injured rabbit VFs restored the vibratory characteristics of the VFs, with maintained restored function for three months without remaining hESCs or derivatives.

1. Introduction

Tissue defects in a vocal fold (VF) heal with scar formation. The scar tissue causes stiffness in the lamina propria (Lp) which renders disturbed viscoelastic properties to the VF [1]. A scarred VF causes severe voice problems [2]. Treatment is difficult. Different injectable substances have been used to augment scarred VFs [312]. Several of these substances have rendered improved vibratory characteristics to the scarred VF, but presently there is no effective method to prevent VF scarring or to heal VF scars.

In xenograft studies, human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) in different preparations have lately shown promising results in healing VF scars [1318].

However, hMSCs have only been found to perform single divisions and have not been shown to have the capacity to differentiate into new tissue in the VFs [15, 16].

Since the first description of successful in vitro culture of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), such cells have been recognized as to provide a potential resource for cell transplantations. HESCs are derived from the blastocyst of an early embryo and are unique in the sense that they have the capacity to self-renew but also that of pluripotency, that is, to differentiate into all cell types of the human body. In a previous study with human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) transplanted to injured VFs of rabbits, we found that hESCs can survive one month in a xenograft rabbit model and that they during this time can differentiate into fully developed epithelium, muscle, and cartilage tissue, adequately placed close to or interpositioned with the rabbit corresponding tissue, thus replacing lost rabbit VF tissue [19]. This study also showed that the VFs treated with hESCs gained a significantly improved viscoelastic function, measured as dynamic viscosity and elastic modulus, compared with untreated scarred VFs.

Using the same xenograft model, the aim of this study was to analyze in longer term, that is, three months, the sustainability of the improved healing in the hESC treated scarred rabbit VFs. Another aim was to examine the destiny of the hESCs and to explore if malignancies or teratomas would develop in the hESC transplanted VFs.

2. Material and Methods

The principal study design has been used by several investigators [7, 10, 13]. American and Swedish principles of laboratory animal care were followed. The experiment was approved by the Local Ethics Committee at the Karolinska Institutet and by the Regional Committee for Animal Experimentation, Stockholm, Sweden, S29-06, S115-08.

Sixteen female New Zealand white rabbits (bw 3.0 kg–4.0 kg) were used in the study. Twenty-eight VFs were operated on and the remaining four VFs were left as normal controls and used in the viscoelastic measurements. HESCs were transplanted to 22 of the 28 operated VFs and the remaining 6 VFs were left untreated, that is, scarred-untreated. Data for another five normal VFs were collected from a data bank from earlier experiments and were added in the histologic analyses, [15, 16]. Figure 1 shows outline of experiment.

2.1. Vocal Fold Scarring

After premedication with glycopyrrolate (0.1 mg/kg s.c.) and Hypnorm (fentanyl citrate 0.3 mg/mL mixed with fluanizonum 10 mg/mL, 0.3 mL/kg i.m., Janssen Pharmaceutica, Beerse, Belgium) the animals were anaesthetized with diazepam (2 mg/kg i.v.). The laryngeal structures and the mobility of the cricoarytenoid joints were found normal at examination by means of a modified 4.0 mm paediatric laryngoscope (model 8576E, Karl Storz Endoskope, Tuttlingen, Germany) and a Storz-Hopkins 0° 2.7 mm rigid endoscope (model 7218A). The scarring procedure was performed with a 1.5 mm microcup forceps (MicroFrance Medtronic, Düsseldorf, Germany) excising the mucosa and the superficial layer of the thyroarytenoid muscle. A digital video recorded on a computer was made of the VFs before and after the operation (Richard Wolf video camera Number 5512 and a Canopus ADVC100 digital video converter, Reading, UK).

2.2. Human Embryonic Stem Cell Preparation and Characterization

The hESC line HS181 (46; XX) derived by the hESC network at Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, was kindly provided by Professor Hovatta et al. [20]. The HS 181 cells were maintained as previously described on mitotically inactivated, by 35 Gy irradiation, human foreskin fibroblasts [21]. HS181 cells corresponding to passage 33 were used in the study.

2.3. Vocal Fold hESC Transplantation

Three to four undifferentiated hESC colonies were dissected directly from the culture plates and aspirated by a 27-gauge needle of a laryngeal injector with a syringe of 1 mL saline (Medtronic Xomed, Inc., Jacksonville, FL). The 1 mL saline then contained approximately 104 cells per 0.1 mL. Under video monitoring, using the 27-gauge needle Xomed laryngeal injector, the hESCs were transplanted by an injection of 0.1 mL of the solution into the lamina propria and/or the superficial part of the thyroarytenoid muscle of the scarred VF. The injection was carried out directly after the scar excision procedure. The correct injection site was stated by observed bulging of the VF corresponding to the injected volume.

To reduce rejection, the animals that received hESCs were treated with immunosuppressant Tacrolimus (TC), (0.05 mg/kg bw s.c.) every second day. The dose was based on the recommended dose/kg from the manufacturer and our previous experiments in rabbits [15, 16].

2.4. Sample Procurement

The animals were sacrificed with an overdose of pentobarbital sodium. Each larynx was dissected out and divided in the posterior midline. Three animals were sacrificed after 6 weeks and the VFs were analyzed for persistence of hESCs. The remaining thirteen animals were sacrificed after 3 months. Eleven hemilarynges were fresh frozen and kept at −70°C until viscoelastic analyses. The remaining hemilarynges were placed in 4% formaldehyde for histologic and antibody analyses.

2.5. Histologic Measurements

After fixation in 4% formaldehyde and 70% ethanol, the VFs removed from the larynges were further processed, dehydrated, and finally embedded in paraffin wax and cut into 5 µm thick horizontal sections covering the whole thickness of each VF. Staining was made with hematoxylin-eosin (HE) for histologic analyses. Image analyses were made at 10x or 20x magnification after digitization of the microscopic images. The slides were blindly analyzed at the Department of Pathology, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden. Inter and intrareliability were assessed by blind reexamination of 10% of the slides, randomly chosen. The results were identical.

Twelve out of the 22 hESC treated VFs were prepared for histologic measurements at time point of three months. Comparisons with three scarred untreated (Scar + NaCl) VFs and with data for 5 normal VFs from the databank were performed [15, 16].

2.5.1. Immunohistochemistry for Collagen Type I Staining

Staining was performed as previously described [13, 19]. Briefly, slides were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated in alcohol, and blocked in PBS containing 3% BSA. Slides were incubated with a primary antibody (antibody 6308, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), followed by incubation with a secondary antibody (nr.A21127 Jackson Immuno Research labs Inc., West Grove, PA). Sections were rehydrated in ethanol and xylene and mounted with Vectashield containing DAPI (Vector labs Inc., Burlingame, CA). The relative contents of collagen type I in the VFs were measured from the digitized stains after a color filtering and normalization process with Photoshop (version 8.0) and a custom made software that automatically summarizes color change for the collagen type I linked fluorescent antibody (Software by Hans Larsson, Karolinska Institutet, Department of Phoniatrics).

2.5.2. Lamina Propria (Lp) Thickness

After being embedded in paraffin wax, each VF was cut in horizonal 5 μm thick sections covering the whole VF. The right angle of the microtome toward the specimen was meticulously adjusted for each sample. The measurements of the Lp thickness were carried out on the digitized HE image representing the optimal level of each VF (custom made software by Hans Larsson, Karolinska Institutet). The Lp was measured at three spots representing each third of the VF. If a tendency of polyp formation was seen, the polyp was included in that section’s measure point. Each single value was then used in the statistic evaluation.

The Lp of two of the hESC treated VFs were partly damaged in the cutting preparation processes and were left out in the Lp thickness measurements, resulting in for the hESC treated VFs in the Lp thickness calculations.

2.5.3. Hematoxylin-Eosin Staining for Analysis of General Fibrosis

The VFs were characterized into four categories depending on grade of scarring, that is, fibrosis. Grade a showed no or minimal signs of fibrosis. Grade b showed a focal or noncompact fibrosis in the Lp or superficial vocal muscle. Grade c showed a more compact fibrosis in the Lp and superficial muscle and Grade d showed a compact fibrosis in Lp and superficial muscle as well as fibrosis in the deeper part of the vocal muscle [16].

2.6. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH-Analysis) for Persistence of Cell Derivatives from the Transplanted hESCs

Detection of human cells in the VFs was performed with a human DNA specific reference probe linked to a fluorescent molecule, that is, FISH-analysis.

The FISH-analysis was accomplished as previously described [19]. Briefly, slides were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in alcohol, followed by pretreatment with pepsin and hybridization over night at 38°C with a human specific fluorescent probe (CEP X (DXZ1) Spectrum Green SRY Probe, human genomic DNA, Vysis Inc., Burlingame, CA). Six hESC treated VFs were analyzed after six weeks and 12 after three months.

2.7. Viscoelastic Measurements

The viscoelastic shear properties of VF tissue have been studied by several researchers [22, 23]. The parallel-plate rheometer in this experiment produces sinusoidal shear small amplitude oscillations at increasing frequency (within 0.01–15 Hz). We used an AR 2000 Rheometer (TA Instrument) with a stationary lower plate (8 mm diameter) separated by about 0.5 mm from a rotating upper plate. Tissue samples from the eleven fresh frozen VFs (4 scarred VFs injected with hESCs (HESC), 3 scarred injected with saline (Scar + NaCl), and 4 untreated, i.e., normal VFs (Normal)) were thawed in room temperature, dissected, and analyzed at 37°C in the parallel-plate rheometer. The samples included Lp and the superficial part of the thyroarytenoid muscle. The tissue was kept moist with saline during the measurements. All rheometric measurements were performed with a constant strain level transferred from the sample to the upper plate where it was measured with a linear variable displacement transducer. In this experiment, the response and reproducibility were stable up to 2-3 Hz. For higher frequencies, the results were not stable probably due to inertia of the measurement system as the tissue samples were not geometrically perfectly flat and did not completely fill out the 8 mm plate space. The dynamic viscosity ( in Pa·s) and elastic modulus ( in Pa) were derived as a function of frequency. Dynamic viscosity is a measure of material’s resistance to shear flow. The elastic (storage) modulus () represents a measure of material’s stiffness in shear. As mentioned in this experiment, the gap between the plates was not completely filled with tissue. Thus the absolute levels of and may not be accurate. However, the same dissection procedure and amount of tissue were used for all samples which allows for comparison between the different groups.

Measurements of (Pa) and (Pa·s) as functions of frequency, , (in Hz) were plotted in log-log scale as shown in Figures 2(a) and 2(b). Curve-fitting regression was then performed for each curve to examine the relationships between and and between and . The obtained data were properly described using the quadric model rather than the linear one. The quadratic model was used for both and , that is, , where , and are coefficients of parameterization. The curve-fitting estimations, based on least-squares regression analysis, resulted in highly significant findings using the ANOVA test in all cases ( and ). The significant values of the test suggested that the variation explained by the model was not due to chance. Goodness of fit was also estimated by the coefficient of determination, . The statistic is a measure of the strength of association between the observed and model-predicted values for both and . The values of were high for each regression model indicating goodness of fit ( for both and ).

2.8. Statistics

Differences between groups were assessed using Mann-Whitney test for independent data. For the histologic measurements, each single value was included when differences between the various groups were estimated. Calculations, whether or not the dynamic viscosity and the elastic modulus, respectively, differed between normal, hESC treated VFs, and untreated scarred controls, were performed with the binomial test. In the regression analyses, the ANOVA test was used. To calculate differences between groups in the analyses of general fibrosis, Fisher’s exact test was used. Statistical significance was considered when .

3. Results

3.1. Viscoelastic Analyses

Dynamic Viscosity, (Pa·s). Scarring significantly increased the dynamic viscosity, indicating stiffer folds, compared with the normal VFs (). Treatment with hESCs significantly decreased the dynamic viscosity compared with the untreated scarred controls (Scar + NaCl) () and was not significantly different from the unscarred controls, that is, normal VFs () (Figure 2(a)).

Elastic Modulus, (Pa). Scarring also significantly increased the elastic modulus compared to normal VFs (). Treatment with hESCs significantly decreased the elastic modulus in comparison with the untreated scarred controls (Scar + NaCl) (). No significant difference was shown for the hESC treated VFs compared with the unscarred controls, that is, normal VFs () (Figure 2(b)).

3.2. FISH-Analysis for Persistence of Transplanted hESC Derivatives

Six weeks after the hESC injections, four out of six treated VFs showed presence of human cells as detected by FISH-analysis. Mitotic activity was rare and detected in 2 out of 6 VFs (Figure 3).

Three months after the hESC injections none of the 12 hESC treated VFs showed persistence of human cells or derivatives, as indicated by the lack of cells positive for the FISH analysis.

3.3. Histologic Analyses
3.3.1. Lamina Propria Thickness

The hESC treated VFs showed a significantly reduced Lp thickness compared with the scarred untreated VFs (). No significant difference was shown between hESC treated VFs and normal VFs (). The difference between untreated VFs and normal VFs was significant () (Figure 4). The Lp thickness was performed blindly. Mean Inter and intrareliability were examined on 20% of the samples and the difference between the measurements was found to be less than 5% with a correlation coefficient of 0.99 at repeated measurements.

3.3.2. Collagen Type I Staining

The hESC treated VFs showed significantly reduced collagen type I in comparison with the scarred untreated VFs (). The difference between normal and hESC treated VFs was not significant (). The difference between normal and untreated VFs was significant () (Figure 5).

3.3.3. Hematoxylin-Eosin Staining for Analysis of General Fibrosis

Ten of the hESC treated VFs were placed in group b, one in each of groups a and c, and none in d (). Of the three scarred untreated VFs, two were placed in the c group and one in the d group (). When the a and b groups were compared with the c and d groups, the hESC treated VFs were placed in the a-b group and the untreated VFs in the c-d group (). Inter and intrareliability were identical in the blinded analyses (Figure 6).

3.3.4. Hematoxylin-Eosin Staining for Malignancies or Teratomas

From the HE staining, there were no malignancies or teratomas found in the hESC transplanted VFs.

4. Discussion

The study is the second one published on hESC treatment of VFs. It shows that the hESC improved healing of scarred rabbit VFs seen after one month is sustainable over a longer period of time. Studies by our group and others have shown that VF scarring is established affecting both tissue viscoelasticity and histology within 3 months in a rabbit model. The specific maturation process of the scar may then take 3–6 months [15, 16, 24].

The derivatives of the transplanted hESCs were able to survive for six weeks but were not detected after three months in this rabbit model. Although a survival of hESC derivatives under the present level of detection cannot be ruled out, this indicates that the regenerated human tissue (epithelium, muscle, and cartilage) found after one month [19] can be expected to undergo apoptosis or rejection in a three-month period.

However, the present study shows that the vibratory characteristics, measured as dynamic viscosity and elastic modulus, were improved compared with untreated scarred VFs and showed statistically no difference to normal VFs after the three months. Moreover, in the histologic analyses no extensive scarring was found in the hESC treated VFs. In fact the collagen type I content and the Lp thickness values for the hESC treated VFs were not found different from the normal VFs. This indicates that lost regenerated human tissue is not replaced by scar tissue but by regeneration of compatible native rabbit tissue. By such factors, the apoptotic hESCs signal to the surrounding rabbit cells, in order to make them proliferate and not to create scar tissue, is unknown and is a challenge for further research.

Two hESC treated VFs did not show any human cells already after six weeks. These two VFs were classified to group b in the classification system of general fibrosis, that is, showing no more fibrosis than the average hESC treated VF. This suggests in this case an initiation of apoptosis already before six weeks, rather than a failed stem cell engraftment.

In all of the 12 VFs, the injected hESCs stayed in the injection site of the Lp and superficial vocal muscle. In none of the VFs, the hESCs were seen to migrate into the deeper part of the vocal muscle. This may be specific for VFs representing a relatively closed compartment [25].

None of the hESC treated VFs developed signs of malignancies or teratomas in this heterologous model. Notably, a human environment may behave differently. The general safety of hESCs however remains for future solutions.

In the study the immunosuppressant (Tacrolimus) was used to reduce the host versus graft reaction. The immunosuppressant was only administrated to the hESC treated VF individuals. This may have influenced the inflammatory reaction and also affected the hESCs. In a study with human mesenchymal stem cells comparing the healing process with and without immunosuppressant (Tacrolimus) we did not find any improved healing with immunosuppressant alone [26]. If the immunosuppressant has had any effect on the hESCs, it is reasonable to believe it has been negative. If so the hESCs have a potential to enhance their effect in an autologous environment.

Currently there is no ideal animal model representing the human VF. However, higher mammals as rabbits seem to have a rather similar VF healing capacity and pattern of scar formation as humans [24, 27, 28]. Therefore it seems reasonable to assume that the histologic and viscoelastic findings are transferable to the human VF.

5. Conclusion

We have previously shown that human embryonic stem cell (hESC) therapy to injured rabbit vocal folds (VFs) induces human tissue generation in the VFs with regained vibratory capacity of the VFs [19]. The present study shows that the hESC transplanted VFs maintained their restored function with improved vocal fold architecture as well as reduction in collagen and Lp thickness for three months although no residual hESCs or derivatives could be detected at this time point. At the three months, no malignancies or teratomas were revealed in the hESC treated VFs.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no competing interests regarding this paper.


The authors acknowledge Professor Frans Maurer, Department of Polymer Science & Engineering, Lund University, Sweden, for assistance with the viscoelastic measurements and Viktor Kempi, Ph.D., Department of Physiology, Östersund Hospital, Sweden, for statistic advice. The study was supported by The Swedish Larynx Foundation (Laryngfonden), the County Council of Jamtland Sweden Foundation (FoU Jamtlands Lans Landsting), and Karolinska Institutet.


  1. M. S. Benninger, D. Alessi, S. Archer et al., “Vocal fold scarring: current concepts and management,” Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 115, no. 5, pp. 474–482, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. I. R. Titze, “Phonation threshold pressure: a missing link in glottal aerodynamics,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 2926–2935, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. N. Ford, D. M. Bless, and J. M. Loftus, “Role of injectable collagen in the treatment of glottic insufficiency: a study of 119 patients,” Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 237–247, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. L. S. Zaretsky, M. L. Shindo, and D. H. Rice, “Autologous fat injection for unilateral vocal fold paralysis,” Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, vol. 105, no. 8, pp. 602–606, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. Remacle, M. Delos, G. Lawson, and J. Jamart, “Correcting vocal fold immobility by autologous collagen injection for voice rehabilitation: a short-term study,” Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, vol. 108, no. 8, pp. 788–793, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. C. Neuenschwander, R. T. Sataloff, M. M. Abaza, M. J. Hawkshaw, D. Reiter, and J. R. Spiegel, “Management of vocal fold scar with autologous fat implantation: perceptual results,” Journal of Voice, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 295–304, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. Hirano, D. M. Bless, B. Rousseau et al., “Prevention of vocal fold scarring by topical injection of hepatocyte growth factor in a rabbit model,” Laryngoscope, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 548–556, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. D. K. Chhetri, C. Head, E. Revazova, S. Hart, S. Bhuta, and G. S. Berke, “Lamina propria replacement therapy with cultured autologous fibroblasts for vocal fold scars,” Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 131, no. 6, pp. 864–870, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. K. Tsunoda, K. Kondou, K. Kimitaka et al., “Autologous transplantation of fascia into the vocal fold: long-term result of type-1 transplantation and the future,” The Laryngoscope, vol. 115, supplement 108, pp. 1–10, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. K. Hansen, S. L. Thibeault, J. F. Walsh, X. Z. Shu, and G. D. Prestwich, “In vivo engineering of the vocal fold extracellular matrix with injectable hyaluronic acid hydrogels: early effects on tissue repair and biomechanics in a rabbit model,” Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, vol. 114, no. 9, pp. 662–670, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. Hertegård, Å. Dahlqvist, and E. Goodyer, “Viscoelastic measurements after vocal fold scarring in rabbits—short-term results after hyaluronan injection,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 126, no. 7, pp. 758–763, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. Gaston and S. L. Thibeault, “Hyaluronic acid hydrogels for vocal fold wound healing,” Biomatter, vol. 3, no. 1, Article ID e23799, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Hertegård, J. Cedervall, B. Svensson et al., “Viscoelastic and histologic properties in scarred rabbit vocal folds after mesenchymal stem cell injection,” Laryngoscope, vol. 116, no. 7, pp. 1248–1254, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. B. J. Johnson, R. Fox, X. Chen, and S. Thibeault, “Tissue regeneration of the vocal fold using bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and synthetic extracellular matrix injections in rats,” Laryngoscope, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 537–545, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. B. Svensson, R. S. Nagubothu, J. Cedervall et al., “Injection of human mesenchymal stem cells improves healing of scarred vocal folds—analysis using a xenograft model,” Laryngoscope, vol. 120, no. 7, pp. 1370–1375, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. B. Svensson, S. R. Nagubothu, J. Cedervall et al., “Injection of human mesenchymal stem cells improves healing of vocal folds after scar excision—a xenograft analysis,” Laryngoscope, vol. 121, no. 10, pp. 2185–2190, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. W. Xu, R. Hu, E. Fan, and D. Han, “Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in collagen—hyaluronic acid gel composite scaffolds for vocal fold regeneration,” Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 123–130, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Ohno, S. Hirano, S.-I. Kanemaru et al., “Implantation of an atelocollagen sponge with autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells for treatment of vocal fold scarring in a canine model,” Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, vol. 120, no. 6, pp. 401–408, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. Cedervall, L. Åhrlund-Richter, B. Svensson et al., “Injection of embryonic stem cells into scarred rabbit vocal folds enhances healing and improves viscoelasticity: short-term results,” Laryngoscope, vol. 117, no. 11, pp. 2075–2081, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. O. Hovatta, M. Mikkola, K. Gertow et al., “A culture system using human foreskin fibroblasts as feeder cells allows production of human embryonic stem cells,” Human Reproduction, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1404–1409, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. P. Imreh, S. Wolbank, C. Unger et al., “Culture and expansion of the human embryonic stem cell line HS181, evaluated in a double-color system,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 337–343, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. L. Thibeault, S. D. Gray, D. M. Bless, R. W. Chan, and C. N. Ford, “Histologic and rheologic characterization of vocal fold scarring,” Journal of Voice, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 96–104, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. R. W. Chan and M. L. Rodriguez, “A simple-shear rheometer for linear viscoelastic characterization of vocal fold tissues at phonatory frequencies,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 1207–1219, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. B. Rousseau, S. Hirano, R. W. Chan et al., “Characterization of chronic vocal fold scarring in a rabbit model,” Journal of Voice, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 116–124, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. E. C. Wang, E. J. Damrose, A. H. Mendelsohn et al., “Distribution of class I and II human leukocyte antigens in the larynx,” Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 280–287, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. B. Svensson, C. Svensson, S. R. Nagubothu et al., “Effects of immunosuppression on human mesenchymal stem cells in healing scarred rabbit vocal folds,” in Restoration of Scarred Vocal Folds with Stem Cell Implantation, B. Svensson, Ed., pp. 978–991, Karolonska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  27. B. Rousseau, S. Hirano, T. D. Scheidt et al., “Characterization of vocal fold scarring in a canine model,” Laryngoscope, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 620–627, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. S. Hirano, S. Minamiguchi, M. Yamashita, T. Ohno, S.-I. Kanemaru, and M. Kitamura, “Histologic characterization of human scarred vocal folds,” Journal of Voice, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 399–407, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Bengt Svensson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.