Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Corrigendum

A corrigendum for this article has been published. To view the corrigendum, please click here.

BioMed Research International
Volume 2015, Article ID 762407, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/762407
Research Article

Characterization of Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells on Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering In Vitro

1Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital of the Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
2Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital of the Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
3German Institute for Cell and Tissue Replacement gGmbH (DIZG), 12555 Berlin, Germany
4Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology, Hospital of the Goethe University and German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Württemberg-Hesse, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Received 1 July 2014; Revised 5 November 2014; Accepted 10 November 2014

Academic Editor: Elena Jones

Copyright © 2015 Dirk Henrich et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. I. Dawson and R. O. C. Oreffo, “Bridging the regeneration gap: stem cells, biomaterials and clinical translation in bone tissue engineering,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 473, no. 2, pp. 124–131, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. U. Kneser, D. J. Schaefer, E. Polykandriotis, and R. E. Horch, “Tissue engineering of bone: the reconstructive surgeon's point of view,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 7–19, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Mobini, B. Hoyer, M. Solati-Hashjin et al., “Fabrication and characterization of regenerated silk scaffolds reinforced with natural silk fibers for bone tissue engineering,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 101, no. 8, pp. 2392–2404, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. E. Geuze, F. Wegman, F. C. Öner, W. J. A. Dhert, and J. Alblas, “Influence of endothelial progenitor cells and platelet gel on tissue-engineered bone ectopically in goats,” Tissue Engineering A, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 3669–3677, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. Usami, H. Mizuno, K. Okada et al., “Composite implantation of mesenchymal stem cells with endothelial progenitor cells enhances tissue-engineered bone formation,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 730–741, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. Zigdon-Giladi, T. Bick, D. Lewinson, and E. E. Machtei, “Co-Transplantation of endothelial progenitor cells and mesenchymal stem cells promote neovascularization and bone regeneration,” Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Seebach, D. Henrich, K. Wilhelm, J. H. Barker, and I. Marzi, “Endothelial progenitor cells improve directly and indirectly early vascularization of mesenchymal stem cell-driven bone regeneration in a critical bone defect in rats,” Cell Transplantation, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1667–1677, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Henrich, C. Seebach, C. Kaehling et al., “Simultaneous cultivation of human endothelial-like differentiated precursor cells and human marrow stromal cells on β-tricalcium phosphate,” Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 551–560, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Seebach, D. Henrich, C. Kähling et al., “Endothelial progenitor cells and mesenchymal stem cells seeded onto β-tcp granules enhance early vascularization and bone healing in a critical-sized bone defect in rats,” Tissue Engineering Part A, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1961–1970, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. Eldesoqi, C. Seebach, C. N. Ngoc et al., “High calcium bioglass enhances differentiation and survival of endothelial progenitor cells, inducing early vascularization in critical size bone defects,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 11, Article ID e79058, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Y. Wang, Z. B. Han, Y. P. Song, and Z. C. Han, “Safety of mesenchymal stem cells for clinical application,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2012, Article ID 652034, 4 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. C. R. Jenkins, O. O. Shevchuk, V. Giambra et al., “IGF signaling contributes to malignant transformation of hematopoietic progenitors by the MLL-AF9 oncoprotein,” Experimental Hematology, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 715.e6–723.e6, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. D. Pearson, “Endothelial progenitor cells—hype or hope?” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 255–262, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. B. Assmus, A. Rolf, S. Erbs et al., “Clinical outcome 2 years after intracoronary administration of bone marrow-derived progenitor cells in acute myocardial infarction,” Circulation: Heart Failure, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 89–96, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. Henrich, C. Seebach, E. Sterlepper, C. Tauchmann, I. Marzi, and J. Frank, “RIA reamings and hip aspirate: a comparative evaluation of osteoprogenitor and endothelial progenitor cells,” Injury, vol. 41, supplement 2, pp. S62–S68, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Z. Kuçi, S. Kuçi, S. Zircher et al., “Mesenchymal stromal cells derived from CD271+ bone marrow mononuclear cells exert potent allosuppressive properties,” Cytotherapy, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1193–1204, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Tormin, O. Li, J. C. Brune et al., “CD146 expression on primary nonhematopoietic bone marrow stem cells is correlated with in situ localization,” Blood, vol. 117, no. 19, pp. 5067–5077, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. Kuçi, Z. Kuçi, H. Kreyenberg et al., “CD271 antigen defines a subset of multipotent stromal cells with immunosuppressive and lymphohematopoietic engraftment-promoting properties,” Haematologica, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 651–659, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. Cuthbert, S. A. Boxall, H. B. Tan, P. V. Giannoudis, D. Mcgonagle, and E. Jones, “Single-platform quality control assay to quantify multipotential stromal cells in bone marrow aspirates prior to bulk manufacture or direct therapeutic use,” Cytotherapy, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 431–440, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. O. Jeon, S. J. Song, S. H. Bhang, C.-Y. Choi, M. J. Kim, and B.-S. Kim, “Additive effect of endothelial progenitor cell mobilization and bone marrow mononuclear cell transplantation on angiogenesis in mouse ischemic limbs,” Journal of Biomedical Science, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 323–330, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. Hernigou, A. Poignard, F. Beaujean, and H. Rouard, “Percutaneous autologous bone-marrow grafting for nonunions: influence of the number and concentration of progenitor cells,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery—Series A, vol. 87, no. 7, pp. 1430–1437, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. B. Assmus, T. Tonn, F. H. Seeger et al., “Red blood cell contamination of the final cell product impairs the efficacy of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell therapy,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 55, no. 13, pp. 1385–1394, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. Schultheiss, C. Seebach, D. Henrich, K. Wilhelm, J. H. Barker, and J. Frank, “Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) and endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) growth and adhesion in six different bone graft substitutes,” European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 635–644, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. Seebach, J. Schultheiss, K. Wilhelm, J. Frank, and D. Henrich, “Comparison of six bone-graft substitutes regarding to cell seeding efficiency, metabolism and growth behaviour of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) in vitro,” Injury, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 731–738, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. B. Assmus, V. Schächinger, C. Teupe et al., “Transplantation of progenitor cells and regeneration enhancement in acute myocardial infarction (TOPCARE-AMI),” Circulation, vol. 106, no. 24, pp. 3009–3017, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. T. Hisatome, Y. Yasunaga, S. Yanada, Y. Tabata, Y. Ikada, and M. Ochi, “Neovascularization and bone regeneration by implantation of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells,” Biomaterials, vol. 26, no. 22, pp. 4550–4556, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. Y. Sun, Y. Feng, and C. Zhang, “The effect of bone marrow mononuclear cells on vascularization and bone regeneration in steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head,” Joint Bone Spine, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 685–690, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. I. Fernandez-Bances, M. Perez-Basterrechea, S. Perez-Lopez et al., “Repair of long-bone pseudoarthrosis with autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells combined with allogenic bone graft,” Cytotherapy, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 571–577, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. T. Zantop, T. W. Gilbert, M. C. Yoder, and S. F. Badylak, “Extracellular matrix scaffolds are repopulated by bone marrow-derived cells in a mouse model of Achilles tendon reconstruction,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1299–1309, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. T. Yamasaki, Y. Yasunaga, M. Ishikawa, T. Hamaki, and M. Ochi, “Bone-marrow-derived mononuclear cells with a porous hydroxyapatite scaffold for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a preliminary study,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery B, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 337–341, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. Berger, L. Dyugovskaya, A. Polyakov, and L. Lavie, “Short-term fibronectin treatment induces endothelial-like and angiogenic properties in monocyte-derived immature dendritic cells: involvement of intracellular VEGF and MAPK regulation,” European Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 91, no. 8, pp. 640–653, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. Maurice, S. Srouji, and E. Livne, “Isolation of progenitor cells from cord blood using adhesion matrices,” Cytotechnology, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 125–137, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. E. Cenni, F. Perut, G. Ciapetti et al., “In vitro evaluation of freeze-dried bone allografts combined with platelet rich plasma and human bone marrow stromal cells for tissue engineering,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 45–50, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. P. Kasten, J. Vogel, R. Luginbühl et al., “Influence of platelet-rich plasma on osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and ectopic bone formation in calcium phosphate ceramics,” Cells Tissues Organs, vol. 183, no. 2, pp. 68–79, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. B. Wildemann, A. Kadow-Romacker, N. P. Haas, and G. Schmidmaier, “Quantification of various growth factors in different demineralized bone matrix preparations,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research A, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 437–442, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. W. S. Pietrzak, J. Woodell-May, and N. McDonald, “Assay of bone morphogenetic protein-2, -4, and -7 in human demineralized bone matrix,” Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 84–90, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. A. Hofmann, L. Konrad, M. H. Hessmann et al., “The influence of bone allograft processing on osteoblast attachment and function,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 846–854, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. Pruss, B. Baumann, M. Seibold et al., “Validation of the sterilization procedure of allogeneic avital bone transplants using peracetic acid-ethanol,” Biologicals, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 59–66, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. A. Pruss, U. B. Göbel, G. Pauli et al., “Peracetic acid-ethanol treatment of allogeneic avital bone tissue transplants—a reliable sterilization method,” Annals of Transplantation, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 34–42, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. Rauh, F. Despang, J. Baas et al., “Comparative biomechanical and microstructural analysis of native versus peracetic acid-ethanol treated cancellous bone graft,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 784702, 11 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. S. Endres, M. Kratz, M. Heinz et al., “Biocompatibility testing of different sterilised or disinfected allogenous bone grafts in comparison to the gold standard of autologous bone grafts—an “in vitro” analysis of immunomodulation,” Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, vol. 143, no. 6, pp. 660–668, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. C. Naujoks, F. Langenbach, K. Berr et al., “Biocompatibility of osteogenic predifferentiated human cord blood stem cells with biomaterials and the influence of the biomaterial on the process of differentiation,” Journal of Biomaterials Applications, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 497–512, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. U. Meyer, U. Joos, and H. P. Wiesmann, “Biological and biophysical principles in extracorporal bone tissue engineering,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 325–332, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. B. F. Pujol, F. C. Lucibello, M. Zuzarte, P. Lütjens, R. Müller, and K. Havemann, “Dendritic cells derived from peripheral monocytes express endothelial markers and in the presence of angiogenic growth factors differentiate into endothelial-like cells,” European Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 99–110, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. J. Rehman, J. Li, C. M. Orschell, and K. L. March, “Peripheral blood “endothelial progenitor cells” are derived from monocyte/macrophages and secrete angiogenic growth factors,” Circulation, vol. 107, no. 8, pp. 1164–1169, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. Y.-K. Wang, X. Yu, D. M. Cohen et al., “Bone morphogenetic protein-2-induced signaling and osteogenesis is regulated by cell shape, RhoA/ROCK, and cytoskeletal tension,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1176–1186, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. S. Honsawek, D. Dhitiseith, and V. Phupong, “Effects of demineralized bone matrix on proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells from human umbilical cord,” Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, vol. 89, supplement 3, pp. S189–S195, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. E. Tsiridis, Z. Ali, A. Bhalla et al., “In vitro proliferation and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on hydroxyapatite versus human demineralised bone matrix with and without osteogenic protein-1,” Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 9–19, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. Y. Kang, S. Kim, J. Bishop, A. Khademhosseini, and Y. Yang, “The osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow MSCs on HUVEC-derived ECM and β-TCP scaffold,” Biomaterials, vol. 33, no. 29, pp. 6998–7007, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. T. J. Burdon, A. Paul, N. Noiseux, S. Prakash, and D. Shum-Tim, “Bone marrow stem cell derived paracrine factors for regenerative medicine: current perspectives and therapeutic potential,” Bone Marrow Research, vol. 2011, Article ID 207326, 14 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar