Research Article
The Role of FGFR1 Gene Amplification as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Squamous Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Published Data
Table 3
RRs of FGFR1 amplification in the studies according to different histology, gender, smoking status, and stage.
| | RRs (95% CI) | | Histology (SQCC versus ADE) | Gender (M versus F) | Current smokers versus nonsmokers | Current smokers versus former smokers | pStage (III-IV versus I-II) |
| Seo et al. [29] | 5.91 (2.63–13.30) | 14.57 (2.01–105.48) | 10.81 (3.37–34.63) | — | 0.84 (0.39–1.81) | Cihoric et al. [26] | 9.46 (2.97–30.09) | 2.51 (1.02–6.18) | 2.49 (0.36–17.14) | — | — | Toschi et al. [30] | 2.45 (1.58–3.80) | 1.32 (0.71–2.45) | — | — | 1.06 (0.70–1.62) | Russell et al. [31] | 13.15 (3.24–53.35) | 2.02 (1.07–3.82) | 1.25 (0.69–2.26) | 1.11 (0.61–2.01) | 0.56 (0.27–1.15) | Gadgeel et al. [22] | 1.24 (0.45–3.46) | 3.95 (0.92–16.98) | 2.06 (0.28–15.11) | — | — | Craddock et al. [38] | — | 1.94 (0.77–4.90) | 0.76 (0.33–1.72) | 0.71 (0.31–1.61) | 0.62 (0.23–1.69) | Tran et al. [24] | 2.19 (1.18–4.05) | 1.27 (0.73–2.22) | 4.40 (0.29–66.54) | — | 1.06 (0.54–2.10) | Kim et al. [25] | — | 5.05 (0.32–79.02) | 14.97 (4.70–47.71) | — | 1.11 (0.55–2.26) | Heist et al. [40] | — | 1.60 (0.84–3.01) | 0.78 (0.35–1.75) | 0.79 (0.35–1.79) | 0.94 (0.49–1.83) | Kohler et al. [28] | 2.25 (0.67–7.45) | — | — | — | — | Sasaki et al. [23] | — | 2.86 (1.10–7.43) | 9.79 (1.41–67.97) | — | — | Weiss et al. [27] | — | — | — | — | — | Overall | 3.49 (2.62–4.64) | 2.03 (1.57–2.63) | 2.63 (1.92–3.60) | 0.90 (0.59–1.36) | 0.90 (0.71–1.15) |
|
|
RR, relative risk; SQCC, squamous cell lung cancer; ADE, lung adenocarcinoma; M, male; F, female; pStage, pathological stage. Pathological stage or clinical stage, not specified.
|