Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015, Article ID 808625, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/808625
Research Article

Availability of Software-Based Correction of Mandibular Plane for the Vertical Measurement of the Mandible in Cone Beam Computed Tomography

1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
2Department of Advanced General Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea

Received 10 September 2015; Accepted 8 October 2015

Academic Editor: Guang Jia

Copyright © 2015 Sang-Sun Han et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. H. Zadeh, “Implant site development: clinical realities of today and the prospects of tissue engineering,” Journal of the California Dental Association, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1011–1020, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. G. P. Cavalcanti, J. Yang, A. Ruprecht, and M. W. Vannier, “Accurate linear measurements in the anterior maxilla using orthoradially reformatted spiral computed tomography,” Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 137–140, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Halperin-Sternfeld, E. E. Machtei, and J. Horwitz, “Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for dimensional linear measurements in the mandible,” The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 593–599, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Gupta and S. P. Ali, “Cone beam computed tomography in oral implants,” National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 2–6, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. K. B. Waltrick, M. J. Nunes de Abreu Junior, M. Corrêa, M. D. Zastrow, and V. D'Avila Dutra, “Accuracy of linear measurements and visibility of the mandibular canal of cone-beam computed tomography images with different voxel sizes: an in vitro study,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 68–77, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. K. Kamburoğlu, C. Kiliç, T. Özen, and S. P. Yüksel, “Measurements of mandibular canal region obtained by cone-beam computed tomography: a cadaveric study,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. e34–e42, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L.-G. Chen, T. Lundgren, H. Hallström, and F. Cherel, “Comparison of different methods of assessing alveolar ridge dimensions prior to dental implant placement,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 401–405, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. Abramovitch and D. D. Rice, “Basic principles of cone beam computed tomography,” Dental Clinics of North America, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 463–484, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Loubele, N. Van Assche, K. Carpentier et al., “Comparative localized linear accuracy of small-field cone-beam CT and multislice CT for alveolar bone measurements,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 512–518, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K.-D. Kim, H.-G. Jeong, S.-H. Choi, E.-H. Hwang, and C.-S. Park, “Effect of mandibular positioning on preimplant site measurement of the mandible in reformatted CT,” The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 177–183, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. Tarazona-Álvarez, J. Romero-Millán, D. Peñarrocha-Oltra, M.-Á. Fuster-Torres, B. Tarazona, and M. Peñarrocha-Diago, “Comparative study of mandibular linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography and digital calipers,” Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. e271–e274, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. Jacobs and M. Quirynen, “Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement,” Periodontology 2000, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 203–213, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. V. Braut, M. M. Bornstein, U. Kuchler, and D. Buser, “Bone dimensions in the posterior mandible: a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Part 2—analysis of edentulous sites,” The International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 639–647, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. L. Vazquez, Y. Nizamaldin, C. Combescure et al., “Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects,” Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, vol. 42, no. 2, Article ID 20110429, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus