Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015, Article ID 842923, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/842923
Research Article

Tumour Relapse Prediction Using Multiparametric MR Data Recorded during Follow-Up of GBM Patients

1Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, P.O. Box 2446, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
2iMinds Medical IT, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
3Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
4Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), PSI Center for Processing Speech and Images, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
5Department of Pedriatic Neuro-Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
6Biomedical MRI/MoSAIC, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium

Received 5 September 2014; Accepted 16 December 2014

Academic Editor: Zhengchao Dong

Copyright © 2015 Adrian Ion-Margineanu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. C. Burger, F. S. Vogel, S. B. Green, and T. A. Strike, “Glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma: pathologic criteria and prognostic implications,” Cancer, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1106–1111, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Dobes, V. G. Khurana, B. Shadbolt et al., “Increasing incidence of glioblastoma multiforme and meningioma, and decreasing incidence of Schwannoma (2000–2008): findings of a multicenter Australian study,” Surgical Neurology International, vol. 2, p. 176, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. A. M. Rulseh, J. Keller, J. Klener et al., “Long-term survival of patients suffering from glioblastoma multiforme treated with tumor-treating fields,” World Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 10, article 220, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. Stupp, W. P. Mason, M. J. van den Bent et al., “Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 352, no. 10, pp. 987–996, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. L. Dean, B. P. Drayer, C. R. Bird et al., “Gliomas: classification with MR imaging,” Radiology, vol. 174, no. 2, pp. 411–415, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. F. Earnest IV, P. J. Kelly, B. W. Scheithauer et al., “Cerebral astrocytomas: histopathologic correlation of MR and CT contrast enhancement with stereotactic biopsy,” Radiology, vol. 166, no. 3, pp. 823–827, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. J. Nelson and S. Cha, “Imaging glioblastoma multiforme,” The Cancer Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 134–145, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Rees, “Advances in magnetic resonance imaging of brain tumours,” Current Opinion in Neurology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 643–650, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Vrabec, S. Van Cauter, U. Himmelreich et al., “MR perfusion and diffusion imaging in the follow-up of recurrent glioblastoma treated with dendritic cell immunotherapy: a pilot study,” Neuroradiology, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 721–731, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. H. Jensen, J. A. Helpern, A. Ramani, H. Lu, and K. Kaczynski, “Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1432–1440, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Lund, S. Rand, H. Krouwer, C. Schultz, and K. Schmainda, “Using rCBV to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence in malignant gliomas,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 63, supplement 1, pp. S65–S66, 2005, Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. W. Möller-Hartmann, S. Herminghaus, T. Krings et al., “Clinical application of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the diagnosis of intracranial mass lesions,” Neuroradiology, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 371–381, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. van Gool, W. Maes, H. Ardon, T. Verschuere, S. van Cauter, and S. de Vleeschouwer, “Dendritic cell therapy of high-grade gliomas,” Brain Pathology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 694–712, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. de Vleeschouwer, F. van Calenbergh, P. Demaerel et al., “Transient local response and persistent tumor control in a child with recurrent malignant glioma: treatment with combination therapy including dendritic cell therapy: case report,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 492–497, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Rutkowski, S. de Vleeschouwer, E. Kaempgen et al., “Surgery and adjuvant dendritic cell-based tumour vaccination for patients with relapsed malignant glioma, a feasibility study,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 91, no. 9, pp. 1656–1662, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. de Vleeschouwer, S. Fieuws, S. Rutkowski et al., “Postoperative adjuvant dendritic cell—based immunotherapy in patients with relapsed glioblastoma multiforme,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 3098–3104, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. Y. Wen, D. R. Macdonald, D. A. Reardon et al., “Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1963–1972, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. Van Cauter, F. De Keyzer, D. Sima et al., “Integrating diffusion kurtosis imaging, dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI, and short echo time chemical shift imaging for grading gliomas,” Neuro-Oncology, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 1010–1021, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. S. Van Cauter, J. Veraart, J. Sijbers et al., “Gliomas: diffusion kurtosis MR imaging in grading,” Radiology, vol. 263, no. 2, pp. 492–501, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. van Cauter, D. M. Sima, J. Luts et al., “Reproducibility of rapid short echo time CSI at 3T for clinical applications,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 445–456, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. SPID, http://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~biomed/software.php#SpidGUI.
  22. A. R. Croitor Sava, D. M. Sima, J.-B. Poullet, A. J. Wright, A. Heerschap, and S. van Huffel, “Exploiting spatial information to estimate metabolite levels in two-dimensional MRSI of heterogeneous brain lesions,” NMR in Biomedicine, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 824–835, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Cavassila, S. Deval, C. Huegen, D. van Ormondt, and D. Graveron-Demilly, “Cramér-Rao bounds: an evaluation tool for quantitation,” NMR in Biomedicine, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 278–283, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. Kreis, “Issues of spectral quality in clinical 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy and a gallery of artifacts,” NMR in Biomedicine, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 361–381, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  25. M. G. Kounelakis, I. N. Dimou, M. E. Zervakis et al., “Strengths and weaknesses of 1.5T and 3T MRS data in brain glioma classification,” IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 647–654, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. L. S. Hu, L. C. Baxter, D. S. Pinnaduwage et al., “Optimized preload leakage-correction methods to improve the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging in posttreatment gliomas,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 40–48, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. H. J. Poot, A. J. den Dekker, E. Achten, M. Verhoye, and J. Sijbers, “Optimal experimental design for diffusion kurtosis imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 819–829, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. E. S. Hui, M. M. Cheung, L. Qi, and E. X. Wu, “Towards better MR characterization of neural tissues using directional diffusion kurtosis analysis,” NeuroImage, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 122–134, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. T. Cover and P. Hart, “Nearest neighbor pattern classification,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. G. A. Seber, Multivariate Observations, vol. 252, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2009.
  31. C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, “Support-vector networks,” Machine Learning, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 273–297, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. N. Cristianini and J. Shawe-Taylor, An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-Based Learning Methods, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. L. Breiman, J. Friedman, C. J. Stone, and R. A. Olshen, Classification and Regression Trees, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 1984.
  34. K. Hornik, M. Stinchcombe, and H. White, “Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators,” Neural Networks, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 359–366, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. T. Hagan and M. B. Menhaj, “Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 989–993, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. F. Rosenblatt, Principles of Neurodynamics; Perceptrons and the Theory of Brain Mechanisms, Spartan Books, Washington, DC, USA, 1962.
  37. R. P. Lippmann, “An introduction to computing with neural nets,” IEEE ASSP magazine, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 4–22, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. L. Breiman, “Random forests,” Machine Learning, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5–32, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. L. Breiman, “Bagging predictors,” Machine Learning, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 123–140, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. Y. Freund and R. E. Schapire, “A desicion-theoretic generaliza tion of on-line learning and an application to boosting,” in Computational Learning Theory, pp. 23–37, Springer, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  41. J. Friedman, T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani et al., “Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting (with discussion and a rejoinder by the authors),” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 337–407, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  42. Y. Freund, “A more robust boosting algorithm,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.2138.
  43. C. Seiffert, T. M. Khoshgoftaar, J. Van Hulse, and A. Napolitano, “RUSBoost: improving classification performance when training data is skewed,” in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR '08), pp. 1–4, Tampa, Fla, USA, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. J. A. K. Suykens and J. Vandewalle, “Least squares support vector machine classifiers,” Neural Processing Letters, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 293–300, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. J. A. Suykens, T. Van Gestel, J. De Brabanter et al., Least Squares Support Vector Machines, vol. 4, World Scientific, 2002.
  46. ESAT, http://www.esat.kuleuven.be/sista/lssvmlab/.
  47. K. de Brabanter, P. Karsmakers, F. Ojeda et al., “Ls-svmlab toolbox users guide,” ESAT-SISTA Technical Report, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  48. O. Chapelle and A. Zien, Semi-Supervised Classification by Low Density Separation, 2004.
  49. G. Niu, W. Jitkrittum, B. Dai, H. Hachiya, and M. Sugiyama, “Squared-loss mutual information regularization: a Novel information-theoretic approach to semi-supervised learning,” in Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML '13), pp. 1047–1055, June 2013. View at Scopus
  50. Y.-F. Li and Z.-H. Zhou, “Towards making unlabeled data never hurt,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 175–188, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. X. Zhu and A. B. Goldberg, Introduction to Semi-Supervised Learning, vol. 3 of Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, Morgan & Claypool, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. M. Sugiyama, 2014, http://www.ms.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp/software.html.
  53. LAMDA, http://lamda.nju.edu.cn/Data.ashx.
  54. O. Chapelle, http://olivier.chapelle.cc/lds/.
  55. R. F. Barajas Jr., J. S. Chang, M. R. Segal et al., “Differentiation of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme from radiation necrosis after external beam radiation therapy with dynamic susceptibility- weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging,” Radiology, vol. 253, no. 2, pp. 486–496, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. L. S. Hu, J. M. Eschbacher, J. E. Heiserman et al., “Reevaluating the imaging definition of tumor progression: perfusion MRI quantifies recurrent glioblastoma tumor fraction, pseudoprogression, and radiation necrosis to predict survival,” Neuro-Oncology, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 919–930, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  57. X. Hu, K. K. Wong, G. S. Young, L. Guo, and S. T. Wong, “Support vector machine multiparametric MRI identification of pseudoprogression from tumor recurrence in patients with resected glioblastoma,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 296–305, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. P. Weybright, P. C. Sundgren, P. Maly et al., “Differentiation between brain tumor recurrence and radiation injury using MR spectroscopy,” The American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 185, no. 6, pp. 1471–1476, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus