Review Article
Novel Approaches to Treatment of Advanced Melanoma: A Review on Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy
Table 2
Summary of selected clinical trials of immunotherapeutic agents for melanoma treatment.
| Phase | Drug Name | Study design | Patient population | No. pts | ORR (%) | PFS (months) | OS (months) | Reference |
| III | Ipilimumab | Ipilimumab vs Ipilimumab plus GP100 vs GP100 | Previously treated advanced melanoma | 676 | 10.9 vs 5.7 vs 1.5 | 2.86 vs 2.76 vs 2.76 | 10.1 vs 10.0 vs 6.4 | [25] |
| III | Ipilimumab, Dacarbazine | Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine vs dacarbazine | Previously untreated metastatic melanoma | 502 | 15.2 vs 10.3 | NA | 11.2 vs 9.1 | [26] |
| II | Ipilimumab, GM-CSF | Ipilimumab plus GM-CSF vs ipilimumab | Metastatic melanoma | 245 | NA | 3.1 vs 3.1 | 17.5 vs 12.7 | [27] |
| I/II | Tremelimumab | Dose-escalation of tremelimumab | Unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma | 117 | 9.8 (10 mg/kg) | NA | 9.97 (10 mg/kg), 11.53 (15 mg/kg) | [28] |
| III | Tremelimumab | Tremelimumab vs dacarbazine/temozolomide | Previously untreated stage IIIc or IV melanoma | 655 | 10.7 vs 9.8 | Duration of response: 35.8 vs 13.7 | 12.6 vs 10.7 | [29] |
| II | Nivolumab | Nivolumab | Unresectable stage III or IV melanoma | 90 | 25 | 172 days | Not yet reached | [30] |
| III | Nivolumab, Dacarbazine | Nivolumab vs Dacarbazine | Previously untreated BRAF-mutation positive melanoma | 418 | 40.0 vs 13.9 | 5.1 vs 2.2 | At 1-year 72.9% vs 42.1% | [31] |
| I | Pembrolizumab | Safety/efficacy of three doses | Advanced melanoma | 135 | 38/37 (by IRC) | Over 7 months | Not reached | [32, 33] |
| I | Pembrolizumab | Pembrolizumb 2 mg/kg/10 mg/kg | Refractory melanoma | 173 | 26 | 22/14 weeks | NA | [34] |
| II | Pidilizumab | Pidilizumab 1.5 mg/kg/6 mg/kg | Metastatic melanoma | 103 | 6 | 2.8/1.9 | 1 year: 65% | [35] |
|
|