BioMed Research International / 2015 / Article / Tab 1 / Review Article
A Review of Computational Methods to Predict the Risk of Rupture of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Table 1 Wall thickness measurements as reported in literature [
52 ].
Author Reported thickness (mm) Method of measurement Remarks
Di Martino et al., 2006 [53 ] Elective AAA 2.5 ± 0.1 Ruptured AAA 3.6 ± 0.3 Mean 2.9
Optical (laser) Thickness is inversely correlated with local strength; only anterior wall tested; use of laser measurement eliminates compression due to caliper Raghavan et al., 2006 [54 ] Min 0.23 Max 4.26 Median 1.48 Caliper No discernible difference in thickness for small and large aneurysm; thickness slightly lower in posterior and right walls; thickness low in ruptured aneurysm near site of rupture Thubrikar et al., 2001 [55 ] Posterior 2.73 ± 0.46 Lateral 2.52 ± 0.67 Anterior 2.09 ± 0.51 Customized micrometer with resistivity meter Thickness decreases from posterior to lateral to anterior walls; accuracy 0.05 mm