BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2015 / Article
Special Issue

Imaging Infection and Inflammation

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 914516 |

Rasmus Sejersten Ripa, Andreas Kjær, "Imaging Atherosclerosis with Hybrid Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging", BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 914516, 8 pages, 2015.

Imaging Atherosclerosis with Hybrid Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Academic Editor: Francois Rouzet
Received23 Jun 2014
Accepted16 Sep 2014
Published28 Jan 2015


Noninvasive imaging of atherosclerosis could potentially move patient management towards individualized triage, treatment, and followup. The newly introduced combined positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system could emerge as a key player in this context. Both PET and MRI have previously been used for imaging plaque morphology and function: however, the combination of the two methods may offer new synergistic opportunities. Here, we will give a short summary of current relevant clinical applications of PET and MRI in the setting of atherosclerosis. Additionally, our initial experiences with simultaneous PET/MRI for atherosclerosis imaging are presented. Finally, future potential vascular applications exploiting the unique combination of PET and MRI will be discussed.

1. Introduction

Molecular imaging can be defined as noninvasive visualization and quantification of distinct molecular pathways. Important features of molecular imaging are the ability to target a molecular process in living organisms without perturbing them. Both positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are classic methods used for molecular imaging.

Atherosclerosis is traditionally assessed using luminal stenosis by anatomical imaging such as angiography or ultrasound. However, atherosclerosis is now recognized as a systemic degenerative inflammatory vascular disease that develops over decades, with a long subclinical period. Postmortem analyses have shown that most fatal vascular events originate from nonstenotic atherosclerotic lesions [1], and about half of all patients who die from coronary heart disease have no prior diagnosis or symptoms of cardiac disease [2]. Despite this fact, screening asymptomatic adults for cardiovascular risk by imaging is considered inappropriate in most cases by current guidelines [3].

The concept of the vulnerable plaque is a hallmark in atherosclerosis. The vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques are those with a high short-term risk of rupture and thrombosis. The vulnerability of a plaque is characterized by a number of factors like a thin, collagen-poor fibrous cap, a large necrotic core, and abundant macrophages in the cap, whereas the luminal protrusion is not a marker of vulnerability [4].

The current goal in noninvasive imaging is to identify vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques that may subsequently lead to myocardial infarction or stroke. This identification could lead to more optimal and individualized risk stratification and thereby enabling personalized therapy.

The aim of this review is to give a summary of current relevant clinical applications of PET and MRI in the setting of atherosclerosis and to discuss potential future uses of the newly introduced combined PET/MRI system.

2. Why Hybrid Imaging with PET and MRI?

A state-of-the-art MRI scanner offers the ability to perform both anatomical and functional examinations. The atherosclerotic plaque components can be differentiated using dedicated imaging sequences (Figure 1). T1-, T2-, and proton density weighted imaging of carotid plaques allows for identification of the lipid-rich necrotic core, calcification, and intraplaque hemorrhage. The high spatial resolution of MRI even allows for identification and assessment of the fibrous cap. One study published as early as 2002 included 60 patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy. The carotid arteries were imaged in vivo with a 1.5-T scanner (time of flight and T1-, PD-, and T2-weighted). The plaque classification from this multisequence MRI showed good agreement with the American Heart Association classifications from the subsequent histological examination (Cohen’s kappa of 0.74) [5]. Since then, the imaging technique has been improved by optimization of the image sequences used, the introduction of new imaging sequences, and increased magnetic field strength in the MRI system. The fibrous cap is a major contributor to the vulnerability of the plaque. The feasibility of fibrous cap visualization by MRI in the carotid artery is well established [6, 7], and fibrous cap rupture is associated with cerebrovascular symptoms in both prospective and cross-sectional studies [8, 9]. Neoangiogenesis in the atherosclerotic plaque is also considered a hallmark of the unstable plaque. Some studies indicate that dynamic contrast enhanced MRI utilizing gadolinium-based extracellular contrast agents can be used to assess microvessel density in the plaques [10].

MRI for plaque characterization in the coronary arteries is technically more challenging than carotid plaques due to cardiac and respiratory motion of the often small tortuous vessels. Several methods are under development to deal with these challenges. Some studies have in fact shown that positive remodeling and intracoronary thrombus detection is feasible in the coronary arteries [11, 12].

Molecular imaging with MRI is also possible using specific contrast agents that allow for visualization of processes in the atherosclerotic plaque at the molecular level. Target specific MRI contrast agents are typically based on paramagnetic gadolinium or iron oxide. Clinical studies have demonstrated uptake of small iron oxide (USPIO) particles in carotid plaques and the uptake was found to correspond to areas of macrophage infiltration [13]. One study has even used USPIO-enhanced carotid MRI to assess the therapeutic response of short term aggressive lipid lower therapy [14]. Fibrin is another molecular target of MRI utilizing a fibrin-specific gadolinium-based contrast agent. This agent has been used in a few clinical studies for thrombi detection [15]. A number of other target specific MRI contrast agents for imaging atherosclerosis are currently being tested in animal models (review in [16]).

It is relevant in this context to consider what PET can add to the “MRI-one-stop-shop.” Clinical PET has a spatial resolution around 3 mm at best and can thus in no way compete with the spatial resolution of MRI. PET is based on photon emission from positron emitting radioactive tracers and does not contain anatomical information. Thus, PET cannot be used to image morphological components of the plaque. PET, however, is a sublime technique for molecular imaging. Molecular imaging with MRI has a limited sensitivity typically in the micromolar range, whereas a typical clinical PET scanner can detect concentrations in nano- to picomoles per liter. This sensitivity, however, is lower in plaque imaging since the plaque size is near the spatial resolution of the system and thus subject to signal loss by partial volume effects.

PET is based on the tracer principle for imaging. The radioactive tracer utilized in PET is a compound where an atom is replaced by a radioisotope or a radioisotope is added. Only traces of the substance are applied; therefore, it has no pharmacologic effect in vivo. Typically, the tracer is a biomolecule that reflects a particular body function or metabolism. PET tracers can be nonspecific following a biochemical pathway or allowing for measurement of tissue extraction or metabolism. These radiotracers include the glucose analogue fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) which is taken up by high-glucose-utilizing cells, where FDG is trapped intracellularly by phosphorylation to allow tissue glucose metabolism assessment. PET tracers can also be specific radioligands involved in an interaction with receptors. PET tracer distribution can be quantified in absolute terms and with dynamic measurement of PET tracer uptake and distribution kinetic analysis is possible.

In summary, we find that molecular imaging with PET in most cases will be far superior to molecular imaging with MRI. In our opinion, optimal utilization of the complementary information from hybrid PET/MR system will require a better understanding and foremost a better use of the pathophysiologic information that can be acquired by MRI. Simply using the anatomical information in conjunction with the metabolic information from the PET will be a suboptimal utilization of the potential of the system.

3. Initial Clinical Experience

3.1. Large Animal Model

As compared to preclinical animal scanners, human hybrid PET/MRI systems can physically contain larger animals. This opens the opportunity to study atherosclerosis in human-like atherosclerosis models such as rabbits and porcines. So far, few feasibility data on this topic has been published; Dregely et al. [17] presented feasibility data from 4 high-cholesterol fed rabbits as an abstract at the 2012 annual meeting of Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. Likewise, our institution is working with a porcine model of atherosclerosis (Figure 2). At our hand, simultaneous PET/MRI of this large animal model is feasible but requires some optimization [18].

3.2. Vascular Imaging in Humans without Atherosclerosis

Our institution recently performed a study aiming at evaluating the feasibility of integrated PET/MR imaging of the carotid arteries in humans [19]. Six HIV patients with increased risk of atherosclerosis but without any symptoms of cardiovascular disease were included to a single-FDG-injection dual-imaging protocol of simultaneous PET/MR and subsequent integrated PET/CT on the same day. It is clear from Figure 3 that MR allowed for superior delineation of both the inner and outer walls of the carotid artery as compared to the CT in the study. The study found a high congruence between FDG-uptake quantification using the two systems despite the inherent methodological differences between the two systems such as method of attenuation correction, the use of time-of-flight in PET, and the potential interference of the MR signal from PET detectors inside the MR scanner.

3.3. PET/MRI of Human Atherosclerosis in the Carotid Arteries

PET imaging of atherosclerosis has so far focused primarily on FDG. The first report on FDG accumulation in the large arteries emerged in 2001 [20], and since then, a large body of evidence has materialized linking FDG uptake to the macrophage contents of high-risk plaques [2123]. The idea of combining FDG-PET with MRI is not new. In fact several studies have used sequential PET and MRI for imaging atherosclerotic plaques in animal models [24] as well as in carotid plaques in humans [2529]. In our experience carotid plaque with simultaneous FDG-PET/MRI is feasible (Figure 4). Future studies will have to show if FDG-PET/MRI has superior prognostic information as compared to FDG-PET/CT.

One very interesting trial is the ongoing prospective observational PESA study [30]. A subgroup of 1,300 participants within this study which have evidence of atherosclerosis on ultrasound or increased coronary artery calcium score will undergo hybrid FDG PET/MRI study of both the carotid and iliofemoral arteries and the FDG PET/MRI study will be repeated at 6 years of followup.

4. Potential Vascular PET/MRI Applications

4.1. New PET Tracers

PET imaging of atherosclerosis has thus far focused primarily on FDG. A major drawback of imaging atherosclerosis with FDG PET, however, is the lack of specificity of the tracer. Another limitation is the high uptake of FDG in the myocardium, which produces a suboptimal signal-to-noise ratio when coronary arteries are imaged. As an alternative, some researchers have suggested 18F-deoxy-mannose as a more atherosclerosis specific tracer than FDG [31], but this needs to be confirmed in clinical trials.

A hunt for new and more specific tracers has started. The tracers should specifically target cell-mediated key molecular processes associated with the vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque. The most prominent of these targets include macrophage infiltration, apoptosis, hypoxia, and neoangiogenesis of the intima/media. Activated macrophages express the somatostatin receptor subtype 2, and this could be a target for PET imaging. 68Ga-DOTATATE is utilized in diagnosis and staging of neuroendocrine tumors and has high affinity for somatostatin receptors and a few studies have suggested a future role in plaque imaging [3234]. PET tracers for imaging apoptosis, hypoxia, and neoangiogenesis are available, but their use in imaging atherosclerosis is very limited thus far [3537].

Another promising PET tracer for plaque imaging is 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF). This tracer is deposited by chemisorptions onto hydroxyapatite and is used in oncology to identify bone metastasis. Recent evidence suggests that NaF uptake is not equivalent to calcification as identified by CT imaging [38] but that it can identify “spotty” metabolic active calcification in the plaques thought to promote plaque vulnerability. Using hybrid PET/CT and a retrospective approach, it was recently described how NaF accumulated in atheroma of the aorta, iliac, femoral, and carotid arteries [39]; however, coincidental NaF and FDG uptake (14 of 215 lesions) is rare [40]. Joshi et al. [41] recently published an interesting study indicating that NaF PET can identify culprit and ruptured plaques in patients with recent myocardial infarction.

In summary, we find that the combination of morphologic and functional information from the MRI with molecular imaging from PET may lead to optimal characterization of the plaque and thus improved individualized counseling and therapy.

4.2. Spectroscopy and Hyperpolarization

Image-guided proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) of atherosclerotic plaques in carotid arteries using clinical 3-T MR systems is feasible [42]. The proton spectrum is collected from image-localized plaques, so that the specific proton resonances can be identified. Duivenvoorden et al. [42] have recently used this method to identify liquid phase cholesteryl ester in carotid plaques. The trial was not without challenges though. The proton spectra were collected from a voxel of  mm with 13 minutes acquisition time. Only 49% of the obtained spectra were of adequate quality for analysis. No studies combining proton spectroscopy with PET have so far been published in the field of atherosclerosis.

Our institution has recently installed a hyperpolarizer with our PET/MRI system allowing us to do simultaneous hyperpolarized MR and PET (HyperPET). Hyperpolarization of nuclear spins like 13C can increase the MR signal with a factor of more than 105. Chemical compounds (tracers) like pyruvate can be enriched with 13C and injected into humans or animals following ex vivo hyperpolarization. The increased signal from the 13C allows both imaging and spectroscopy of the tracer within a limited time window. Hyperpolarized MRI for atherosclerosis has only been reported in few preclinical reports [43]. The HyperPET offers several new applications for in vivo molecular imaging of atherosclerosis. Due to its physical nature, PET can only image one radioactive tracer at the time. In comparison, HyperPET can measure several biological processes simultaneously; for example, plaque glycolysis can be assessed with hyperpolarized 13C-pyruvate and plaque hypoxia can be assessed with a specific radiolabelled PET tracer like 64Cu-ATSM simultaneously. In this way, HyperPET can combine two molecular imaging techniques with a possible synergistic effect in atherosclerosis. HyperPET, however, is a very demanding and expensive solution that will most likely be restricted to experimental use in few selected cases. Nevertheless, the distinct and small volume of interest, the plaque, makes HyperPET more realistic to be applied than in diseases where whole body evaluation is needed.

4.3. Research Platform

The acquisition of a PET/MRI system is a huge task that requires widespread knowhow by technicians, physicists, and physicians in addition to extensive funding both initially and for running costs. It is our expectation that this will limit the technique to mainly experimental use in a limited number of major university centers for some time. At our institution, we have set up an atherosclerosis research workflow in collaboration with the vascular surgeons (Figure 5). This workflow allows our staff technicians to become familiar with the multimodality setup, but at the same time gives us flexibility to introduce new imaging sequences, reconstructions, or ex vivo molecular techniques.

One apparent area for simultaneous PET/MRI is cross validation of new imaging modalities when similar molecular imaging probes exist in PET and MRI. The simultaneous acquisition allows for experiments to be performed under one and the same physiologic condition. One very elegant example is the use of a reporter gene approach. Higuchi et al. [44] transduced endothelial progenitor cells with the sodium iodide symporter gene for reporter gene imaging by PET and also labeled the cells with iron oxides for visualization by MRI. After intramyocardial injection, cells were followed with both PET and MRI. The PET tracer uptake decreased and was undetectable on day 7, whereas the MRI signal remained unchanged throughout the follow-up period. Histological analysis confirmed the presence of labeled transplanted cells at the site on day 1 but not on day 7, when only iron-loaded macrophages were seen [44]. This example clearly states the difference between anatomical imaging with MRI and molecular imaging with PET.

4.4. Interventional Studies of Atherosclerosis

Both PET and MRI have been used for followup after clinical intervention. The dal-PLAQUE study randomly assigned 130 patients with, or with high risk of, coronary heart disease to placebo or dalcetrapib [45]. Coprimary endpoints were MRI-assessed structural changes in the arterial wall after 24 months and assessment of arterial inflammation with FDG PET/CT. Also, some animal studies have utilized sequential PET/CT and MRI as endpoint in interventional trials [46, 47]. There are, however, clear advantages of using simultaneous PET/MRI as compared to PET/CT and stand-alone MRI in this setting. The simultaneous acquisition diminishes the problem with correct alignment between sequential examinations; this could be of particular importance in a follow-up trial where the expected plaque changes might be small. The use of repetitive CT examinations inflicts a nonnegligible radiation dose to the patients that is avoided when using MRI.

To date, no interventional studies of human atherosclerosis using hybrid PET/MRI have been published.

5. Conclusion

We have presented our initial experiences with simultaneous PET/MRI in the field of atherosclerosis. It is our belief that the synergy between PET and MRI will justify its use in atherosclerotic imaging despite its higher cost and more complex management. At the same time though, we do not see a translation from experimental applications to clinical routine in the very near future.

We expect a continuous development of the integration of molecular, functional, and anatomical imaging as well as the clinical indications within atherosclerosis. This novel imaging methods may lead to early detection of high-risk vulnerable plaques, enabling clinicians to improve risk stratification and thus paving the way for individualized therapy.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors have received generous unrestricted support from the John & Birthe Meyer Foundation, the National Advanced Technology Foundation, Danish Medical Research Council, Rigshospitalets Research Foundation, Svend Andersen Foundation, AP Møller Foundation, Novo Nordisk Foundation, and Lundbeck Foundation. All of the staff in the PET center are thanked for their skillful assistance. The sublime cooperation with Professor Sillesen and Dr. Sandholt from the Department of Vascular Surgery is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. A. P. Burke, A. Farb, G. T. Malcom, Y.-H. Liang, J. Smialek, and R. Virmani, “Coronary risk factors and plaque morphology in men with coronary disease who died suddenly,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 336, no. 18, pp. 1276–1282, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. H. Ni, S. Coady, W. Rosamond et al., “Trends from 1987 to 2004 in sudden death due to coronary heart disease: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study,” American Heart Journal, vol. 157, no. 1, pp. 46–52, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. P. Greenland, J. S. Alpert, G. A. Beller et al., “2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: A report of the american college of cardiology foundation/american heart association task force on practice guidelines,” Circulation, vol. 122, no. 25, pp. e584–e636, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. F. Bentzon, F. Otsuka, R. Virmani, and E. Falk, “Mechanisms of plaque formation and rupture,” Circulation Research, vol. 114, no. 12, pp. 1852–1866, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  5. J.-M. Cai, T. S. Hatsukami, M. S. Ferguson, R. Small, N. L. Polissar, and C. Yuan, “Classification of human carotid atherosclerotic lesions with in vivo multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging,” Circulation, vol. 106, no. 11, pp. 1368–1373, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. C. Yuan, S.-X. Zhang, N. L. Polissar et al., “Identification of fibrous cap rupture with magnetic resonance imaging is highly associated with recent transient ischemic attack or stroke,” Circulation, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 181–185, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. T. S. Hatsukami, R. Ross, N. L. Polissar, and C. Yuan, “Visualization of fibrous cap thickness and rupture in human atherosclerotic carotid plaque in vivo with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging,” Circulation, vol. 102, no. 9, pp. 959–964, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Millon, J.-L. Mathevet, L. Boussel et al., “High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of carotid atherosclerosis identifies vulnerable carotid plaques,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1046–1051, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. N. Takaya, C. Yuan, B. Chu et al., “Association between carotid plaque characteristics and subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events: a prospective assessment with MRI—initial results,” Stroke, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 818–823, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. W. S. Kerwin, M. Oikawa, C. Yuan, G. P. Jarvik, and T. S. Hatsukami, “MR imaging of adventitial vasa vasorum in carotid atherosclerosis,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 507–514, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. W. Y. Kim, M. Stuber, P. Börnert, K. V. Kissinger, W. J. Manning, and R. M. Botnar, “Three-dimensional black-blood cardiac magnetic resonance coronary vessel wall imaging detects positive arterial remodeling in patients with nonsignificant coronary artery disease,” Circulation, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 296–299, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. Ehara, T. Hasegawa, S. Nakata et al., “Hyperintense plaque identified by magnetic resonance imaging relates to intracoronary thrombus as detected by optical coherence tomography in patients with angina pectoris,” European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 394–399, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. R. A. Trivedi, C. Mallawarachi, J.-M. U-King-Im et al., “Identifying inflamed carotid plaques using in vivo USPIO-enhanced MR imaging to label plaque macrophages,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1601–1606, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. T. Y. Tang, S. P. S. Howarth, S. R. Miller et al., “The ATHEROMA (atorvastatin therapy: effects on reduction of macrophage activity) study: evaluation using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in carotid disease,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 53, no. 22, pp. 2039–2050, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. Vymazal, E. Spuentrup, G. Cardenas-Molina et al., “Thrombus imaging with fibrin-specific gadolinium-based MR contrast agent EP-2104R: results of a phase II clinical study of feasibility,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 697–704, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. R. Makowski and R. M. Botnar, “MR imaging of the arterial vessel wall: Molecular imaging from bench to bedside,” Radiology, vol. 269, no. 1, pp. 34–51, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. I. Dregely, I. Laitinen, C. Baumgartner et al., “Characterization of atherosclerotic plaques with simultaneous PET/MR: preliminary results in a rabbit model,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 53, no. 1, abstracts no. 1759, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  18. S. F. Pedersen, T. P. Ludvigsen, H. H. Johannesen et al., “Feasibility of simultaneous PET/MR in diet-induced atherosclerotic minipig: a pilot study for translational imaging,” American Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 448–458, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  19. R. S. Ripa, A. Knudsen, A. M. Hag et al., “Feasibility of simultaneous PET/MR of the carotid artery: first clinical experience and comparison to PET/CT,” American Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 361–371, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  20. M. Yun, D. Yeh, L. I. Araujo, S. Jang, A. Newberg, and A. Alavi, “F-18 FDG uptake in the large arteries: a new observation,” Clinical Nuclear Medicine, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 314–319, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. Græbe, S. F. Pedersen, L. Borgwardt, L. Højgaard, H. Sillesen, and A. Kjær, “Molecular pathology in vulnerable carotid plaques: correlation with [18]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET),” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 714–721, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. F. Pedersen, M. Graebe, A. M. Fisker Hag, L. Højgaard, H. Sillesen, and A. Kjaer, “Gene expression and 18FDG uptake in atherosclerotic carotid plaques,” Nuclear Medicine Communications, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 423–429, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. H. F. Rudd, E. A. Warburton, T. D. Fryer et al., “Imaging atherosclerotic plaque inflammation with [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography,” Circulation, vol. 105, no. 23, pp. 2708–2711, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. Millon, S. D. Dickson, A. Klink et al., “Monitoring plaque inflammation in atherosclerotic rabbits with an iron oxide (P904) and 18F-FDG using a combined PET/MR scanner,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 228, no. 2, pp. 339–345, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. Wang, H. Liu, J. Sun et al., “Varying correlation between 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in carotid atherosclerosis: implications for plaque inflammation,” Stroke, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1842–1845, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  26. M. T. B. Truijman, R. M. Kwee, R. H. M. van Hoof et al., “Combined 18F-FDG PET-CT and DCE-MRI to assess inflammation and microvascularization in atherosclerotic plaques,” Stroke, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 3568–3570, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. H. Saito, S. Kuroda, K. Hirata et al., “Validity of dual MRI and F-FDG PET imaging in predicting vulnerable and inflamed carotid plaque,” Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 370–377, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. C. Calcagno, S. Ramachandran, D. Izquierdo-Garcia et al., “The complementary roles of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT for imaging of carotid atherosclerosis,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 1884–1893, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. S. Silvera, H. E. Aidi, J. H. F. Rudd et al., “Multimodality imaging of atherosclerotic plaque activity and composition using FDG-PET/CT and MRI in carotid and femoral arteries,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 207, no. 1, pp. 139–143, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. Fernández-Ortiz, L. J. Jiménez-Borreguero, J. L. Peñalvo et al., “The progression and early detection of subclinical atherosclerosis (PESA) study: rationale and design,” American Heart Journal, vol. 166, no. 6, pp. 990–998, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. N. Tahara, J. Mukherjee, H. J. De Haas et al., “2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-mannose positron emission tomography imaging in atherosclerosis,” Nature Medicine, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 215–219, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. X. Li, S. Samnick, C. Lapa et al., “68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT for the detection of inflammation of large arteries: correlation with 18F-FDG, calcium burden and risk factors,” EJNMMI Research, vol. 2, article 52, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. X. Li, W. Bauer, M. C. Kreissl et al., “Specific somatostatin receptor II expression in arterial plaque: 68Ga-DOTATATE autoradiographic, immunohistochemical and flow cytometric studies in apoE-deficient mice,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 230, no. 1, pp. 33–39, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. Rominger, T. Saam, E. Vogl et al., “In vivo imaging of macrophage activity in the coronary arteries using 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT: correlation with coronary calcium burden and risk factors,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 193–197, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. J. Beer, J. Pelisek, P. Heider et al., “PET/CT imaging of integrin αvβ3 expression in human carotid atherosclerosis,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 178–187, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. E. M. Laufer, M. H. M. Winkens, M. F. Corsten, C. P. M. Reutelingsperger, J. Narula, and L. Hofstra, “PET and SPECT imaging of apoptosis in vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques with radiolabeled Annexin A5,” Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 26–34, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  37. J. M. U. Silvola, A. Saraste, S. Forsback et al., “Detection of hypoxia by [18F]EF5 in atherosclerotic plaques in mice,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1011–1015, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. R. Dweck, M. W. L. Chow, N. V. Joshi et al., “Coronary arterial 18F-sodium fluoride uptake: a novel marker of plaque biology,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 59, no. 17, pp. 1539–1548, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. T. Derlin, U. Richter, P. Bannas et al., “Feasibility of 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT for imaging of atherosclerotic plaque,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 862–865, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. T. Derlin, Z. Tóth, L. Papp et al., “Correlation of inflammation assessed by 18F-FDG PET, active mineral deposition assessed by 18F-fluoride PET, and vascular calcification in atherosclerotic plaque: a dual-tracer PET/CT study,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1020–1027, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. N. V. Joshi, A. T. Vesey, M. C. Williams et al., “18F-fluoride positron emission tomography for identification of ruptured and high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a prospective clinical trial,” The Lancet, vol. 383, no. 9918, pp. 705–713, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. R. Duivenvoorden, D. Van Wijk, M. Klimas, J. J. P. Kastelein, E. S. G. Stroes, and A. J. Nederveen, “Detection of liquid phase cholesteryl ester in carotid atherosclerosis by 1H-MR spectroscopy in humans,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1277–1284, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. P. Bhattacharya, E. Y. Chekmenev, W. F. Reynolds et al., “Parahydrogen-induced polarization (PHIP) hyperpolarized MR receptor imaging in vivo: a pilot study of 13C imaging of atheroma in mice,” NMR in Biomedicine, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1023–1028, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. T. Higuchi, M. Anton, K. Dumler et al., “Combined reporter gene PET and iron oxide MRI for monitoring survival and localization of transplanted cells in the rat heart,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1088–1094, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. Z. A. Fayad, V. Mani, M. Woodward et al., “Safety and efficacy of dalcetrapib on atherosclerotic disease using novel non-invasive multimodality imaging (dal-PLAQUE): a randomised clinical trial,” The Lancet, vol. 378, no. 9802, pp. 1547–1559, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. E. Vucic, S. D. Dickson, C. Calcagno et al., “Pioglitazone modulates vascular inflammation in atherosclerotic rabbits: noninvasive assessment with FDG-PET-CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1100–1109, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. E. Vucic, C. Calcagno, S. D. Dickson et al., “Regression of inflammation in atherosclerosis by the LXR agonist R211945: a noninvasive assessment and comparison with atorvastatin,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 819–828, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Rasmus Sejersten Ripa and Andreas Kjær. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.