Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 948610, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/948610
Review Article

Focus on Diffusion MR Investigations of Musculoskeletal Tissue to Improve Osteoporosis Diagnosis: A Brief Practical Review

1CNR-IPCF UOS Roma Sapienza, Physics Department, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Italy
2Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, PTV Foundation, “Tor Vergata” University of Rome, Italy
3Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Radiotherapy, PTV Foundation, “Tor Vergata” University of Rome, Italy

Received 28 October 2014; Accepted 18 February 2015

Academic Editor: Jimin Ren

Copyright © 2015 Silvia Capuani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Le Bihan, “Molecular diffusion nuclear magnetic resonance imaging,” Magnetic Resonance Quarterly, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. J. Basser, J. Mattiello, and D. LeBihan, “MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 259–267, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. J. Basser, “Inferring microstructural features and the physiological state of tissues from diffusion-weighted images,” NMR in Biomedicine, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 333–344, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. J. Basser and C. Pierpaoli, “Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Series B, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 209–219, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Le Bihan, R. Turner, P. Douek, and N. Patronas, “Diffusion MR imaging: clinical applications,” The American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 159, no. 3, pp. 591–599, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. A. Horsfield and D. K. Jones, “Applications of diffusion-weighted and diffusion tensor MRI to white matter diseases—a review,” NMR in Biomedicine, vol. 15, no. 7-8, pp. 570–577, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D.-M. Koh and D. J. Collins, “Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 188, no. 6, pp. 1622–1635, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. A. Haider, T. H. van der Kwast, J. Tanguay et al., “Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 189, no. 2, pp. 323–328, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. P. Lichy, P. Aschoff, C. Plathow et al., “Tumor detection by diffusion-weighted MRI and ADC-mapping—initial clinical experiences in comparison to PET-CT,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 605–613, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Gourtsoyianni, N. Papanikolaou, S. Yarmenitis, T. Maris, A. Karantanas, and N. Gourtsoyiannis, “Respiratory gated diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: value of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in the differentiation between most commonly encountered benign and malignant focal liver lesions,” European Radiology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 486–492, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M.-T. Wu, W.-Y. I. Tseng, M.-Y. M. Su et al., “Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging mapping the fiber architecture remodeling in human myocardium after infarction: correlation with viability and wall motion,” Circulation, vol. 114, no. 10, pp. 1036–1045, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. P. Adams Jr., G. Del Zoppo, M. J. Alberts et al., “Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American heart association/American stroke association stroke council, clinical cardiology council, cardiovascular radiology and intervention council, and the atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease and quality of care outcomes in research interdisciplinary working groups,” Stroke, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1655–1711, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. C. Thoeny and F. Keyzer, “Extracranial applications of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging,” European Radiology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1385–1393, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. Biffar, O. Dietrich, S. Sourbron, H.-R. Duerr, M. F. Reiser, and A. Baur-Melnyk, “Diffusion and perfusion imaging of bone marrow,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 323–328, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. M. Y. Khoo, P. A. Tyler, A. Saifuddin, and A. R. Padhani, “Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in musculoskeletal MRI: a critical review,” Skeletal Radiology, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 665–681, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Colagrande, S. F. Carbone, L. M. Carusi, M. Cova, and N. Villari, “Magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging: extraneurological applications,” Radiologia Medica, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 392–419, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. F. Beattie, “Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the musculoskeletal system: an emerging technology with potential to impact clinical decision making,” Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 887–895, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. O. Dietrich, A. Biffar, M. F. Reiser, and A. Baur-Melnyk, “Diffusion-weighted imaging of bone marrow,” Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 134–144, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. T. A. Bley, O. Wieben, and M. Uhl, “Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in musculoskeletal radiology: applications in trauma, tumors, and inflammation,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 263–275, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J.-F. Budzik, V. Balbi, S. Verclytte, V. Pansini, V. le Thuc, and A. Cotten, “Diffusion tensor imaging in musculoskeletal disorders,” Radiographics, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. E56–E72, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. O. Dietrich, A. Biffar, A. Baur-Melnyk, and M. F. Reiser, “Technical aspects of MR diffusion imaging of the body,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 314–322, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. Jaramillo, “Whole-body MR imaging, bone diffusion imaging: how and why?” Pediatric Radiology, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 978–984, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. H. K. Kim, D. M. Lindquist, S. D. Serai et al., “Magnetic resonance imaging of pediatric muscular disorders. Recent advances and clinical applications,” Radiologic Clinics of North America, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 721–742, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Baur-Melnyk and H. Boehm, “Osteoporosis,” in Screening and Preventive Diagnosis with Radiological Imaging, M. F. Reiser, G. van Kaick, C. Fink, and S. O. Schoenberg, Eds., pp. 249–260, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  25. H. K. Genant and Y. Jiang, “Advanced imaging assessment of bone quality,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1068, no. 1, pp. 410–428, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. World Health Organization, “Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: report of a WHO study group,” World Health Organization Technical Report Series vol. 843, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  27. J. A. Kanis, “Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk,” The Lancet, vol. 359, no. 9321, pp. 1929–1936, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. B. Cortet and X. Marchandise, “Bone microarchitecture and mechanical resistance,” Joint Bone Spine, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 297–305, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. F. Griffith and H. K. Genant, “Bone mass and architecture determination: state of the art,” Best Practice and Research: Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 737–764, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. P. McDonnell, P. E. McHugh, and D. O'Mahoney, “Vertebral osteoporosis and trabecular bone quality,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 170–189, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. S. Bauer and T. M. Link, “Advances in osteoporosis imaging,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 440–449, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. NIH Consensum Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, “Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 285, no. 6, pp. 785–795, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. F. W. Wehrli, J. C. Ford, M. Attie, H. Y. Kressel, and F. S. Kaplan, “Trabecular structure: preliminary application of MR interferometry,” Radiology, vol. 179, no. 3, pp. 615–621, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. F. W. Wehrli, J. A. Hopkins, S. N. Hwang, H. K. Song, P. J. Snyder, and J. G. Haddad, “Cross-sectional study of osteopenia with quantitative MR imaging and bone densitometry,” Radiology, vol. 217, no. 2, pp. 527–538, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. T. M. Link, S. Majumdar, P. Augat et al., “Proximal femur: assessment for osteoporosis with T2* decay characteristics at MR imaging,” Radiology, vol. 209, no. 2, pp. 531–536, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. P. K. Saha, B. R. Gomberg, and F. W. Wehrli, “Three-dimensional digital topological characterization of cancellous bone architecture,” International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 81–90, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. R. Krug, S. Banerjee, E. T. Han, D. C. Newitt, T. M. Link, and S. Majumdar, “Feasibility of in vivo structural analysis of high-resolution magnetic resonance images of the proximal femur,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1307–1314, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. Majumdar, D. Thomasson, A. Shimakawa, and H. K. Genant, “Quantitation of the susceptibility difference between trabecular bone and bone marrow: experimental studies,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 111–127, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. N. Hwang and F. W. Wehrli, “The calculation of the susceptibility-induced magnetic field from 3D NMR images with applications to trabecular bone,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Series B, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 126–145, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. S. de Santis, M. Rebuzzi, G. Di Pietro, F. Fasano, B. Maraviglia, and S. Capuani, “In vitro and in vivo MR evaluation of internal gradient to assess trabecular bone density,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 55, no. 19, pp. 5767–5785, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. F. W. Wehrli, “Magnetic resonance of calcified tissues,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance, vol. 229, pp. 35–48, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. T. H. Berquist, MRI of the Musculoskeletal System, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 5th edition, 2006.
  43. S. Capuani, “Water diffusion in cancellous bone,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 178, pp. 34–38, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. D. Schellinger, C. S. Lin, J. Lim, H. G. Hatipoglu, J. C. Pezzullo, and A. J. Singer, “Bone marrow fat and bone mineral density on proton MR spectroscopy and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: their ratio as a new indicator of bone weakening,” The American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 183, no. 6, pp. 1761–1765, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. D. K. W. Yeung, J. F. Griffith, G. E. Antonio, F. K. H. Lee, J. Woo, and P. C. Leung, “Osteoporosis is associated with increased marrow fat content and decreased marrow fat unsaturation: a proton MR spectroscopy study,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 279–285, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. F. Griffith, D. K. W. Yeung, G. E. Antonio et al., “Vertebral bone mineral density, marrow perfusion, and fat content in healthy men and men with osteoporosis: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and MR spectroscopy,” Radiology, vol. 236, no. 3, pp. 945–951, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. M. C. Walsh, G. R. Hunter, and M. B. Livingstone, “Sarcopenia in premenopausal and postmenopausal women with osteopenia, osteoporosis and normal bone mineral density,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 61–67, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. U. Tarantino, J. Baldi, M. Celi et al., “Osteoporosis and sarcopenia: the connections,” Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. S93–S95, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. G. P. Liney, C. P. Bernard, D. J. Manton, L. W. Turnbull, and C. M. Langton, “Age, gender, and skeletal variation in bone marrow composition: a preliminary study at 3.0 Tesla,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 787–793, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. F. H. Netter, R. T. Woodburne, E. S. Crelin, and F. Kaplan, Musculoskeletal System, Part 1: Anatomy, Physiology, and Metabolic Disorders, vol. 8 of Netter Collection of Medical Illustrations, Ciba Pharmaceutical, 1987.
  51. J. Ren, I. Dimitrov, A. D. Sherry, and C. R. Malloy, “Composition of adipose tissue and marrow fat in humans by 1H NMR at 7 Tesla,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 2055–2062, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. S. A. Athavale, S. D. Joshi, and S. S. Joshi, “Internal architecture of calcaneus: correlations with mechanics and pathoanatomy of calcaneal fractures,” Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 115–122, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. S. Capuani, E. Piccirilli, G. di Pietro, M. Celi, and U. Tarantino, “Microstructural differences between osteoporotic and osteoarthritic femoral cancellous bone: an in vitro magnetic resonance micro-imaging investigation,” Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. S51–S54, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. C. J. Rosen and M. L. Bouxsein, “Mechanisms of disease: is osteoporosis the obesity of bone?” Nature Clinical Practice Rheumatology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. M. Rebuzzi, V. Vinicola, F. Taggi, U. Sabatini, F. W. Wehrli, and S. Capuani, “Potential diagnostic role of the MRI-derived internal magnetic field gradient in calcaneus cancellous bone for evaluating postmenopausal osteoporosis at 3T,” Bone, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 155–163, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. W. S. Price, “Pulsed-field gradient nuclear magnetic resonance as a tool for studying translational diffusion. Part 1. Basic theory,” Concepts in Magnetic Resonance, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 299–335, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. E. O. Stejskal and J. E. Tanner, “Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 288–292, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. U. Sinha, S. Sinha, J. A. Hodgson, and R. V. Edgerton, “Human soleus muscle architecture at different ankle joint angles from magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 807–819, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. J. F. Budzik, V. Le Thuc, X. Demondion, M. Morel, D. Chechin, and A. Cotten, “In vivo MR tractography of thigh muscles using diffusion imaging: initial results,” European Radiology, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 3079–3085, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. J. E. Tanner, “Use of stimulated echo in NMR-diffusion studies,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 2523–2526, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. D. K. Jones and P. J. Basser, “‘Squashing peanuts and smashing pumpkins’: how noise distorts diffusion-weighted MR data,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 979–993, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. M. E. Bastim, P. A. Armitage, and I. Marshall, “A theoretical SNR: non monotonic behaviors of tensor contrasts,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 16, pp. 773–785, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. B. A. Landman, J. A. D. Farrell, H. Huang, J. L. Prince, and S. Mori, “Diffusion tensor imaging at low SNR: nonmonotonic behaviors of tensor contrasts,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 790–800, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. G. Manenti, S. Capuani, E. Fanucci et al., “Diffusion tensor imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy assessment of cancellous bone quality in femoral neck of healthy, osteopenic and osteoporotic subjects at 3T: preliminary experience,” Bone, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 7–15, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. B. M. Damon, Z. Ding, A. W. Anderson, A. S. Freyer, and J. C. Gore, “Validation of diffusion tensor MRI-based muscle fiber tracking,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 97–104, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. U. Sinha and L. Yao, “In vivo diffusion tensor imaging of human calf muscle,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 87–95, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. A. van Doorn, P. H. M. Bovendeerd, K. Nicolay, M. R. Drost, and J. D. Janssen, “Determination of muscle fibre orientation using diffusioni-weighted MRI,” European Journal of Morphology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 5–10, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. C. Rossi, A. Boss, G. Steidle et al., “Water diffusion anisotropy in white and gray matter of the human spinal cord,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 476–482, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. F. Schick, “Bone marrow NMR in vivo,” Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, vol. 29, no. 3-4, pp. 169–227, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. Y. Ueda, T. Miyati, N. Ohno et al., “Apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy in the vertebral bone marrow,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 632–635, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. F. W. Wehrli, L. Hilaire, M. Fernández-seara et al., “Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in the calcaneus and femur of women with varying degrees of osteopenia and vertebral deformity status,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 2265–2273, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. J. F. Griffith, D. K. W. Yeung, G. E. Antonio et al., “Vertebral marrow fat content and diffusion and perfusion indexes in women with varying bone density: MR evaluation,” Radiology, vol. 241, no. 3, pp. 831–838, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. D. K. W. Yeung, S. Y. S. Wong, J. F. Griffith, and E. M. C. Lau, “Bone marrow diffusion in osteoporosis: evaluation with quantitative MR diffusion imaging,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 222–228, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. S. Capuani, C. Rossi, M. Alesiani, and B. Maraviglia, “Diffusion tensor imaging to study anisotropy in a particular porous system: the trabecular bone network,” Solid State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, vol. 28, no. 2–4, pp. 266–272, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. G. Di Pietro, M. Palombo, and S. Capuani, “Internal magnetic field gradients in heterogeneous porous systems: comparison between Spin-Echo and Diffusion Decay Internal Field (DDIF) method,” Applied Magnetic Resonance, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 771–784, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  76. J. Mitchell, T. C. Chandrasekera, M. L. Johns, L. F. Gladden, and E. J. Fordham, “Nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation and diffusion in the presence of internal gradients: the effect of magnetic field strength,” Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 81, no. 2, Article ID 026101, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. E. E. Sigmund, H. Cho, and Y.-Q. Song, “High-resolution MRI of internal field diffusion-weighting in trabecular bone,” NMR in Biomedicine, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 436–448, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. J. Zhong, R. P. Kennan, and J. C. Gore, “Effects of susceptibility variations on NMR measurements of diffusion,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 267–280, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. C. Rossi, A. Boss, P. Martirosian et al., “Influence of steady background gradients on the accuracy of molecular diffusion anisotropy measurements,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1250–1258, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus