Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015, Article ID 958302, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/958302
Research Article

Intuitive Web-Based Experimental Design for High-Throughput Biomedical Data

1Applied Bioinformatics, Center for Bioinformatics, Quantitative Biology Center (QBiC) and Department of Computer Science, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
2Quantitative Biology Center (QBiC), University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany

Received 26 December 2014; Accepted 9 March 2015

Academic Editor: Chao Wang

Copyright © 2015 Andreas Friedrich et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. V. Marx, “Biology: the big challenges of big data,” Nature, vol. 498, no. 7453, pp. 255–260, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. L. Metzker, “Sequencing technologies—the next generation,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 31–46, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. C. Koboldt, K. M. Steinberg, D. E. Larson, R. K. Wilson, and E. R. Mardis, “The next-generation sequencing revolution and its impact on genomics,” Cell, vol. 155, no. 1, pp. 27–38, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Watson, “Illuminating the future of DNA sequencing,” Genome Biology, vol. 15, article 108, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. R. Chen, G. I. Mias, J. Li-Pook-Than et al., “Personal omics profiling reveals dynamic molecular and medical phenotypes,” Cell, vol. 148, no. 6, pp. 1293–1307, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. Lynch, “Big data: how do your data grow?” Nature, vol. 455, no. 7209, pp. 28–29, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Linkert, C. T. Rueden, C. Allan et al., “Metadata matters: access to image data in the real world,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 189, no. 5, pp. 777–782, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Field, S.-A. Sansone, A. Collis et al., “Megascience. 'Omics data sharing,” Science, vol. 326, no. 5950, pp. 234–236, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy, Ensuring the Utility and Inetgrity of Research Data in a Digital Age, Ensuring the Integrity, Accessibility, and Stewardship of Research Data in the Digital Age, National Academies Press, 2009.
  10. M. Via, C. Gignoux, and E. G. Burchard, “The 1000 genomes project: new opportunities for research and social challenges,” Genome Medicine, vol. 2, no. 1, article 3, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Brazma, P. Hingamp, J. Quackenbush et al., “Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)—toward standards for microarray data,” Nature Genetics, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 365–371, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. T. Spellman, M. Miller, J. Stewart et al., “Design and implementation of microarray gene expression markup language (MAGE-ML),” Genome Biology, vol. 3, no. 9, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. T. F. Rayner, P. Rocca-Serra, P. T. Spellman et al., “A simple spreadsheet-based, MIAME-supportive format for microarray data: MAGE-TAB,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 7, article 489, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. Ramakrishnan, A. Bieri, N. Sauter et al., “OpenBEB: open biological experiment browser for correlative measurements,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 15, no. 1, article 84, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M.-L. T. Lee and G. A. Whitmore, “Power and sample size for DNA microarray studies,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 21, no. 23, pp. 3543–3570, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. Wiese, M. Eiglsperger, and M. Kaufmann, Yfiles—Visualization and Automatic Layout of Graphs, Springer, 2004.
  17. E. W. Sayers, T. Barrett, D. A. Benson et al., “Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 39, supplement 1, pp. D38–D51, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Grönroos, Book of Vaadin, Vaadin Limited, 2011.
  19. T. Pöntelin, Wizards for Vaadin, 2014, https://vaadin.com/directory#addon/wizards-for-vaadin.
  20. A. Bauch, I. Adamczyk, P. Buczek et al., “OpenBIS: a flexible framework for managing and analyzing complex data in biology research,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 12, no. 1, article 468, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Cox and M. Mann, “Maxquant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized ppb-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 1367–1372, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus