Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015, Article ID 968087, 20 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/968087
Review Article

Biomaterials for Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery: How Can We Do Better?

1Material Science Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK
2Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK
3Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, 05410-020 São Paulo, Brazil

Received 25 June 2014; Accepted 19 August 2014

Academic Editor: Uwe Klinge

Copyright © 2015 Giulia Gigliobianco et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. Milsom, D. Altman, R. Cartwright et al., “Epidemiology of urinary incontinence (UI) and other lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and anal incontinence,” in Incontinence (5th International Consultation on Incontinence), P. Abrams, L. Cardozo, S. Khoury, and A. Wein, Eds., Paris, France, 2013.
  2. P. Abrams, L. Cardozo, M. Fall et al., “The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society,” Neurourology and Urodynamics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 167–178, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. X. Fritel, N. Varnoux, M. Zins, G. Breart, and V. Ringa, “Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse at midlife, quality of life, and risk factors,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 609–616, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. B. T. Haylen, D. de Ridder, R. M. Freeman et al., “An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction,” Neurourology and Urodynamics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 4–20, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. S. Maggi, N. Minicuci, J. Langlois, M. Pavan, G. Enzi, and G. Crepaldi, “Prevalence rate of urinary incontinence in community-dwelling elderly individuals: The Veneto study,” Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. M14–M18, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Miedel, G. Tegerstedt, M. Mæhle-Schmidt, O. Nyrén, and M. Hammarström, “Nonobstetric risk factors for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 113, no. 5, pp. 1089–1097, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. I. Nygaard, C. Bradley, and D. Brandt, “Pelvic organ prolapse in older women: prevalence and risk factors,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 489–497, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. U. Ulmsten and P. Petros, “Intravaginal slingplasty (IVS): an ambulatory surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary incontinence,” Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 75–82, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. Ward and P. Hilton, “Prospective multicentre randomised trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension as primary treatment for stress incontinence,” British Medical Journal, vol. 325, no. 7355, pp. 67–70, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Mahon, D. Varley, and J. Glanville, “Summaries of the safety/adverse effects of vaginal tapes/slings/meshes for stress urinary incontinence and prolapse,” Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  11. D. G. Schultz, FDA Public Health Notification: Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh in Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence, 2008.
  12. US-FDA, Safety Communication: UPDATE on Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, Md, USA, 2011.
  13. C. Birch and M. M. Fynes, “The role of synthetic and biological prostheses in reconstructive pelvic floor surgery,” Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 527–535, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. O. Freytes, R. S. Tullius, and S. F. Badylak, “Effect of storage upon material properties of lyophilized porcine extracellular matrix derived from the urinary bladder,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 327–333, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. T. Vangsness Jr., I. A. Garcia, C. R. Mills, M. A. Kainer, M. R. Roberts, and T. M. Moore, “Allograft transplantation in the knee: tissue regulation, procurement, processing, and sterilization,” The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 474–481, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Golomb, A. Groutz, Y. Mor, I. Leibovitch, and J. Ramon, “Management of urethral erosion caused by a pubovaginal fascial sling,” Urology, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 159–160, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. O. Morgan Jr., O. L. Westney, and E. J. McGuire, “Pubovaginal sling: 4-year outcome analysis and quality of life assessment,” Journal of Urology, vol. 163, no. 6, pp. 1845–1848, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. M. Latini, M. M. Lux, and K. J. Kreder, “Efficacy and morbidity of autologous fascia lata sling cystourethropexy,” Journal of Urology, vol. 171, no. 3, pp. 1180–1184, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. D. Dora, D. S. Dimarco, M. E. Zobitz, and D. S. Elliott, “Time dependent variations in biomechanical properties of cadaveric fascia, porcine dermis, porcine small intestine submucosa, polypropylene mesh and autologous fascia in the rabbit model: implications for sling surgery,” Journal of Urology, vol. 171, no. 5, pp. 1970–1973, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. W. S. Hilger, A. Walter, M. E. Zobitz, K. O. Leslie, P. Magtibay, and J. Cornella, “Histological and biomechanical evaluation of implanted graft materials in a rabbit vaginal and abdominal model,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 195, no. 6, pp. 1826–1831, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. M. Choe, R. Kothandapani, L. James, and D. Bowling, “Autologous, cadaveric, and synthetic materials used in sling surgery: comparative biomechanical analysis,” Urology, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 482–486, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. L. Kim, M. C. LaBarbera, R. V. Patel, W. J. Cromie, and G. T. Bales, “Comparison of the durability of cadaveric and autologous fascia using an in vivo model,” Urology, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 800–804, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. P. FitzGerald, J. Mollenhauer, and L. Brubaker, “The fate of rectus fascia suburethral slings,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 183, no. 4, pp. 964–966, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. Jeong, Y. R. Ma, and Y. G. Park, “Histopathological study of frontalis suspension materials,” Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 171–174, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. D. G. Carneiro, L. U. Sennes, P. H. N. Saldiva, D. H. Tsuji, and J. A. Ximenes Filho, “Assessment of collagen deposits after implant of fascia lata and fat in the vocal folds of rabbits: histomorphometric study,” Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 798–802, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. E. Krambeck, C. D. Dora, T. J. Sebo, A. L. Rohlinger, D. S. DiMarco, and D. S. Elliott, “Time-dependent variations in inflammation and scar formation of six different pubovaginal sling materials in the rabbit model,” Urology, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 1105–1110, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. J. Woodruff, E. E. Cole, R. R. Dmochowski, H. M. Scarpero, E. N. Beckman, and J. C. Winters, “Histologic comparison of pubovaginal sling graft materials: a comparative study,” Urology, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 85–89, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. B. de Rezende Pinna, J. N. Stavale, P. A. de Lima Pontes, and O. de Oliveira Camponês do Brasil, “Histological analysis of autologous fascia graft implantation into the rabbit voice muscle,” Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 185–190, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S. H. M. de Almeida, M. A. F. Rodrigues, É. Gregório, J. Crespígio, and H. A. Moreira, “Influence of sling material on inflammation and collagen deposit in an animal model,” International Journal of Urology, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1040–1043, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. P. A. Moalli, “Cadaveric fascia lata,” International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, vol. 17, supplement 1, no. 7, pp. S48–S50, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. L. Lemer, D. C. Chaikin, and J. G. Blaivas, “Tissue strength analysis of autologous and cadaveric allografts for the pubovaginal sling,” Neurourology and Urodynamics, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 497–503, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  32. A. W. McBride, R. M. Ellerkmann, A. E. Bent, and C. F. Melick, “Comparison of long-term outcomes of autologous fascia lata slings with Suspend Tutoplast fascia lata allograft slings for stress incontinence,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 192, no. 5, pp. 1677–1681, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. N. S. Howden, H. M. Zyczynski, P. A. Moalli, E. R. Sagan, L. A. Meyn, and A. M. Weber, “Comparison of autologous rectus fascia and cadaveric fascia in pubovaginal sling continence outcomes,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 194, no. 5, pp. 1444–1449, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. J. Walter, A. N. Morse, K. O. Leslie, M. E. Zobitz, J. G. Hentz, and J. L. Cornella, “Changes in tensile strength of cadaveric human fascia lata after implantation in a rabbit vagina model,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 169, no. 5, pp. 1907–1910, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. P. E. Spiess, D. Rabah, C. Herrera, G. Singh, R. Moore, and J. Corcos, “The tensile properties of tension-free vaginal tape and cadaveric fascia lata in an in vivo rat model,” BJU International, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 171–173, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. R. D. Rice, F. S. Ayubi, Z. J. Shaub, D. M. Parker, P. J. Armstrong, and J. W. Tsai, “Comparison of surgisis, AlloDerm, and Vicryl Woven Mesh grafts for abdominal wall defect repair in an animal model,” Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 290–296, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. A. P. Sclafani, T. Romo III, A. A. Jacono, S. McCormick, R. Cocker, and A. Parker, “Evaluation of acellular dermal graft in sheet (AlloDerm) and injectable (micronized AlloDerm) forms for soft tissue augmentation. Clinical observations and histological analysis,” Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 130–136, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. Yildirim, E. K. Basok, T. Gulpinar, C. Gurbuz, E. Zemheri, and R. Tokuc, “Tissue reactions of 5 sling materials and tissue material detachment strength of 4 synthetic mesh materials in a rabbit model,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 174, no. 5, pp. 2037–2040, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. P. J. VandeVord, K. M. Broadrick, B. Krishnamurthy, and A. K. Singla, “A comparative study evaluating the in vivo incorporation of biological sling materials,” Urology, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 1228–1233, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. C. M. Kolb, L. M. Pierce, and S. B. Roofe, “Biocompatibility comparison of novel soft tissue implants vs commonly used biomaterials in a pig model,” Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 147, no. 3, pp. 456–461, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. C. D. Richters, A. Pirayesh, H. Hoeksema et al., “Development of a dermal matrix from glycerol preserved allogeneic skin,” Cell and Tissue Banking, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 309–315, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. K. V. Amrute and G. H. Badlani, “The science behind biomaterials in female stress urinary incontinence surgery,” TheScientificWorldJournal, vol. 9, pp. 23–31, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J. C. Winters, “InteXen tissue processing and laboratory study,” International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, vol. 17, supplement 1, pp. S34–S38, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. M. Lucas, S. Emery, W. Alan, and W. Kathy, “Failure of porcine xenograft sling in a randomised controlled trial of three sling materials in surgery for stress incontience,” in Proceedings of the International Continence Society (34th Annual Meeting) and the International UroGynecological Association, Paris, France, 2004.
  45. J. S. Jones, R. R. Rackley, R. Berglund, J. B. Abdelmalak, G. Deorco, and S. P. Vasavada, “Porcine small intestinal submucosa as a percutaneous mid-urethral sling: 2-year results,” BJU International, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 103–106, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. A. B. Rutner, S. R. Levine, and J. F. Schmaelzle, “Processed porcine small intestine submucosa as a graft material for pubovaginal slings: durability and results,” Urology, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 805–809, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. M.-H. Zheng, J. Chen, Y. Kirilak, C. Willers, J. Xu, and D. Wood, “Porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) is not an acellular collagenous matrix and contains porcine DNA: possible implications in human implantation,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research B: Applied Biomaterials, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 61–67, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. L. M. Pierce, M. A. Grunlan, Y. Hou, S. S. Baumann, T. J. Kuehl, and T. W. Muir, “Biomechanical properties of synthetic and biologic graft materials following long-term implantation in the rabbit abdomen and vagina,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 200, no. 5, pp. 549.e1–549.e8, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. Z. Liu, R. Tang, Z. Zhou, Z. Song, H. Wang, and Y. Gu, “Comparison of two porcine-derived materials for repairing abdominal wall defects in rats,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 5, Article ID e20520, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. L. Konstantinovic, P. Lagae, F. Zheng, E. K. Verbeken, D. de Ridder, and J. A. Deprest, “Comparison of host response to polypropylene and non-cross-linked porcine small intestine serosal-derived collagen implants in a rat model,” BJOG, vol. 112, no. 11, pp. 1554–1560, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. F. Zhang, J. Zhang, S. Lin et al., “Small intestinal submucosa in abdominal wall repair after TRAM flap harvesting in a rat model,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 565–570, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. S. Badylak, K. Kokini, B. Tullius, and B. Whitson, “Strength over time of a resorbable bioscaffold for body wall repair in a dog model,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 282–287, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. E. D. Jenkins, L. Melman, C. R. Deeken, S. C. Greco, M. M. Frisella, and B. D. Matthews, “Biomechanical and histologic evaluation of fenestrated and nonfenestrated biologic mesh in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 212, no. 3, pp. 327–339, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. R. Ko, E. A. Kazacos, S. Snyder, D. M. J. Ernst, and G. C. Lantz, “Tensile strength comparison of small intestinal submucosa body wall repair,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 9–17, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. S. Badylak, K. Kokini, B. Tullius, A. Simmons-Byrd, and R. Morff, “Morphologic study of small intestinal submucosa as a body wall repair device,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 190–202, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. A. Wiedemann and M. Otto, “Small intestinal submucosa for pubourethral sling suspension for the treatment of stress incontinence: first histopathological results in humans,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 215–218, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. B. K. Poulose, S. Scholz, D. E. Moore et al., “Physiologic properties of small intestine submucosa,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 262–267, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. M. Thiel, P. C. Rodrigues Palma, C. L. Z. Riccetto, M. Dambros, and N. R. Netto Jr., “A stereological analysis of fibrosis and inflammatory reaction induced by four different synthetic slings,” BJU International, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 833–837, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. M. S. Kim, H. H. Ahn, Y. N. Shin, M. H. Cho, G. Khang, and H. B. Lee, “An in vivo study of the host tissue response to subcutaneous implantation of PLGA- and/or porcine small intestinal submucosa-based scaffolds,” Biomaterials, vol. 28, no. 34, pp. 5137–5143, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. E. Cole, A. Gomelsky, and R. R. Dmochowski, “Encapsulation of a porcine dermis pubovaginal sling,” Journal of Urology, vol. 170, no. 5, p. 1950, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. J. Deprest, B. Klosterhalfen, A. Schreurs, J. Verguts, D. De Ridder, and F. Claerhout, “Clinicopathological study of patients requiring reintervention after sacrocolpopexy with xenogenic acellular collagen grafts,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 183, no. 6, pp. 2249–2255, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. T. M. Macleod, G. Williams, R. Sanders, and C. J. Green, “Histological evaluation of Permacol as a subcutaneous implant over a 20-week period in the rat model,” British Journal of Plastic Surgery, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 518–532, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. T. P. Rauth, B. K. Poulose, L. B. Nanney, and M. D. Holzman, “A comparative analysis of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and small intestinal submucosa—implications for patch repair in ventral herniorrhaphy,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 43–49, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. M. Sandor, H. Xu, J. Connor et al., “Host response to implanted porcine-derived biologic materials in a primate model of abdominal wall repair,” Tissue Engineering Part A, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 2021–2031, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. L. M. Pierce, A. Rao, S. S. Baumann, J. E. Glassberg, T. J. Kuehl, and T. W. Muir, “Long-term histologic response to synthetic and biologic graft materials implanted in the vagina and abdomen of a rabbit model,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 200, no. 5, pp. 546.el–546.e8, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. K. A. Daly, S. Liu, V. Agrawal et al., “The host response to endotoxin-contaminated dermal matrix,” Tissue Engineering—Part A, vol. 18, no. 11-12, pp. 1293–1303, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. M. A. Suckow, W. R. Wolter, C. Fecteau, S. M. Labadie-Suckow, and C. Johnson, “Bupivacaine-enhanced small intestinal submucosa biomaterial as a hernia repair device,” Journal of Biomaterials Applications, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 231–237, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. A. Gomelsky and R. R. Dmochowski, “Biocompatibility assessment of Synthetic Sling Materials for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence,” Journal of Urology, vol. 178, no. 4, pp. 1171–1181, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. P. K. Amid, “Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery,” Hernia, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 15–21, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  70. M. W. Weinberger and D. R. Ostergard, “Postoperative catheterization, urinary retention, and permanent voiding dysfunction after polytetrafluoroethylene suburethral sling placement,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 50–54, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. S. B. Young, A. E. Howard, and S. P. Baker, “Mersilene mesh sling: short- and long-term clinical and urodynamic outcomes,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 185, no. 1, pp. 32–40, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. J. C. Winters, M. P. Fitzgerald, and M. D. Barber, “The use of synthetic mesh in female pelvic reconstructive surgery,” BJU International, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 70–77, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. M. Slack, J. S. Sandhu, D. R. Staskin, and R. C. Grant, “In vivo comparison of suburethral sling materials,” International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 106–110, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. K. C. Zorn, P. E. Spiess, G. Singh, M. A. Orvieto, B. Moore, and J. Corcos, “Long-term tensile properties of tension-free vaginal tape, suprapubic arc sling system and urethral sling in an in vivo rat model,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 177, no. 3, pp. 1195–1198, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. M. Boukerrou, L. Boulanger, C. Rubod, E. Lambaudie, P. Dubois, and M. Cosson, “Study of the biomechanical properties of synthetic mesh implanted in vivo,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 262–267, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. T. M. Bazi, R. F. Hamade, I. A. H. Hussein, K. A. Nader, and A. Jurjus, “Polypropylene midurethral tapes do not have similar biologic and biomechanical performance in the rat,” European Urology, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1364–1375, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. L. Melman, E. D. Jenkins, N. A. Hamilton et al., “Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of a novel macroporous polytetrafluoroethylene knit mesh compared to lightweight and heavyweight polypropylene mesh in a porcine model of ventral incisional hernia repair,” Hernia, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 423–431, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. S. Manodoro, M. Endo, P. Uvin et al., “Graft-related complications and biaxial tensiometry following experimental vaginal implantation of flat mesh of variable dimensions,” BJOG, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 244–250, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. H. P. Dietz, P. Vancaillie, M. Svehla, W. Walsh, A. B. Steensma, and T. G. Vancaillie, “Mechanical properties of urogynecologic implant materials,” International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 239–243, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. U. Klinge, B. Klosterhalfen, V. Birkenhauer, K. Junge, J. Conze, and V. Schumpelick, “Impact of polymer pore size on the interface scar formation in a rat model,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 208–214, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. F. Zheng, Y. Lin, E. Verbeken et al., “Host response after reconstruction of abdominal wall defects with porcine dermal collagen in a rat model,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 191, no. 6, pp. 1961–1970, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. F. Spelzini, M. L. Konstantinovic, I. Guelinckx et al., “Tensile strength and host response towards silk and type I polypropylene implants used for augmentation of fascial repair in a rat model,” Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 155–162, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. M. Bogusiewicz, A. Wróbel, K. Jankiewicz et al., “Collagen deposition around polypropylene tapes implanted in the rectus fascia of female rats,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 106–109, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. D. M. Rabah, L. R. Bégin, A. Zahran, and J. Corcos, “Tissue reactions of the rabbit urinary bladder to cadaveric human fascia lata and polypropylene surgical mesh,” The Canadian Journal of Urology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 2344–2349, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. G. Pascual, M. Rodríguez, S. Sotomayor, B. Pérez-Köhler, and J. M. Bellón, “Inflammatory reaction and neotissue maturation in the early host tissue incorporation of polypropylene prostheses,” Hernia, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 697–707, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. R. K. Huffaker, T. W. Muir, A. Rao, S. S. Baumann, T. J. Kuehl, and L. M. Pierce, “Histologic response of porcine collagen-coated and uncoated polypropylene grafts in a rabbit vagina model,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 198, no. 5, pp. 582.e1–582.e7, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. L. Boulanger, M. Boukerrou, E. Lambaudie, A. Defossez, and M. Cosson, “Tissue integration and tolerance to meshes used in gynecologic surgery: an experimental study,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 103–108, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. R. Tayrac, A. Alves, and M. Thérin, “Collagen-coated vs noncoated low-weight polypropylene meshes in a sheep model for vaginal surgery. A pilot study,” International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 513–520, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. C. Falconer, M. Söderberg, B. Blomgren, and U. Ulmsten, “Influence of different sling materials on connective tissue metabolism in stress urinary incontinent women,” International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. S19–S23, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. A. C. Wang, L. Y. Lee, C. T. Lin, and J. R. Chen, “A histologic and immunohistochemical analysis of defective vaginal healing after continence taping procedures: a prospective case-controlled pilot study,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 191, no. 6, pp. 1868–1874, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. C. Elmer, B. Blomgren, C. Falconer, A. Zhang, and D. Altman, “Histological inflammatory response to transvaginal polypropylene mesh for pelvic reconstructive surgery,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 181, no. 3, pp. 1189–1195, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. F. E. Govier, K. C. Kobashi, D. D. Kuznetsov et al., “Multi-center prospective study of the long-term effectiveness of a silicone coated synthetic mesh sling,” Journal of Urology, vol. 171, supplement 4, pp. 92–93, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. A. Mangera, A. J. Bullock, C. R. Chapple, and S. MacNeil, “Are biomechanical properties predictive of the success of prostheses used in stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse? A systematic review,” Neurourology and Urodynamics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. A. Feola, S. Abramowitch, Z. Jallah et al., “Deterioration in biomechanical properties of the vagina following implantation of a high-stiffness prolapse mesh,” BJOG, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 224–232, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. A. Remes and D. F. Williams, “Immune response in biocompatibility,” Biomaterials, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 731–743, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. M. T. Wolf, C. L. Dearth, C. A. Ranallo et al., “Macrophage polarization in response to ECM coated polypropylene mesh,” Biomaterials, vol. 35, no. 25, pp. 6838–6849, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. A. Kligman and R. Gollhausen, “The “angry back”: a new concept or old confusion?” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 115, no. 31, pp. 93–100, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. B. M. Sicari, J. P. Rubin, C. L. Dearth et al., “An acellular biologic scaffold promotes skeletal muscle formation in mice and humans with volumetric muscle loss,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 6, no. 234, Article ID 234ra58, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. H. Patel, D. R. Ostergard, and G. Sternschuss, “Polypropylene mesh and the host response,” International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 669–679, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. J. Deprest and A. Feola, “The need for preclinical research on pelvic floor reconstruction,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 141–143, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. M. E. Karlovsky, L. Kushner, and G. H. Badlani, “Synthetic biomaterials for pelvic floor reconstruction,” Current Urology Reports, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 376–384, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. C. R. Chapple, S. Raz, L. Brubaker, and P. E. Zimmern, “Mesh sling in an era of uncertainty: lessons learned and the way forward,” European Urology, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 525–529, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus