Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016, Article ID 1242845, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1242845
Research Article

Differences in Dry Eye Questionnaire Symptoms in Two Different Modalities of Contact Lens Wear: Silicone-Hydrogel in Daily Wear Basis and Overnight Orthokeratology

1Clinical & Experimental Optometry Research Lab (CEORLab), Center of Physics (Optometry), School of Sciences, University of Minho, Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
2Ocular Surface and Contact Lenses Research Group, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, 15782 A Coruña, Spain
3Department of Optics II (Optometry and Vision), School of Optics, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Received 3 May 2016; Revised 31 July 2016; Accepted 1 August 2016

Academic Editor: Maria Dolores Pinazo-Duran

Copyright © 2016 Nery García-Porta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. B. Morgan, C. A. Woods, I. G. Tranoudis et al., “International contact lens prescribing in 2015,” Contact Lens Spectrum, vol. 31, pp. 24–29, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  2. D. Fonn, P. Situ, and T. Simpson, “Hydrogel lens dehydration and subjective comfort and dryness ratings in symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 76, no. 10, pp. 700–704, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. G. Begley, B. Caffery, K. K. Nichols, and R. Chalmers, “Responses of contact lens wearers to a dry eye survey,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 40–46, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Santodomingo-Rubido, E. Barrado-Navascués, and M.-J. Rubido-Crespo, “Ocular surface comfort during the day assessed by instant reporting in different types of contact and non-contact lens wearers,” Eye and Contact Lens, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 96–100, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. Dumbleton, C. A. Woods, L. W. Jones, and D. Fonn, “The impact of contemporary contact lenses on contact lens discontinuation,” Eye and Contact Lens, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 93–99, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. K. Richdale, L. T. Sinnott, E. Skadahl, and J. J. Nichols, “Frequency of and factors associated with contact lens dissatisfaction and discontinuation,” Cornea, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 168–174, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. L. Chalmers and C. G. Begley, “Dryness symptoms among an unselected clinical population with and without contact lens wear,” Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. Young, J. Veys, N. Pritchard, and S. Coleman, “A multi-centre study of lapsed contact lens wearers,” Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 516–527, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. B. M. Aakre, A. E. Ystenaes, M. J. Doughty, Ø. Austrheim, B. Westerfjell, and M. T. Lie, “A 6-month follow-up of successful refits from daily disposable soft contact lenses to continuous wear of high-Dk silicone-hydrogel lenses,” Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 130–141, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. N. A. Brennan, M. L. C. Coles, T. L. Comstock, and B. Levy, “A 1-year prospective clinical trial of balafilcon a (purevision) silicone-hydrogel contact lenses used on a 30-day continuous wear schedule,” Ophthalmology, vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 1172–1177, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Campbell, G. Kame, N. Leach, M. Paul, E. White, and L. Zigler, “Clinical benefits of a new multipurpose disinfecting solution in silicone hydrogel and soft contact lens users,” Eye and Contact Lens, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 93–101, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. M. González-Méijome, M. A. Parafita, E. Yebra-Pimentel, and J. B. Almeida, “Symptoms in a population of contact lens and noncontact lens wearers under different environmental conditions,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. E296–E302, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Guillon and C. Maissa, “Dry eye symptomatology of soft contact lens wearers and nonwearers,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 82, no. 9, pp. 829–834, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. J. Doughty, D. Fonn, D. Richter, T. Simpson, B. Caffery, and K. Gordon, “A patient questionnaire approach to estimating the prevalence of dry eye symptoms in patients presenting to optometric practices across Canada,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 74, no. 8, pp. 624–631, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. G. Begley, R. L. Chalmers, G. L. Mitchell et al., “Characterization of ocular surface symptoms from optometric practices in North America,” Cornea, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 610–618, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Schafer, G. L. Mitchell, R. L. Chalmers et al., “The stability of dryness symptoms after refitting with silicone hydrogel contact lenses over 3 years,” Eye and Contact Lens, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 247–252, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. J. Nichols, C. Ziegler, G. L. Mitchell, and K. K. Nichols, “Self-reported dry eye disease across refractive modalities,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1911–1914, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. “The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop,” The Ocular Surface, vol. 5, pp. 75–92, 2007.
  19. H. A. Swarbrick, “Orthokeratology review and update,” Clinical and Experimental Optometry, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 124–143, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. Alharbi and H. A. Swarbrick, “The effects of overnight orthokeratology lens wear on corneal thickness,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 2518–2523, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H. A. Swarbrick, G. Wong, and D. J. O'Leary, “Corneal response to orthokeratology,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 75, no. 11, pp. 791–799, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. Narayanan, W. L. Miller, T. C. Prager et al., “The diagnosis and characteristics of moderate dry eye in non-contact lens wearers,” Eye and Contact Lens, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 96–104, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. K. K. Nichols, J. J. Nichols, and G. L. Mitchell, “The lack of association between signs and symptoms in patients with dry eye disease,” Cornea, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 762–770, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. K.-S. Na, J.-W. Mok, J. Y. Kim, C. R. Rho, and C.-K. Joo, “Correlations between tear cytokines, chemokines, and soluble receptors and clinical severity of dry eye disease,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 5443–5450, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J.-F. Huang, Y. Zhang, K. D. Rittenhouse, E. H. Pickering, and M. T. McDowell, “Evaluations of tear protein markers in dry eye disease: repeatability of measurement and correlation with disease,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 4556–4564, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Enríquez-de-Salamanca, E. Castellanos, M. E. Stern et al., “Tear cytokine and chemokine analysis and clinical correlations in evaporative-type dry eye disease,” Molecular Vision, vol. 16, pp. 862–873, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. H. Lam, L. Bleiden, C. S. de Paiva, W. Farley, M. E. Stern, and S. C. Pflugfelder, “Tear cytokine profiles in dysfunctional tear syndrome,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 147, no. 2, pp. 198–205.e1, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. L. Massingale, X. Li, M. Vallabhajosyula, D. Chen, Y. Wei, and P. A. Asbell, “Analysis of inflammatory cytokines in the tears of dry eye patients,” Cornea, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1023–1027, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. Pintor, G. Carracedo, M. C. Alonso, A. Bautista, and A. Peral, “Presence of diadenosine polyphosphates in human tears,” Pflügers Archiv, vol. 443, no. 3, pp. 432–436, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. Peral, G. Carracedo, M. C. Acosta, J. Gallar, and J. Pintor, “Increased levels of diadenosine polyphosphates in dry eye,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 4053–4058, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. G. Carracedo, A. Peral, and J. Pintor, “Diadenosine polyphosphates in tears of Sjögren syndrome patients,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 5452–5459, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. R. L. Chalmers, C. G. Begley, K. Moody, and S. B. Hickson-Curran, “Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8) and opinion of contact lens performance,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 89, no. 10, pp. 1435–1442, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. G. Carracedo, J. M. González-Méijome, and J. Pintor, “Changes in diadenosine polyphosphates during alignment-fit and orthokeratology rigid gas permeable lens wear,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 4426–4432, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. Mishima, A. Gasset, S. D. Klyce Jr., and J. L. Baum, “Determination of tear volume and tear flow,” Investigative Ophthalmology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 264–276, 1966. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. R. L. Terry, C. M. Schnider, B. A. Holden et al., “CCLRU standards for success of daily and extended wear contact lenses,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 234–243, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. C. W. McMonnies, “Psychological and other mechanisms for end-of-day soft lens symptoms,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. e175–e181, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. P. Cho and M. V. Boost, “Daily disposable lenses: the better alternative,” Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 4–12, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. Walker, G. Young, C. Hunt, and T. Henderson, “Multi-centre evaluation of two daily disposable contact lenses,” Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 125–133, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. Fahmy, B. Long, T. Giles, and C.-H. Wang, “Comfort-enhanced daily disposable contact lens reduces symptoms among weekly/monthly wear patients,” Eye and Contact Lens, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 215–219, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. H. Wagner, K. Richdale, G. L. Mitchell et al., “Age, behavior, environment, and health factors in the soft contact lens risk survey,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 252–261, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. M. López-Lópeza, J. M. Pelegrín-Sáncheza, P. Sobrado-Calvob, and D. García-Ayusob, “Contact lens intolerance: refitting with dual axis lens for corneal refractive therapy,” Journal of Optometry, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 4–8, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. N. García-Porta, L. Rico-del-Viejo, H. Ferreira-Neves, S. C. Peixoto-de-Matos, A. Queirós, and J. M. González-Méijome, “Performance of three multipurpose disinfecting solutions with a silicone hydrogel contact lens,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 216932, 13 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. C. Maïssa, M. Guillon, and R. J. Garofalo, “Contact lens-induced circumlimbal staining in silicone hydrogel contact lenses worn on a daily wear basis,” Eye and Contact Lens, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 16–26, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. J. Ozkan, K. Ehrmann, D. Meadows, J. Lally, B. Holden, and P. L. De la Jara, “Lens parameter changes under in vitro and ex vivo conditions and their effect on the conjunctiva,” Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 171–175, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. F. Zuazo, D. López-Ponce, D. Salinas-Toro et al., “Conjunctival impression cytology in patients with normal and impaired OSDI scores,” Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia, vol. 89, no. 10, pp. 391–396, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. E. Lum, B. Golebiowski, R. Gunn, M. Babhoota, and H. Swarbrick, “Corneal sensitivity with contact lenses of different mechanical properties,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 90, no. 9, pp. 954–960, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. V. Martín-Montañez, A. López-de la Rosa, A. López-Miguel, J. Pinto-Fraga, J. M. González-Méijome, and M. J. González-García, “End-of-day dryness, corneal sensitivity and blink rate in contact lens wearers,” Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 148–151, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. P. B. Morgan and N. Efron, “Hydrogel contact lens ageing,” CLAO Journal, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 85–90, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. N. A. Brennan, N. Efron, A. S. Bruce, D. I. Duldig, and N. J. Russo, “Dehydration of hydrogel lenses: environmental influences during normal wear,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 277–281, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. V. Martín-Montañez, A. López-Miguel, C. Arroyo et al., “Influence of environmental factors in the in vitro dehydration of hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 764–771, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. L. Sorbara, L. Jones, and D. Williams-Lyn, “Contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis with silicone hydrogel lenses,” Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 93–96, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. C. Maissa, M. Guillon, S. Wong, A. Lane, T. Patel, and R. Garafalo, “Silicone hydrogel contact lenses effects on eyelid tissues: lens care influence,” in Proceedings of the BCLA Conference, poster 72, Manchester, UK, 2013.
  53. N. Keir, C. A. Woods, K. Dumbleton, and L. Jones, “Clinical performance of different care systems with silicone hydrogel contact lenses,” Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 189–195, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. M. J. Lipson, A. Sugar, and D. C. Musch, “Overnight corneal reshaping versus soft disposable contact lenses: vision-related quality-of-life differences from a randomized clinical trial,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 82, no. 10, pp. 886–891, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. E. R. Ritchey, J. T. Barr, and G. L. Mitchell, “The Comparison of Overnight Lens Modalities (COLM) study,” Eye and Contact Lens, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 70–75, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. A. Queirós, C. Villa-Collar, A. R. Gutiérrez, J. Jorge, and J. M. González-Méijome, “Quality of life of myopic subjects with different methods of visual correction using the NEI RQL-42 questionnaire,” Eye and Contact Lens, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 116–121, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus