Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016, Article ID 1764692, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1764692
Research Article

Premature Destruction of Microbubbles during Voiding Urosonography in Children and Possible Underlying Mechanisms: Post Hoc Analysis from the Prospective Study

1Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland
2Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland

Received 4 June 2016; Revised 4 September 2016; Accepted 13 October 2016

Academic Editor: Enzo Terreno

Copyright © 2016 Maciej Piskunowicz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Riccabona, “Application of a second-generation US contrast agent in infants and children—a European questionnaire-based survey,” Pediatric Radiology, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 1471–1480, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. K. Darge and J. Troeger, “Vesicoureteral reflux grading in contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 122–128, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Nakamura, T. Shinozaki, N. Taniguchi, H. Koibuchi, M. Momoi, and K. Itoh, “Simultaneous voiding cystourethrography and voiding urosonography reveals utility of sonographic diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux in children,” Acta Paediatrica, vol. 92, no. 12, pp. 1422–1426, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. F. Papadopoulou, A. Anthopoulou, E. Siomou, S. Efremidis, C. Tsamboulas, and K. Darge, “Harmonic voiding urosonography with a second-generation contrast agent for the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux,” Pediatric Radiology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 239–244, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Berrocal, F. Gayá, and A. Arjonilla, “Vesicoureteral reflux: can the urethra be adequately assessed by using contrast-enhanced voiding US of the bladder?” Radiology, vol. 234, no. 1, pp. 235–241, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. Duran, A. Valera, A. Alguersuari et al., “Voiding urosonography: the study of the urethra is no longer a limitation of the technique,” Pediatric Radiology, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 124–131, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. F. Papadopoulou, A. Ntoulia, E. Siomou, and K. Darge, “Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography with intravesical administration of a second-generation ultrasound contrast agent for diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux: prospective evaluation of contrast safety in 1,010 children,” Pediatric Radiology, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 719–728, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Riccabona, P.-H. Vivier, A. Ntoulia et al., “ESPR uroradiology task force imaging recommendations in paediatric uroradiology, part VII: standardised terminology, impact of existing recommendations, and update on contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the paediatric urogenital tract,” Pediatric Radiology, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 1478–1484, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. A. Koff, “Estimating bladder capacity in children,” Urology, vol. 21, no. 3, p. 248, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. F. Dietrich, A. Ignee, M. Hocke, D. Schreiber-Dietrich, and C. Greis, “Pitfalls and artefacts using contrast enhanced ultrasound,” Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 350–356, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. F. Dietrich, A. Ignee, C. Greis, X. W. Cui, D. G. Schreiber-Dietrich, and M. Hocke, “Artifacts and pitfalls in contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver,” Ultraschall in der Medizin, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 108–128, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. Darge, “Voiding urosonography with ultrasound contrast agents for the diagnosis of vesicoureteric reflux in children. I. Procedure,” Pediatric Radiology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 40–53, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Piscitelli, R. Galiano, F. Serrao et al., “Which cystography in the diagnosis and grading of vesicoureteral reflux?” Pediatric Nephrology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 107–110, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. N. de Jong, F. J. ten Cate, W. B. Vletter, and J. R. T. C. Roelandt, “Quantification of transpulmonary echocontrast effects,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 279–288, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Bouakaz, P. J. A. Frinking, N. de Jong, and N. Bom, “Noninvasive measurement of the hydrostatic pressure in a fluid-filled cavity based on the disappearance time of micrometer-sized free gas bubbles,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1407–1415, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Schneider, M. Arditi, M.-B. Barrau et al., “BR1: a new ultrasonographic contrast agent based on sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubbles,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 451–457, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. S. Epstein and M. S. Plesset, “On the stability of gas bubbles in liquid‐gas solutions,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1505–1509, 1950. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. Talu, R. L. Powell, M. L. Longo, and P. A. Dayton, “Needle size and injection rate impact microbubble contrast agent population,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1182–1185, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. R. Shapiro, S. A. Reisner, G. S. Lichtenberg, and R. S. Meltzer, “Intravenous contrast echocardiography with use of sonicated albumin in humans: systolic disappearance of left ventricular contrast after transpulmonary transmission,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 1603–1607, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. Vuille, M. Nidorf, R. L. Morrissey, J. B. Newell, A. E. Weyman, and M. H. Picard, “Effect of static pressure on the disappearance rate of specific echocardiographic contrast agents,” Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 347–354, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M.-X. Tang, H. Mulvana, T. Gauthier et al., “Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging: a review of sources of variability,” Interface Focus, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 520–539, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. G. Wen, C. K. Yeung, and J. C. Djurhuus, “Cystometry techniques in female infants and children,” International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 103–112, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. G. Wen and E. C. Tong, “Cystometry in infants and children with no apparent voiding symptoms,” British Journal of Urology, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 468–473, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Chandra and H. Maddix, “Urodynamic dysfunction in infants with vesicoureteral reflux,” The Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 136, no. 6, pp. 754–759, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. U. Sillén, M. Bachelard, S. Hansson, G. Hermansson, B. Jacobson, and K. Hjälmås, “Video cystometric recording of dilating reflux in infancy,” Journal of Urology, vol. 155, no. 5, pp. 1711–1715, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus