Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 1765624, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1765624
Clinical Study

Efficacy of Combined Laparoscopic and Hysteroscopic Repair of Post-Cesarean Section Uterine Diverticulum: A Retrospective Analysis

1The Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510145, China
2St. Louis School, 179 Third Street, Sai Ying Pun, Hong Kong

Received 7 December 2015; Revised 7 February 2016; Accepted 25 February 2016

Academic Editor: Andrea Tinelli

Copyright © 2016 Cuilan Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. P. Betrán, M. Merialdi, J. A. Lauer et al., “Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates,” Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 98–113, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. L. Luo, G. Niu, Q. Wang, H.-Z. Xie, and S.-Z. Yao, “Vaginal repair of cesarean section scar diverticula,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 454–458, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. F. van der Voet, A. M. Bij de Vaate, S. Veersema, H. A. M. Brölmann, and J. A. F. Huirne, “Long-term complications of caesarean section. the niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding,” BJOG, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 236–244, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M.-L. Marotta, J. Donnez, J. Squifflet, P. Jadoul, N. Darii, and O. Donnez, “Laparoscopic repair of post-cesarean section uterine scar defects diagnosed in nonpregnant women,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 386–391, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. Florio, M. Filippeschi, I. Moncini, E. Marra, M. Franchini, and G. Gubbini, “Hysteroscopic treatment of the cesarean-induced isthmocele in restoring infertility,” Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 180–186, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Api, A. Boza, H. Gorgen, and O. Api, “Should cesarean scar defect be treated laparoscopically? A case report and review of the literature,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1145–1152, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. C. Stamatopoulos, I. Tsimpanakos, B. McKenzie-Gray, N. Gkioulekas, I. Korkontzelos, and A. Magos, “An unusual case of cervical diverticulum identified by presence of 3 cavities at diagnostic hysteroscopy,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 238–240, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. Li, Y. Guo, Y. Liu, J. Cheng, and W. Zhang, “Hysteroscopic and laparoscopic management of uterine defects on previous cesarean delivery scars,” Journal of Perinatal Medicine, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 363–370, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. Nirgianakis, R. Oehler, and M. Mueller, “The Rendez-vous technique for treatment of caesarean scar defects: a novel combined endoscopic approach,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 770–771, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. A. J. M. Bij de Vaate, L. F. van der Voet, O. Naji et al., “Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 372–382, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. P. Chauhan, E. F. Magann, C. D. Wiggs, P. S. Barrilleaux, and J. N. Martin Jr., “Pregnancy after classic cesarean delivery,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 100, no. 5, part 1, pp. 946–950, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y.-C. Ou, K.-H. Huang, H. Lin, H.-L. Eng, H.-M. Lu, and C.-C. ChangChien, “Sepsis secondary to cesarean scar diverticulum resembling an infected leiomyoma,” Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 100–102, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. V. H. Talamonte, U. G. Lippi, R. G. C. Lopes, and S. A. B. Stabile, “Hysteroscopic findings in patients with post-menstrual spotting with prior cesarean section,” Einstein, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 53–56, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. O. Donnez, P. Jadoul, J. Squifflet, and J. Donnez, “Laparoscopic repair of wide and deep uterine scar dehiscence after cesarean section,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 974–980, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. Klemm, C. Koehler, M. Mangler, U. Schneider, and A. Schneider, “Laparoscopic and vaginal repair of uterine scar dehiscence following cesarean section as detected by ultrasound,” Journal of Perinatal Medicine, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 324–331, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J.-X. Ding, J.-L. Chen, H.-W. Zhang et al., “Hysteroscopic examination and l aparoscopic repair of uterine scar defect after cesarean section,” Fudan University Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 506–510, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  17. N. Schepker, G. Garcia-Rocha, F. von Versen-Höynck, P. Hillemanns, and C. Schippert, “Clinical diagnosis and therapy of uterine scar defects after caesarean section in non-pregnant women,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 291, no. 6, pp. 1417–1423, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar