Research Article
Comparative Evaluation of Anthelmintic Activity of Edible and Ornamental Pomegranate Ethanolic Extracts against Schistosoma mansoni
Table 2
Effect of oral administration of different doses of SEP, LEP, LOP, and SOP extracts in vivo.
| Group | Dose (mg/kg) | Granuloma number | Granuloma diameter (GD) | Eggs in liver tissue | Immunohistochemical findings | Mean SE | Reduction% | Mean (μm) SE | Reduction% | iNos hepatocytes | iNos inflammatory cells |
| SEP (G5&G7) | 600 | 51.2 | 57.8 | 141.2 22.1 | 40.1 | Absent | Weakest | Negative | 800 | 45.3 | 62.7 | 139.2 24.5 | 40.9 | Absent | Weakest | Negative |
| LEP (G4&G6) | 600 | 59.1 | 51.3 | 154.3 11.2 | 34.5 | Numerous | Strong | Strong | 800 | 55.7 | 54.1 | 148.1 22.1 | 37.2 | Absent | Weak | Weak |
| LOP (G8&G10) | 600 | 63.2 | 47.9 | 168.1 22.1 | 28.7 | Numerous | Strong | Strong | 800 | 60.8 | 49.9 | 164.5 21.2 | 30.2 | Few | Weak | Strong |
| SOP (9&G11) | 600 | 68.2 | 43.8 | 189.4 24.5 | 19.6 | Numerous | Strong | Strong | 800 | 57.3 | 52.8 | 176.2 25.1 | 25.2 | Few | Strong | Strong |
| PZQ(G3) | 200 | 39.4 | 67.6 | 135.4 20.3 | 42.5 | Absent | Weakest | Negative |
| Infected untreated controls (G1&G2) | 121.3 | — | 235.7 16.1 | — | Numerous | Strong | Strong |
|
|
The difference was significant at and compared to infected untreated control group.
|