Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 3067123, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3067123
Research Article

Comparison of Imaging Characteristics of 124I PET for Determination of Optimal Energy Window on the Siemens Inveon PET

1Laboratory Animal Center, OSONG Medical Innovation Foundation, Osong, Chungbuk 28160, Republic of Korea
2Department of Radiological Science, College of Health Science, Yonsei University, Wonju 26493, Republic of Korea
3Molecular Imaging Research Center, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul 01812, Republic of Korea
4Korea Drug Development Platform Using Radio-Isotope (KDePRI), Seoul 01812, Republic of Korea
5Radiological and Medico-Oncological Sciences, University of Science and Technology (UST), Seoul 01812, Republic of Korea

Received 3 December 2015; Revised 4 February 2016; Accepted 7 February 2016

Academic Editor: Guang Jia

Copyright © 2016 A Ram Yu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Bruehlmeier, U. Roelcke, P. A. Schubiger, and S. M. Ametamey, “Assessment of hypoxia and perfusion in human brain tumors using PET with 18F-fluoromisonidazole and 15O-H2O,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 1851–1859, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Castellani, A. Colombo, R. Giordano et al., “The role of PET with 13N-ammonia and 18F-FDG in the assessment of myocardial perfusion and metabolism in patients with recent AMI and intracoronary stem cell injection,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 1908–1916, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. W. Jentzen, R. Weise, J. Kupferschläger et al., “Iodine-124 PET dosimetry in differentiated thyroid cancer: recovery coefficient in 2D and 3D modes for PET(/CT) systems,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 611–623, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. W. Jentzen, R. F. Hobbs, A. Stahl, J. Knust, G. Sgouros, and A. Bockisch, “Pre-therapeutic 124I PET(/CT) dosimetry confirms low average absorbed doses per administered 131I activity to the salivary glands in radioiodine therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 884–895, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. S. Lee and J. C. Paeng, “Molecular nuclear cardiac imaging,” Korean Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 175–179, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  6. S. Pandey, A. Venugopal, R. Kant, R. Coleman, and J. Mukherjee, “124I-Epidepride: a PET radiotracer for extended imaging of dopamine D2/D3 receptors,” Nuclear Medicine and Biology, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 426–431, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. M. S. Braghirolli, W. Waissmann, J. B. da Silva, and G. R. dos Santos, “Production of iodine-124 and its applications in nuclear medicine,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 90, pp. 138–148, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. Anizan, T. Carlier, C. Hindorf, J. Barbet, and M. Bardiès, “Acquisition setting optimization and quantitative imaging for 124I studies with the Inveon microPET-CT system,” EJNMMI Research, vol. 2, article 7, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. A. Gregory, C. A. Hooker, M. Partridge, and G. D. Flux, “Optimization and assessment of quantitative 124I imaging on a Philips Gemini dual GS PET/CT system,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1037–1048, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Vandenberghe, “Three-dimensional positron emission tomography imaging with 124I and 86Y,” Nuclear Medicine Communications, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 237–245, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. A. Disselhorst, M. Brom, P. Laverman et al., “Image-quality assessment for several positron emitters using the NEMA NU 4-2008 standards in the siemens inveon small-animal PET scanner,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 610–617, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Surti, R. Scheuermann, and J. S. Karp, “Correction technique for cascade gammas in 124I imaging on a fully-3D, time-of-flight PET scanner,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 653–660, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  13. M. Lubberink, A. Van Schie, H. W. A. M. De Jong, G. A. M. S. Van Dongen, and G. J. J. Teule, “Acquisition settings for PET of 124I administered simultaneously with therapeutic amounts of 131I,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1375–1381, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. W. Jentzen, “Experimental investigation of factors affecting the absolute recovery coefficients in iodine-124 PET lesion imaging,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 2365–2398, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. Taleb, M. A. Bahri, G. Warnock et al., “Performance measurements of the MicroPET FOCUS 120 for iodine-124 imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1868–1878, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. Chang, G. Chang, J. W. Clark Jr., R. H. Diab, E. Rohren, and O. R. Mawlawi, “Reliability of predicting image signal-to-noise ratio using noise equivalent count rate in PET imaging,” Medical Physics, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 5891–5900, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. C. Watson, M. E. Casey, B. Bendriem et al., “Optimizing injected dose in clinical PET by accurately modeling the counting-rate response functions specific to individual patient scans,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 1825–1834, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. W. Wilson, B. M. W. Tsui, and H. H. Barrett, “Noise properties of the EM algorithm. II. Monte Carlo simulations,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 847–871, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. S. Kim and A. R. Yu, “Determination of single gamma photon fraction of 124I PET,” Journal of Instrumentation, vol. 10, no. 3, p. p03006, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. C. C. Constantinescu and J. Mukherjee, “Performance evaluation of an Inveon PET preclinical scanner,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 2885–2899, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. R. Yu, J. S. Kim, K. M. Kim et al., “Performance measurement of siemens inveon PET scanner for small animal imaging,” Korean Journal of Medical Physics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 145–152, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  22. Q. Bao, D. Newport, M. Chen, D. B. Stout, and A. F. Chatziioannou, “Perfrmance evalution of the inveon dedicated PET preclinical tomograph based on the NEMA NU-4 standards,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 401–408, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. S. Kim, J. S. Lee, K. C. Im et al., “Performance measurement of the microPET focus 120 scanner,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 1527–1535, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. S. Yamamoto, H. Horii, M. Hurutani, K. Matsumoto, and M. Senda, “Investigation of single, random, and true counts from natural radioactivity in LSO-based clinical PET,” Annals of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 109–114, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. L. Goertzen, Y. S. Joon, and C. J. Thompson, “Imaging of weak-source distributions in LSO-based small-animal PET scanners,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1692–1698, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. A. Bahri, A. Plenevaux, G. Warnock, A. Luxen, and A. Seret, “NEMA NU4-2008 image quality performance report for the micropet focus 120 and for various transmission and reconstruction methods,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 1730–1738, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. R. Yu, J. S. Kim, K. M. Kim et al., “Optimal PET acquisition setting of 124I with Siemens Inveon PET: ccomparative simulation study with 18F and microPET R4,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC ’09), pp. 2666–2668, IEEE, Orlando, Fla, USA, October 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. W. H. Miller, C. Hartmann-Siantar, D. Fisher et al., “Evaluation of beta-absorbed fractions in a mouse model for 90Y, 188Re, 166Ho, 149Pm, 64Cu, and 177Lu radionuclides,” Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 436–449, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. R. D. Badawi, P. Domigan, O. Johnson et al., “Count-rate dependent event mispositioning and NEC in PET,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 41–45, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus