Research Article

Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation of Sugar Beet Pulp for Efficient Bioethanol Production

Table 2

Effect of simultaneous saccharification and fermentation conditions on sugar beet pulp-based wort fermentation factors and intake of sugars.

Fermentation trialParametersPretreatment
Without pretreatment, pulp suspended in water Pressure-thermal pretreatmentUltrasound pretreatment
30 min60 min50% amplitude, 20 min100% amplitude, 20 min
Pulp suspended in water Pulp suspended in 2% w/w sulfuric acid solutionPulp suspended in waterPulp suspended in 2% w/w sulfuric acid solutionPulp suspended in waterPulp suspended in 2% w/w sulfuric acid solutionPulp suspended in waterPulp suspended in 2% w/w sulfuric acid solution

Initial fermentable sugar content as sum of glucose, fructose, galactose, saccharose, and xylose [g/L]51.75 ± 1.5555.18 ± 1.6562.21 ± 1.8655.45 ± 1.6562.85 ± 1.9052.23 ± 1.4051.43 ± 1.5451.27 ± 1.5454.67 ± 1.64

Without enzymatic activationEthanol content (g/L)14.3 ± 0.619.9 ± 0.722.5 ± 1.120.5 ± 0.822.7 ± 0.915.8 ± 0.416.3 ± 0.516.2 ± 0.517.5 ± 0.7
Fermentation efficiency
(% of the theoretical yield)
54.2 ± 2.270.7 ± 2.370.9 ± 3.572.5 ± 2.880.3 ± 3.159.4 ± 1.562.2 ± 1.962.1 ± 1.962.7 ± 2.5
Intake of hexoses (%)85.1 ± 2.483.2 ± 2.583.8 ± 2.284.2 ± 2.683.8 ± 2.582.1 ± 2.482.8 ± 2.585.2 ± 2.585.1 ± 2.4
Intake of xylose (%)65.3 ± 1.575.2 ± 1.877.2 ± 1.576.2 ± 1.477.5 ± 1.667.3 ± 1.574.5 ± 1.576.2 ± 1.571.3 ± 1.5

Enzymatic activation, Variant IEthanol content (g/L)16.7 ± 0.522.5 ± 0.726.9 ± 1.223.6 ± 0.927.1 ± 1.217.5 ± 0.618.3 ± 0.718.1 ± 0.618.7 ± 0.8
Fermentation efficiency
(% of the theoretical yield)
63.3 ± 1.880.1 ± 2.386.5 ± 2.183.4 ± 3.284.4 ± 3.765.8 ± 2.269.8 ± 2.769.3 ± 2.367.0 ± 2.9
Intake of hexoses (%)91.6 ± 2.588.2 ± 2.290.3 ± 2.490.5 ± 2.595.5 ± 2.689.2 ± 2.588.6 ± 2.288.2 ± 2.287.5 ± 2.5
Intake of xylose (%)74.5 ± 2.586.5 ± 2.688.2 ± 1.987.5 ± 1.889.5 ± 1.583.5 ± 1.680.5 ± 1.282.5 ± 1.581.5 ± 1.4

Enzymatic activation, Variant IIEthanol content (g/L)16.9 ± 0.522.1 ± 0.826.6 ± 1.522.7 ± 0.826.9 ± 1.518.1 ± 0.618.6 ± 0.819.2 ± 0.719.6 ± 0.7
Fermentation efficiency
(% of the theoretical yield)
64.3 ± 1.678.5 ± 2.883.8 ± 4.780.3 ± 2.783.8 ± 4.268.0 ± 2.371.0 ± 2.873.6 ± 2.670.3 ± 2.5
Intake of hexoses (%)91.3 ± 2.288.2 ± 2.692.0 ± 2.589.5 ± 1.893.0 ± 1.588.3 ± 2.288.5 ± 2.286.2 ± 2.588.2 ± 2.4
Intake of xylose (%)74.9 ± 1.983.3 ± 2.288.1 ± 2.285.2 ± 2.289.5 ± 2.274.9 ± 1.980.8 ± 1.580.3 ± 2.080.5 ± 1.5

Results expressed as mean values ± SE (); mean values for initial fermentable sugar content with different letters are significantly different ( < 0.05, one-way ANOVA); mean values for ethanol content, fermentation efficiency, intake of hexoses, and intake of xylose with different letters are significantly different ( < 0.05, two-way ANOVA).
Without enzymatic activation: inoculation with yeast Ethanol Red immediately after application of enzyme preparations.
Enzymatic activation, Variant I: inoculation with yeast Ethanol Red after 6 h of enzymatic preparations action (Viscozyme 0.02 mL/g d.m.; Ultraflo Max 0.02 mL/g d.m., 40°C). Enzymatic activation, Variant II: inoculation with yeast Ethanol Red after 6 h of enzymatic preparations action (Viscozyme 0.015 mL/g d.m.; Ultraflo Max 0.015 mL/g d.m., 48–50°C).