Review Article

A Review of Management of Inflammation in the HIV Population

Table 1

Antiretroviral interventions that affect immune dysregulation in patients on cART.

AuthorMethodYear of publicationPrimary endpointNumber of patientsConclusion

Barrios et al. [92]Retrospective cohort study2005HIV-infected individuals who initiated a protease inhibitor-sparing regimen were retrospectively assessed by analyzing viral load and CD4+ count. 570Patients receiving ddI + TDF-based combinations showed a decrease in CD4+ count despite having an undetectable viral load.

Gandhi et al. [79]Prospective, randomized, placebo- controlled trial2010Groups were randomized with RAL intensification or placebo, and plasma HIV-1 RNA was averaged between weeks 10 and 12.5312 weeks of RAL intensification did not demonstrably reduce low-level plasma viremia in patients on currently recommended cART.

Hatano et al. [81]Prospective, randomized, placebo- controlled trial2011Patients received 24 weeks of cART intensification with RAL or placebo. End points were defined as change in the % CD38+HLA-DR+CD8+ T-cells in PBMCs and number of patients with undetectable viral load.30RAL intensification did not have a significant effect on immune activation or HIV-specific responses in PBMCs or gut-associated lymphoid tissue.

Chege et al. [76]Prospective, randomized, placebo- controlled trial2012Patients received 48 weeks of cART intensification with RAL or placebo. After week 48, all patients were given RAL until week 96. Blood and sigmoid biopsies were sampled to document CD4+ count as well as HIV-1 proviral DNA load.24RAL did not cause any significant difference in CD4+ count and blood and gut HIV-1 proviral load compared to placebo.

Martínez et al. [82]Prospective, randomized, open-label study2012Changes in fasting lipids, hsCRP, MCP-1, osteoprotegerin, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, ICAM-1, VCAM-1, E-selectin, P-selectin, adiponectin, insulin, and D-dimer were documented for 48 weeks in patients on a RAL-boosted protease inhibitor and those who were switched to RAL.273Significant decreases in cardiovascular biomarkers were reported in patients who were switched to RAL.

Cuzin et al. [86]Prospective, open-label study2012Patients were put on MVC intensification and changes in CD4+ slopes were documented. 60MVC intensification caused enhancement of CD4+ cell slopes in patients with history of poor immune restoration.

Silva et al. [83]Prospective, randomized, open-label study2013Plasma IL-6, hsCRP, and D-dimer levels were documented at baseline and at weeks 24 and 48.164At week 24, a significant decrease in IL-6 and D-dimer level was seen in the immediate RAL switch arm compared with the deferred switch arm. At week 48, the deferred RAL switch arm had a decrease in all measured biomarkers.

Gupta et al. [85]Prospective, randomized, placebo- controlled trial2013Flow-mediated dilation, 25(OH) vitamin D, PTH levels, total cholesterol, hsCRP, serum ALP, sCD14 levels, and renal function were compared for 24 weeks between patients on EFV and those switched to RAL. 30The RAL switch group showed a decrease in total cholesterol, hsCRP, serum ALP, sCD14 levels, and renal function.

Hunt et al. [87]Prospective, randomized, placebo- controlled trial2013Patients with MVC intensification were compared to a placebo group by measuring % CD38+HLA-DR+, CD8+, CD4+, CCR5 ligand levels, plasma lipopolysaccharide, sCD14 levels, and neutrophils. 45During MVC intensification, plasma lipopolysaccharide declined and sCD14 and neutrophils increased in blood and rectal tissue.

Hatano et al. [80]Prospective, randomized, placebo- controlled trial2013Patients received 24 weeks of cART intensification with RAL or placebo. 2-LTR circles by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction were documented at weeks 0, 1, 2, and 8.31RAL intensification resulted in a rapid increase in the level of 2-LTR circles in a proportion of subjects, indicating that low-level viral replication persists in some individuals even after long-term cART.

Lake et al. [84]Prospective, randomized open-label study2014Changes in sCD14 and other inflammatory biomarkers in virologically suppressed HIV-infected women were documented for 48 weeks. 37A switch to RAL from a protease inhibitor or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor was associated with a statistically significant decline in sCD14.

Papakonstantinou et al. [91]Prospective, open-label study2014Treatment naïve patients were assigned a regimen of TDF/FTC/EFV or ABC/3TC/EFV. Inflammatory markers, metabolic enzymes, and HIV-implicated cytokines were collected and compared for a 12-month period.18The TDF-containing regimen caused a decrease in PAF levels and Lp-PLA2. The ABC-containing regimen caused increased Lp-PLA2.

Hileman et al. [89]Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study2015sCD14, sCD163, sTNF-RI, IL-6, hsCRP, and Lp-PLA2 were compared over 24 and 48 weeks between patients on EVG and EFV.200EVG seems to have better effects on immune activation than EFV.

Belaunzarán-Zamudio et al. [88]Prospective, randomized, placebo- controlled trial2016Flow cytometry was used to characterize the maturation phenotype, CCR5 ligand level expression, and T-cell activation at weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, and 48 in patients who received MVC intensification. CD4+ and CD8+ cell reactivity was also determined by intracellular expression of IFN-γ, TNF-α, and CD40 ligand at weeks 0, 4, and 12.40Those on MVC intensification retained CD4+ and CD8+ cells. Treatment had no effect on the occurrence of IRIS.

Chan et al. [90]Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study201632 biomarkers and bone mineral density of the hip were measured at weeks 0 and 48 for treatment naïve patients on MVC or TDF.230Initiating cART with MVC compared to TDF caused a greater increase in CD4+ count and smaller decline in CD8+ count, but less rise in CD4+/CD8+ ratio. There was no difference in inflammatory biomarkers.

ddI: didanosine; TDF: tenofovir; RAL: raltegravir; HLA-DR: human leukocyte antigen-antigen D related; PBMCs: peripheral blood mononuclear cells; cART: combination antiretroviral therapy; hsCRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; MCP-1: monocyte chemoattractant protein 1; IL-6: interleukin-6; IL-10: interleukin-10; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-alpha; ICAM-1: intercellular adhesion molecule-1; VCAM-1: vascular cell adhesion molecule-1; MVC: maraviroc; PTH: parathyroid hormone; ALP: alkaline phosphatase; EFV: efavirenz; CCR5: C-C chemokine receptor type 5; 2-LTR: 2-long terminal repeat; Lp-PLA2: lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2; FTC: emtricitabine; ABC: abacavir; 3TC: lamivudine; PAF: platelet-activating factor; sTNF-RI: soluble tumor necrosis factor α receptor I; EVG: elvitegravir; IFN-γ: interferon-gamma; IRIS: immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome.