Research Article

Effect of Erythropoietin on Postresuscitation Renal Function in a Swine Model of Ventricular Fibrillation

Table 3

Number and frequency (%) of levels of biochemically and histologically confirmed renal injury among subjects and comparisons between control versus EPO and ROSC versus non-ROSC subjects.

ParameterTotalGroup CGroup E value

ROSC 16 (66.67)5 (41.67)11 (91.67)0.027

Renal injury (ROSC subjects)
 None3 (18.75)0 (0.00)3 (27.27)<0.001
 Mild3 (18.75)0 (0.00)3 (27.27)
 Moderate5 (31.25)0 (0.00)5 (45.45)
 Severe0 (0.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)
 AKI5 (31.25)5 (100.00)0 (0.00)

AKI (ROSC subjects)5 (31.25)5 (100.00)0 (0.00)<0.001

Severe injury or AKI (ROSC subjects)5 (31.25)5 (100.00)0 (0.00)<0.001

ROSC = return of spontaneous circulation; AKI = acute kidney injury.
0.01 < value ≤ 0.05; value ≤ 0.001, for differences in AKI frequencies of ROSC versus non-ROSC subjects (within either total of subjects or same treatment group, accordingly); differences marked with asterisks next to “none”; kidney damage category frequencies correspond to overall frequency differences for all kidney damage categories (i.e., not only specific differences for “none”).